California nuclear expert criticizes EPA: “We have an emergency network that’s supposed to help us know whether to take emergency action and it’s not working”

Published: April 4th, 2011 at 6:40 pm ET
By ENENews
Email Article Email Article
5 comments





Radiation in Bay Area rainwater high, but weakening, San Francisco Examiner, April 4, 2011:

[Emphasis Added]

… Results released Saturday by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency show that rainwater tested in Richmond on March 22 contained 138 picocuries per liter of iodine-131… According to the EPA, drinking water is only permitted to contain 3 picocuries per liter. …

The [UC Berkeley’s Department of Engineering] test results showed on March 24, rooftop water exceeded federal drinking water iodine-131 thresholds by 181 times…

“It’s already decaying … and it’s not necessarily meaning it’s there at the level that is harmful,” supervising Professor Kai Vetter said. …

[A]nother Bay Area professor has criticized the EPA’s tardy response since this is the first time in the more than three weeks since the Fukushima I Nuclear Power Plant crisis that the agency has issued any substantial data regarding the Bay Area’s safety.

We have an emergency network that’s supposed to help us know whether to take emergency action and it’s not working,” said Daniel Hirsch, a nuclear policy lecturer at UC Santa Cruz. …

Read the report here.

Published: April 4th, 2011 at 6:40 pm ET
By ENENews
Email Article Email Article
5 comments





Related Posts

  1. Nuclear policy expert: “Striking” that radioactive iodine-131 in California rainwater is so far above level permitted in drinking water April 2, 2011
  2. Radioactive Iodine-131 in Pennsylvania rainwater sample is 3300% above federal drinking water standard March 29, 2011
  3. Radioactive Iodine-131 in rainwater sample near San Francisco 18,100% above federal drinking water standard March 31, 2011
  4. EPA: Radioactive Iodine-131 levels in PA & MA rainwater “exceed maximum contaminant level permitted in drinking water” March 29, 2011
  5. NY Times contributor confirms California rainwater 181 times above drinking water standards for radioactive iodine-131 April 2, 2011

5 comments to California nuclear expert criticizes EPA: “We have an emergency network that’s supposed to help us know whether to take emergency action and it’s not working”

  • FUCK THESE ASSHOLES TIME FOR CIVIL WAR

  • Don'tWanttoGlowintheDark!

    I’m sending this to everyone I know in CA…and, of course, they have small children, too!! :(

  • If you vote to reinstall these Corrupt MOFO then you need a bullet right between the eyes. We are lied too we are kept in the dark and told nothing is the matter. BUT WE ARE ALL GOING TO DIE FROM THIS. In one way or the other, STOP BEING SHEEPOLE AND STAND UP AND FIGHT
    http://www.thesandmanproject.com/

  • Alicia

    I live in Northern California, and note that we have RAIN in the forecast for April 6th and 7th … so, I guess that means plenty of deposition if both weather and plume forecasts are correct. Keep children and pets out of the rain!
    Not much I can do personally–I am one of a small percentage already hypersensitive to iodine. I am more worried about what it means for agriculture, especially local raw milk dairies and family-owned organic farms.

    • xdrfox

      Just take precautions (stay out of the rain) (buy bottle water by the gallons) untill there is some real inf. on the results of rain fall, giving us clues on the rest.