FORUM: Links to news articles, reports, and posts that contain false or misleading information

Published: September 1st, 2012 at 12:33 am ET
By
Email Article Email Article
93 comments


Here are a few to get things started… leaving comments on the sites publishing this information probably couldn’t hurt.

Title: No big Fukushima health impact seen: U.N. body chairman
Source: Reuters
Date: Feb 1, 2012

The fact that some radioactive releases spread over the ocean instead of populated areas also contributed to limiting the consequences, said Wolfgang Weiss of the U.N. Scientific Committee on the effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR).

“As far as the doses we have seen from the screening of the population … they are very low,” Weiss told Reuters. This was partly “due to the rapid evacuation and this worked very well.” [...]


Title: Nuclear accidents pose little risk to health: NRC
Source: Reuters
Date: Jan 31, 2012

The risk to public health from a severe nuclear power plant accident in the United States is “very small” because reactor operators should have time to prevent core damage and reduce the release of radioactive materials, U.S. nuclear regulators said in a study on Wednesday. [...]


Title: Health impact of Fukushima small
Source: Examiner.com
Author: Patrick Mason
Date: Feb 1, 2012

Patrick Mason, reactor engineer in Baton Rouge, LA

[...] The long term goal of TEPCO and the Japanese government at this stage in the game is to ensure that the public is safe and that the areas around Fukushima are cleaned of contamination and made safe for future public use. [...]

Published: September 1st, 2012 at 12:33 am ET
By
Email Article Email Article
93 comments

Related Posts

  1. FORUM: Post Your Radiation Monitoring Data Here (Dec. 17, 2011 – Present) September 1, 2012
  2. FORUM: Fukushima Webcam Discussion Thread (Dec. 14, 2011 – June 29, 2012) September 1, 2012
  3. FORUM: Discussion Thread for Jan. 17 – 23, 2012 January 17, 2012
  4. FORUM: Discussion Thread for Jan. 3 – Jan. 10, 2012 January 3, 2012
  5. FORUM: Discussion Thread for Jan. 10 – 17, 2012 January 10, 2012

93 comments to FORUM: Links to news articles, reports, and posts that contain false or misleading information

  • "Can a nuclear power plant explode?"
    "No. That's impossible."

    "Even the most serious accident won't affect farm land for more than a few weeks."

    From a NEW JERSEY Emergency Management Pamphlet.
    http://www.state.nj.us/njoem/farmers.html

    Credit original comment by enenews user 'bmurr'.
    http://enenews.com/asahi-shimbun-demands-tepco-release-all-footage-related-to-fukushima-disaster/comment-page-1#comment-293421


    Report Comment

    • Maggie123

      ChasAha – I don't know about 'formal legality', but this authoritative, calm, reassurance is criminally negligent to me

      "if you need to wash your livestock – wearing clothing used when handling pesticides would be a good choice" should fire off a mental alarm for the farmer, but those who have made a habit of using pesticides will interpret the risks similarly. (In my experience they dismiss pesticide dangers, especially cumulative and long-term. They remind me that "the instructions say it's safe if used properly."

      "wind can carry it to where it's less harmful" – suggests it's OK if the neighbors or next county takes the hit!

      "Understatement" prevails from start to finish of this document. Emphasis is on "brief" consequences to be dealt with. Wonder when it was last updated? I hope citizens of NJ and elsewhere will approach their state advisory bodies and legislators with evidence from Chernobyl and Fukushima!


      Report Comment

      • I agree. It is criminally negligent!

        The 'understatements' do prevail.
        They also use the words, MAY and 'most likely' quite a bit.
        Like a 'disclaimer' it probably helps with the 'legalities'.

        I wonder what others states radiation pamphlets look like?
        That's a project for another day.


        Report Comment

  • :( Outright lies. I think so.

    1. "— the heroic workers… barely averted a catastrophic disaster that could have contaminated much of eastern Japan, including Tokyo."
    (NOT an understatement: "could have contaminated" should say… "did contaminate". A CATASTROPHIC DISASTER was NOT averted.)

    2. "…the workers successfully shut down all of the reactors and averted a catastrophic nuclear chain reaction."
    (The 'chain reaction' part is debatable perhaps, but saying that it 'averted catastrophe' is NOT TRUE and misleading at best.)

    The 'heroic workers' part is true, but the rest is more than 'disinformation'.

    Japan Times article:
    Sunday, Oct. 7, 2012
    "Trip to facility possibly pre-election publicity stunt"
    http://www.japantimes.co.jp/text/nn20121007x1.html

    See original comments on this article
    by 'chargedbarticle' and 'sickputer' here:
    http://enenews.com/forum-fukushima-webcam-discussion-thread-june-30-2012-present/comment-page-18#comment-293826


    Report Comment

    • jec

      And one of the real heros..the plant manager..with cancer..is denied workmans comp..as he didnt demonstrate the requirements..they dont care much for their workers at Fukushima.."good by, leave..we dont want to hear about illness". Fake medical exams, fake dosimeters, all a coverup. Sad.


