|
You must be logged in to post a comment.
|
Discussion Threads
-
FORUM: Fukushima Webcam Discussion Thread
(5,240 Comments)
-
FORUM: General Discussion Thread (Nuclear Issues)
(5,481 Comments)
-
FORUM: Off-Topic Discussion Thread (Non-Nuclear Issues)
(4,114 Comments)
-
FORUM: Post Your Radiation Monitoring Data Here
(3,298 Comments)
-
FORUM: Alternative Energy — Converting to clean, renewable energy sources
(419 Comments)
-
FORUM: Petitions, Ballot Initiatives, Other Signature Drives (VIDEO)
(173 Comments)
-
FORUM: Upcoming meetings, gatherings, & demonstrations about energy issues
(477 Comments)
-
FORUM: What should be done about Japan burning radioactive debris?
(151 Comments)
-
FORUM: Methods for combating radiation and its effects
(1,069 Comments)
-
FORUM: Effects of low level radiation
(537 Comments)
-
FORUM: Possible Fukushima-related Anomalies — Deformations, Yellow Rain, Metallic Taste in Mouth, etc.
(1,731 Comments)
SUBMIT YOUR NEWS TIPS Your identity will not be made public unless you request it
|
Location: Bellingham, Washington, 12 miles east of the bay.
Weather: Cool and raining (as usual . . . )
Radiation monitoring today: CPM's between 20 and 65 CPM. Only bounced up to 65 once.
Report Comment
If you are thinking of purchasing a Geiger counter, or
have just purchased one here, is a free resource to help you.
If you are new to this forum. This Basic Guide will provide you with information on how to protect your Geiger Counter from contamination, plus how get the best out of it.
The Free Geiger Counter Use Guide has been given another update with lots more useful info. Download it from here. If you have any suggestions or additions to improve the guide, please let me know. It is provided free as a resource for this community.
http://technologypals.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Using-a-Geiger-Counter-to-test-food-for-Radioactive-Contamination.pdf
Report Comment
Hamster,
A few years ago I WOOFED (Willing Workers on Organic Farms) just outside Bellingham, at River Farm? Know of it? One of my favorite places.
I've been hearing from people like Gundersen that the Cascades got dumped on by Fukushima and I've been wondering how the area is really doing.
A little surprisingly, your CPMs are in the same range–if not slightly lower–than what I have here in New Jersey (usually between 40 and 65 CPM outside). My location, however, is completely surrounded by NPPs, as well as being directly downwind from TMI.
Thank you for posting, and I will be sure to look for more from you.
Report Comment
MoonlightEmpire, I am not sure why Gundersen singles out the Cascades for being a high radiation dump area. All high elevations, including the Sierras and Rockies, are liable for this, due to orographic lift, and the consequent rain and snowfall. Maybe Arnie has some radiation data that he is not sharing with us.
Report Comment
I'd say he mentioned the Cascades because that was a pertinent place to the current topic being discussed, not because he is witholding any valuable information.
He also made a statement about the wind hitting the Rockies and being a location of potentially higher fallout–due to the lift that you mentioned.
I believe that if Arnie is leaving anything out, it's because there is just way too much material to cover in quick interviews or Youtube videos. I'm sure more and more will come out as he has time for it. He's a guy just like us…he needs to eat and sleep while trying to keep up his actual business.
He doesn't have to make any videos. He has done so on his own, and is compensated for them only by the people who are have been gratefull–and able–enough to donate.
Regardless of that, nobody even has to mention every minute detail and instance for the majority of discerning people to get the point. For instance, "oh, the cascades got more fallout because they are mountains at high elevation?"–then we can deduce that ALL mountains are more probable to have higher fallout.
And, "oh, all of the tuna sampled 7 months ago contained Cesium?"–and we can deduce that ALL aquatic life in the Pacific is or will be contaminated.
There's so much more, but always so little time.
Keep up the good work, I appreciate your comment, Bobby1.
Report Comment
MoonlightEmpire, I'm not implying any ulterior motives on Gundersen's part. The data likely came from Kaltofen, and it's not Arnie's to give away.
Report Comment
That's an interesting point I hadn't considered. Thanks.
Have you noticed how many of the Main Stream Media sources, since 3/11/11, have used certain keywords like "meltdown" and "Fallout", completely out of the context of nuclear power?
