Published: December 26th, 2011 at 6:53 pm ET
|
Uploaded by: 148Production
Date: Dec 26, 2011
Title: Dreaming of the day when it can return to the agitated deliberate evacuation area home
Description: 2011.12.25 This production passed Christmas with deliberate evacuation area. Because this year it becomes last photographing, this time the Namie Cho red space/large house wood and the rice which had become famous area with hot spot [maikurosupotsuto] 舘 it went to village headman mud and the neighborhood. The above-mentioned area is area of the high dose which from the Fukushima first nuclear plant is a match within 10 kilometers. There is a kind of pain which with the shade even now sticks the needle to the eye. When it tries going to this kind of locale, doubt boils truly in degree of completion of the decontamination. If so, intently it does not keep pushing on in revival with such as decontamination, it cannot reset the inhabitant into the town.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGxdTF-6ahc
Published: December 26th, 2011 at 6:53 pm ET
|
sending...
LOL! 333 microSv/h!?! LOL!
Report Comment
10km from the plants snowing. BUT the live webcam has no snow whatsoever.
Report Comment
power generating plants can produce local snow if the air is cold enough.. of course if you put the hot gases up a 300 meter stack that snow will fall further away!!
nicely spotted maaa!
Report Comment
http://www.windfinder.com/windreports/windkarte_japan.htm
the winds on the east side of the mountains does strange things in the lower atmosphere though the higher atmosphere is currently pointing due east.. the forecast around the time of the video would be best.. magick seaweed shows that hurricanes that are forming have a big temporary effect on the wind direction..and can blow due south for a period of time depending on its strength!
Report Comment
“The new study, which appears in the Royal Meteorological Society journal Weather, included data from winter 2006, showing that snow fell around the power station when the rest of the county stayed foggy, but dry.
Dr Wood said: “What normally happens with freezing fog is a process called ‘super-cooling’, where even though it is below freezing temperature, it remains liquid.
“To cause snow, you need some sort of particle in the air.
Around power stations, it seems pretty probable that industrial effluent acts as that catalyst.””
http://www.witneygazette.co.uk/news/4658058.Cooling_towers_cause_snowfall/
remember the snowfall after march 11th in japan?
same thing this winter downwind of them reactors/corium
anthonies response
Anthony
October 5, 2011 at 10:04 am
“You are so right about the snow that happened also where I was in March. It was a shocking mega dump of snow. Took the small city where I was by surprise – we got about two feet in four hours overnight. It melted off within few hours in morning because the month was way too warm to have snowed like that in the first place. It was soon after the explosion I remember. It was toxic snow I now realize.”
Report Comment
That’s like 33300 CPM! In the snow. That says to me there is still fallout coming from Fukushima Daiichi.
Report Comment
hope he manages to get an inside reading! snow samples?? next time! my respects to anyone who documents such dangerous levels..
take care of yourselfs!! should be wearing a paper mask at least to stop plutonium if it is there..
domo arigato
Report Comment
Merry Christmas from Tepco.
Their gift is the iodine, cesium, strontium & plutonium in our bodies, which they say now belongs to us.
How generous of them.
Report Comment
And these gift’s (reactor cores) will keep giving for all time !
Report Comment
GOOD GRIEF!! POSTED HERE:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/12/26/japan-fukushima-disaster-probe_n_1169837.html
Report Comment
Chernobyl at Ten: Half-lives and Half Truths
by John M. LaForge
PART II
“In a long page one story, the Aug. 2, 1995 New York Times reported that life expectancy has plummeted in Russia, making it the first nation in history to ever experience such a public health status reversal. Male life expectancy is now the lowest in the world (below even India or Bolivia) and, at the same time, infant mortality rose 15 percent in both 1993 and 1994, and there are now epidemic rates of heart disease and cancer.
Dr. David Hoel, an epidemiologist at the Medical University of S. Carolina, is studying whether Chernobyl’s radiation is a major factor in the spread in cancers and birth defects. “Everyone assumes the connection,” he said.
The journal Nature has published a study of children born in 1994 to mothers exposed to Chernobyl’s fallout in 1986. Researchers studied 79 families 186 miles from Chernobyl and found never-before-observed “germ-line” mutations: changes in DNA of the sperm and ovum. Such mutations are passed on from generation to generation.[18]
Nature has also reported that in Greece, 2,800 kilometers from Chernobyl, where radiation exposures were far lower than in areas close to the reactor, leukemia has been diagnosed at rates 2.6 times the norm in young people who were in the womb when the reactor exploded. The British epidemiologist
Dr. Alice Stewart found long ago that only one diagnostic X-ray to the pregnant abdomen increases the risk of leukemia in the offspring by 40 percent.[19] However, the report from Greece is the first to link Chernobyl’s wreckage to increased leukemia incidence in children exposed in utero.[20] The report has moved some experts to again warn that the low levels of radiation to which people are exposed every day “could contribute to cancer.”
cont..
