|
|
Discussion Threads
-
FORUM: Fukushima Webcam Discussion Thread
(5,209 Comments)
-
FORUM: General Discussion Thread (Nuclear Issues)
(5,424 Comments)
-
FORUM: Off-Topic Discussion Thread (Non-Nuclear Issues)
(4,032 Comments)
-
FORUM: Post Your Radiation Monitoring Data Here
(3,288 Comments)
-
FORUM: Alternative Energy — Converting to clean, renewable energy sources
(419 Comments)
-
FORUM: Petitions, Ballot Initiatives, Other Signature Drives (VIDEO)
(173 Comments)
-
FORUM: Upcoming meetings, gatherings, & demonstrations about energy issues
(477 Comments)
-
FORUM: What should be done about Japan burning radioactive debris?
(151 Comments)
-
FORUM: Methods for combating radiation and its effects
(1,068 Comments)
-
FORUM: Effects of low level radiation
(537 Comments)
-
FORUM: Possible Fukushima-related Anomalies — Deformations, Yellow Rain, Metallic Taste in Mouth, etc.
(1,731 Comments)
SUBMIT YOUR NEWS TIPS Your identity will not be made public unless you request it
SUPPORT ENENews ENENews receives no funding from anyone or anything, except 1) People who donate via the button below, and 2) Google, who pays for the two ad spots. Thanks to all who have donated or are planning on doing so, it's nice to know people appreciate your work.
|
sending...
And Nuckelchen has both the TNN/JBS & Tepco cams up at bottom of webcam forum.
Report Comment
OOPS! Forgot to say goodnight. It's 4:30 now. Hope to see you all in the morning!
Report Comment
Nite
Report Comment
Shake Shake Shake. Now TECPO webcam has hardly any color to the video stream, but this video shows the earthquakes and "colors of fukushima". While reports go back and forth if SPF 4 or Reactor 1 dry well are increasing in temperature..think is probably BOTH. SPF 4 is fragile, but so are all the other reactors. Dangerous, and only a matter of time before a 7.0 EQ. International interests (all countries) need to come together to assist with SPF 4. Or do we all want MOX fuelcell fallout on our soil, in our air…??
Report Comment
jec,
Not written in stone about a 7, … a number of smaller ones over time as we have seen can do the job at breaking out the bottom on the fuel pools, (pools) … could be already done !
Concrete now is extremely brittle from sea water and radiation affects !
Report Comment
I'm afraid your right doc. Can you imagine how weak it all is now?! Yikes! Only a matter of time. It's like watching a slow motion TRAIN WRECK coming the Worlds way. It's only a matter of time.
Report Comment
SO LET ME GET THIS STRAIGHT:
we have been seeing smoke on the webcams;
tepco has reported temperature spikes;
there have been emissions recorded visually;
citizen reported radiation spikes (uncorroborated by official reports of course);
isotopes indicative of criticality were recently detected;
jnn webcam was down for a day;
allergy season so bad in sonoma that it makes the news – one seventeen year old hospitalized;
it has been proven time and again not only that WE WILL NOT BE TOLD OF CATASTROPHIC NUCLEAR EVENTS but also WE WILL BE TOLD THERE IS NOTHING TO WORRY ABOUT SHOULD CATASTROPHIC NUCLEAR EVENTS TRANSPIRE.
#4 may not be able to take a 6.0;
it got hit by a 6.0 on April 13.
Personally I think that the only reason not to freak out would be that its lack of proven effectiveness. I am, notwithstanding this, having some difficulty: I live on the west coast, I think I am going to hyperlink this (all of the above are sourced from Energy News, may their web administrators be blessed for all their work) and post it (started with the capitalization already). To remain effective would mean not freaking out, I think.
Any assistance would be really really appreciated.
Report Comment