Discovery.com: Nuclear reactors to power Mars colonies — “Sadly” biggest hurdle for space fission may be bad press

Published: August 30th, 2011 at 4:17 pm ET
By
Email Article Email Article
12 comments


‘Suitcase’ Nuclear Reactors to Power Mars Colonies, Discovery.com by Ian O’Neill, August 30, 2011:

[...] On Monday, at the 242nd National Meeting and Exposition of the American Chemical Society (ACS) in Denver, Colo., the future face of space nuclear power was described. [...]

Of course, to make these “mini-nuclear reactors” a viable option for the first moon and Mars settlements, they’ll need to be compact, lightweight and safe. [...]

Sadly, I suspect the biggest hurdle facing space fission power won’t be the viability of its technology, but the bad press nuclear power receives, on Earth and in space.

via SpaceRef

Published: August 30th, 2011 at 4:17 pm ET
By
Email Article Email Article
12 comments

Related Posts

  1. Tepco blames ‘spontaneous’ and ‘natural’ nuclear fission for radioactive xenon… What about the 14,000% increase in Krypton-85? November 3, 2011
  2. “Nuclear mafia” saying Fukushima “is not so terrible” — What they say is meaningless because they depend on nuclear power for their livelihood May 28, 2011
  3. FLASH: Smoke seen rising from ANOTHER nuclear power plant 10 km away — Fukushima Daini March 30, 2011
  4. CBS Affiliate: Water level drop of 20+ inches in a day in lake used by reactors have many near quake-hit Virginia nuke plant concerned — Dam problem? August 25, 2011
  5. STRANGE: Two high-profile Fukushima studies ‘edited’ by global warming advocate James Hansen — Wrote article “Why America Needs Nuclear Energy” November 22, 2011

12 comments to Discovery.com: Nuclear reactors to power Mars colonies — “Sadly” biggest hurdle for space fission may be bad press

  • Hot Tuna Hot Tuna

    Maybe if there were no accidents the would no ‘bad press’?


    Report Comment

  • Pallas89juno Pallas89juno

    We must never allow the rich to colonize off-world. There should be a cessation of spending money on such fantasies until AFTER we, as a species, learn well to live by biomimicry, without exploitation, within the proscribed confines of our ecosystem, all we’re entitled to and to steward well this planet first. Stewardship includes eliminating exploitation/hoarding based socioeconomic systems. We are barbarians, as a species, and not any inevitable or “natural” sense, without doing so. Right now we are among the least intelligent of all species on the planet. We must not allow the fascist despots at the top of status quo hegemonic parasitic systems to either move underground. If most of us are going to go extinct, so are the short-sighted, parasitic, selfish f-ckers who created this mess.


    Report Comment

  • Pallas89juno Pallas89juno

    Obviously, we must not allow suitcase nukes, without revolution as the response. I fully mean and intend guillotine style against the leaderships of hierarchies that create suitcase nukes. Remember, the U.S. military and human technologies are eminently failable. Along with increasingly regular nuclear power reactor meltdowns from now on, if we allow this idiocy to perpetuate, we will have plutonium and other suitcase nuke fuel raining down on us, as well. Completely outrageous and unacceptable. Be furious!!!


    Report Comment

  • lam335 lam335

    What if there is a Challenger-type explosion as the vehicle is taking off? Then the “suitcase nuke” material will rain down upon the earth below.


    Report Comment

  • PrimalScream

    Here is a company that needs to be stopped.
    http://www.nuscalepower.com/


    Report Comment

  • Nukeholio

    Of all things…fission is the worst of all things nuclear. They should be trying their hardest to reach fusion.


    Report Comment

    • Steven Steven

      Yeah that sounds much better… let’s replace finite explosive technology (fuel = radioactive elements) with infinite explosive technology (fuel = all matter).


      Report Comment

  • nohobear nohobear

    “Sadly” biggest hurdle for space fission may be bad press….. no, the biggest hurdle will be we’re all dead.

    Given that we can’t even get back to the moon, I think travel to Mars is a few decades away, decades that we don’t have.


    Report Comment

  • Tanuki San

    Maybe if we don’t ruin this planet we won’t have to think about having colonies on Mars.


    Report Comment

  • lokay5

    While not nuclear reactors per se, there are a few RTGs (Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generators) on the moon.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radioisotope_thermoelectric_generator


    Report Comment