Five quakes M4 and above hit Fukushima in last six days

Published: August 11th, 2012 at 12:29 pm ET
By
Email Article Email Article
5 comments


Title: Earthquake Information
Source: Japan Meteorological Agency
Date: August 12, 2012

  • 00:03 JST 12 Aug 2012 23:58 JST 11 Aug 2012 Fukushima-ken Oki M4.0 2

  • 19:33 JST 11 Aug 2012 19:30 JST 11 Aug 2012 Fukushima-ken Oki M4.4 3

  • 10:04 JST 10 Aug 2012 09:59 JST 10 Aug 2012 Fukushima-ken Oki M4.4 1

  • 09:00 JST 08 Aug 2012 08:54 JST 08 Aug 2012 Fukushima-ken Oki M4.5 2

  • 13:23 JST 07 Aug 2012 13:18 JST 07 Aug 2012 Fukushima-ken Oki M4.5 3

Published: August 11th, 2012 at 12:29 pm ET
By
Email Article Email Article
5 comments

Related Posts

  1. New Study: Radioactive Thorium detected 100 km from Fukushima meltdowns — Daughter products of Uranium October 26, 2011
  2. Radioactive fallout in rain 10 times more than originally reported October 9, 2011
  3. Now 7 quakes hit same area near Fukushima Daiichi — Includes M5.2 within the hour April 13, 2012
  4. Study warns of another nuclear disaster at Fukushima Daiichi — Likely to be directly disturbed by large quakes (Full Paper) February 14, 2012
  5. Now 20 quakes centered in Fukushima beginning with M5.9 just over 24 hours ago — Consecutive M4.4s in last 30 minutes April 14, 2012

5 comments to Five quakes M4 and above hit Fukushima in last six days

  • Time Is Short Time Is Short

    Say Mother Nature is pissed off. What better way of getting rid of a parasite that is destroying her, than to pound a bunch of the most fragile – and deadly – nuclear reactors into rubble?

    The Gaia Theory taken to its' logical conclusion.

    This is exactly what we are seeing in all this.


    Report Comment

  • rambojim

    Well said Time Is Short and weeman..

    Trouble is,the innocent will suffer also..


    Report Comment

  • CBuck CBuck

    I can't for the life of me figure out why in the first place, Japan would even have nuclear power with being such an earthquake prone area. And to build that GE reactor type on top of it? Forty years ago there were warnings and red flags about this reactor type as being unstable.
    So build an already badly designed reactor from the get go on an earthquake prone area and when a quake/tsunami takes it out stick your head in the sand about it?
    Where the hell was/is the logic?
    I guess it was/is rolled up in those over flowing money clips the people in charge are stuffing in their pockets.


    Report Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.