Published: January 6th, 2012 at 4:08 pm ET
|
Directorate G – Veterinary and International affairs/G4 – Food, Alert system and training, EUROPEAN COMMISSION, HEALTH & CONSUMERS DIRECTORATE-GENERAL, January 3, 2012:
[...] the European Commission recommends the Member States to monitor on an at random basis for the presence of Caesium- 134 and Caesium-137 migratory pelagic fish in FAO Major Fishing Area 61 and derived/processed products thereof (see map in annex to this note)
Migratory pelagic fish species of relevance are the
- tuna (albacore, bluefin, bigeye and skipjack)
- billfishes (swordfish and marlin)
[...]
Risk
There is zero risk to human consumers from Pacific fish. Maximum radioactivity levels are set at a level that requires years of exposure to harm human health. No contamination has been found and even if it were, the health-risk of consuming one tin of tuna with contamination slightly above the limit would be of the same order as smoking one cigarette. However it is necessary to maintain consumer confidence.
h/t Anonymous tip
Published: January 6th, 2012 at 4:08 pm ET
|
sending...
We need warning labels on tuna. Just like cigarettes.
Report Comment
Tuna is close to extinction thanks to constant overfishing.
STOP BUYING TUNA.
It’s bizarre that tuna might survive because of Fuku. Ironic.
Report Comment
Spanish cigarette package warning: “Fumar es morir”–”To smoke is to die.”
Report Comment
Actually, cigarettes don’t cause cancer, but the fertilizer used to grow tobacco does:
http://www.webspawner.com/users/radioactivethreat/
Anything else grown with that same fertilizer will cause cancer as well:
For over 40 years, researchers and tobacco corporations have known that cigarettes contain radionuclides(1). The contamination is sourced in naturally occurring radioactive radon gas(2) which is absorbed and trapped in apatite rock(3). Apatite, or phosphate rock, is mined for the purpose of formulating the phosphate portion of most chemical fertilizers(4). Polonium releases ionizing alpha radiation which is 20 times more harmful than either beta or gamma radiation when exposed to internal organs(5).
Lung cancer rates increased significantly during most of the 1900′s(6). It’s no coincidence that between 1938 and 1960, the level of polonium 210 in American tobacco tripled commensurate with the increased use of chemical fertilizers and Persistant Organic Pollutant (POP) accumulation(7).
In 1982, tobacco researchers DiFranza and Winters concluded that smoking a pack and a half of cigarettes per day exposed a person to the same radiation as 300 chest x-rays per year(8). Due to improvements in X-ray technology and increasing levels of radionuclides in tobacco, the Institute of Medicine now estimates that a heavy smoker is exposed to the equivalent radiation as up to 2,000 chest X-rays every year(9). The National Institutes of Health state that tobacco is by far the largest source of radiation for the American public(10). Polonium is also present in chewing tobacco, benignly referred to as smokeless tobacco, and may contribute to the development of oral cancers(11).
The oldest living people in the world were all smokers:
http://www.forces.org/evidence/hamilton/other/oldest.htm
Report Comment
Tobacco naturally contains a form of Polonium. Just learned this recently. A risk factor? Am an ex-smoker. Supposedly the “average” smoker gets a 300 microsievert per year dose of radiation.
Report Comment
Radium and Polonium 210.
http://www.epa.gov/radtown/tobacco.html
The question is: was the radiation there BEFORE the nuke era (the Polonium 210 anyway) ?
Report Comment
Yesterday, one tuna went for $736,000 at a Japan auction.
http://ca.news.yahoo.com/single-tuna-fetches-record-736k-japan-auction-040041043.html
Report Comment
The levels of accumulation in large fish will be a lot more than “just a smoke” because the types of radiation are unknown. You could get all kinds of side effects that eventually could cause cancer. The idea that seafood from the Pacific is a myth. You roll the dice every time you eat something radioactive even if it is just for a CAT scan. Stating there is no risk to human health is dangerous and displays the same criminal negligence in reporting of Cesium in milk on the west coast. I guess they just want everyone to shut up and die.
