300,000+ bq/m² of radioactive iodine deposited in areas near Tokyo before end of March: Japan study — Only includes I-131 (MAP)

Published: August 26th, 2011 at 6:24 am ET
By
Email Article Email Article
28 comments


Atmospheric behavior, deposition, and budget of radioactive materials from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant in March 2011, Regional Environment Research Center, National Institute for Environmental Studies, by Yu Morino, Toshimasa Ohara, and Masato Nishizawa, August 2011:

h/t EX-SKF

Figure: Distributions of accumulated deposition rates of I-131 simulated by CMAQ over 11–29 March 2011

 

Published: August 26th, 2011 at 6:24 am ET
By
Email Article Email Article
28 comments

Related Posts

  1. Gov’t simulation shows radioactive plume of Krypton-85 over Tokyo March 15 — Reactor No. 3 with MOX exploded March 14 June 5, 2011
  2. WSJ: Top Japan official on “alarming issue of recently discovered radioactive ‘hot spots’ in Tokyo and other areas far from Fukushima” (VIDEO) October 19, 2011
  3. Absorbed radiation dose of iodine-132 was 10 times higher than iodine-131 in Northern Japan after Fukushima meltdowns — Plus iodine-132 is 9 times more ‘effective’ at irradiating thyroid November 17, 2011
  4. Study claims Tokyo newborns had ‘safe’ 1,140 microsievert thyroid dose — Only counted food and water — Did not include inhaled radioactivity — Did not include first 10 days when iodine and other short-lived isotopes peaked March 13, 2012
  5. UN document: "There would be a hazard around eastern part of Japan" — 60 hours of emissions blowing southwest over Tokyo forecasted last March February 15, 2012

28 comments to 300,000+ bq/m² of radioactive iodine deposited in areas near Tokyo before end of March: Japan study — Only includes I-131 (MAP)

  • TOKYO VS. SEATTLE…
    10 hot particles a day 5 hot particles a day…
    300,000+ bq/m 150,000+bq/m

    Simple statistics implied there…

    Source of particle distribution rates: Arnie Gunderson.
    Source of particle distribution: Enenews.com


    Report comment

    • cosmicwind

      A few months ago there was a volcanic explosion in Chile. The ash from the volcano covered a huge territory that even included Argentina. Planes couldn’t take off etc. That ash moved across the pacific very quickly and caused the same problems in Australia.
      Volcanic ash is huge compared to tiny plutonium particles…yet these large pieces of ash made their way all the way across the pacific…intact! They were very much in the same condition as when they started their journey a few days earlier in chile. I think the most important part is you could SEE these particles….where nuclear particles…much lighter and smaller and invisible are also , no doubt about it, are making the same journey all intact and able to cause the same problems in the USA as they are causing in Japan.


      Report comment

  • irradiated californian

    the poor japanese. their p.m. has resigned which i see as him sort of planning to get the hell outta dodge while he can…hopefully the japanese don’t let him get off so easily.


    Report comment

  • larry-andrew-nils

    that picture should show red streaking straight to the right of the picture where the wind was going on those days.

    it won’t do any good to complain i suppose.

    hey, if you turn the pic upside down there is the outline of GODZILLA in red.

    lol

    maybe the us nuke fallout map makers can make an upsidedown KING KONG.


    Report comment

  • Obama is in dodge this week too…
    Coincidence…?


    Report comment

    • larry-andrew-nils

      what is the significance of that?…


      Report comment

      • IDk. Kinda coincidental that world leaders are completely ignoring nuclear meltdowns…

        Out of dodge from the public eye…

        Its significant in its timing, and leads one to wonder if our military has access to super computers, that do advanced / futures, weather plotting… (which they do).
        I can’t help but to ask myself:

        Would the disappearance / reclusiveness of world leaders be an indication of events to come… As far as I know the pentagon and the white house are in states of evacuation…

        To me thats worth paying some attention too…


        Report comment

        • That all makes me wonder:
          Are large radiation releases, making area weather patterns more violent. Are the particles really impacting Super cells in our storm fronts?

          & /If so… How colossal are the events to come? Should we expect even larger atmospheric catastrophes in the near future? ect…


          Report comment

          • larry-andrew-nils

            my thoughts are that the radioactive particles are going to change the weather so that forecasting will not be as accurate.

            also, during the first three weeks of fukushima, on a heavy metal-mouth day, the rain came down and then it formed clouds right on the ground… but it was not hot ground in a temperate sense.
            i was thinking at the time that radioactive particles were aiding in the evaporation of the rain which hit the ground thereby making a cloudy mist on the ground which hovered only three feet.

            i’ll bet i am not wrong, as i have lived over 40 years and only ever have seen steam like that hovering when the ground had been hot.

            am i crying over spilled milk ? probably should focus on the future i guess.