Report Comment
“……contEven the stodgy New York Times has reported that “cancers are now believed to be the result of smaller [radiation] doses, and the amount of damage inflicted by a given dose is now believed to be larger.”[21]
In a related study, two U.S. geneticists analyzing animals inside Chernobyl’s 6-mile radius found that small rodents known as voles “sustain an extraordinary amount of genetic damage.” The study found that “the mutation rate in these animals is . . . probably thousands of times greater than normal.” Two findings called “ominous” were, first, that one-third of the mutations that the scientists expected to see were not even detected — probably because they were lethal. “It could be that the animals were never born,” said Dr. Robert Becker of Texas Technical Univ. Second, “the vole mutations were cumulative, increasing with each succeeding generation.” Both researchers doubted that any species could sustain such a mutation rate indefinitely.[22]
Acceptable Whole-Earth Poisoning
The extent of Chernobyl’s radioactive, biological and ecological damage, and the depth its psychological and economic devastation are incalculable.
What everyone does know about nuclear reactors is that they have a record of whole-earth poisoning, and that their potential for more of the same is considered acceptable — authorized in advance. This potential, for unlimited and uncontrollable radiation “accidents,” has been deliberately developed, promoted, protected, ignored and then denied, or forgotten.
Sadly, denial and forgetfulness only make another Chernobyl inevitable. “
http://www.ratical.com/radiation/Chernobyl/Chernobyl@10p2.html
Report Comment
POSTED 2ND HALF. great esp last statement.
Report Comment
Get a load of this – a person is ASKING ATOMS:
“You give calm, reasonable arguments I have noticed here. Tell me, if you had every resource at your disposal and you were calling the shots, what would be your course of action starting right now for Fukushima remediation?
THINK ATOMS WILL ANSWER? lol!
Report Comment
Someone just posted this. New? Haven’t watch yet:
Here is a clip that says it all. If you want to be dramatically convinced of an evil coverup.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MxUQKJwkIeY&feature=player_embedded
Report Comment
Missing minutes of pm Noda’s cold shutdown ‘press conference’ 12/16/2011. archived at rc with an update. tks for link!
http://realitycheck.no-ip.info/forum/index.php/topic,67.0.html
Report Comment
nice one chemfood!!
Report Comment
That is great video, especially Noda’s answer that Cold Shutdown only included measuring the temperature of the container, regardless of the fact that the fuel has left the building, or container.
I can’t even do justice to the arrogance and stupidity of Noda’s answer.
It’s must see TV.
Report Comment
Hosono bails, same press conference, i think
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ch2r7BBT2OQ
Report Comment
Nekomanma reports! That’s an awesome name. Glad to see honest independent reporting. This level of contamination was above what I expected. The snow must be absorbing good levels of concentrated radiation from the air. I want that cat too…he doesn’t deserve the rad snow.
Report Comment
Heavy snow stops bullet trains
Tourists photograph Kinkakuji temple in Kyoto in the snow Monday.
Many areas across the country, mainly along the Sea of Japan from Hokkaido to the Kinki region, saw heavy snow Monday because of a strong wintertime low-pressure pattern.
Heavy snow repeatedly caused power outages on the Tokaido Shinkansen line between Gifu-Hashima and Maibara stations after heavy snow felled …
http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/dy/national/T111226002401.htm
Report Comment
Sea of Japan coast gets snow warning
Dec. 26, 2011
The Meteorological Agency issued a warning Sunday for blizzards and high waves in northern Japan, and said heavy snow is expected to hit coastal areas along the Sea of Japan through Tuesday.
It also warned of avalanches, lightning and tornadoes along the Sea of Japan coast.
More than 50 cm of snow had fallen within 24 hours as of …
http://www.japantimes.co.jp/text/nn20111226a9.html
Report Comment
Snow is only a frozen water molecule with area particle accumulation.
One thing to note. That the snow would moderate any alpha rays. So this is likely a gamma signature. Even beta emitters would have some level of difficulty emitting through these layers of moderation.
Report Comment
also radon gas gets trapped under the snow.. thinking hexaflouride stuff here?? wonder if xenon/iodine 131 stays in gas form or would bleed into the snow??
Report Comment
September 20th; Japanese government and TEPCO announced the installation of new filters at the reactors 1, 2 and 3 to reduce the release of radioactive materials into the air. Gases from the reactors would be decontaminated before they would be released into the air. In the first half of September 2011 the amount of radioactive substances released from the plant was about 200-million becquerels per hour, according to TEPCO, that was approximately one-four millionths of the level of the initial stages of the accident in March. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiation_effects_from_Fukushima_Daiichi_nuclear_disaster
According to the following article, the total radiation released at Fukushima is 60 million curies, while Chernobyl only released 50 million Curies. http://enenews.com/60-million-curies-radiation-released-fukushima-50-million-curies-chernobyl
The Japanese government is saying that the the radiation releases from Fukushima are ‘under control’. On April 25, the Japanese government raised the ‘acceptable’ radiation exposure limit for children from 1 mSv/year to 20 mSv/year. So now all children are safe, because the ‘safe’ radiation levels were raised. (Forget about measuring internal radiation sources; that does not count at all.) http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2011/08/201181665921711896.html
According to Arnie Gunderson, the DAILY radiation release from Fukushima is estimated at 13 TRILLION Bequerels per day, with much higher levels previously. What caused the radiation levels to go down?