Report Comment
POW….right on
Report Comment
As pointed out in articles on this site before, cancer is actually the least of a person’s worries who has consumed radioactive food. Radiation affects all organs and most people die of radiation induced heart attack or stroke before they can get cancer. Cancer is in that sense a “red herring” (pardon the pun!). When Professor Chris Busby spoke in Japan about the Fukushima crisis he pointed out that most most people contaminated with fallout from the Chernobyl crisis suffered heart attacks and strokes leading to their deaths rather than cancer.
http://enenews.com/expert-beware-fukushima-radiation-causing-deadly-heart-problems-children-kids-already-suffering-heart-attacks-locals-affected-areas-video
Only a small amount of fallout leads to electrical problems in the heart.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e1iuNWCBXQo
Then there is the problem of infertility too…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P9lyxgJhc0c
Basically, internal exposure to radiation means on average a reduced life span. Chris Busby said that the average life expectancy of people living within 200km of Chernobyl is 10 years less than comparable uncontaminated areas. Radiation affects every part of the body. In that sense, eating contaminated fish is no doubt very serious.
The nuke industry is well versed in only focusing on cancer. How many heart attacks and strokes are fallout induced? We will never know precise figures, but we can make estimates from Chernobyl now. It is very significant. I’ve seen a comment on this site to the effect that 5 years after Chernobyl people started dropping dead with heart attacks and that was when real panic stepped in. It is very easy for industry captured governments to ignore such health statistics. Unless someone drops dead on the top of a reactor as it blows up, their death can be attributed to some other cause. (even then they would argue the point!)
Report Comment
Fall out man! you just triggered a thought-
very conspiracy-ish – was the big cholesterol/heart disease thing a planned misdirection campaign? (with a side-effect of big-pharma profits?)to cover for radiation damage?
I only say this because much reading the last several years has convinced me there is much disinfo in that issue too (without opening another can of worms I hope).
Report Comment
I thought the same thing Or-well. I can tell you of another health related type thing that was definitely started by the Nuke industry and which does help cover up some very serious health damage they have done.
It was the Nuke industry that started fluoridation. Investigative journalist Christopher Bryson wrote a book about it. There is a youtube interview with him which is fascinating.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ly_QP4rGczo
Here is a very short article about how the Nuclear industry (then AEC) established fluoridation to cover the terrible effects of fluoride poisoning from emissions from uranium processing and steel/aluminium production
http://www.fluoridation.com/atomicbomb.htm
Here is Bryson’s book on the subject.
http://www.amazon.com/Fluoride-Deception-Christopher-Bryson/dp/1583225269
Finally, its a whole nother topic, but yes, cholesterol in food is ironically good for a person, within reason. For example, a class action law suit has been brought against companies pushing cholesterol lowering drugs. It turns out that within reason, in women, the higher a woman’s cholesterol levels, on average the longer she will live. So it is inexcusable that cholesterol lowering drugs were marketed to women. But I’d better not follow down that rabbit trail or I’ll be off topic. But yes, even the cholesterol myths do work in the nuke industry’s favour and you have to wonder whether there could be a connection there.
http://www.second-opinions.co.uk/cardiovascular.html
As for fluoridation, that was genuinely started by the nuke industry and it covers over a number of the nuke industry’s deletarious health effects. (including thyroid damage) With the right propaganda (eg, what people are taught in medical school or in dental school) and with the peer pressure effect, people can be made to believe and promote anything. Even promoting things that will kill people as “healthy”.
Report Comment
Fall out man!…link-thanks!…yeah, the whole on-topic thing – it’s all the same darn topic in a way!
coconut oil(sneak)
non-cherrypicked studies indicate statins about equal to placebos etc (sneak) what a battle !
I had a thought today how the almost “inevitability” of cancer is becoming a promoted meme. Wonder what the next “official” risk factor will be – oh wait – maybe natural supplements outside of the codex alimentarius !
Report Comment
@Or-well
>>>”I had a thought today how the almost “inevitability” of cancer is becoming a promoted meme.”
Yes, another good point, you are absolutely right. It is promoted now as basically inevitable. No mention of rates in the past.
Regarding supplements, here in NZ, the government really did have a crack at banning supplements but didn’t have the political muscle to sneak that through. They wanted the same standards applied to dietary supplements that are applied to pharmaceutical drugs (peer reviewed research studies and govt approval heaping such expense on producers as to eliminate any competition). Public outrage was enough to stop it… for the time being. Nonetheless, they have a new bill before parliament that will make selling produce from one’s own garden or from a farm gate a crime unless the seller complies with 300 pages of vaguely defined rules as to inspection and various standards. (deliberately vague rules no doubt so that the noose can be tightened later)
So yes, here in New Zealand there are already the stirrings of various moves to ban natural supplements, and even natural food bought at farmers markets and road side stalls in farming areas.
