4-alarm fire less than 300 feet away from nuclear reactor — Steam continues to be emitted from burning sub — New aerial footage (VIDEOS)

Published: May 24th, 2012 at 3:18 am ET
By
Email Article Email Article
42 comments


Fire aboard nuclear submarine at Portsmouth Naval Shipyard
WCSH 6
May 24, 2012

[...] 

In a press conference at 11:30pm Capt. Fuller of the Shipyard said:

“While the fire is not out the situation is improving. Due to the heat that was created by the fire, steam continues to emit from the ship from the fire-fighting efforts.

[...]

According to the reporter above, the submarine’s dimensions are approximately 360 feet long by 32 feet wide. The reactor appears to be located about 200 feet from the front of the vessel where the fire is said to be burning.

SOURCE: localnews15

Published: May 24th, 2012 at 3:18 am ET
By
Email Article Email Article
42 comments

Related Posts

  1. Local TV: Nuclear sub fire ‘very difficult to fight’ — Special operation team arriving on scene — Heat ‘creating significant amount of steam’ — Burning for over 7 hours (PHOTOS & VIDEO) May 24, 2012
  2. New TEPCO footage shows smoke/steam rising from reactor buildings — (AERIAL VIDEOS) April 16, 2011
  3. Trillions of becquerels per day still being emitted from Fukushima Daiichi — Radioactive steam continues (VIDEO) May 20, 2012
  4. Report: “Evidence Of Fukushima Daiichi Reactor Fire” (PHOTOS & VIDEO) May 8, 2011
  5. Incredible devastation seen near NJ nuclear plant in new aerial footage from Air Force (VIDEO) October 31, 2012

42 comments to 4-alarm fire less than 300 feet away from nuclear reactor — Steam continues to be emitted from burning sub — New aerial footage (VIDEOS)

  • Spectrometising

    Good grief!! Another log on the nuclear fire.


    Report comment

  • richard richard

    What if it does a number 3?


    Report comment

  • Blown Camaro

    I wonder how much radiation is in that smoke in the video? Remember the rules of nuclear disaster minimization:

    If the people see smoke, tell them it is harmless steam being vented.
    If the people see an explosion, tell them it was harmless hydrogengas.


    Report comment

    • richard richard

      "firefighters from numerous Seacoast communities, including Portsmouth, Kittery, York and South Berwick, provided mutual aid. An engine and foam truck were also requested from Logan Airport in Boston. State, local and federal authorities have been notified.

      The shipyard gates remain open, and Fuller said the workforce will report to work as scheduled."

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uz9LAB7_C0w


      Report comment

    • many moons

      Blown camaro I think your terms are spot on and might I add that in minimizing the hydrogen explosion…that in itself could be liken to simple event that we could call Nuclear Flatulence…just passing some harmless gas…


      Report comment

  • aigeezer aigeezer

    "the workforce will report to work as scheduled". It's not so baaaaaad, they'll say, sheepishly.


    Report comment

    • aigeezer aigeezer

      Looking a bit more closely, it says "The shipyard gates remain open for workers to report for their shifts as usual on Friday."

      This happened Wednesday, right?

      Today is Thursday, right? No workers today? Wny not, if everything is so safe and the fire is out?


      Report comment

  • aigeezer aigeezer

    This is bizarre. Look carefully at the text at the top of the page below the heading "In the control room of a Los Angeles-class submarine."

    I won't spoil the surprise. Hehe.

    Admin – please leave it there for a while.


    Report comment

  • Whoopie Whoopie

    Cha-Ching!! Departing NRC Chief Presses For Heightened Safety Regulations http://huff.to/Lr4O6P via @HuffPostGreen
    Come on Jaczko!! SPILL THE BEANS! IT'S TIME FOR YOU TO SHINE!


    Report comment

  • Heart of the Rose Heart of the Rose

    What is the purpose of the new safety regulations?…is this the hardened vents thing again?
    Does anyone really believe that these reactors can be made safe?


    Report comment

  • Heart of the Rose Heart of the Rose

    PS..The point is NO NUKES..the only rational lesson from Fukushima.


    Report comment

  • Heart of the Rose Heart of the Rose

    PS..Jaczko isn't resigning just yet..he stays to finish his term ..and his pals have indicated he could be renominated ..so for Jaczko's fans..it's all good.
    http://ex-skf.blogspot.com/2012/05/nrcs-jaczko-right-now-i-intend-to.html


    Report comment

    • Whoopie Whoopie

      I'm R E A L L Y not a big fan of any of these guys but I have hope he WILL SPILL with his resignation! He WARNED about Daiichi. For that HE GETS A GOLD STAR…1 only.


