FORUM: Post Your Radiation Monitoring Data Here

Published: December 4th, 2012 at 12:00 am ET
By
Email Article Email Article
3,272 comments


Previous radiation monitoring thread here: http://enenews.com/forum-post-radiation-monitoring-data-dec-17-2011-present

Published: December 4th, 2012 at 12:00 am ET
By
Email Article Email Article
3,272 comments

Related Posts

  1. FORUM: Effects of low level radiation September 1, 2012
  2. FORUM: Methods for combating radiation and its effects September 1, 2012
  3. FORUM: What should be done about Japan burning radioactive debris? September 1, 2012
  4. FORUM: Fukushima Webcam Discussion Thread February 5, 2013
  5. FORUM: Possible Fukushima-related Anomalies — Deformations, Yellow Rain, Metallic Taste in Mouth, etc. September 1, 2012

3,272 comments to FORUM: Post Your Radiation Monitoring Data Here

  • mungo mungo

    i mean off the south east coast of japan….


    Report Comment

  • arclight arclight

    london and uk radiatio reading update..

    well it was really smeggie (tech term) up till last night when the high rises to 0.20 and most of the 0.42 mcSv/h peaks have eased up..

    the winds turned around and came from the north then the radiation readings lowered.. hope it stays that way

    average in the uk now a more respectable 0.12 mcSv/h

    for the last couple of days prior to the drop the average was over 0.14 mcSv/h

    it may drop more if we dont get anymore downwind pukings!

    fingers crossed and will keep you posted!

    my cough cleared up largely today!!?? do i need a gieger counter to find this stuff? ;/


    Report Comment

  • anne anne

    Longmont, CO
    204 CPM, 1.6565 uSv/h, 1.2523 AVG uSv/h, 4 time(s) over natural radiation
    11:49 AM – 11 May 12
    https://twitter.com/LongmontRadMon

    Induction Magnetometer, Gakona, AK
    http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/cgi-bin/scmag/disp-scmag.cgi?date=latest&Bx=on
    HAARP Fluxgate Magnetometer
    http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/cgi-bin/magnetometer/gak-mag.cgi


    Report Comment

    • arclight arclight

      @ anne

      did you get the information about the type of isotope test that is being done on this monitor station?


      Report Comment

      • anne anne

        arclight. I don't know what he is reading. Here is part of his explanation. There is more at the link below:

        “… CPM varies by detector and as such is not a reliable measurement. The "times over natural radiation" figure is not (in a practical sense) that important because of the small scale we're dealing with (e.g. 4 x 0.23 is still a small number especially since we're measuring in Microsieverts (vs Milisieverts or even Sieverts). The key number on this page is the Microsievert (μSv) number. 100 μSv is equivalent to a chest x-ray. Natural background radiation is 0.23 μSv/h. This monitor reads on average about 0.69 μSv/h. So about once a week you get a chest x-ray's worth of radiation….”
        http://radmon.stan4d.net/


        Report Comment

  • andii

    1) Koriyama-city, Fukushima
    The sign says:
    Before 1.27 mcSv/h
    After 0.21 mcSv/h
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MXLNcrEZerw
    Did they really clean the area!?

    2) Onomachi, Fukushima
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3RYn_l4pczc
    It doesn't seem to change from 0.177 mcSv/h
    How much can we trust the monitoring posts data?


    Report Comment

  • aigeezer aigeezer

    Does everyone know about "safecast"? I haven't seen it mentioned here for months and I had forgotten all about it.

    Tim at the radiation network reminded me of it. As you may know, the radiation network has few volunteer stations in Japan (so far) so Tim recommends that people also go to safecast for more detailed information about the Japanese situation.

    http://blog.safecast.org/maps/

    http://radiationnetwork.com/


    Report Comment

  • richard richard

    Sydney, the last few mornings, the bedroom reading has settled back to 0.16 μSv/h to 0.18 μSv/h.

    This is after the high of 0.20 μSv/h and above several days ago, coincedently during the recent lunar maximus perigee :)


    Report Comment

  • arclight arclight

    multiple reactor releases in europe!!

    london radiation reading

    this morning i woke up to a steady climb to 0.33 mcSv/h and then a slow drop back to 0.14 mcSv/h

    european radiation reading

    la hague, penly, turkey (lots of +0.30 mcSv/h there), greece an hour long spike to 1.4 mcSv/h, budapest again (a really bed week), spain, italy, slovenia, finland and germany is completely unscathed??

    @bnb, i know why they were switched off now!! and eurdeps back on!


    Report Comment

  • Sickputer

    Arc:

    The Northern Hemisphere westerlies in the horse latitudes bring you Daiichi May Day emission greetings!

    Slow, but sure the little nasties make their way around the globe and where there is rain they drop some of their load. We all get a piece of Japan's troubles.


    Report Comment

    • arclight arclight

      an incident report from the sellafield news that has no date

      mostly getting 0.21 mcSv/h average around london this morning… wind from sellafield… went into a couple of hospitals and the average dropped to 0.12 mcSv/h but with slot of spikes, the highest of which in the hospital was 0.54 mcSv/h

      outside high spike was 0.64 mcSv/h

      in west london the highest spike was 0.50 mcSv/h with and average of about 0.13 mcSv/h with short rises (10 or 15 minutes long) to 0.18 mcSv/h.. big difference in air quality as i moved to inner and outer london!

      "In order to carry out the tie in to a redundant plant, the existing ventilation system was shut down and isolated to enable new sections of ducting to be installed. During the outage, activity in air monitors sounded in the facility and the contingency plan was implemented. During operation of the contingency plan a small section of flexible ducting failed, leading to the discharge of filtered air. The system was isolated and work was successfully completed within 24 hours to restore the plant back to normal operations. No radiological contamination was detected as a result of the event

      ………cont


      Report Comment

      • arclight arclight

        "……….As a result of the failure, filtered air was briefly discharged from an unauthorised discharge point, which is a potential breach of a condition of an environmental permit. A full investigation is currently underway to confirm the extent of any potential discharge. However, the consequences of any discharge over the five minute period are believed to be negligible based upon sample data collected. The Environment Agency was informed immediately."

        http://www.sellafieldsites.com/newsletter/edition/469/user/archive


        Report Comment

        • arclight arclight

          got the date

          14 March 2012 ISSUE No. 1195

          heres the latest!! 02 may 2012

          "..During a proactive inspection of a legacy compound on the Sellafield site some activity was detected in redundant equipment. This is to be expected when pro-active inspections of historic facilities take place.