Industry takes an “evolutionary” approach to achieving goals. All these very controversial things start slowly and don’t appear “too bad” or “too aggressive” at first, but then slowly the noose tightens. The government claims they are just protecting the public over banning farmers and house holders selling garden produce. But they have not been able to point to one problem with that here in NZ. The main reasons are commercial. The big boys don’t want competition or to be shown to be unhealthy. When you look at things such as how governments cover over the horrible health effects of nuclear power plant emissions, it is painfully obvious the powers that be care not one jot for public health.
The love of money is A root of all evils. Not the only root, but certainly A root…
Report Comment
Great discussion. Thanks!
Report Comment
Defending your right to breathe smokefree air since 1976
2530 San Pablo Avenue, Suite J ● Berkeley, California 94702 ● (510) 841-3032 / FAX (510) 841-3071
http://www.no-smoke.org ● anr@no-smoke.org
HEALTH EFFECTS OF SECONDHAND SMOKE ON CHILDREN
September 2009
“The 2006 U.S. Surgeon General’s Report, “The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Secondhand Smoke,” has concluded that there is no safe level of exposure to secondhand smoke and that, on average, children are exposed to more secondhand smoke than adults Children are significantly affected by secondhand smoke. Children’s bodies are still developing, and exposure to the poisons in secondhand smoke puts them at risk of severe respiratory diseases and can hinder the growth of their lungs. Secondhand smoke is a known cause of low birth weight, Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS), asthma, bronchitis, pneumonia, middle ear infection, and other diseases………..”
http://www.no-smoke.org/pdf/shs_children.pdf
the eu ? who in the eu?? not WHO, who? individuals.. are they smokers? do they smoke around there children and say
its the same as eating a can of tuna???
feckinidiots !! as my dear grandmother used to say (pavee stock)
Report Comment
Processed sea-food 22 samples 0 samples found OVER the contamination level??
Marine mammals 27 samples 0 samples found OVER the contamination level?? (wonder how they did thar then? mixed it down perhaps with less contaminated products at least statistically!!
They did not list which animals? Err could it be .. errr … whales maybe?
No seals?
Kids in Belarus need to go to places where they don’t have any cesium. Where will they be able to go to detox if they don’t know what food containes cesium.. “under the limit” is not good for them!! And it wont be good for the children of japan that have high cesium levels (more than a packet of cigarettes worth or a feckin huge banana dipped in corium juice!)
And concerning cesium retention in general, is this right?
“………. Using the half-life of 58 days that the literature indicates, one can estimate that the
speediest fishes, potentially contaminated offshore Japan, would reach the United States west coast
with a contamination half the value when leaving Japanese waters. Such fast migrating fish caught in the middle of their migration (say offshore Hawaii) would remain with a contamination rate of about
70 % of the initial value. “
And its not all about cesium either was it?
http://enenews.com/unconstrained-radiation-discharge-ocean-coming-groundwater-reactors-complete-melt-surprising-study/comment-page-1#comment-165722
““We cannot allow scientific research without our country’s consent,” the top government spokesman Yukio Edano said.”
Luv from
Maria Betti …International Atomic Energy Agency
Masanao Nakano….. Japan Atomic Energy Agency
Report Comment
>>>>… (more than a packet of cigarettes worth or a feckin huge banana dipped in corium juice!)”
Ha x2 !!!!
Report Comment
Any sentence that contains “There is zero risk to human consumers” is just pure bullshit.
Report Comment
there will be no tuna on the plate for this lemming!! they can stick there “ADDED VALUE” where the sun dont shine!!
Report Comment
A lemming!
I get it now…your avatar is a lemming!!!
Here is a tuna check for those who did not see it. This establishes a base count for tuna. Luckily, we won’t be buying any for at least a few years. Prolly won’t be any around then so live it up large in the tuna bliss of your choice from the seven seas of radiation soup now while you can!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L8tOWXEgijE
Report Comment
the norwegian lemmus lemmus
violent, thugish, frisky, hairy and a lover of lichen and moss
usually found romping around norway, often seen hunting the director of NILU, a recently privatised tax funded creature rarely seen on the slopes of norway. but that alas is for another thread!
peace to you sir james!
