7-fold increase in radioactive cesium being released from Reactor No. 2 during April (CHART)
Follow-up to:

h/t Fukushima Diary
Reactor No. 2
- April 24, 2012: 7,000,000 becquerels per hour (Bq/h)
- March 24, 2012: 1,000,000 Bq/h
Related Posts
- FOX: Radiation may have been released from Reactor No. 2 — TEPCO scheduled for 10pm EST press conference November 1, 2011
- Reactor No. 2 temperature near 80°C — Up almost 20°C in a week (CHART) March 21, 2012
- Japan Gov’t Confirms Detection of Radioactive Xenon in Reactor No. 2 November 2, 2011
- Japan Journalist: It’s now 78°C in Reactor No. 2 — Can’t disclose source February 11, 2012
- Pressure doubles inside Reactor No. 2 containment vessel since start of April — Tepco making effort to reduce pressure April 24, 2012
|
Discussion Threads
-
FORUM: Fukushima Webcam Discussion Thread
(5,241 Comments)
-
FORUM: General Discussion Thread (Nuclear Issues)
(5,481 Comments)
-
FORUM: Off-Topic Discussion Thread (Non-Nuclear Issues)
(4,121 Comments)
-
FORUM: Post Your Radiation Monitoring Data Here
(3,299 Comments)
-
FORUM: Alternative Energy — Converting to clean, renewable energy sources
(419 Comments)
-
FORUM: Petitions, Ballot Initiatives, Other Signature Drives (VIDEO)
(173 Comments)
-
FORUM: Upcoming meetings, gatherings, & demonstrations about energy issues
(477 Comments)
-
FORUM: What should be done about Japan burning radioactive debris?
(151 Comments)
-
FORUM: Methods for combating radiation and its effects
(1,069 Comments)
-
FORUM: Effects of low level radiation
(537 Comments)
-
FORUM: Possible Fukushima-related Anomalies — Deformations, Yellow Rain, Metallic Taste in Mouth, etc.
(1,731 Comments)
SUBMIT YOUR NEWS TIPS Your identity will not be made public unless you request it
|
Just to help a lot of us here…Took a while to sift through the graphics.
It appears that H23 is 2011 and H24 is 2012
Left bars are Oct 2011
Right bars are April 2012
Middle graph is Cesium, but which isotope!!??
Would be great if we could get a translated graphic some how.
Report Comment
fireguyjeff…TY for that comment. I've pretty much goven up even looking at the graphs, graphics, etc…Too much missing info, and it takes too long to fill in the blanks.
Report Comment
Kan: Let public decide on nuclear power in Lower House election http://ajw.asahi.com/article/0311disaster/fukushima/AJ201204240093
Report Comment
IMPORTANT ENGLISH: #MayDay #Fukushima #May1 ( hello ! twitter : @iomicrab ) http://www.micrab.tv/log/important-english-mayday-fukushima-may1-hello-twitter-iomicrab/ via @iomicrab
Report Comment
So what does 7MBq/hr mean?
The evac criteria is about 0.3MBq/m2
This means about 23m2/hr is contaminated to the evac level or 1 ha (2.5 acre) every 18 days
Report Comment
Here's the link for 0.3MBq/m2
http://www.sbpr.org.br/IRSN%20Fukushima%20Report%20May%2023%202011_DEFF.pdf
Report Comment
I think that one needs to be careful on this one.
The measurement in this story is a flow rate, of sorts, with the units of amount per hour.
Trying to relate that to a density, i.e. Bq per unit area (or flux density, to be more precise) doesn't work.
We don't have the option to mix units.
Much the same as trying to relate temperature to energy density.
Some one correct me if I have missed something here.
(like equating Federal Reserve Notes and actual money, etc).
Report Comment
Take a full size peice of paper and fold it seven times !
Do it !,… we'll talk !
Report Comment
maybe a better example of 7 fold would be…
Drink 1 shot of vodka. No problem, might make you feel good.
Now drink 7 shots in a row. Now you are DUI material, prone to drunk call ex-girlfriends, possibly getting sick is on your agenda suddenly and will likely wake up with a headache.
A 7 fold increase in radiation can cause expotential rise in problems.
Report Comment
You can't, right?
Report Comment
You can, but not if you try to fold it in half 7 times
Report Comment