Floodwater enters turbine building at Ft. Calhoun nuclear plant

Published: June 27th, 2011 at 1:23 pm ET
By
Email Article Email Article
86 comments


Fort Calhoun Nuclear Plant: Flood Seeps Into Turbine Building At Nebraska Nuke Station, AP, June 27, 2011:

Missouri River floodwater seeped into the turbine building at a nuclear power plant near Omaha on Monday, but plant officials said the seepage was expected and posed no safety risk because the building contains no nuclear material. [...]

Omaha Public Power District spokesman Jeff Hanson said pumps were handling the problem at the Fort Calhoun Nuclear Station and that “everything is secure and safe.” [...]

Nuclear Regulatory Commission spokesman Victor Dricks described the situation as stable. [...]

Published: June 27th, 2011 at 1:23 pm ET
By
Email Article Email Article
86 comments

Related Posts

  1. Top Ft. Calhoun nuke plant official: To get to a disaster level floodwater would have to rise 3.5 feet above current levels — No one has a model of what river is going to do, says NWS hydrologist June 18, 2011
  2. 2,000 ft berm holding back floodwater has collapsed at Ft. Calhoun nuke plant — River now surrounding two buildings June 26, 2011
  3. Auxiliary building at Ft. Calhoun surrounded by water after berm failure — NRC letter said if water enters auxilary building, could have station blackout with core damage in hours June 26, 2011
  4. WSJ reports press release from NRC saying Ft. Calhoun’s flood deficiencies were remedied — No mention of recent NYT report that NRC’s evaluation of plant’s new defenses is not complete June 25, 2011
  5. Two-thirds of hot nuclear fuel remains in reactor core at Calhoun plant even though media claims it was ‘shut down’ for refueling and maintenance June 17, 2011

86 comments to Floodwater enters turbine building at Ft. Calhoun nuclear plant

  • NoNukes NoNukes

    Yeah, who needs that old turbine anyway?


    Report comment

  • milk and cheese milk and cheese

    We meant to do that. Yes.


    Report comment

  • SteveMT

    They always say that everything is safe, stable, and that the latest failure was expected after the fact.

    They are again preparing to reheat that nearly dead frog.


    Report comment

  • “seepage” when the berm deflated water flowed unabated I’ll bet !


    Report comment

  • jump-ball jump-ball

    ‘Power District spokesman Jeff Hanson said pumps were handling the problem at the Fort Calhoun Nuclear Station and that “everything is secure and safe” ‘.

    If Jeff faces more serious developments, he said he will call in his boss, Captain Ron.


    Report comment

  • Whoopie Whoopie

    Posted to HP. They’re gonna have to WRITE A NEW ONE every minute the way this is going.
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/06/27/fort-calhoun-nuclear-flood-nebraska-plant_n_885067.html


    Report comment

  • ZP

    Correct me if I am wrong, but from what I have been reading, the “official” consensus it that these conditions are to last thru August before the waters recede.

    Is that correct?


    Report comment

  • Ariana

    Yes, yes… I feel brainwashed now… *There is no danger…no nuclear materials…radiation isn’t harmful to human health…all these cancer cases are caused by cigarettes, second hand smoke, car exhaust, and being unhappy…*
    *we are looking for weapons of mass destruction…*


    Report comment

    • Whoopie Whoopie

      Have you noticed the INCREASE in anti-smoking ads? The increase in Lawyers commercials saying they’ll take your case if you’ve had adverse affects from DRUGS? (shame on FDA) And have you noticed the increase in articles stating “such and such” NOW found to cause CANCER? I think it’s all a PLOY/lies to cover the Radiation Effects soon to happen here in this country.


      Report comment

      • An lots of articles about chemicles in our bodies and childrens that cause cancer !


        Report comment

        • Whoopie Whoopie

          Boy, if nothing else, our society is waking up that WE ARE BEING LIED TO on every front, every step of the way. Which is great…but I’m afraid too late for the world. Took Japan and now here in the U.S. to get an outcry. HOpe we survive this…but it’s highly doubtful. Fetus’s ect.
          CRIMINALS! They should all be locked up!


