Gundersen: Extremely radioactive rubble on Fukushima Reactor No. 3 has to be nuclear fuel… from either spent fuel pool or reactor! — Can’t be from simple hydrogen explosion

Published: May 5th, 2013 at 3:52 pm ET
By

28 comments


Fairewinds chief engineer Arnie Gundersen on how the extremely radioactive debris reported yesterday got on top of Reactor 3:

It has to be from fuel…. either the SFP or the reactor!

A simple hydrogen explosion would not dislodge this much radiation.

See also: [intlink id="extremely-radioactive-rubble-found-on-top-of-fukushima-reactor-no-3-photo" type="post"]{{empty}}[/intlink]

Published: May 5th, 2013 at 3:52 pm ET
By

28 comments

Related Posts

  1. Extremely radioactive rubble found on top of Fukushima Reactor No. 3 (PHOTO) May 4, 2013
  2. Japan Expert: It was a nuclear explosion at Reactor No. 3 — I believe fuel rods were blown out of spent fuel pool December 13, 2011
  3. “Mysterious circumstances” of explosion at reactor No. 3 — Cannot be explained by a simple hydrogen build-up April 26, 2011
  4. Gundersen: New data shows Fukushima exceeds Chernobyl… Plumes seen emanating from both the Unit 3 fuel pool & reactor — Nuke Engineer: Broken fuel rods are above all 3 melted down reactors — Gov’t Experts: Unit 3 explosion may have damaged spent fuel & released even more radioactive material (VIDEO) February 9, 2015
  5. Kyodo: Secret worst scenario was ‘reactor explosion’ at No. 1 and Spent Fuel Pool 4 drying up -Hosono January 6, 2012

28 comments to Gundersen: Extremely radioactive rubble on Fukushima Reactor No. 3 has to be nuclear fuel… from either spent fuel pool or reactor! — Can’t be from simple hydrogen explosion

You must be logged in to post a comment.