            Report comment

        • Darth

          Congressional Recess…


          Report comment

  • Bobby1

    That was only iodine-131, there was also a huge amount of I-132. And the CTBTO (who later retracted it) documented I-135 in ten times the amount of I-131.


    Report comment

    • Hot Tuna Hot Tuna

      Based on new ‘lower estimates’ released by the Japan Atomic Energy Agency yesterday, Cs-137 was about 2% and I-131 about 9% of the total radioactive material released between 3/11 and 4/5. I haven’t heard what the other 89% might be.


      Report comment

  • BreadAndButter BreadAndButter

    Unit 1 back to 367 Sv/h
    http://atmc.jp/plant/rad/?n=1

    ooops…pendulum swung back.


    Report comment

    • BreadAndButter BreadAndButter

      Can any of you smart people provide me with an explanation why these intervals between low and high become shorter and shorter over time? And: where will it stop? Will it?
      Thank you!


      Report comment

    • farawayfan farawayfan

      Internal gauge at a melted through reactor, even smart guys would be guessing with the paucity of data to draw from. What I can tell you (not that I ain’t no genius) is that I’ve never seen any gauge of any type be “defective” in this pattern. Defective meters either read nothing (most common) or more rarely constantly offscale (representing either contamination or some sort of electrical short. Cycling indicates to me this meter is telling us something (whether that’s corium criticalities, migration, or what I don’t know).

      One interesting theory is a blob of corium with water outside would form a hard crust, the internal liquid corium would then steadily increase in temp/pressure until it achieves criticality, resulting in a spike, and a crack in the crust. The crack would leak a bit lowering pressure/temp and resolving the criticality. Then the crust re-solidifies and the process starts all over. That is 100% conjecture and guesswork and pretty much any other theory probably holds as much validity.

      Tempest in a teacup in the middle of a tornado, really…..


      Report comment

      • larry-andrew-nils

        that is a very concise postulation of what probably is occurring.

        and i suspect this is more than guesswork, and more like educated-guesswork… or psychic knowledge.

        and the water would be steamed away each time the criticality opened the crack in the blob, but this would have a cooling effect, and the blob’s cracks would crust over again.

        And then the reason why the spikes on the graph get closer together could be because the entire lump is actually getting more hot.

        like what if it keeps burrying itself into the ground and down into some recess in some water table edge somewhere… will there be a geyser in the future from the blobs?

        like, a regularly blowing geyser like the one in jellystone?

        hmmm. ancient nuclear site causing yellowstone geyser?

        probable.


        Report comment

      • bmurr bmurr

        Maybe each time the tide changes it gets covered? as the core melts father into the ground, more is covered at high tide, making a more pronounced cooling and heating cycle?

        I did no research to substantiate that, just typing out my first impression…


        Report comment

  • StillJill StillJill

    Sorry B&B,….that leaves me out! :-)


    Report comment

  • StillJill StillJill

    farawayfan,…that rings TRUE for me,….but like I said,….I’m just glad they raised MR from 70 down to 65,…was getting a tad too close for this ol’e gal! :-)


    Report comment

  • StillJill StillJill

    dropped, I meant.


    Report comment

  • arclight arclight

    to my understanding, the composition of isotopes released were identical in thier quantities giving a unique and constant signature! so there must be other isotopes deposited?

    this info is obviously being strung out and even completely censored…the big PR is running a mitigation piece for the lawyers to manipulate! this is BP disaster on steroids in all aspects! and the mindshare machine is happily doing its thing!! cant believe that the press can keep quiet about all this! they should be leading the revolution! its thier food being contaminated too!

    Radiation risks from Fukushima ‘no longer negligible’[fr]
    Published 11 April 2011 – Updated 12 April 2011

    http://www.euractiv.com/en/health/radiation-risks-fukushima-longer-negligible-news-503947

    bearing in mind the message that europe recieved and was published by the MSM after chernobyl saved alot of disease and death!…this time though…silence! although the scientists at criirad steped up to the plate, as did the norwegians with the nilu forecasts at that time! what/who happened??/rant
    peace


    Report comment

  • Thebes

    So, that Yellow Rain wasn’t “pollen” after all?


    Report comment

  • larry-andrew-nils

    no. i had some in a bucket and i didn’t think to save it. i dumped it out because i wanted to save my bucket and not have radiation sitting on the water… evaporating ?

    paranoid feeling about real danger… that is invisible.


    Report comment