          Report comment

          • Ariana

            You know, my husband and I want to have a baby really badly, but I am so thankful that I am not pregnant right now. I would be terrified. I have some friends who are pregnant, and of course, they are completely oblivious to the dangers their babies face.


            Report comment

        • Radioactive fallout children

          New York, New Jersey plan for special pediatric care during nuclear disaster
          By Marcia Frellick
          Monday June 27, 2011
          With nuclear instability still threatening Japan after the earthquake and tsunami in March, many Americans are concerned about how prepared U.S. healthcare networks are to handle similar nuclear disasters. New York and New Jersey are among the states formulating their own disaster plans, including strategies for caring for the youngest victims — those most susceptible to the effects of radiation.
          Signs and symptoms

          Because children are growing, more cells are repeatedly dividing in their bodies, and there is a greater opportunity for radiation to disrupt this process. The small size of their bodies also can make them more vulnerable….
          The bigger concern for children comes later if radioactive fallout enters the food and water supply.

          Over time, exposure to radiation has been proven a risk factor for thyroid cancer,
          Children have a disproportionately higher minute ventilation, leading to greater internal exposure to…
          http://news.nurse.com/article/20110627/NY02/106270015


          Report comment

      • Ariana

        Yes, Whoopie! My family thinks I’m crazy because I believe radiation is the cause for all the cancer in this world. I know one thing: My great grandmother smoked unfiltered Camels from the time she was 12 years old. She lived to be 95; died from “natural causes.” I think they are using tobacco as a scape-goat. I also think that all of these stupid reports of everything under the sun causing cancer is a bunch of lies just out there to keep us from realizing the truth.


        Report comment

        • Whoopie Whoopie

          Yeah, I noticed in the last 2 weeks, HP has headlines stating just that. New Discovery of Cancer causing agent. I call BS.
          And I’m sorry. Your family sounds like mine.


          Report comment

          • Ariana

            My Mom, at least, agrees with me. But everyone else just thinks I’m cracked. I’ll say this though: I have been trying very hard to enjoy my life more lately. I feel like we don’t have much time left.
            I saw a video on youtube where this scientist was talking about the increase in cancer cases since 1945, and now I can’t find it. (of course) She had a map of the U.S. displaying all of the cases, which were not so coincidentally clumped around nuclear power plants. It was pretty scary, esp considering I live within a stones throw of about 4 of them.


            Report comment

          • Whoopie Whoopie

            Wow…that’s interesting. I think they’ve talked about that on the HP threads. More cancers around the plants.
            As far as my life, I’m not stopping anything I do outdoors. I can’t – and survive mentally. NWest here.


            Report comment

        • Much was pre fallout tobacco !

          Pre nuke age of testings !


          Report comment

        • StPaulScout StPaulScout

          Cigarettes cause lung cancer period. Your grandmother simply beat the odds.


          Report comment

          • Rica E

            The woman who was the oldest in the world at 114 did not quit smoking till she was 97 . My best friends dad , another life long smoker after dying from a fatal head wound, was found to have pink lungs on autopsy. The worst part of the cancer travesty is the heaps of money and tears that go to find the cure org.s when cancer facilities that treat with wholesome foods and supplements like the gerson method, are forced to operate over the border in TJ.


            Report comment

        • Mark Mark

          Cigarettes aren’t healthy but no one will know if it was the cigarettes or combination of cigarettes and nuclear fall-out and other poisons like paint fumes household cleaners gasoline fumes etc etc. that caused cancer. No catalog of cancer victims occupations that I know of.
          Met a young man who had his leg amputated due to cancer his doc told him off the record his cancer most likely caused by nuclear fall-out.

          Used to live in Toronto Canada and remember 20-30 years ago rumblings of higher cancer rates and birth defects around local Pickering Nuclear Plant. Data suppressed. Vancouver has lowest cancer rates in Canada attributed to our lifestyle but Toronto has more pollution more nukes etc etc. Vancouver less industrialized no nukes drinking water comes from mountain water not Lake Ontario (Toronto water supply source) with many nukes on shore routinely dumping low level radiated water into that Lake. Bottom line official stance is we don’t know why cancer rates have increased over latter half of 20th century and beyond. But we are working on it!