Report Comment
Pancreatic Cancer and smoking cigarttes-great bed fellows! This is so sad. And the levels of “okay” radiation in fish is only in the case of a “nuclear accident” which allows elevation because its a one time emergency…not daily day after day..and with all the other external and internal radiation added on to the human body. Basic math..addition! multipling! where is the common sense..??
Report Comment
NA Management Staff
Ms. Maria Betti, Head of the IAEA Marine Environment Laboratories (IAEA-MEL), Monaco
“Maria Betti has been appointed as the first female Director of the IAEA’s Marine Environment Laboratories (IAEA-MEL) in Monaco. She assumed the post 1 August 2008. A native of Italy, Betti is a reputed researcher with a strong contribution to the development of techniques for the analysis of radionuclides in bulk and particles from environmental materials. She carried out research for many years at the European Commission Joint Research Centre, Institute for Transuranium Elements (ITU), in Karlsruhe, Germany, leading the analytical chemistry and the environmental radioactivity groups”.”
“The IAEA Marine Environment Laboratories are the only ones of their kind within the United Nations system and stand among the world´s leading centres for marine environmental protection.”
“MEL has derived unique marine radioecological datasets, which enable modelling and prediction of radionuclide pathways and risks through marine foodchains. The Laboratories apply nuclear and isotopic techniques to research and document pollution and other problems, and technically assist States facing threats to their lakes, seas, and coastal waters.”
http://www-naweb.iaea.org/NA/about/mel-head.html
hmm should i use her picture as my avatar?
pro buisness? i think so!! lets try to not get too excited here?? twas only a minor spill with 2 isotopes… we ran it through the old computer software and voila! instant 75% on fast fish !! slow fish bit more! really quick fish dont have time to get irradiated .. phew !!
TRUST US……HORMESIS!!……IS GOOD!… ENENEWS IS BAD…..SLeeeP!!
Report Comment
arclight HI! – question – you have so many names of “these” people,
(you know, the kind one doesn’t admit to knowing in civilised company, and hopefully the data is all in a vault in an undislosed location)
have you ever thought of making a simple list – a “usual pro-nuke suspects” kind of list for reference whenever names appear in articles?
That would be nice to have on a sidebar at ENENEWS !!!
Black hats in white lab coats
Crony chameleons
Compromised counter-revolutionaries
Complicit clowns
High priests of Hormesis etc.
Report Comment
and everybody could contribute to it !
Report Comment
hi orwell
i posted an idea when enenews was upgraded to have a villians and heroes section… but there might be litigation issues… the info can be searched on the enenews specific searchbar.. top right.. just type the name in… try “allison wade” and “jebus” for example… wade got his butt kicked there! LOL!!
Report Comment
arc, oh yeah, litigation, crap, … so we lie! “A” list and “B” list wink wink…guess not
I just got excited for a minute. Too much coffee I guess.
Report Comment
Tritium Concentration and Diffusion in Seawater
Discharged from Tokai Reprocessing Plant
Yuji KOKUBUN*, Hiroki FUJITA, Masanao NAKANO and Shuichi SUMIYA
Japan Atomic Energy Agency, 4-33 Muramatsu, Tokai-mura, Naka-gun, Ibaraki,319-1194, Japan
Progress in NUCLEAR SCIENCE and TECHNOLOGY, Vol. 1, p.384-387 (2011)
“The Tokai Reprocessing Plant has reprocessed the total amount of 1,140 tons of spent fuels since 1977 to the end
of fiscal year 2008. During the operation, radioactive liquid effluent has been discharged into the sea from the outlet
of the pipeline after the discharge approval. The amount of 3H discharged to the sea was 4.5 PBq in total.
Therefore,
since 1978, JAEA has sampled seawater around the outlet every month. Tritium concentrations in seawater were
analyzed and measured using a liquid scintillation counter. All data were used to calculate the dilution factor which
means the ratio of the 3H concentration in seawater to that in liquid effluent.
The number of 3H samples with
concentrations below the detection limit was 9,079 (82.0 %) and the number of those from the limit to 40 Bq/L (as
quantification limit) was 1,964 (17.7 %).
