Former NRC Chairman in Fukushima: No excuse for any of us in nuclear arena to let this happen — I wish more people could come see it firsthand (VIDEO)

Published: December 30th, 2012 at 11:28 am ET
By
Email Article Email Article
29 comments


Title: NRC former chairman’s trip to Fukushima – to re-examine the safety of nuclear power plants
Source: NHK
Date Aired: December 22, 2012

At 11:00 in

NRC Chairman Gregory Jaczko during August 2012 visit to Japan: This is an important lesson for all of us and I wish more people could come and see firsthand what has happened.

I think there’s really no excuse for any of us that have been involved in the nuclear arena to let something like this happen.

Watch the broadcast here

Published: December 30th, 2012 at 11:28 am ET
By
Email Article Email Article
29 comments

Related Posts

  1. Fukushima workers “undergoing treatment for radiation exposure” — Tepco: “6 people have been irradiated… big mistakes like this continue to happen again and again… essential that we put something in place to stop this” (VIDEO) October 9, 2013
  2. Former NRC Chairman: “We all know Fukushima had a lot of impact worldwide” (VIDEO) September 13, 2012
  3. “Shocking”: Officials make it mandatory to use Fukushima rice in school lunches December 17, 2012
  4. ABC: Prime Minister Kan still worries about what would happen if area where people couldn’t live spread to 200 or 300 km — Leaked memo shows fears of radioactive cloud reaching Tokyo (AUDIO) March 5, 2012
  5. Report: The people of Japan are responsible for poisoning of world’s food chain due to Fukushima catastrophe — They have to stand up and take action — “The buck has to stop somewhere” (VIDEO) August 11, 2013

29 comments to Former NRC Chairman in Fukushima: No excuse for any of us in nuclear arena to let this happen — I wish more people could come see it firsthand (VIDEO)

  • ForwardAssist ForwardAssist

    Jaczko began to show some human responses to the accident, and they replaced him because of it. Not just replaced him, but did they their best to disparage his reputation as an individual.


    Report comment

  • gottagetoffthegrid

    I'd like to see Jaczko join up with The Gundersens at fairewinds.


    Report comment

  • gottagetoffthegrid

    Jaczko said:
    —/—-
    I think there’s really no excuse for any of us that have been involved in the nuclear arena to let something like this happen.
    ——–

    The obvious extension of this is to immediately shut in and decommission all BWRs today.
    All other reactors that have reached 75% of design life should also be shut in and decommissioned tomorrow.

    And Every other reactor by next year

    They are doing it in Quebec.


    Report comment

      • hogy

        It was not Quebec's 'last reactor'–they only had one and this one is it.
        As usual unions complainnig about any type of decomissioning.


        Report comment

      • VanneV anne

        There was a second reactor that had 180 on-power days over 7 years:

        “On October 3, 2012, Hydro-Québec CEO, Thierry Vandal announced his intention not to proceed with the refurbishment of the Gentilly-2 facility and its closure on December 28, 2012 for economic reasons. At that time, a decommissioning process will proceed over a period of 50 years and is expected to cost $1.8 billion[4]. The permanent shut down and decommissioning of the power plant follows an election pledge from Quebec's newly appointed premier, Pauline Marois.[5]…

        “Gentilly-1 was a prototype CANDU-BWR reactor, based on the SGHWR design. It was designed for a net output of 250MW(e). The reactor had several features unique amongst CANDU reactors, including vertically oriented pressure tubes (allowing for the use of a single fuelling machine below the core), and light-water coolant. These features were intended to reduce the cost and complexity of the unit, again to make it an attractive export unit. However, the design was not successful, and over nearly 7 years recorded only 180 on-power days. Gentilly-1 is no longer in operation….”
        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gentilly_Nuclear_Generating_Station


        Report comment

    • BreadAndButter BreadAndButter

      "They are doing it in Quebec."
      Cool, I didn't know that! So how do they meet their energy needs?
      Renewables?
      Or just even more tar sands?


      Report comment

      • gottagetoffthegrid

        Hydro. They produce an amazing amount of hydro that is mostly exported to the US NE states


        Report comment

        • BreadAndButter BreadAndButter

          Thanks! I just read the comments under the article you posted, and one says:
          "The fact is G-2 was producing 3%, yes, 3%, of Quebec's total electricity output. It's not needed. Unnecessary risk for unnecessary energy, supported by a few local businessmen and the uranium lobby."

          Congratulations then! One more off the list!! :-)


          Report comment

          • aigeezer aigeezer

            B&B, when this story was first posted at Enenews in September (it's ok, we can't read everything posted) I included some media links about how the nuke plant union leadership responded to the proposed shutdown.

            In a nutshell, they used the fear tactic that these plants were very dangerous and only they (the employees) could keep the public safe (by forever keeping their jobs). At the time, I predicted it would be a card played whenever a shutdown is proposed – something we should keep in the back of our minds for "next time".

            Here's a current article from a pro-industry neocon tabloid, showing the kind of nasty fear spin that surrounds a shutdown (risky, dangerous, expensive, loss of jobs, blah blah), even after the new government had campaigned on the shutdown issue and had won election easily.

            http://www.torontosun.com/2012/12/28/shutdown-of-que-nuclear-plant-to-cost-2b

            The operator's main plan for the $2 billion "phaseout" is to do nothing for 40 years in the hope that the radiation dissipates and/or someone comes up with new technology.

            Oh, and Quebec is about as far away from the Tar Sands (geographically and politically) as, say, Luxemburg is from Moscow. Canada is huge. ;-)

            I said "neocon tabloid", so I'd better provide some evidence: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toronto_Sun

            One irony here is that both the "union left" and the "neocon right" wanted the boondoggle plant to keep going.