          Report comment

          • They dumped some nuke waste in a lake in Canada last month !

            MEDIA RELEASE
            For Immediate Release
            May 16, 2011
            Nuclear waste repository is a serious threat to the Great Lakes, warns Council of Canadians

            The Council of Canadians is warning of the risks from a proposed nuclear waste repository on Lake Huron. The Ontario Power Generation (OPG) has submitted a proposal for a deep geologic disposal facility on the Bruce Nuclear site in Kincardine, Ontario. The facility will be 680 metres underground and only one mile away from Lake Huron.
            http://www.canadians.org/media/water/2011/16-May-11.html

            YouTube – Canada nuclear plant accident turns drinking water …

            14 Mar 2011 … Uploaded by AFAskygoddess on Mar 17, 2011. Nuclear plant admits that 73000 litres of radioactive water was dumped into Lake Ontario, …
            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q0t33K1ozjM

            YouTube – In Case You Missed It – Canada’s Nuclear ‘Accident …

            14 Mar 2011… 73000 liters of radioactive water was dumped into Lake …
            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QpxaGIvQMQM

            YouTube – Pickering Nuclear Plant Leak 19000 gallons of water into …
            Nuclear plant admits that 73000 litres of radioactive water was dumped into …
            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PWYEJv86lbg


            Report comment

          • milk and cheese milk and cheese

            Well with the Fukushima radiation, Vancouver will catch up with Toronto really fast now.


            Report comment

          • milk and cheese milk and cheese

            xdrfox, thank you for posting that notice of the ‘accidental’ release of radiation three days after Fukushima. I noticed that at the time. What a convenient thing Fukushima was for them, distracting from any unwelcome attention. I kept thinking things would be different when I moved up here, and they are not.


            Report comment

      • Could be because 3/4 of all nuclear plants in the U.S. have been leaking radioactive tritium for years.

        Some in Canada too (Chalk River is one) – leaking into the Ottawa River.

        So, a regular day for most people now is tritium, Corexit, PCB’s, dioxins, background from the ’60′s, a wee scoop of Chernobyl and Fukey-flavored icing.


        Report comment

  • Ariana

    Possibly a stupid question, but something I’m curious about: why would they fill this berm with water? Perhaps sand would have been better? Maybe something NOT WET?!


    Report comment

    • Ever pack a sausage 2,000 ft. long and 6 ft high ??


      Report comment

    • StPaulScout StPaulScout

      Why didn’t they build the plant on higher ground? I mean come on, a nuclear plant in a known flood plain? That’s as stupid as putting them on a fault line or on the coast of the ocean where sunamis are common or, oh, never mind….


      Report comment

      • tony wilson

        read up…
        the people with the biggest amounts of money the most power believe in population control.
        no point in being rational when we are dealing with psychos that can kill anyone fron the pres on down to a security man called barry jennings.
        find ge,westinghouse,rothchilds,rockerfeller.
        bill gates,clinton,bush snr,liar blair.kissinger.
        all want the general non productive scum dead.
        it is a policy find a bad location and wait,then let nature take it’s course with water earth quake.also the 20 or 30 years you have to wait is still good cos the plant will be pumping slow cancer death into the environment.


        Report comment

      • Ariana

        Yeah, also, why don’t they start out with a giant wall around the thing, reaching underground in case of an accident? They spend astronomical amounts of money building these plants, but have absolutely no back-up in case of an accident.


        Report comment

    • Ariana

      Wow… that reminds me of the picture of that Kindergarten in Ukraine filled with gas masks. So depressing.


      Report comment

      • Or the one from early 70′s with the little girl and a FLASH of light,
        (helped leed to reduction of warheads both sides)
        We don’t have to be a FLASH of light, we know that now don’t we, we were deceived in believing nuclear power was safer or safe !


        Report comment

        • BetaFlare

          @xdrfox Here it is. Take a copy n spread… pls leave a msg u got it.

          http://wp.me/pwIAV-1


          Report comment

          • got, anything particular in it ?