I'm on the east coast and I assume some of our programming is different than other parts of the country, but it has been so obvious here. A lot of what is supposed to be "comedy bits" on commercials that show a person freaking out in a dramatic way and calling it a meltdown. Or any sort of repercussions from political blunders being described as fallout.
Not to mention the barrage of ads for cancer treatment centers. As well as all the pro-energy company poopaganda.
I believe it is a method of diluting some people's understanding of what a meltdown or fallout is, this way, when the truth of Fukushima reaches past their propaganda, people will associate meltdowns and fallout with comical, stupid, nonsensical things.
A lot of us are wise to this allready and didn't need Fuku to teach us that, but there are so many people who are not wise to it, and they are the ones who are most at risk of believing the lies.
Hope this sparks more thought. Thanks again.
Report Comment
Why not move if you are completely surrounded by NPP?
Why compound the bio-accumulation by absorbing and
risking living in the radius of these death dealing monsters.
Don't be resigned. Move. .
Report Comment
Sam,
haha! Of course I want to move! Want to know the bitter reality of it? I've been scared to. I don't WANT to HAVE to move…I know that I SHOULD move. I've been ready to move since two weeks after Fukushima when I FIRST heard about the plant going up in smoke (I don't watch much tv).
I can even speak enough spanish to get by just fine…
What was I afraid of? Being on my own in a totally foreign country because none of my friends or family feel the same way I do about the disaster. None of them. And no one else I've ever met in person so far.
I'm worried about trying to live a life down there with no possibility of healthcare after I get sick from the water.
Those are the major things, most of the rest I can make due with.
And I could give you a million more reasons why I SHOULD go, but if I did, nothing will be fixed. I will have just moved to a distant place to temporarily escaped the largest plumes. If I don't help the world to get rid of NPPs–safely–then I can kiss my ass goodbye no matter where on Earth it is.
So I'm staying until I'm done.
Report Comment
Wow, Moonlight…I bet a lot of Japanese feel very similar to you…:-(
Report Comment
I'm sure they do.
So that's part of what we can do for them.
I may be 6000 miles away from them, but I stand with the Japanese,
and the rest of us trying to make a positive difference.
P.S. B&B, I only started commenting recently, but have read much of what you've written over the past year. You are greatly appreciated.
Report Comment
Thanks Moonlight for the friendly words…great you joined in here!!
Report Comment
1 june 2012
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5zinrptrdLk
"update at 14.30 hrs gmt
1 hour after i left the jouse the rads jumped up at 12.00 hrs gmt and sustained for 2 and a half hours then a light drop
range 0.10 to 0.29 mcSv/h a single peak of 0.58 mcSv/h with lots of 0.29 mcSv/h peaks and rises (a signature of a beta isotope maybe?)
the average after 12.00 hrs gmt was 0.22 mcSv/h
the average after the drop at 0.2.30 hrs gmt is 0.18 mcSv/h
will post an update later!
winds from the west
watch out wales and west country!"
happy golden jubille everybody! from EDF
Report Comment
arclight, did you know this…..
In the meantime, Japan’s plutonium stockpile—most of which is stored in France and Britain—has swelled despite Tokyo’s promise to international regulators not to produce a plutonium surplus.
http://www.japantoday.com/category/national/view/japan-to-make-more-plutonium-despite-big-stockpile
Report Comment
stuff the jubilee (i am an old punk at heart!)
Report Comment
i floated around the edge of the early punk scene too, but no safety pins! god save the queen!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DQq2RUU0YzA
the good old days!
at 20.00 hrs gmt
0.10 to 0.21 mcSv/h
peaks to 0.33 mcSv/h
going out there now to see the rad levels
memo to self
set above song on loop
wonder why above song seems so appropriate today!
wonder if we have turned into sheeple in the uk !! :0
Report Comment
GOD SAVE THE QUEEN FROM RADIATION!!
well i just did another video on radiation.. grrr
i should be working on other stuff..
will post it later when its rendered etc…
just got back in after 3 and a half hours of isotopic hell and lots of mileage in the rain on occasion…
at first i put the rises on the impending rain and thought , is the rain hot?
radon?
because the rain came down in phases of lightness to heavy with breaks in between i was able to ascertain that the contamination for saturday night london was in the air!
also that the dust invisible isotopic particles from sizewell that are suspended high into the air came down with an almighty crash as the rain increased.. 0.75 mcSv/h (have to recheck the video to be sure)
lots and lots of peaks and the rain after an hour approx started to lower the raiation levels.. this is good for the people turning up tommorrow as long as the contaminated emmissions stop..
unfortunately her MAJ will be on a simple rowboat but hopefully has a couple of inches of lead shielding because the nearer i got to the river the higher the rads…
this means that for the next 10 + hours the radionuclides in the thames may be a health threat! oops just got another 0.42 mcSv/h peak (not loooking good for clean pure thames water hopes then?