          The equipment in question comprised three half inch pipes with open ends through which radioactive material has leaked sometime in the past. The pipes have been redundant for many years and the activity detected is historic in nature, with no evidence of any ongoing leak.

          The pipes have been temporarily secured as a short term measure pending permanent capping/removal.

          The spillage assessment initially indicates the activity from the pipes is approximately 40% of what is classified as ‘significant’ in schedule 8 of the Ionising Radiation Regulations 1999.

          Soil samples have been taken and analysis is underway to determine how much activity has migrated into the soil.

          There is no risk to the workforce, general public or external environment from the discovery…"

          http://www.sellafieldsites.com/newsletter/edition/474/user/archive

          nothing about the present releases though??


          Report Comment

    • arclight arclight

      weve had very high pulses of low level winds, it has been raining over the last 2 days on and off.. the readings dont change when it rains.. in fact i got a slight drop in readings this morning during a rain shower.. this leads me to believe that the low level winds are bringing heavy contamination and the fukushima signature is swamped by the surrounding nuclear reactors! i will keep an eye on north norway to see any usa, canada or japanese fallout as the wind is coming direct from the polar regions via sellafield to london.. though the over averaging of software in norway will generally hide any peaks or rises that would highlight such contamination.. april is traditionally the time of year as the ice melts, that the radiation levels rise (it was early last year…) in norway, probaly from the european reactors largely i am beginning to suspect.. the usa can send readable amounts of radiation too! i suspect that most of the waste burning is being deposited mostly at the first large mountain ranges that the fallout reaches.. criirad said we get 10 percent of what the usa gets in thier april 2011 statement about pregnant women and children :(

      i hope to get some feedback from other uk giegers on this to support my theory of local reactors or disprove.. will get back on that!

      70 000 000 people and hardly any gieger counters.. even the anti nukers havent bothered largely!! how stupid is that! the biggest weapon in an anti nukes arsenal, positively gandhian too!! :)


      Report Comment

  • dunkelmann

    About 50% increased levels (43cpm) starting last night, now slowly

    declining back to normal (26cpm) here in Bavaria, Germany.

    See logged data graph:

    Yesterday:
    http://www.radiation-logger.net/logging/130512.png

    Today:
    http://www.radiation-logger.net/logging/140512.png


    Report Comment

  • anne anne

    Longmont, CO

    228 CPM, 1.8514 uSv/h, 1.3616 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
    5:21 PM – 14 May 12

    186 CPM, 1.5103 uSv/h, 1.1346 AVG uSv/h, 4 time(s) over natural radiation
    4:31 PM – 14 May 12

    9696 CPM, 0.7795 uSv/h, 0.7413 AVG uSv/h, 2 time(s) over natural radiation
    1:48 PM – 14 May 12
    https://twitter.com/LongmontRadMon

    http://sid.stanford.edu/database-browser/


    Report Comment

  • A few .29 spikes but basic .11µSv/hr outside, .08 indoors, wooden framed structure on third floor 20 min count outside and inside both counts, today May 14 in Vancouver, BC


    Report Comment

  • arclight arclight

    eurdep update and uk radiation warning 15 may 2012 Part 1/2

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xhtsHcwO1aY

    eurdep update and uk radiation warning 15 may 2012 Part 2/2

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=adMJX_hMJks


    Report Comment

    • Interesting ZOOM IN at .19 sec. above the reactor in Bordeaux France.

      I also noticed the fields surrounding the plant. hmmm…?


      Report Comment

      • arclight arclight

        in fact if you look at the river side all the way out the estuary the fields look pretty manky… go up stream and you see patches of beautiful lush green fields alongside the sediment carrying river.. the land degradation seems to begin after Blaye moving down the estuary.. think that food goes to the tourists maybe? non? :(

        off to post some incriminating evidence against UK NUKE PUKE! ;)
        will post when done! ;)


        Report Comment

        • arclight arclight

          oh yea! chasha

          best to bring vitamin supplements if you are coming to the 2012 pfizer (sorry about bopal) olympics.. i am currently developing an olympic supplementary zinc,vitamin c and apple pectin concuction of my own making (an ardous and expensive process)

          i think i am going to make a killing selling them at the olympics!! and wasnt there a radioactive protective yak blanket too!!

          seriously, i am a capitalist!! LET THE GOOD TIMES ROLE!! LOL! ;)

          now im off to zerohedge to let the lads know about this sure fire investment!! ;)


          Report Comment

  • arclight arclight

    UK Emergency Alert – Nuclear Attack

    the err bbc and err home office

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5U6TOo7NzkQ&feature=related


    Report Comment

  • arclight arclight

    london radiation reading 17 may 2012

    this morning before 6 oclock i was getting lots of peaks to 0.33 mcSv/h

    they generally stopped after 07.00 hrs gmt and the range after was 0.08 to 0.15 mcSv/h. cold clean winds!! hmmm!

    will post later for an evening update.. i think… it has stopped!!

    winds from france.. there is a reactor about to let off there soon! :(


    Report Comment

  • anne anne

    Longmont, CO, 9:45 AM – 9:04 PM 17 May 2012
    186 CPM, 1.5103 uSv/h, 1.2271 AVG uSv/h, 4 time(s) over natural radiation
    9:04 PM – 17 May 12

    198 CPM, 1.6078 uSv/h, 1.4005 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
    8:44 PM – 17 May 12

    204 CPM, 1.6565 uSv/h, 1.6540 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
    8:04 PM – 17 May 12

    234 CPM, 1.9001 uSv/h, 1.6516 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
    7:54 PM – 17 May 12

    192 CPM, 1.5590 uSv/h, 1.4032 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
    7:44 PM – 17 May 12

    216 CPM, 1.7539 uSv/h, 1.3740 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
    7:24 PM – 17 May 12

    210 CPM, 1.7052 uSv/h, 1.5702 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
    6:44 PM – 17 May 12

    198 CPM, 1.6078 uSv/h, 1.4351 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
    6:34 PM – 17 May 12

    186 CPM, 1.5103 uSv/h, 1.2582 AVG uSv/h, 4 time(s) over natural radiation
    6:14 PM – 17 May 12

    252 CPM, 2.0462 uSv/h, 1.5249 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
    5:54 PM – 17 May 12

    216 CPM, 1.7539 uSv/h, 1.1790 AVG uSv/h, 4 time(s) over natural radiation
    5:34 PM – 17 May 12

    204 CPM, 1.6565 uSv/h, 1.2753 AVG uSv/h, 4 time(s) over natural radiation
    4:54 PM – 17 May 12

    222 CPM, 1.8026 uSv/h, 1.2981 AVG uSv/h, 4 time(s) over natural radiation
    4:04 PM – 17 May 1

    192 CPM, 1.5590 uSv/h, 1.3520 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
    2:44 PM – 17 May 12

    234 CPM, 1.9001 uSv/h, 1.1449 AVG uSv/h, 4 time(s) over natural radiation
    2:34…


    Report Comment

  • Sam

    200CPM ==14.6millisiervert per year = real risk of cancer if exposed to this level for a year.
    (from NukePro; Geirger counter interpretation simplified)