            Report comment

          • BetaFlare

            Its displays how the funny circus works when 40yr ol plants are to be tuned up to 20% more power. With Plutonium mox. The reg board of N R C is a farce – just like the whole industry.

            Check specifcally on how the zero brain clown called scar bro ugh can spin the whole circus. No responsibility to anyone, plants blow up again and again, no changes. If changes are done, theyre done by TEPCO fucukids by welding more steel and causing meltdown danger. And these folks just keep talking…

            FORD: If you look at it, it’s September 2004, which is over two years since the first [disaster] occurrence. And yet they’re still talking about plans. Is there any motion or thoughts as to what the danger might be or the safety impact of just continuing to make plans and not do anything between over the last two years?

            MR. SCAR BR O UGH: Right. Well, I thinkpart of it is—is, you know, right now, you know, Quad Cities and are at the old power level. Imean, so that’s—so they have that. But, you know,there is this—and I’ve heard, and it’s interesting that blabla

            Sat for a moment at LATimes, soon disappeared.


            Report comment

          • And IAEA is ??
            Oh they got some dentures this week so now they have phony teeth !


            Report comment

    • chemfood chemfood

      it took at least 8 months to clean up the world trade center. sans rads, fukushima gonna be busy with the dust pan for a very long time


      Report comment

    • dharmasyd dharmasyd

      Yikes:

      Debris from the tsunami – including this mountain of bicycles – is collected and sorted for recycling or incineration.
      There is an estimated 6 million tons of debris…

      Recycling or incineration??? Great choices for radioactive metals. Another reason to quit breathing and not to sit in restaurants with metal-legged tables!

      Paranoia runs deep!


      Report comment

  • Mark Mark

    Just a couple of things I’m wondering about after reading the complete article

    “Vendor workers were at the plant Monday to determine whether the 2,000 foot berm can be repaired.” Whats a vendor worker? Glorified temp? Sorry my over-active imagination envisions Fort Calhoun operator calling up Labor Ready “try and get me some decent workers who aren’t too hung-over”.

    “The base of Cooper and its storage area for used nuclear fuel is 903 feet above sea level. The river was 900.2 feet above sea level early Monday.” That means a strong wind or the wake of a cabin cruiser would spill water into spent fuel storage area?


    Report comment

  • flatsville

    This article lays out (what the MSM has been told) the back-up systems and at what point in the flood level they could be triggered.

    http://www.omaha.com/article/20110627/NEWS01/706279901


    Report comment

  • Whoopie Whoopie

    Don’t know if you guys follow the Fukusall Tweet thread. I only got “smart” the other day and keep it open for new info coming.
    http://twitter.com/#!/search/fukushima
    What took me so long to get there…i haven’t a clue. duh.


    Report comment

  • dpl dpl

    what did Arnie say, the 2 words you don’t want to see being used in the same sentence
    “hip-waders” and “nuclear power plants”

    if you are waiting for the warning sign to change to level5 flee now the disaster will not be televised.


    Report comment

  • dharmasyd dharmasyd

    And keep in mind what I.F. ‘Izzy’ Stone always said:
    “Don’t believe anything until it is officially denied!”


    Report comment

  • Ariana

    Go get a f*cking helmet. Put on the f*cking helmet. Love Ron White.


    Report comment

  • Are these reactors like the Ft. Calhoun reactor ?? Why now ? Did they see the flaw in design suffering at Ft. Calhoun
    N.J. Nuclear Task Force report recommends additional backup systems at state’s nuclear plants
    Tuesday, June 28, 2011
    TRENTON — An interim report issued Monday by New Jersey’s Nuclear Review Task Force suggests a strengthening of the backup systems of the state’s nuclear power plants, including the three located in Salem County.

    Established in late March by the Christie Administration to assess operations and emergency preparedness for the state’s nuclear power plants following Japan’s nuclear tragedy, the Task Force has issued its interim report based upon early lessons learned from that ongoing nuclear emergency….
    http://www.nj.com/salem/index.ssf/2011/06/nj_nuclear_task_force_report_r.html


    Report comment