«  
  »

4 quakes over M4 hit Fukushima in past hour — Video of M6.0 shaking Tepco webcam

Published: April 13th, 2012 at 7:12 am ET
By
Email Article Email Article
7 comments


Follow-up to: M6 quake hits Fukushima at 6:10a ET -- M4.5 in same location 5 minutes later

SOURCE: JMA

Video of M6.0 Earthquake (h/t Infopest)

Published: April 13th, 2012 at 7:12 am ET
By
Email Article Email Article
7 comments

Related Posts

  1. Kyodo: M10 quake possible, says study — An hour of shaking — Tsunami lasting for several days December 15, 2012
  2. Strong quakes hit across eastern Japan — M5.8 in Chiba was 5- of 7 on intensity scale — M5.6 in Iwate within last hour (MAPS) April 29, 2012
  3. Smoke from Fukushima Daiichi fire visible on webcam footage? (VIDEO) October 19, 2012
  4. ~M6 quake hits Fukushima, intensity 5- of 7 — Tepco webcam shifts position (PHOTOS & VIDEO) April 1, 2012
  5. Gundersen: “The water is steaming and boiling” still at Fukushima; “Yes, there’s some radiation being given off ” (AUDIO) — Visible in recent Tepco webcam footage? (VIDEO) May 3, 2012
April 13th, 2012 | Category: Audio/Video Clips, Japan (Fukushima)
«  
  »

7 comments to 4 quakes over M4 hit Fukushima in past hour — Video of M6.0 shaking Tepco webcam

  • dharmasyd
    April 13, 2012 at 7:22 am

    And Nuckelchen has both the TNN/JBS & Tepco cams up at bottom of webcam forum.


    Report Comment

  • jec
    April 13, 2012 at 7:27 am

    Shake Shake Shake. Now TECPO webcam has hardly any color to the video stream, but this video shows the earthquakes and "colors of fukushima". While reports go back and forth if SPF 4 or Reactor 1 dry well are increasing in temperature..think is probably BOTH. SPF 4 is fragile, but so are all the other reactors. Dangerous, and only a matter of time before a 7.0 EQ. International interests (all countries) need to come together to assist with SPF 4. Or do we all want MOX fuelcell fallout on our soil, in our air…??


    Report Comment

    • xdrfox
      April 13, 2012 at 8:08 am

      jec,
      Not written in stone about a 7, … a number of smaller ones over time as we have seen can do the job at breaking out the bottom on the fuel pools, (pools) … could be already done !

      Concrete now is extremely brittle from sea water and radiation affects !


      Report Comment

      • Whoopie Whoopie
        April 13, 2012 at 8:15 am

        I'm afraid your right doc. Can you imagine how weak it all is now?! Yikes! Only a matter of time. It's like watching a slow motion TRAIN WRECK coming the Worlds way. It's only a matter of time. :(


        Report Comment

  • a female faust a female faust
    May 18, 2012 at 11:08 pm

    SO LET ME GET THIS STRAIGHT:

    we have been seeing smoke on the webcams;
    tepco has reported temperature spikes;
    there have been emissions recorded visually;
    citizen reported radiation spikes (uncorroborated by official reports of course);
    isotopes indicative of criticality were recently detected;
    jnn webcam was down for a day;
    allergy season so bad in sonoma that it makes the news – one seventeen year old hospitalized;
    it has been proven time and again not only that WE WILL NOT BE TOLD OF CATASTROPHIC NUCLEAR EVENTS but also WE WILL BE TOLD THERE IS NOTHING TO WORRY ABOUT SHOULD CATASTROPHIC NUCLEAR EVENTS TRANSPIRE.

    #4 may not be able to take a 6.0;
    it got hit by a 6.0 on April 13.

    Personally I think that the only reason not to freak out would be that its lack of proven effectiveness. I am, notwithstanding this, having some difficulty: I live on the west coast, I think I am going to hyperlink this (all of the above are sourced from Energy News, may their web administrators be blessed for all their work) and post it (started with the capitalization already). To remain effective would mean not freaking out, I think.

    Any assistance would be really really appreciated.


    Report Comment

«  
  »