    What adjective do you want to put on this high count today?

    High amounts of radioactive emissions from Fukushima ongoing!

    We need to know what is exactly, precisely, definitively going on there NOW AND IN THE PAST
    TWO WEEKS.

    All we know it that there has been massive steam emissions from the coriums,
    Flashes of light and red glows ——neutron show ongoing re-criticality?
    what is burning?

    Still too many unknowns

    How much now are we being bathed by this. (invisible radioactive slime..)


    Report Comment

    • Yes I am with you totally Sam

      If this continues we are going to have more than cancer and respiratory illness spikes, especially as the contamination bio-accumulates in our food and water.

      I am truly afraid that we will actually start having more than sub-acute symptoms if this continues unabated.

      Already that is happening in Japan.

      It will happen up and down the west coast and west of the Rockies if something doesn't change.

      I am unable to wake my academic colleagues up.

      It is like they are sleep walking–awake but not awake.

      The intelligentsia is mostly useless

      The problem is the government will not respond to (relatively) small groups of aware people like us here at Enenews

      I see some stirrings in the media but the public is too transfixed by other matters…


      Report Comment

  • anne anne

    Longmont, CO 9:44 PM May 17 – 1:54 AM May18, 2012
    294 CPM, 2.3873 uSv/h, 1.8738 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
    1:54 AM – 18 May 12

    234 CPM, 1.9001 uSv/h, 1.5515 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
    1:34 AM – 18 May 12

    186 CPM, 1.5103 uSv/h, 1.4801 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
    1:14 AM – 18 May 12

    264 CPM, 2.1437 uSv/h, 1.7303 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
    12:54 AM – 18 May 12

    222 CPM, 1.8026 uSv/h, 1.5621 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
    12:34 AM – 18 May 12

    186 CPM, 1.5103 uSv/h, 1.5225 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
    12:14 AM – 18 May 12

    234 CPM, 1.9001 uSv/h, 1.5346 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
    12:04 AM – 18 May 12

    192 CPM, 1.5590 uSv/h, 1.1692 AVG uSv/h, 4 time(s) over natural radiation
    11:54 PM – 17 May 12

    216 CPM, 1.7539 uSv/h, 1.5090 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
    11:14 PM – 17 May 12

    192 CPM, 1.5590 uSv/h, 1.2641 AVG uSv/h, 4 time(s) over natural radiation
    11:04 PM – 17 May 12

    234 CPM, 1.9001 uSv/h, 1.8317 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
    10:04 PM – 17 May 1

    252 CPM, 2.0462 uSv/h, 1.7633 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
    9:54 PM – 17 May 12

    252 CPM, 2.0462 uSv/h, 1.7633 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
    9:54 PM – 17 May 12

    216 CPM, 1.7539 uSv/h, 1.4804 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
    9:44 PM – 17 May 12
    https://twitter.com/#!/LongmontRadMon\


    Report Comment

  • anne anne

    Longmont, CO 3:34 AM – 10:36 PM 18 May 2012
    270 CPM, 2.1924 uSv/h, 1.6083 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
    10:36 PM – 18 May 1

    186 CPM, 1.5103 uSv/h, 1.4638 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
    10:16 PM – 18 May 12

    216 CPM, 1.7539 uSv/h, 1.4173 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
    10:06 PM – 18 May 12

    246 CPM, 1.9975 uSv/h, 1.7653 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
    7:06 PM – 18 May 12

    294 CPM, 2.3873 uSv/h, 1.7508 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
    6:46 PM – 18 May 12

    222 CPM, 1.8026 uSv/h, 1.4855 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
    6:16 PM – 18 May 12

    186 CPM, 1.5103 uSv/h, 1.3075 AVG uSv/h, 4 time(s) over natural radiation
    5:36 PM – 18 May 12

    210 CPM, 1.7052 uSv/h, 1.4921 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
    4:36 PM – 18 May 12

    234 CPM, 1.9001 uSv/h, 1.4862 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
    4:16 PM – 18 May 12

    228 CPM, 1.8514 uSv/h, 1.4691 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
    3:26 PM – 18 May 12

    240 CPM, 1.9488 uSv/h, 1.4839 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
    2:46 PM – 18 May 12

    222 CPM, 1.8026 uSv/h, 1.5743 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
    2:05 PM – 18 May 12

    186 CPM, 1.5103 uSv/h, 1.3459 AVG uSv/h, 4 time(s) over natural radiation
    1:55 PM – 18 May 12

    186 CPM, 1.5103 uSv/h, 1.2913 AVG uSv/h, 4 time(s) over natural radiation
    1:35 PM – 18 May 12

    204 CPM, 1.6565 uSv/h, 1.4162 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
    12:55…


    Report Comment

    • anne anne

      12:55 PM – 18 May 12

      216 CPM, 1.7539 uSv/h, 1.5565 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
      10:45 AM – 18 May 12

      240 CPM, 1.9488 uSv/h, 1.3541 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
      10:25 AM – 18 May 12

      222 CPM, 1.8026 uSv/h, 1.3876 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
      8:05 AM – 18 May 12

      192 CPM, 1.5590 uSv/h, 1.0645 AVG uSv/h, 3 time(s) over natural radiation
      7:35 AM – 18 May 12

      186 CPM, 1.5103 uSv/h, 1.6908 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
      6:25 AM – 18 May 12

      330 CPM, 2.6796 uSv/h, 1.8713 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
      6:15 AM – 18 May 12

      204 CPM, 1.6565 uSv/h, 1.4926 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
      5:55 AM – 18 May 12

      210 CPM, 1.7052 uSv/h, 1.3419 AVG uSv/h, 4 time(s) over natural radiation
      5:35 AM – 18 May 12
      246 CPM, 1.9975 uSv/h, 1.5295 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
      4:44 AM – 18 May 12

