30 microsieverts per hour in Nikko City, Tochigi — 150 km from Fukushima meltdowns (VIDEO)

Published: November 28th, 2011 at 10:47 pm ET
By ENENews
Email Article Email Article
9 comments





Title: 栃木県日光市瀬尾30.0μSv/h

Google Translation

Title: Nikko City, Tochigi Prefecture Cathode End 30.0 μSv/h

Uploaded by: kiseki06office

Date: Nov 28, 2011

Description: Measure 30.0μSv / h in rain prefab offices in Nikko, Tochigi Prefecture Seo. http://directorzone.cyberlink.com/video/848233

Published: November 28th, 2011 at 10:47 pm ET
By ENENews
Email Article Email Article
9 comments





Related Posts

  1. Oklahoma City rain at 1.62 microsieverts per hour — “Dangerous Radiation Background” (VIDEO) August 7, 2011
  2. 33.53 microsieverts/hr in Koriyama city (VIDEO) November 19, 2011
  3. City near Tokyo sets maximum radiation dose for children — Averages out to .31 microsieverts per hour June 21, 2011
  4. NHK reports 57.5 microsieverts per hour detected just 25 km from Tokyo — But is it from Fukushima meltdowns? October 21, 2011
  5. 65 microsieverts per hour in front of Tsushima junior high school (VIDEO) November 28, 2011

9 comments to 30 microsieverts per hour in Nikko City, Tochigi — 150 km from Fukushima meltdowns (VIDEO)

  • and into the water supplies !

    and:

    *CHARTS* Nothing’s stopping the sea contamination

    Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries published the latest data of sea food contamination on 11/24.

    It revealed the fact that sea contamination is definitely spreading and fish are more and more contaminated. …

    http://fukushima-diary.com/2011/11/3949/

  • Grampybone Grampybone

    No gloves, no mask? This dude has some balls! Heroic reporting from true journalists risking their lives. I would not want to put any part of my body 3 feet from that spot. The nature of atomic particles is to have electrons circling in a rotation around the emitting particle. Hence it is a charged isotope. When they clump up they make little nuggets of emitting ground. If the west coast is lucky they will not have build up of these clumps. I wish we knew if there are Plutonium and Uranium at that location because it could provide a statistical way to average the amounts projected for other hot spot location.

    As for the rivers and water table 30km away from the plant…That is a completely different story. Billions becquerels usually kills if consumed right? I wonder how Bernie Goldberg would spin it.

    • Grampybone, “If the west coast is lucky they will not have build up of these clumps.”

      Run off from last spring record snow melts, after the largest nuclear disaster, future snows and rains will be felt all along the west coast of Ca. ! Reports have been documented in articles here at enenews and fairwinds !

      : (

      • Grampybone Grampybone

        At least the build up will take a bit longer after the rains have to cross the ocean. Fairewinds has done an alright job documenting levels on the west coast, but I think more needs to be done considering the recent releases and Iodine fallout across Europe.

    • fireguyjeff fireguyjeff

      @Grampy:

      “The nature of atomic particles is to have electrons circling in a rotation around the emitting particle. ”

      Within the context of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle and probability distribution(s) of electrons (valence or not) with respect to a nucleus, your statement has left me a bit confused.

      Are you referencing electron spin?
      A model more along the lines of Bohr or Sommerfeld?
      What particle is emitting?
      Just curious if I have missed something here.

  • Mauibrad Mauibrad

    Equal to 3000 CPM, suburb about 60 miles from Tokyo.

  • Understanding soil contamination measurements

    To help give some perspective on the numbers,
    http://biocatastrophe.blogspot.com/2011/03/nuclear-disaster-in-japan.html

    • Bobby1

      That link says the highest cesium deposition during the bomb test era in the US was 2,500 Bq/m2.

      Kashiwa has a level 11,000 times higher than that.

      It is estimated that the bomb tests killed 60,000,000 people worldwide.

      Perspective.