Published: April 25th, 2012 at 1:46 pm ET
|
Title: ERe-suspension of the radioactive fallout after the Fukushima accident: risk of internal dose during the first week and the first two months
Source: Geophysical Research Abstracts
Authors: Yamauchi et al.
Date: 2012
After the wet contamination on 20 March until late April, the radioactive fallout on the ground are re-suspended during daytime by daily convection due to sunshine, and transported to downwind direction.
Read the report here
Title: press-Yamauchi-handout.pdf (application/pdf Object)
Authors: Yamauchi et al. (oral) & Takeda et al. (poster)
Date: Apr 21, 2012
- ~ 20 April : Re-suspension by daily wind and transport, from highly-contaminated to moderately-contaminated areas.
- ~ summer 2011: minor plumes from the FNPP-1.
Read the handout here
Published: April 25th, 2012 at 1:46 pm ET
|
I think it is more...
sending...
Who do they think they are kidding? Do they really want us to believe that Fuku radiation miraculously stops at a distance of 150 km from Fuku? ENEnews recently reported that kelp found off the California coast contained 40,000,000 Bq/kg of Iodine-131! Holy cow! I-131 has a half life of 7 days. So the amounts of I-131 that would have had to be released from Fuku to cause these levels of radiation in California must be astronomical!
http://enenews.com/40000000-bq-of-iodine-131-in-a-single-bed-of-kelp-off-southern-california-amount-most-likely-larger.
I-131 is deadly to human beings. It concentrates in the thyroid gland, causing lumps which become cancerous over time. If this I-131 came from Japan, the levels of radiation in Japan must be simply off the charts, from one end of Japan to the other! Shortly after 311, the US government bought up much of the Iosat tablet supply (I-131 thyroid blocker) in the US for shipment to Japan. In order not to alarm their people, the Japanese government did not widely distribute Iosat. If the California I-131 data is correct, the US government should have distributed our supplies of Iosat right here, to people on the west coast. Cause they sure all received a lethal dose of I-131 levels if the kelp data is correct. California, are you angry yet? Fuku destroyed your agriculture industry, destroyed your fishing industry, and destroyed the value of your real estate. Fuku killed you. BUT WE STILL CAN'T HEAR YOU!
Report Comment
Kansas identified higher levels of Iodine than UC Berkeley. Radiation doesn't stop at the California border, either.
http://enenews.com/just-in-govt-report-kansas-detected-iodine-131-in-grass-at-over-2000-pcikg-attributed-to-fukushima-around-700-higher-than-highest-levels-reported-by-uc-berekely
Idaho saw a spike in infant deaths after Fukushima
http://enenews.com/idaho-tv-data-showed-a-large-spike-in-deaths-%E2%80%93-particularly-infant-deaths-%E2%80%93-in-the-14-weeks-following-the-fukushima-meltdown-video
Excess deaths are from across the country
http://enenews.com/happening-now-medical-journal-article-says-14000-u-s-deaths-tied-to-fukushima-fallout-streaming-audio-available-at-4pm
Some of the highest levels of Cesium were identified in Florida early on, Iodine was at one of the highest levels in Boston's rain, etc., etc.
The idea that the radiation is confined to California is even more illogical than that the radiation is confined to Japan.
None of our food in the U.S. is safe. It may be worse in areas with a lot of rain than dry areas closer to Japan, since so much radiation comes down in the rain. The west coast will see higher effects from the radiation release into the Pacific. However, the radiation in the air, water, food across the U.S.-in the heartland, coasts, north, south, mountains, prairies-has killed many innocent people and other creatures as a result of Fukushima, and other Japanese NPPS, in addition the U.S. nuclear plants.
Report Comment
Kansas isn't that far from Fort Calhoun NPP. Also Kansas has the worst nuclear power plant in the US. When you add the indigenous radiation with the radiation from Fukushima and all the previous radioactive pollution of the last 65 years, including silos with active nuclear missiles, well…..
Report Comment
NoNukes: many thanks!
The reference to California is because California is such a hotbed of anti-nuke sentiment, and I have a lot of friends there I worry about. I keep wondering why California isn't in the streets, as yet, over the death sentence from Fuku. I was attempting to say one thing cogently. I wasn't trying to convey the larger picture, that all residents of Oregon, Washington, BC, and Alaska have been dosed. Alongmwith the rest of us, all over the world. Apparently, as your post illustrates, you can make many thoughts coherently in a single post.
Report Comment
You're right about BC and the coastal states. Let's not forget about Hawaii. I have friends in California and Washington who are trying to figure out where to move. No place is safe, but some places seem to be getting less Fukushima radiation that others. Does anyone have any thoughts on which places might be better than the West Coast?
Report Comment
Southeast. I moved here about 4 years ago. I really miss California. Not that much though
Report Comment
As I related last year, it will build up in the night air and permeate every inch of Japan and the rest of the world accumulatively !
As the night air breezes in as a door is opened you will receive un-wanted quest, … ask the mushrooms !
Report Comment
i was talking with a computer scientist here in california and i mentioned that at least one reactor aerosolized its contents and mr.scientist's response was "whatever."
Report Comment
A sad fact, but unless we can see the offending material with our very own eyes, the majority of us will always say "whatever"!! It takes the will to learn and educate oneself to see the bigger picture!!
So go forth Enenewsers and spread the gospel!!!!!!!!!!!!
Report Comment
Majia has an excellent article analyzing Fukushima Fallout
http://realitycheck.no-ip.info/forum/index.php/topic,20.msg457.html#msg457
There have also been many numerous scientific comparisons made between radioactive fallout from Fukushima vs Chernobyl
http://realitycheck.no-ip.info/forum/index.php/topic,67.msg332.html#msg332
Report Comment
They're trying to pass that off as news?
Report Comment