      Report Comment

  • Jebus Jebus

    coughbullshitcough

    Nobel laureate debunks radiation myths

    http://www.browndailyherald.com/nobel-laureate-debunks-radiation-myths-1.2777592

    More proof that having a nobel prize means you sold your soul…


    Report Comment

  • Here we go again. More dis/mis-information!
    From NBCnews – Aug 15, 2012

    Story written – By Christopher Wanjek
    I hope somebody someday does a google of this guys name and finds this forum. That would make my day. :)

    1. "They found the residents' exposure to be minimal, equivalent on average to less than half of a chest X-ray."

    2. "The researchers added that this glimmer of good news about low radiation exposure…"

    3. "…few if any people have died from the radiation exposure."

    4. "The study is hopeful news for the millions of Japanese in the Fukushima area.."

    5. "'"I don't think most people will experience long-term health problems related to the nuclear accident'…" – Tsubokura

    JAMA – Journal of the American Medical Association
    :( What?

    http://vitals.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/08/14/13283029-after-fukushima-residents-spared-of-nuclear-contamination#comments

    (The comment war was interesting.)


    Report Comment

    • Cataclysmic Cataclysmic

      Well ChasAha, consider the source.. nbe=GE so no surprise..

      NBCUniversal (49% ownership, remaining owned by Comcast)
      NBC – National Broadcasting Company
      NBC Entertainment
      NBC News
      TheGrio.com
      Peacock Productions
      NBC Sports
      NBC Studios
      NBCUniversal Sports & Olympics
      NBCUniversal Television Group
      Universal Television
      NBCUniversal Television Distribution
      NBCUniversal International Television
      NBC Owned Television Stations
      WNBC 4 – New York
      KNBC 4 – Los Angeles
      WMAQ 5 – Chicago
      WCAU 10 – Philadelphia
      KNTV 11 – San Jose/San Francisco
      KXAS 5 – Dallas/Fort Worth²
      WRC 4 – Washington
      WTVJ 6 – Miami
      KNSD 39 (cable 7) – San Diego²
      WVIT 30 – Hartford
      NBC Nonstop
      LXTV
      EMKA, Ltd.
      NBC Universal Digital Media
      NBC Universal Cable
      A&E Television Networks (co-owned with The Hearst Corporation and Disney/ABC):
      A&E
      The Biography Channel
      Crime & Investigation Network
      The History Channel
      The History Channel en Español
      History Channel International
      Lifetime
      Military History Channel
      Bravo
      Chiller (horror-themed cable channel, launched March 1, 2007) [1]
      CNBC
      CNBC World
      MSNBC (co-owned with Microsoft)
      mun2
      SyFy
      ShopNBC
      Sleuth
      USA Network
      Universal HD
      Weather Channel Companies – with private equity firms Bain Capital and the Blackstone Group
      The Weather Channel
      Weatherscan
      The Weather Channel Interactive
      weather.com
      The Weather Channel Mobile
      The Weather Channel Desktop
      Weather Services International


      Report Comment

      • Cataclysmic Cataclysmic

        cont..
        Comcast Sports Group
        NBCUniversal Global Networks
        NBCUniversal Global Networks
        LAPTV (Latin America) – co-owned with Paramount Pictures (Viacom), MGM and 20th Century Fox (News Corporation);
        Telecine (Brazil) – co-owned with Globosat Canais, Paramount Pictures, DreamWorks, MGM and 20th Century Fox;
        Universal Channel Latin America (except Brazil)
        Universal Channel Brazil (co-owned with Globosat Canais);
        Sci Fi Channel (Latin America)
        NBCUniversal Global Networks España.
        Telemundo
        KVEA/KWHY – Los Angeles
        WNJU – New York
        WSCV – Miami
        KTMD – Houston
        WSNS – Chicago
        KXTX – Dallas/Fort Worth
        KVDA – San Antonio
        KSTS – San Jose/San Francisco
        KTAZ – Phoenix
        KBLR – Las Vegas
        KNSO – Fresno
        KDEN – Longmont, Colorado
        WNEU – Boston/Merrimack
        KHRR – Tucson
        WKAQ – Puerto Rico (independent Spanish station)
        Universal Studios (co-owned with Comcast)
        Universal Pictures
        Focus Features
        Rogue
        Working Title Films
        Universal Studios Licensing
        Universal Animation Studios
        Universal Interactive
        Universal Pictures International
        Universal Studios Home Entertainment
        Universal Home Entertainment Productions
        United International Pictures (co-owned with Paramount Pictures/Viacom);
        Universal Operations Group
        Universal Production Studios
        Universal Parks & Resorts
        qubo – Qubo Venture,LLC¹
        ¹Minority interest
        ²Stations which LIN Television owns a minority interest (24%) in

        Be sure to notice GE's partners, Comcast, Hearst, ABC, Microsoft, Paramount, Viacom, Bain…


        Report Comment

  • Jebus Jebus

    atomic rod adams the nuclear mouthpiece

    Anyone care to b***h slapp this blind nucleocratic tool with the facts?