The maximum concentration was 1,700 Bq/L at the point just above the
outlet in 1979. Moreover, the dilution factors were ranged between 240 and 6,500,000. All 3H concentrations in water
were confirmed to be below 60,000 Bq/L that was specified by the law and there has been no concern about
environmental safety risk.”
http://www.aesj.or.jp/publication/pnst001/data/384.pdf
TRUST US! …….WITHIN LEGAL LIMITS!! … LOL!!
Report Comment
and most certainly this from that article
“Normalized 3H discharge amount (in GBq/GWa) defines
3H discharge amount per generated electric energy by the
reprocessed spent fuel. Normalized 3H discharge amount of
the TRP was 5.6 x 105 (GBq/GWa) at maximum, which was
approximately equal to those of the
La Hague reprocessing
plant in France and of
the Sellafield one in United
Kingdom.3) The 3H discharge of liquid effluent was
relatively proportional to the amounts of fuel reprocessed,
being independent of the type of reprocessing plant.”
leukeamia staistics anyone? or this
Uploaded by redbuttonstudio on 22 Dec 2011
Welsh Language ITV flagship programme Byd ar Bedwar (20/12/2011) investigates breast cancer increases downwind of the Wylfa Nuclear Power Station on Anglesey.
“Dr Chris Busby was commissioned by the programme to investigate cancer death rates in the 11 wards surrounding the plant. He found a significant 60% excess risk in women dying between 1999 and 2008 in the downwind wards compared with the distant wards.
There was also two-fold excess lung cancer risk in men in Amlwch Port downwind of the plant. Busby had previously studied cancer near three other nuclear power stations, Hinkley Point in Somerset, Bradwell in Essex and Trawsfynydd in Wales.
All three have statistically significant excess risk of breast cancer in those living near the contaminated areas. The Bradwell breast cancers were associated with living near the contaminated coastal sediment of the R Blackwater estuary
Report Comment
…” The Laboratories apply nuclear and isotopic techniques to research and document pollution and other problems,….”
Research and document. Not publish.
Report Comment
teeth gritting isnt it??
Report Comment
It would look like what the nuke industry is trying to say here is that this – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x4c_wI6kQyE – is ok when your food is contaminated. Nuke industry…meet two pack toddler…
Report Comment
dont forget the water!!
go to page 12.. the chart marked….
Radiological Contaminants: Jan. 1, 2010 – Dec. 31, 2010
Values are in Picocurries per liter (pCi/L), unless otherwise specified
2 Some systems may have violations in multiple categories
3 Number of violations for failure to perform sanitary survey under the Total Coliform Rule.
4 All Systems with an acute MCL violation also had a non-acute monthly MCL violation for the same month
http://dnr.mo.gov/pubs/pub2439.pdf
and you can compare previous years here!!
“Drinking Water Annual Reports
Each year the Missouri Department of Natural Resources produces, and submits to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, an annual report on public water system violations.”
http://www.dnr.mo.gov/env/wpp/fyreports/index.html
Report Comment
oops !! 109 violations!!
TRUST US!!…. SLURP SLURP WATER…..GO TO SLeeeeeP!!
Report Comment
China conducts second radiation monitor in Pacific OceanBy Yu Jianbin (People’s Daily Overseas Edition)17:19, December 29, 2011
“marine monitoring team dispatched by China’s State Oceanic Administration accomplished the mission of monitoring radiation in the western Pacific Ocean for the second time, and returned to Xiamen on Dec. 27 aboard the Xiangyanghong 09 scientific exploration ship.
The monitoring team sailed about 6,100 nautical miles in 30 days, and monitored radiation in the air over and water in the western Pacific Ocean as well as radiation-sensitive sea creatures, chemistry and dynamic environments.
This is the second time that China has monitored radiation in international waters in the western Pacific Ocean.
The aim of the mission is to gain a deeper understanding of the impact of Japan’s Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster on the western Pacific Ocean and China’s marine environment, and to help build a western Pacific marine environmental monitoring and early warning system.”
http://english.people.com.cn/202936/7691886.html
oops! somebody better tell the man from the IAEA
(IAEA Implements Technical Cooperation Project on Marine Environment After Fukushima Accident
http://www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/2011/tcmarine.html
china isnt on board so to speak
!! was it something they said?
“WP: Many believe that Iran carried out nuclear weapons research in the past, including work on weaponization… Do you agree with this?