      276 CPM, 2.2411 uSv/h, 1.9295 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
      3:54 AM – 18 May 12

      288 CPM, 2.3386 uSv/h, 1.7741 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
      3:34 AM – 18 May 12

      192 CPM, 1.5590 uSv/h, 1.3182 AVG uSv/h, 4 time(s) over natural radiation
      2:24 AM – 18 May 12
      https://twitter.com/#!/LongmontRadMon


      Report Comment

  • arclight arclight

    good morning all
    uk own goal here!
    london radiation from dounray/sellafield via norway 20 may 2012 10.00 hrs gmt

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LxQYyoDcLz8

    iceland, norway, greenland, usa, southern spain, france, northern africa and if you follow the wind chart, finally south america.. oh and the norway circulatory pattern brings some of the dounray stuff back to … london, france and northern spain…

    hows that for sharing?


    Report Comment

    • Heart of the Rose Heart of the Rose

      Good morning..arclight..thanks for this..and the excellent music as always.


      Report Comment

      • arclight arclight

        hi heart and mungo

        just a quick update to let you know that the average in west london is hovering between 0,13 and 0.15 mcSv/h at 20.00 hrs gmt

        :( the peaks have eased off will check in later with a wind direction update

        also, a bit of hearsay from the medical community in macedonia..

        1 in 3 people are likely to develop a cancer

        from chernobyl or…

        A New Chernobyl in the Balkans

        By Natasha Dokovska

        SKOPJE, Macedonia, April 13, 1999 (ENS) – Macedonian environmentalists are reacting with horror against the bombing in Yugoslavia, particularly after reports from Greek researcher, Professor Zeferos who said that bombing in Yugoslavia is a great environmental catastrophe for the entire Balkan region. The Macedonian environmental movement is asking the Macedonian government to react against the NATO bombing of Yugoslavia and help the whole world.

        Professor Zeferos, an environmental chemist from the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, says that the first three days of bombing above Yugoslavia released a large amount of hazardous, toxic, carcinogenic and radioactive substances.

        The biggest fear of possible bombing of power plants by NATO forces, because the public's risk of inhaling highly contaminated air would then be very high……"

        http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/apr1999/1999-04-13-01.asp

        depleted uranium and chernobyl perhaps..

        a tipping point??

        the 1 in 3 figure has been covered up by the medical authorities


        Report Comment

        • BreadAndButter BreadAndButter

          I'm getting depressed now. I mean, seriouslay depressed. Depressingly depressed.
          Off to bed, dreaming of brighter days.

          *peace all.


          Report Comment

          • arclight arclight

            take care bnb and sleep well… dont let em get u down dear.. your very much needed! ;)


            Report Comment

          • richard richard

            @B&B – it's not easy, i'd agree. i find i'm a little to quick at getting angry. there's is a lot of injustice going down, as well as all the unheralded destruction.

            so i'm not going to provide much in the way of words of solace. you know i'd be lying.

            the thing is, you are not alone, and i hope that helps. many of us are looking out, seeing what can be done. if it reaches the threshold of no return, then i'll be saying so and quitting my job. but it hasn't got there yet.

            i have an email address for initiating private messages, you can write to richard 2012 at hush mail . com (without any of the spaces). i'd like to hear your thoughts, without having to clutter the space here.


            Report Comment

        • arclight arclight

          these figures are interesting..

          breast cancer stats by country..

          all in the northern hemishere except new zealand (pacific testing? australian mining emmissions..)

          iceland is interesting as it gets hit from europe, russia and the usa… i showed the switch offs and the odd high reading in iceland in my earlier videos

          http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/hea_bre_can_inc-health-breast-cancer-incidence


          Report Comment

          • arclight arclight

            had to mention hungary …

            number 7 on the list… and CRIIRAD has a report on severe land contamination???

            the IAEAS very own isotope profit making machine causing more cancers than they are curing??

            just saying

            whaddya think?


            Report Comment

            • arclight arclight

              hungary and macedonia are not far apart as the wind blows ??

              tipping point indeed
              :(


              Report Comment

              • arclight arclight

                somebody has been checking my emails again… just thought i would note it here..

                think it might be a private concern as the police said that they would not investigate any hacks on my account..
                the phone appears to have reconnected to the system and now most of my emials are being checked…

                heads up bamm bamm! (u know who u are)
                back to you tube methinks… :)


                Report Comment

  • mungo mungo

    arclight, i think it is a case of oversharing!


    Report Comment

  • Travels FL-OR. SOEKS 1-meter height gamma, five-reading averages.

    Monday, May 14
    Palatka, FL .10 mcSv.
    Lake City, FL .13
    Tifton, GA .18
    Macon, GA .14
    Atlanta, GA .20
    Chattanooga, TN .14
    Nashville, TN .14
    Paducah, KY .10

    Tuesday, May 15
    St. Louis, MO .13
    Columbia, MO .12
    Kansas City, MO .17
    Falls City, NE .11 (significant flood damage at river crossing here. No sign of a bump from Ft. Calhoun)
    Lincoln, NE .19
    Grand Island, NE .15

    Wednesday, May 16
    North Platte, NE .20
    Kimball, NE .24 (altitude a factor? Summit is almost 9,000 feet)
    Cheyenne, WY .22
    Rawlins, WY .22
    Rock Springs, WY .18
    Evanston, WY .19

    Thursday, May 17
    Ogden, UT .12
    Burley, ID .18
    Twin Falls, ID .17
    Mountain Home, ID .21
    Boise, ID .15
    Ontario, OR .21
    Burns, OR .15
    Bend, OR .11
    Cascade summit Hwy 20 .22
    Eugene, OR .16


    Report Comment

  • andii

    wow 9 mcSv/h in front of the Fukushima JR station.
    Business as usual and nobody is wearing a mask :O
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SrH2Ul4XE04


    Report Comment

  • arclight arclight

    heads up.. strong earthquake in northern italy in the Emilia-Romagna province and eurdep shows switch offs at 05.00 local time but not everywhere and not in the effected areas… will keep you posted on the situation

    13:17 05/20/2012
    ROM, 20 May (RIA Novosti).