      Report comment

    • Heart of the Rose Heart of the Rose

      Here are the new rules…
      I'm sure are sufficient.(not)
      http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/health-science-technology/nuclear-aftershocks/first-post-fukushima-safety-rules-approved-by-nrc/
      The first new reactors in 30 years has been licensed under his chairmanship.
      http://money.cnn.com/2012/02/09/news/economy/nuclear_reactors/index.htm
      Crazy Diamond..oh.. Whoopie..you are sweet..but I would never say such a thing to anyone..even in lovemaking..lol.


      Report comment

    • aigeezer aigeezer

      Good point, Heart. This is reminiscent of the debate here about Arnie, and it reflects the dilemma we all face.

      Should we be content with "improvements", knowing that the game will probably still be rigged or should we hold out for the much harder goal of "shut them all down"?

      Is each little incremental victory worth pursuing? Do we put our energy into one accomplishment at a time or try to get a top-level global policy change that shuts everything down at once?…

      The time will come when tptb will offer to shut down all the Mark 1 bwr reactors, ostensibly to shut us up, but really in exchange for our not opposing shiny new "safe" reactors, built at great public expense. Good is always the enemy of better – so what will we (the public) actually settle for?

      My own take is that incrementalism is helpful, as long as one doesn't lose sight of the main goal. If Jaczko's moment in the spotlight yields some minor improvements, that's fine by me but I'll be looking closely to see what is being given up in exchange.

      SHUT THEM ALL DOWN. (Sorry, but I needed to shout. It's been a while).


      Report comment

  • Heart of the Rose Heart of the Rose

    Shiny new rules..before however… the NRC had just finishing loosening the rules.
    June 19 2011
    http://www.cleveland.com/nation/index.ssf/2011/06/nrc_loosens_ignores_safety_rul.html
    Yes ..I believe in small gains..
    I don't believe the new safety measures are technically efficient to prevent disaster.
    Yes..there is a definite exchange here.
    In my position ..I don't have to settle…SHUT THEM ALL DOWN.
    Yelling..perhaps…taking an exception.. as it was done with clenched teeth.)


    Report comment

  • It's an air-tight vessel, divided into many small air-tight compartments. Can't they just seal off the fire until the O2 is gone?


    Report comment

    • BillyRaz

      Hobbynee- Excellent observation! Why just not choke out the fire close the lid and put it out!!!!!!! Well yes why not indeed? Obviously the drydocks main concern was putting the fire out without destroying the mundo expensive and top secret crap inside the wessel. Why didnt they pull the water gates and flood that puppy? Well it wasnt to save the sub thats already toast –Maybe it waz cuz adding the water woood just be converted to more fuel for the fire- Now what fire grows stronger with water? Well its either a nasty grease fire in the kitchen or Nu clear fuel- thats still steamin!


      Report comment

  • stopnp stopnp

    Sure would be nice to see someone with a dosimeter confirming what ol buddy was saying in the interview.


    Report comment

  • markww markww

    Something fishy from the Video no water inside the ship and they blanked out the side with a screen to protect the ship from someone seeing something. The HULL IS A DOUBLE HULL so all the water they are using is NOT DOING A THING.


    Report comment

    • AFTERSHOCK AFTERSHOCK

      @markww: aren't these craft supposed to be compartmentalized? If so, how is it possible for a fire to spread through water-tight sections? Do the doors still require manual closing? If so, were there not enough personnel on board to respond?


      Report comment

    • Toadmac

      Fishy to say the least markww! " the water they are using is NOT DOING A THING." I will give you my take: The water they are spraying on the side is to make it look like thats where the fire is? Also I would like to know what it means when stating "the reactor was not active"? Does this mean "cold shut down" or does it mean it was shut down mins/hrs/days/weeks before hand and therefore needing a longer period of time for the fuel to cool to be considered cold and safe? or was it getting fuel replaced and therefore has 2x the normal amount of fuel (spent & enriched) on board? Do these reactors use MOX? I am smelling a dirty rat to often these days. This crap just seems to much!
      Peace.


      Report comment

  • Lacsap Lacsap

    Drag it offshore and sink it..


    Report comment

  • MACtheYODA

    Do you smell the RAT ???

    Things come in 3s for a reason, a human reason.

    Since when does the army admit there is a fire next to a nuclear reactor and NOT categorically state that it can not possibly spread to the reactor.

    All these nuclear disasters are MANUFACTURED to get YOU to accept the idea that we need an EVIL NASTY world government to CONTROL EVERYTHING AND EVERYONE !!!!!!


    Report comment