            Report comment

            • BreadAndButter BreadAndButter

              Thank you aigeezer! I learn here every day!
              As far as Moscow???? Dang, that IS huge….
              ;-)


              Report comment

            • gottagetoffthegrid

              Quote:
              ———

              The operator's main plan for the $2 billion "phaseout" is to do nothing for 40 years in the hope that the radiation dissipates and/or someone comes up with new technology.
              ———–

              That is the same argument I use against ever building them in the first place. They can't be turned off in any conventional sense. Just kicked to the next generation to cleanup.


              Report comment

      • Anthony Anthony

        Funny, I swear I JUST watched a extreme pro nuke news story about how they have approved a major facility upgrade, I was sure it was PQ…. All nukes ahead was the flavor of the piece. Ill see if I can find something to substantiate this, it was on our major channel.


        Report comment

  • Cataclysmic Cataclysmic

    Badabing! GE employee files whistleblower lawsuit "WILMINGTON, NC (WECT) – An employee of the GE-Hitachi Nuclear Plant in Wilmington has filed a federal whistleblower lawsuit in U.S. Eastern District Court. The suit names GE-Hitachi Nuclear Energy Americas, LLC and Global Nuclear Fuel-Americas, LLC as defendants.

    The employee, Harry Knight, is claiming that as a direct result of raising concerns over safety protocol issues at the plant, he was threatened and demoted.

    Knight has worked for the company for 12 years. He is currently still employed with GE."

    http://www.wect.com/story/19402591/nuclear-plant-employee-files-federal-whistleblower-lawsuit-against-ge-hitachi


    Report comment

    • Cataclysmic Cataclysmic

      "..James said he filed a complaint with OSHA on behalf of his client. The OSHA complaint has been pending for three years. Because it has taken so long to resolve with OSHA, James said he felt compelled to move the case forward by filing the lawsuit in federal court."


      Report comment

      • PavewayIII PavewayIII

        1. The guy is an engineer. I'm assuming he's fairly intelligent, yet he submits an *OSHA complaint*? OSHA is the most feeble, useless excuse for a federal regulator that has ever existed. Wake up, dude. Your job sucks.

        2. The guy is an engineer. I'm assuming he's fairly intelligent, yet he files a federal whistle-blower lawsuit? He really thinks there is some protection there? Wake up, dude. Your career is over.

        3. The guy is an engineer. I'm assuming he's fairly intelligent, yet he files this against one of the dons of the nuclear cabal? Wake up, dude. Your life is over.

        4. Note to dude: check brake-lines and steering linkage on auto before every use. Avoid NRC-types carrying umbrellas. Don't drink anything again. ever.


        Report comment

  • No excuse indeed. You'd have to get on an airplane to visit Fukushima, and you know what that means:

    Finally, an Independent Study of the Health Effects of Airport Scanners

    11 DEC 18 2012, 10:24 AM ET 16
    http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/12/finally-an-independent-study-of-the-health-effects-of-airport-scanners/266406/

    "anywhere from six to 100 U.S. airline passengers each year could get cancer from the machines."


    Report comment

  • Heart of the Rose Heart of the Rose

    I hope this is helpful..for the anti-nuclear movement.
    A well timed human interest story is not the same as admission of the actual on-going conditions at Fukushima Npp.


    Report comment

  • weeman

    Let this happen, it was enevatable when you build a nuclear reactor in a active seismic zone, your own data told you the design of the plant would not withstand a major earthquake above 7-7.5 and you licensed it knowing that a major quake would most probably strike in the life time of the plant.
    The only thing the IAEA is good for is protecting themselves they certainly do no fore fill there charter and I believe that is how we can nail them to the cross, please read it you will get my drift hopefully.


    Report comment

  • TheBigPicture TheBigPicture

    Those in the "nuclear arena" can't "let" or "not let" a nuclear meltdown happen, as proven by past and present nuclear disasters.

    The concept of controlling nuclear fission is a failed one.

    It can only be controlled "some of the time", which makes this technology unacceptable. A hundred percent unacceptable.


    Report comment

  • Johnny Blade Johnny Blade

    I remember ripping Mr. J a new bunghole here when he met reporters questions about deaths & health impacts due to Fukushima with what we now know was "nervous" laughter,but at the time it really fired many of us up and we posted some intense things about him that no man with an ounce of self-respect would ever want a group of people who obviously CARE about what really matters to publicly denounce & insult him with what "was" just the painful truth & our perception of him at the time!~I even said "I hope he reads this & it eats away at any remnants of a soul still fed by a sliver of a conscience"!~I'd like to think that he did read ALL of what we had to say and had a change of heart that led to him having this opportunity to change his legacy & even better if he "drops a dime" on his former colleagues who he now knows were never his friends! I say to you Mr. J-"Thank you and I apologize for the foul things I may have said under duress while emotionally charged due to the nature of the issues",but not for the principle behind my angst at the time,that hasn't changed.However,I'd like to extend an invitation to jump into the discussion groups at any time and from what I can see and feel about your present activities-"welcome you back to OUR world"!!(?) ~ :) ~


    Report comment

  • Jebus Jebus

    I really hope someone translates this video…


    Report comment

  • waterbug

    Decommissioning of all the outdated Mark I BWRs in the US would be a good start.
    Sooner or later, they will run out of 'conservatively overspec' margins of error.

    Instead, license extensions..
    Tiger by the tail.


    Report comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.