YUKIYA AMANO, DIRECTOR GENERAL, IAEA: We receive information from various countries and collect information from our own sources that give us concern over the possible use of nuclear materials for military purposes – in the past and perhaps now.”
http://www.iaea.org/newscenter/transcripts/2011/wp140211.html
Report Comment
How to Maintain Your Confidence
(in a World of Declining Test Uncertainty Ratios)
David K. Deaver
John Fluke Mfg. Co., Inc.
Everett, Washington
“Setting test limits different than specification limits influences the risk of accepting defective units
(consumer risk) and rejecting conforming units (producer risk). Much has been written about setting
limits to accomplish various strategies such as maintaining a minimum consumer risk, equalizing consumer risk with producer risk, minimizing total risk, or equalizing the cost of faulty test
decisions between the producer and consumer.
This paper reviews the statistical foundation for making decisions as to where to place test limits
and includes a multitude of charts to simplify what used to be tedious calculations of the test limit,
consumer risk, and producer risk. The implications of various test strategies can be seen very
quickly using the charts.
The MathCAD Ò [1] formulas used to generate the charts are included so MathCAD users can
duplicate or customize the charts. Representative formulas are shown in Appendix C.”
MathcAD or MAD for short!!
“ Fig. 6 Conforming Unit Reported Out-of-Tolerance (Producer Risk)
The Producer Risk at t2 is represented by the shaded area and can be calculated for each value to t
located between the specification limits as shown in Eq. 3.”
Great graph! Now imagine the product is nuclear in origin?? Or your water supply, or the fish you eat… all decided with statistics…
bored with this one now! err for now
http://assets.fluke.com/appnotes/Calibration/ddncsl93.pdf
Report Comment
“However it is necessary to maintain consumer confidence.”"
TRUST US!!
Report Comment
Nice find, arclight. Statisticians are normally pretty careful with this kind of stuff, but once it gets into the hands of marketing departments, politicians, and so forth then almost anything can happen.
Nassim Taleb has done fascinating research on this kind of thing. He is very unpopular among the corporate establishment (perhaps because of his crusty personality, perhaps not).
http://www.fooledbyrandomness.com/
To him, it was obvious all along that the magnitude of the risky events in nuclear was far more important than the relative infrequency of the events. Nuclear shills focused on the relative infrequency and ignored or minimized the severity. They still do.
Hey, did you hear about the statistician who drowned in a river that had an average depth of one foot? (old joke).
Report Comment
think i would like to put some thoughts down here
concerning sociopaths, childrens rights, citizen rights!
sociopaths first..
there are two types of sociopath
the naturally chemically unbalanced
and the co-dependent enabler of the sociopathic type..
like alcoholics set the standard of behaviour and response in the home/work areas, so does the sociopath.. both need “enablers” to exsist.
this type of destructive relationship can be found in many walks of life and in many varied situations..
its easy for people to aquire other peoples behaviours and it is hard to get rid of them, presuming of course, you realise that they might be damaging your quality of life or others.. that can be a hard one to see!!
of course a respect for life is a sign of awareness..
i think the shamans say that you must be aware of EVERYTHING around you and respectful of its intent!
we here at enenews have been battling a corporate psycotic self motviating profit orientated monster!
but the aware are fighting back! the peace side of the UN (mostly childrens charities supported) for instance have recently won a huge battle for children everywhere! childrens rights has been accepted as full adult status.. !! this means that the children of japan have a chance at justice that the children of kazahkstan and belarus etc, never had!
and it could be used now for all!! its awaiting its last ok but it is fully agreed! good news!
now to citizens rights .. they follow the childs rights!!
support green action japan and others by spending ten minutes a week to “search for child related japanese stories and post them here and if necessary to green action japan! (only really good stuff to GAJ as they are busy people)..
LETS HELP MAKE A CHANGE!!
thanks for reading
hope you like the idea!
hope admin likes the idea? suspect so though!
hope the iaea hates the idea
peace
Report Comment
Harumph ah harumph…
And ditto and kudos too.
All shining the light on you…the Lemming King in a far away land!
Report Comment
Report Comment
Good angle of attack – protect the kids.
Offence AND Defence, win/win(nukes lose).
Report Comment
and I’ll add the co-dependants in nukopathy include big Media, especially in Japan.
Report Comment
Along with psychopaths, you and people answering your post exist! My privelege to read your posts, people! There is still something to value and love, to work for, and be inspired by! My graetiest stupid human pride is to meet great souls here, and you are such! Thank you!
Report Comment