    At least five people have come in on Saturday night during a violent earthquake in northern Italy killed. Among the victims of a German citizen who was staying for business reasons in the region.'s earthquakes of 5.9 had the strength of Emilia-Romagna region shaken. The television station Sky TG24 reported by at least 50 injured.

    http://de.rian.ru/society/20120520/263627872.html

    maybe a medical reactor or 2 at risk??


    Report Comment

  • doctorwhowhatwhere doctorwhowhatwhere

    Thank you, ai. I have a thought and I have a question. Now, you've been tied into frequent active monitoring much more than I have — I've been dealing much more with the statistical and the normative values side of things. But something I seem to be seeing when I have been able to monitor is a bigger distance between daily lows and highs. I could easily be wrong, as I haven't had that many days in which to monitor frequently, but on the days I have, I keep feeling as though the difference between high and low is greater. There have always been some stations that seemed that way, but it seems more widespread to me, and I'm wondering if you've noticed that, too, or if it's only in my own head. If so, maybe that's something we should be paying attention to — maybe it's not alert-level events (although I sadly suspect we'll see some of those at times) but high-fluctuation days that will indicate an uptick in Fukushima fumes.

    Also (and I can't believe I've never thought to ask this), are the daily averages at Radiation Network computed as an average of all the readings in the day, or just the average of the lowest reading and the highest reading?


    Report Comment

    • arclight arclight

      hi doc and wellcome

      the highs and lows you refer to are the range..

      these are not always shown on alot of public mapping but are on some..

      the key thing is the software that is used on the monitoring device and perhaps the settings..

      my sorks has a twenty second update whereas public monitoring might be 1 hour between readings to 15 minutes.. that sort of thing..

      also, the soeks will give the quick high peaks and these will be removed by monitoring staff claiming electrical or atmospheric issues (sometimes this could be true but at other times not

      as to the rad network i am unaware of the data point spacing's but believe they are updated fairly quickly.. though another poster from the usa might have a better angle on it..

      as to measurement of fukushima fallout… you may have some difficulty because of the hidden existing pollution from usa reactors/waste/medical/military to overcome.. the nuke companies like covering up one thing with another too!

      hope this helps


      Report Comment

      • doctorwhowhatwhere doctorwhowhatwhere

        Thanks, arclight! I'm hoping to drag aigeezer over for an answer, as he mentioned being in Radiation Network. Radiation Network updates every minute, which makes its data especially interesting to me.

        I always worry about "suspicious" highs being tossed by the wayside. A friend of mine who was a health physicist had that happen to his "inconvenient" readings at times, at a power plant on the US east coast.

        There's a tragic amount of hidden plant and facility pollution here. I had a project once of studying the frequency of cancers and autoimmune diseases around power plants and certain industries, and it was nearly always impossible to correlate the number of illnesses with the admitted pollution, but years later when more information got out the correlations were clear as crystal. And you hit it, covering up one thing with another.

        There's a little forest preserve in the suburban Chicago area, a peaceful, pretty place… except that unbeknownst to almost everyone who drifts through it's the site of the dismantled and buried remains of the first reactor, Chicago Pile-1. And we all know how well the government and the nuclear industry cleans up their messes….


        Report Comment

    • aigeezer aigeezer

      drw3, I'm too old to be doing quants reliably, but those are interesting questions. The best guy to ask is probably Tim at the radiation network. I won't post his email addy directly but if you click this link you can grab it:

      http://radiationnetwork.com/Message.htm

      I know Tim is planning some new features and your questions might come at a perfect time.

      Please share the answers here if you get 'em.

      One of the reports you can get for each station is a minute by minute spreadsheet of raw data, including an average calculated from the time of startup. It bounces around a lot at first, but then tends to settle into a very solid "background level" for a given (fixed location) station. I believe Tim is thinking of offering additional variations of that kind of data because of questions like yours.


      Report Comment

      • doctorwhowhatwhere doctorwhowhatwhere

        ai, thanks so much. I'll get in touch with Tim and pester him. We're just in such new territory these days, and I keep looking for patterns that may or may not be there. Also I'm doing weather map overlays on top of readings and looking for patterns there. Patterns seem to be a knack of mine, and have gotten me in trouble more than once, haha.


        Report Comment

        • aigeezer aigeezer

          Yup. You could have a lot of fun with Matlab or SPSS or a neural network and some of the raw data from the radiation network. I'm almost tempted to un-retire. Almost.

          Weather, yes! Some people here speculate about unannounced nuke plant "ventings" too. I wish the network was not so sparse.

          Nicholas Taleb scorns those of us who overdo causality/patterns. He's got a point – gotta find a balance.


          Report Comment

          • doctorwhowhatwhere doctorwhowhatwhere

            I think I've un-retired every year for the last ten years.

            I always laugh a little about Taleb's disdain for patterns. He's not so embracing of randomness when it comes to things like book tours and lecture schedules, haha.

            Unannounced ventings are a hard, cold, especially irritating fact… unless by "announced" the nuclear power companies mean "post-" as well as "pre-." Exelon in Illinois is a major offender, as is the Palisades NPP just NE of me, in Michigan. They get me roiled fairly regularly. But what's a little tritium among friends, eh?


            Report Comment

  • richard richard

    Sydney Australia, Monday morning,

    My dosimeter was reading 0.13 uSv/h in the bedroom last night.. that's the lowest reading I've had (it has exceeded 0.20 uSv/h), it was back to 0.15 uSv/h this morning.

    Outdoors, I've seen a low of 0.08 uSv/h recently.

    Inside (State) Parliament house last Friday, that was at 0.11 uSv/h.


    Report Comment

  • mungo mungo

    Simplyinfo… no monitoring here for 3 days, geiger reading has frozen….
    http://houseoffoust.com/group/?cat=33


    Report Comment

  • Tested: S. Korean Kelp 202% above normal.
    86.8 cpm (background 42.9)

    Here is what's really interesting. This kelp was harvested Pre-Fuku. Uh oh!

    See EnviroReporter article, credit Michael Collins
    http://www.enviroreporter.com/2011/07/eat-me/#comment-132759


    Report Comment

    • WildTurnip WildTurnip

      It said the kelp was dried.