    He says:

    Arnie Gundersen Caught on Video Lying About Risk of Radiation Released During Fukushima Event

    Arnie Gundersen, the sole engineer of Fairewinds Associates, continues to tell lies about the radiation released from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plants. He also continues to lie about the potential effects and seeks to spread fear and uncertainty where neither one are justified. He is a dangerous man on a mission to make money by harming the industry that once employed him – until he was fired for poor performance of his assigned duties.

    http://atomicinsights.com/2012/07/arnie-gundersen-caught-on-video-lying-about-risk-of-radiation-released-during-fukushima-event.html


    Report Comment

  • Sickputer

    Rod is just jealous of Arnie's expertise. And angry because his little dream of getting rich building small reactors never got any interest.

    We all know how he would fare in an open discussion on TV with Arnie… Rod would be exposed as the liar and an ass to boot.

    Get over yourself Rod, you've got nothing they want to hear at CNN. You should have stayed in the Navy a few more decades. Life underwater is exsctly where you fit in best…with a bunch of manly men.


    Report Comment

  • Jebus Jebus

    Lol, thats what I'm talkin about. Das Boot! Gives new meaning to his name. I bet he enjoyed "collecting the garbage" on that big deep diving submarine.

    I always wonder about the ones who back up their words with "check my resume listed, it proves I know what I'm talking about"

    And I apologize for giving a tiny little man riding on a tiny little reactor any more exposure than his tiny little blog gives him…


    Report Comment

  • :( Nature.com lies!!!

    [[ "Fukushima has stopped releasing radioisotopes into the air, and radioactivity in the sea seems to have dispersed with little effect." - author Brumfiel ]]

    Nature – Fukushima's legacy of fear
    written March 2012
    http://www.nature.com/news/japan-s-nuclear-crisis-fukushima-s-legacy-of-fear-1.10183#comments

    My comment:
    "2013-01-19 10:50 AM
    #53982
    ChasAha said:

    This is about as inaccurate as it gets. Obviously the author is not researching the reports from TEPCO or anywhere else for that matter. IMO – this is an outright lie!

    Dis or Mis information stated is bordering on criminal, as many could suffer as a result of this horrible inaccuracy."
    _______

    My biggest fear is that misinformation, such as this clown is spewing, will cause harm. It goes beyond negligent.

    Note: My observation. The FEAR factor, radiophobia, seems to be a media push over the last several weeks.

    IMO – If meltdowns did nothing more than cause mass psychological damage, then that itself is too much. A broken windmill has never caused mental stress to an entire population.

    Also: His latest piece of rhetoric:
    Read or please leave a comment there:
    Title – Fukushima: Fallout of fear
    written 16 January 2013

    "After the Fukushima nuclear disaster, Japan kept people safe from the physical effects of radiation — but not from the psychological impacts." – author Geoff Brumfiel

    http://www.nature.com/news/fukushima-fallout-of-fear-1.12194


    Report Comment

  • Jebus Jebus

    DR. FORREST J. REMICK

    Rinse, repeat, rinse, repeat…
    False claims alert…
    Is this the path you will choose, Gregory Jaczko?
    Or will it be the path less travelled?

    Nuclear energy opponents use scare tactics

    The storage of used fuel at Limerick is another Cuthbert fear-mongering tool. The pools are safe by strict NRC standards. We saw at Fukushima that even a huge earthquake and tsunami did not result in fuel overheating in the pools.

    DR. FORREST J. REMICK
    State College

    http://www.pottsmerc.com/article/20130211/OPINION02/130219986/nuclear-energy-opponents-use-scare-tactics


    Report Comment

    • Jebus Jebus

      DR. FORREST J. REMICK

      Forrest Remick is a Senior Nuclear Safety Consultant to Talisman. He completed a five-year term as a Commissioner of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) on June 30, 1994 and is now a private consultant to various government, industry and university clients.
      When appointed to the Commission by President Bush, Dr. Remick was Associate Vice President for Research and Professor of Nuclear Engineering at The Pennsylvania State University. He was also serving as Chairman of the NRC's independent statutory Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards. During his tenure as a Commissioner of the NRC, the relicensing rule was written and adopted. Dr. Remick was intimately involved in the development of the rule and was instrumental in resolving differences between the NRC staff and the nuclear power industry. At his request, a series of meetings were held between the staff and representatives of the industry to rewrite certain provisions in the final rule to make it acceptable to both parties.

      http://www.talisman-intl.com/bio.php?username=fremick


      Report Comment

      • Jebus Jebus

        More false claims from 2010…

        Who's spreading false facts?

        DR. FORREST J. REMICK

        Nuclear energy opponents spread fear and disinformation

        The size of the equipment in such a plant including how nuclear plants are generally similar to other steam-electric plants except: (1) that the source of energy necessary for the process comes from the fissioning of uranium in contrast to the combustion of coal, oil, or natural gas; and, (2) that there are no unmonitored or polluting gases, particulates or other material released to the atmosphere.

        That all steam-electric plants require cooling, mostly by the use of water; that not only nuclear plants use cooling towers; that cooling towers are used to reduce the amount of heat discharged to nearby streams for environmental protection reasons; and, that the discharge from the cooling towers is water vapor containing no pollutants.

        http://paenergyalliance.com/913


        Report Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.