0.75 mcSv/h?? wtf is going on at sizewell?? they burning up all japans plutonium before someone puts a stop to the practice..
sizewell village MUST have contamination problems or…
Report Comment
heads up on eurdep.
there are no access to useful radinuclide measures..
all monitors that offer this service are closed to the public..
they are trying to cover hungary again and realised iwas able to trace it with these last time..
budapest oncology institute at it again?? wonder how bad it was? wonder how much was released.. starting to think chinon was a cover for hungary? but is that possible? surely criirad would have picked it up? still cant access the data though? maybe they have?
just thought i would mention it to any eastearn europeans as the new fascillity is not ready yet and they need the isotopes for rich old people! "sorry about the thyroid problems for your children" /sarc!!! grrr
heads up to greece.. you are downwind quite often!
Report Comment
yuk!
a quick rad check as the rain stopped..
i was able to put the gieger in a plastic bag.
air range before test 0.13 to 0.18 mcSv/h
in the water puddle 2 times..
1 reading got to 0.18 mcSv/h
2 reading got to 0.16 mcSv/h
air reading after up to 0.20 mcSv/h with a 0.29 mcSv/h quick peak returning to the average of approx 0.15 to 0.16 mcSv/h
no let up from edf then?
gnight
Report Comment
scuse the rad fried brain and lungs
slurp! (apple juice again minimal cesium i hope)
time of test 01.30 hrs gmt to 02.15 mcSv/h
london west
03/june/2012
video to follow of last nights carnage!
in the morning with a quick jubilee update! a good one hopefully!
my lungs are aching a bit!
Report Comment
Thank you arclight, I look forward to it.
Report Comment
and thank you CB
http://enenews.com/congressman-to-fda-unknown-how-radioactive-fallout-in-us-affected-marine-environment-wants-a-listing-of-all-instances-of-species-found-to-have-elevated-levels/comment-page-1#comment-257134
ive put the updates and a corroborating reading from goldieluvmj on the comments of the latest, scroll down for the details and last video is last night 0.75 mcSv/h…. phew i have made some assumptions there too!
FULLY IMBEDDED IN HEPAVILLE
avoiding the river thames for 24 hrs or so! will keep you posted on that
Report Comment
london radiation reading
3 june 2012
22.00 hrs to 00.00 hrs gmt
peaks to 0.58 mcSv/h
range from 0.10 to 0.22 mcSv/h
alot of smaller peaks to 0.42 mcSv/h
raining on and off and the rain has brought down the suspended particles in the passing clouds and washing them down to the river
average away from the river 0.16 mcSv/h
average near the river 0.18 to 0.19 mcSv/h
no let up from sizewell then?
inside average with hepa filter on
0.13 mcSv/h with lesser peaks
things to note
as i step outside i get a quick peak as the gieger reacts to the air pollution before it settles at the higher average..
so it is better to be inside that outside in terms of dose.. but more importantly in terms of air quality
i git a report that lots of people had coughs down by the river too! and more people i know have gad bronchitis etc…
when i saw what was happening i immediately started upping my intake of fruit juices and water
i ate a healthier diet than normal..
i got a small intermittent cough with thick white or slightly green bile when the pollution was bad but avoided the flu stuff this time. also, i avoided being outside more than normal and kept the flip front down on my motorbike helmet..
so i believe if people have warning they can minimize the health impacts of these releases.. shame its censored news huh?
still feeling a bit chesty and tired with a slight headache, likily the Pb lead
(need more zinc in diet before next time…)
peace
Report Comment
288 CPM, 2.3386 uSv/h, 1.7850 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
4:05 PM – 2 Jun 12,, Longmont, CO
https://twitter.com/#!/LMRadMonAlert
At 3:00 a bus driver made me stand out in the rain for 15 minutes. When he came back I explained about the radioactive fallout in the rain and the huge amounts of radiation faced by residents in Longmont. I don't know it he was actually all that ignorant. He was of Asian descent and surely must know something.