      I observed that in the foods I have tested (results in this forum), any foods I have dehydrated (from my garden or store bought), have CPMs much higher than the original food. Pre-Fukushima items included.


      Report Comment

  • HamburgGeiger

    Hi,

    Hamburg, Germany, here. I measured some special though not worrying values in the last hours. Just for the record.

    Normally I measure around 22 cpm with my one geiger and around 12 cpm with the other one. (Nobody knows which is correct, so I note both.) Since yesterday afternoon it is more like 24 or 25 and 14 or 15 cpm, and rising. Last hour was 25 and 18. That is not normal. I measure since october, and this is special though not disturbing high. I see it as an indication that something is going on above/around us. Maybe SFP 4 stopping by? Just wanted to let you know, especially arclight.


    Report Comment

    • arclight arclight

      hi hamburg

      nuke uk is running out of money

      they cant afford glasification imo

      so ….. heads up !!

      sizewell is at it too!!

      kraftwerk radioactivity live at the stop sellafield concert

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OW3ZUqLFT5o

      a pre olympic clearout of the decommissioning process.. burn baby burn and share :(

      see above for info on greaves nuke puke too! :(


      Report Comment

    • arclight arclight

      @ hamburg
      did you get my message about the gieger? you need to take it back to the manufacturer.. they have replaced others too.. other gieger users were able to compare that model with one they had and the replaced gieger worked properly

      looks like it was a design fault..
      peace


      Report Comment

      • arclight arclight

        oh and the olympic thing?

        the uk will be fined if it exceeds the pollution levels (its nearly or it is there …) by the olympic authorities (pfizer i think ;) )

        maybe they are going for the big

        get it out of the way now! procedure??

        gieger on!! ;)


        Report Comment

        • arclight arclight

          get it out of the way now! procedure??

          the links on my latest blockbuster below in the deascriptions to the evidence that sellafield has a deadline by the end of the year to begin reducing the emmissions from decommisioning etc..

          so its actually catch up!!
          :(


          Report Comment

      • HamburgGeiger

        Hi arclight,

        yes, I got that message. But I don`t know if I want to send it back to the manufacturer. What if it is correct and the newer geigers are wrong (maybe intentionally)?

        I have three more new gamma scouts here and two more soeks, so one more measuring the same is not that valueable for me. For now I prefer to use it right or wrong as it is and have another "opinion" on what is going on.

        Perhaps the old one is correct. Then I am happy to own it. And it measured spikes that correspond to observations I made on my body, like coughing, etc. while the newer geigers always show more or less the same normal values.

        I think I`ll keep that old one for what it`s worth.


        Report Comment

  • dunkelmann

    @Hamburg:

    nothing special here today in Bavaria…

    see logged data at

    http://www.radiation-logger.net/logged_data/logged_data.php

    hafe fun!


    Report Comment

  • aigeezer aigeezer

    A rad station map of Australia is now available at the radiation network public site.

    http://www.radiationnetwork.com/Australia.htm


    Report Comment

  • vital1

    Australia,
    Queensland
    Caloundra
    23rd May 2012

    My background here is almost back to normal pre 3/11 levels. At the same time there have been reported peaks in the last 24 hours in the South Island New Zealand of .62 uSv/hr.

    The monitoring station I have set up on the east coast of Australia is posting daily averages and monthly average charts so you can see the
    historical trends.

    If a significant event happens I post the daily chart for that day. The daily chart is recording every 60 sec.

    http://sccc.org.au/archives/2630

    Daily and monthly trends for your local background radiation levels are a very important bits of information. Read the free Geiger Counter Use Guide on how to collect this information.

    http://technologypals.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Using-a-Geiger-Counter-to-test-food-for-Radioactive-Contamination.pdf

    Been so work busy at present I haven't been able to get all my food testing info together for posting it here. Have all the equipment set up and in a shielded testing chamber, calibrated. Some very interesting results. I should be working right now :)

    Spectrometising, would like to send you some samples for verification, could you give permission for Steven to send me your email address.


    Report Comment

    • Spectrometising

      Thanks Vital1. I have just sent two lots of samples to associates/friends in Japan in very tiny plastic medical test tubes used in medical pathology which also look nice.

      Each sample, Urananinite, Euxenite-(Y), Polycrase-(Y), antique Radium watch hand are in separate tubes and then the remainder of the tube is filled with epoxy resin for safe handling and so the materials are imobilised within safely. I can do this because the samples i purchased on Ebay are in vastly in excess of what is required for sensitive gamma spectrometry. 2cm rock samples. You should find the sample size ample.

      Particularly the radium embedded in a watch minute hand is surprisingly hot. The Zinc Sulphide that glows breaks down so the hands do not glow anymore, but the Radium is hot as it ever was. I actually merely handled one when i first got them, and my fingers became distinctly radioactive from the microscopic residue left on my fingers so now that the samples are encapsulated you will have no problem unless the tubes are smashed with a hammer or something equally unlikely.Hope you follow your own precautions and keep them away from living areas or outside in some lead shielding.

      Make sure you do your own safety checks before just adding water to any of my crude advices :-)

      Cool bananas.

      I will send this monday, with a tracking number. You will find them very/ultra handy for calibrating your new setup. :-)


      Report Comment

  • vital1

    It is good to see radiation network has a person posting for Australia as well. 50 CPM overnight or even 38 which now showing on the radiation network Sydney is high. I am averaging around 11 CPM where I am at present.


    Report Comment

    • aigeezer aigeezer

      The blurb about the station says:

      "This station operates the high count rate, pancake-tubed Inspector Geiger Counter, which is logistically set up indoors for the time being. The station is near sea level, so its average reading seems high at 50 CPM (as of 5/21/12). The station operator suggests there is a lot of stone around which may be slightly radioactive, and he will be trying out different locations."

      Growing pains, perhaps, re the highish readings.


      Report Comment

  • May 22, clean-bagged SOEKS 5-reading averages, near Eugene OR.

    Inside house, 1 meter height .17 mcSv, this is after running the HEPA filter overnight. Outside, light rain (heavy for an hour yesterday, 1M height, .14. On the ground (mowed grass), .14.

    On lettuce in organic permaculture garden, .26.

    Hmm.


    Report Comment

    • vital1

      risabee,

      "On lettuce in organic permaculture garden, .26"

      That is well above your background, I don't think it would be wise to eat it.


