10 comments to EPA finds DRINKING water with radioactive iodine-131 in Idaho and Washington — Samples collected last week

• SolarGeo

  April 5, 2011 at 2:19 am

  UC Berkeley ANSWERS many of our questions here:

  http://radiationfears.com/fukushima/uc-berkeley-nuclear-engineering/
  

  
  Report Comment
  
  

• w00f

  April 5, 2011 at 2:50 am

  The EPA at it again, revising the legal limits for radiation:

  ”
  The internal documents show that under the updated PAG a single glass of water could give a lifetime’s permissible exposure. In addition, it would allow long-term cleanup limits thousands of times more lax than anything EPA has ever before accepted. These new limits would cause a cancer in as much as every fourth person exposed. ”

  http://www.peer.org/news/news_id.php?row_id=1325
  

  
  Report Comment
  
  

  • xdrfox

    April 9, 2011 at 6:25 pm

    Here is the article I posted a few weeks back:
    EPA plans to boost radioactivity safety limits up to 100,000-fold increase
    Posted on March 28, 2011
    http://coto2.wordpress.com/2011/03/28/epa-to-increase-radioactivity-safety-limits/
    

    
    Report Comment
    
    

• Rusty

  April 5, 2011 at 1:47 pm

  Does anyone else notice that these locations are pretty close to local contamination sources? I wonder if the EPA just found a nice scapegoat in the Japan man made nuclear disaster and it now publishing suppressed information on existing conditions.
  

  
  Report Comment
  
  

  • xdrfox

    April 5, 2011 at 3:13 pm

    Absolutely !
    

    
    Report Comment
    
    

• xdrfox

  April 5, 2011 at 8:18 pm

  What was it ? Six shrimp they tested in the gulf ? A few fish with smell test !
  EPA not testing for hydrocarbons in seafood !

  EPA says fish is safe for consumption !

  One person after another… I’m having kidney failure, my pancreas is rotted out, my liver won’t stop hurting (VIDEO)

  http://www.floridaoilspilllaw.com/one-person-after-another-having-kidney-failure-my-pancreas-is-rotted-out

  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2yZilbj9-YM&feature=player_embedded
  

  
  Report Comment
  
  

• Someone

  April 9, 2011 at 5:59 pm

  Nuclear Power Plants take advantage and release more into the air than usual, it is called piggybacking. If you live within 100 miles of a nuclear power plant protect yourself from the radiation.
  

  
  Report Comment
  
  

• AtomicZombie

  April 10, 2011 at 11:30 am

  Many people are still scared of radiation and the whole topic. Fukushima will force us to get an education on the real risks instead of listening to the likes of Helen Caldicott. The AntiNukes are not enjoying the fact that people are not up in arms in a mass protest of nuclear power. Our designs are more robust that the Japanese. People do not realize that even though GE made the reactors, and the “NSSS” system, the “Balance of Plant”, or the systems that got knocked out by the 1000-year tsunami were in fact, designed and built by the Japanese.
  

  
  Report Comment
  
  

  • xdrfox

    April 10, 2011 at 11:42 am

    Like the accident in Washington’s Plant Friday or Canada dumping 10 of thousands of liters of active waist water into the lake 2 weeks ago, and all the unreported accidents that we hear of, and what about all them spent fuel rods just laying around the world that have no place to be put for eternity ?
    

    
    Report Comment
    
    

• gebbysolar

  September 20, 2011 at 11:38 am

  We need the EPA and clean energy. Tell congress! I am petitioning the president and congress. I need many signatures to have an effect.
  http://signon.org/sign/increase-government-support.fb1?source=c.fb&r_by=548645
  

  
  Report Comment