With the plastic cover over unit #1, it is now down to 10 Trillion Bq per day, as long as the filter is working well and taking out up to 90%? of the total airborne radiation. This release is ONGOING, CONSTANT and NEVER ENDING.
This ‘acceptable radiation release’ amounts to 100 Trillion Bq every ten days, 1,000 Trillion Bq every 100 days, and 3000 Trillion Bq every 300 days.
Report Comment
The radiation from FUKU continues to pour out, and will not stop for a long, long time…
Most of it in my opinion is going up and out the 700 foot vent stacks, so that it can be carried FAR, FAR away, like to Tokyo, or the USA, and then settle out.
Why are there no radiation meters up there on these ‘vents’ I wonder? Why none downwind of the plant?
Report Comment
Source for Arnie Gunderson quotes above…http://fairewinds.com/content/update-gundersen-if-you-love-planet-dr-hellen-caldicott
So where is the filter material? Who is in charge of disposing of it or changing it? Where is the report saying how often they change it out?
Who is measuring the total radiation amount collected and verifying this, plus the types of radiation found? Where is this filter material anyway?
Who is adding the total of the following radiation sources from then until now, to get a total amount of radiation released via all methods?
GASES IN AIR; XENON, IODINE, CESIUM, PLUS FIFTY OTHERS AS WELL
WATER UNDERGROUND
BASEMENTS OF ALL BUILDINGS
ON SITE STORAGE TANKS, ACCUMULATING RAPIDLY
‘WATER’ SPRAYED ON FORESTS
WATER IN HUGE BARGES
WATER RELEASED INTO OCEAN
RADIOACTIVE FUEL/DUST THROWN INTO AIR DURING NUCLEAR EXPLOSION
RADIOACTIVITY COMING DOWN RIVERS DAILY GOING INTO OCEAN
Report Comment
I have not seen ANYONE add up all of these to get a TRUE TOTAL..
There is lots of spin and minimizing going on, counting only TWO gases released into the air, for a short time, and assuming no nuclear material was released, but leaving out EVERYTHING ELSE.
Well, I can do that too… 1 Quadrillion plus 1 Trillion Bq’s per hour,,,,, ummm, well we do not really need all those zeros.. how about we make it a nice round number like 21 Bq’s total? That sounds like a young, fresh, healthy number.. and it sounds safe as well. Yea, let’s make that the total amount released. Make it official and hand it out to the mass media, where they never bother to ask ANY questions.
People will like that and vote for building new nuke plants.
Report Comment
Please correct me if I’m wrong, but isn’t 333uSv/hr the same as 0.333mSv/hr? Which, in a 24hr period would be 7.992mSv/hr of exposure? Isn’t this amount fatal??
Report Comment
Well Ok, not fatal but time to drop the Geiger and run???
Report Comment
Where does everybody see 333uSv/hr? I see 3.33 uSv/hr in the video.
Report Comment
nice catch hg!! it is hard to make it out but you get the odd glimpse of the “.”
he should have bought soeks!
still really high though!!
Report Comment
Yes, MUCH too high, but realistic. I feel we all look a little hysteric shouting 333uSv/hr. We know that is nearly impossible. At least I hope it is.
Comparing the way my Geiger shows the numbers, it looks like 3,33 to me and not like 333. Lets hope the best.
Report Comment
Hm, I watched the video again and in the context of the video I think the article is right. His geiger just has a strange way to show the values, I think.
In one scene there clearly is a “.” and in the 333 scene there clearly is no “.” . Seems the geiger shows all numbers in the same position on the display and just adds or removes the “.” . So I fear the article is right. It seems to be 333 uSv/hr.
Wow, that is unbelievable bad! You reach the normal yearly dose in just 3 hours there… So in one year you would get 2,9 sievert, right?
Report Comment
“The established worldwide practice of protecting people from radiation costs hundreds of billions of dollars a year to implement and may well determine the world’s future energy system. But is it right?”
This guy certainly didn’t find any opposition to the submission of his paper by the proper authorities!….. http://www.riskworld.com/nreports/1999/jaworowski/NR99aa01.htm
Report Comment
a classic goathead! LOL!
“It was only in 1994 that UNSCEAR recognized and endorsed the very existence of radiation hormesis. It caused a revolutionary upheaval of radiology’s ethical and technical foundations.
Many radiologists have come to realize that their overreaction to theoretical (actually imaginary) health-harming effects of radiation is unethical in that it leads to the consumption of funds that are desperately needed to deal with real health problems.
Applying the no-threshold principle for the alleged protection of the public has led to the imposition of restrictive regulations on the nuclear utilities, restrictions that have virtually strangled the development of environmentally benign nuclear energy in the US and in other countries.
My own country, Poland, spent billions of dollars on the construction of its first nuclear power reactor—only to abandon the project after what I regard as the politically motivated manipulation of public opinion by means of the LNT theory.”
Report Comment
333 Msv of radiation..sure does not match the “offical” government readings…at
http://www.japantimes.co.jp/radiation-levels.html
Report Comment