      Report Comment

    • arclight arclight

      thats alot of bequerels risabee

      checked local dairy products?

      is this from the rain?

      send it to antiproton on you tube or at least contact him for advice.. ie might be radon ? bag it and stick it in the freezer..

      let us know how it goes
      peace


      Report Comment

      • arclight arclight

        @risabee
        you can check the level everyday to see if it reduces..

        if not check once a week, iodine131 will drop on a weekly basis

        if not its probably cesium (from soil?)

        antiprotons might have a clever angle on it though


        Report Comment

    • Sam

      Any readings done from greenhouse grown produce?
      Seems most likely a cesium build up in the soil over the
      last year. Not too surprised nor shocked nor numbed.
      It is the new reality we have to deal with. Wonder what
      the readings are in the central valley of California that
      got hit hard. Especially Fresno, Bakersfield area.
      Perhaps UC DAvis has them but will not release data.
      Cannot harm corporate agriculture.

      What is our choice. We do need to eat. It is here
      and bio-accumulating. Time to do cell defense
      strategies and hope they work..


      Report Comment

  • arclight arclight

    london radiation from sellafield 22 may 2012 and audio of busby and parsons (extract)

    i have 2 theorieson why the lokdon solar monitors were switched off for a 10 months

    1 that the heavy cloud cover would have shown a weather effect on record
    remember the lenticulus clouds no one wanted to discuss that were seen all around the northern hemisphere?
    cover up
    2 that the 3 month life of iodine 131 meant that the solar monitors had to be switched off or they would show a strong gamma effect during the heavy cloud incident caused by the releases in daichi all of last year
    march daichi… 3months
    june..budapest institute 3 months
    sep…mercoule 3months
    jjan clear?

    remember also that the solar monitor switch off in late 2010 coincides with a rise i noticed in norway at the same time… hmmm?
    never did trace that reactor release!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w0TplDtRajc


    Report Comment

  • mungo mungo

    arclight, i noticed a lenticular cloud a few months ago, first one i have ever seen…i am in the uk


    Report Comment

    • arclight arclight

      @mungo
      a bit worrying if it was only a few months ago! the reported ones were in the late summer i believe..

      the idea is that the fast moving winds from the equator meet the slower winds from the north,,

      to get lenticular clouds both wind speeds have to be the same! so what happened?? and if it happened again.. why is it still happenning..

      more hidden weather effects

      did you catch the video at the start?

      kings college londons solar monitor graph was switched off for a whole year! the timimg is odd to say the least..

      anyone know if solar monitors are effected by gamma ionising radiation?? i think they are and that graph might be the smoking gun??

      looks like kings college is dishonest too!!
      :(
      i had high hopes with that discussion on effects of previously safe smaller particulates… i bet that will come to nothing, like the petitioner in the UN to give children human rights!
      and marco (gundies mate) goes with the old "certain size" only causing problems….

      its an uphill struggle sometimes! :(

      nice one obama… man of peace but hates "foreign" kids!!


      Report Comment

    • What-About-The-Kids

      We get lenticular clouds here from time to time in W. Washington, but they appear directly over our volcano, Mt. Rainier.

      Are yours forming over an area where there are volcanic vents, or other heat sources? (I need to read up on the dynamics of what forces are at play in forming such clouds.)


      Report Comment

  • WHAT IF local FALLOUT happened in your 'neck of the woods'?
    You might want to know your 'downwind' position.

    Nuclear Fallout Map
    Enter your USA zip code:
    http://www.nrdc.org/nuclear/fallout/

    :) Entering your zip will call up a more detailed display.


    Report Comment

  • Margot Margot

    hi! :)
    swiss update here,
    there is a beautiful night, stars above, mild spring wind, the smell of the grass and the water of the nearby lake and my Soeks shows the average of 0.15mcSv/h with the range 0.12mcSv/h-0.20mcSv/h.
    Ughh..!!
    Peace everyone :)


    Report Comment

  • arclight arclight

    repost

    ondon radiation sizewell alert 25 may 2012 03.00hrs gmt
    and some other stuff!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oICsJZxs0go


    Report Comment

  • Hawaii, 12400 clicks 8 hours, 25 click per minute, normal

    Check out normal on my easy to use chart.

    http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.com/2012/04/geiger-counter-interpretation.html


    Report Comment

  • Spectrometising

    Thought i would check the rain in this heavy downpour. I am using a gamma spectrometer and do real time monitoring regularly.

    I use it with a 170 kilos of lead. Sheeting of Lead flashing wrapped around 50mm copper pipe sitting on top of a hemisphere of lead giving 3 inches of lead in every direction around the detector except for the hole facing straight up which is fine left open as most of the gamma is coming from the ground and horizon.

    The water comes off the roof, and goes through a small tube into a plastic vessel in the test chamber with the detector in it. There is a second tube so the water can come out, and that way i get constantly refreshed water off the roof and can see the counts on a graph and the gamma spectrum .

    So far the activity is pretty low. Probably because the rain is so heavy and has already washed out most of the Radon or anything else.

    I am out in the far east of Melbourne.

    There were some higher readings earlier in the year. Mainly Radon around then.


    Report Comment

    • Spectrometising

      It is interesting to get readings this way because it allows me to see the general gamma spectrum which is usually that of Radon progeny. It also shows me the number of counts using bars which keep stacking up eventually showing highs and lows with respect to time.

      Mostly the readings are a little higher when the rain starts, but if Radon is present, the number of counts depends on constant fresh rain going through the little plastic vessel that the detector head sits on top of.

      If it stops raining, the remaining water in the vessel does not get changed and then the activity in the water rapidly diminishes due to the Radon i assume. Since the half life of its progeny is so short.


      Report Comment

  • Spectrometising

    Here is a picture of a 'flow cell' made from a small plastic jar. The lead shielding was about 50 mm wall thickness then
    https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=168857646557274&set=a.168852016557837.33308.100002991180317&type=3&theater

    https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=143436579099381&set=a.143435202432852.27391.100002991180317&type=3&theater

    The detectors are sitting on top of the lead shield as a display, but one is usually upside down in the hole of the Lead copper lined shield.

    All of that sits on a hospital patient lifter on castors which is so the Lead shield is easy to move and to be a frame for the netbook which i have since attached to the frame of the lifter.


    Report Comment

  • CB CB

    What happened to the misleading, deceitful, lying blasters, good for nothing terrorists news forum?
    Good News: Fukushima Radiation Should Not Cause a Rise in Cancer Cases
    http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2012/05/25/good-news-fukushima-radiation-should-not-cause-a-rise-in-cancer-cases/


    Report Comment

  • NoNukes NoNukes

    Was the potrblog "Maximum Alert" posted? I don't see it here, apologies if it this repost is a repeat.

    NoNukes
    May 24, 2012 at 9:16 pm · Reply
    What-About-The-Kids,

    Thanks for your posts. I am still working, so I don't know if you have seen that potrblog put out a "Maximum Alert."

    http://pissinontheroses.blogspot.com/

    This was posted because of Radiation Network's notice of an unusual, higher reading in Colorado.

    "Rattler operates the ultra-sensitive, pancake-tubed Inspector model which records normal background radiation at about 50 CPM (his elevation is 4,200 feet). So his average had moved up to about 60 CPM, or 20% higher, and for those who focus on spikes, you can see that one minute average in the mid 80's. Rattler was monitoring indoors at the time, with his Inspector near a window. I don't believe it was raining. After the elevated readings had subsided, he moved the Inspector outdoors for later in the day."

    http://radiationnetwork.com/Message.htm

    If you look at the Jet stream images on potrblog, it looks like it was going right by you in Washington on the way to Colorado, the timing of his increase would match your increase in symptoms.

    nuckelchen's videos also indicate activity:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ms5_JcfV6g0&feature=youtu.be


    Report Comment

  • Toramaru, Japan… The readings via Safecast are consistently over 100 cpm. Yet most all others show 50 to 60 cpm.

    Over time, over 100 cpm is NOT good.

    I believe this monitor is slightly south of Tokyo.

    Note: coastal cpm is usually about 20 cpm or less.

    Charts:
    http://scanningtheearth.org/?page_id=90
    (There is also a uSv chart)

    https://maps.google.com/maps?q=toramaru+japan+google+map&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-a&ie=UTF-8&ei=MMW_T6WzPKbi2AWx2fGZCg&oi=mode_link&cd=3&ved=0CE8Q_AUoAg


    Report Comment

  • anne anne

    Longmont, CO – May 25, 2012

    234 CPM, 1.9001 uSv/h, 1.7214 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
    8:29 PM – 25 May 12

    186 CPM, 1.5103 uSv/h, 1.5427 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
    8:19 PM – 25 May 12

    402 CPM, 3.2642 uSv/h, 2.1759 AVG uSv/h, 8 time(s) over natural radiation
    7:59 PM – 25 May 12

    228 CPM, 1.8514 uSv/h, 1.7852 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
    7:39 PM – 25 May 12

    318 CPM, 2.5822 uSv/h, 2.1226 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
    7:19 PM – 25 May 12

    216 CPM, 1.7539 uSv/h, 1.6629 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
    7:09 PM – 25 May 12

    258 CPM, 2.0950 uSv/h, 1.5720 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
    6:59 PM – 25 May 12

    252 CPM, 2.0462 uSv/h, 1.8056 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
    6:39 PM – 25 May 12

    228 CPM, 1.8514 uSv/h, 1.5650 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
    6:29 PM – 25 May 12

    192 CPM, 1.5590 uSv/h, 1.2787 AVG uSv/h, 4 time(s) over natural radiation
    6:19 PM – 25 May 12

    228 CPM, 1.8514 uSv/h, 1.4555 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
    5:29 PM – 25 May 12

    228 CPM, 1.8514 uSv/h, 1.8504 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
    4:49 PM – 25 May 12

    204 CPM, 1.6565 uSv/h, 1.8495 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
    4:39 PM – 25 May 12

    432 CPM, 3.5078 uSv/h, 2.7696 AVG uSv/h, 10 time(s) over natural radiation
    4:19 PM – 25 May 12

    216 CPM, 1.7539 uSv/h, 2.0314 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
    4:08 PM – 25 May 12


    Report Comment

  • anne anne

    Longmont, CO 25-26, 2012
    204 CPM, 1.6565 uSv/h, 1.6964 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
    2:09 AM – 26 May 12

    318 CPM, 2.5822 uSv/h, 1.7364 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
    1:59 AM – 26 May 12

    246 CPM, 1.9975 uSv/h, 1.9424 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
    12:29 AM – 26 May 12

    228 CPM, 1.8514 uSv/h, 1.8873 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
    12:19 AM – 26 May 12

    300 CPM, 2.4360 uSv/h, 1.9232 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
    12:09 AM – 26 May 12

    264 CPM, 2.1437 uSv/h, 1.8463 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
    11:49 PM – 25 May 1

    198 CPM, 1.6078 uSv/h, 1.9285 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
    11:29 PM – 25 May 12

    282 CPM, 2.2898 uSv/h, 2.2492 AVG uSv/h, 8 time(s) over natural radiation
    11:19 PM – 25 May 12

    330 CPM, 2.6796 uSv/h, 2.2086 AVG uSv/h, 8 time(s) over natural radiation
    11:09 PM – 25 May 12

    372 CPM, 3.0206 uSv/h, 2.2083 AVG uSv/h, 8 time(s) over natural radiation
    10:49 PM – 25 May 12

    372 CPM, 3.0206 uSv/h, 2.9530 AVG uSv/h, 10 time(s) over natural radiation
    10:19 PM – 25 May 12

    462 CPM, 3.7514 uSv/h, 2.8854 AVG uSv/h, 10 time(s) over natural radiation
    10:09 PM – 25 May 12

    318 CPM, 2.5822 uSv/h, 2.0193 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
    9:59 PM – 25 May 1

    258 CPM, 2.0950 uSv/h, 1.4565 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
    9:49 PM – 25 May 1

    192 CPM, 1.5590 uSv/h, 1.3926 AVG uSv/h,


    Report Comment

  • Spectrometising

    I truly thought this part of enenews was to post our own findings and readings not those of other devices unless it is for a comparison..

    Is there any way Admin can clean this up??….Is there no place where we can post data free from the HAARP theories and magnetometers and so forth,,,,

    Unless someone actually has their own HAARP Magnetometer or special device they would like to share here. :-)


    Report Comment

  • Spectrometising

    It would be great if Enenews could have a special forum for exotic theories where they could be assimilated and compared by purveyors, critics & enthusiasts in this highly specialised area. :-) :-)


    Report Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.