Report Comment
Anyway, the bus driver didn't argue with me. He just said "rain is rain". Then he took out his handkerchief and wiped off the top of his head.
Report Comment
Good for you! Sounds like you made him think about it, at the very least, Anne.
It is probably all you could do for him, at that moment in time…
I find my "talks" with others don't seem to penetrate too deeply…it is as if many of them have a human defense mechanism shield that protects them from contemplating issues that really can "mess with your brain," if you think about the ramifications for the long-term health of life on Earth.
And being a person of compassion who wishes to respect others and where they are at in their lives, I don't try to force the lesson upon them. Not sure what the answer is…But it sounds like you are doing the best you can to be helpful, whether or not others are ready to hear the message.(Sounds almost evangelical. Oops! Not my intention. LOL)
Hmm…I'll have to think about that one for a bit…
Report Comment
I wasn't really trying to educate him. I was explaining to him why I wasn't happy being made to stand in the rain for an additional 15 minutes.
Report Comment
And I didn't have an umbrella, because the online forecast said it wasn't going to rain.
Report Comment
I hope you had your umbrella Anne! I always have one (anybody growing up in the Houston area have one sewn at the hip!).
I really dislike rain now, but we must drink something. Even as it grows more contaminated.
Report Comment
Longmont, CO 2-3 June 2012
210 CPM, 1.7052 uSv/h, 1.3260 AVG uSv/h, 4 time(s) over natural radiation
6:30 PM – 3 Jun 12
192 CPM, 1.5590 uSv/h, 1.4484 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
6:00 PM – 3 Jun 12
186 CPM, 1.5103 uSv/h, 1.3378 AVG uSv/h, 4 time(s) over natural radiation
5:50 PM – 3 Jun 12
270 CPM, 2.1924 uSv/h, 1.5911 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
5:00 PM – 3 Jun 12
198 CPM, 1.6078 uSv/h, 1.3767 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
4:30 PM – 3 Jun 12
192 CPM, 1.5590 uSv/h, 1.1420 AVG uSv/h, 4 time(s) over natural radiation
3:30 PM – 3 Jun 12
216 CPM, 1.7539 uSv/h, 1.3662 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
2:50 PM – 3 Jun 12
222 CPM, 1.8026 uSv/h, 1.4454 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
2:10 PM – 3 Jun 12
252 CPM, 2.0462 uSv/h, 1.4456 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
1:50 PM – 3 Jun 12
216 CPM, 1.7539 uSv/h, 1.2514 AVG uSv/h, 4 time(s) over natural radiation
1:30 PM – 3 Jun 12
186 CPM, 1.5103 uSv/h, 0.8526 AVG uSv/h, 3 time(s) over natural radiation
10:19 AM – 3 Jun 12
258 CPM, 2.0950 uSv/h, 1.9241 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
9:37 AM – 3 Jun 12
228 CPM, 1.8514 uSv/h, 1.7533 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
9:26 AM – 3 Jun 12
210 CPM, 1.7052 uSv/h, 1.6553 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
9:16 AM – 3 Jun 12
252 CPM, 2.0462 uSv/h, 1.8954 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
8:56 AM – 3 Jun 12
Report Comment
[cont.]
210 CPM, 1.7052 uSv/h, 1.7446 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
8:46 AM – 3 Jun 12
228 CPM, 1.8514 uSv/h, 1.7840 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
8:36 AM – 3 Jun 1
270 CPM, 2.1924 uSv/h, 1.7167 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
8:26 AM – 3 Jun 12
354 CPM, 2.8745 uSv/h, 1.9460 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
8:06 AM – 3 Jun 12
240 CPM, 1.9488 uSv/h, 1.7717 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
6:46 AM – 3 Jun 12
228 CPM, 1.8514 uSv/h, 1.5945 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
6:36 AM – 3 Jun 12
288 CPM, 2.3386 uSv/h, 1.8958 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
6:16 AM – 3 Jun 12
252 CPM, 2.0462 uSv/h, 1.4531 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
6:06 AM – 3 Jun 12
234 CPM, 1.9001 uSv/h, 1.6659 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
5:26 AM – 3 Jun 12
300 CPM, 2.4360 uSv/h, 1.7914 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
5:06 AM – 3 Jun 1
234 CPM, 1.9001 uSv/h, 1.8665 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
4:26 AM – 3 Jun 12
252 CPM, 2.0462 uSv/h, 1.8328 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
4:16 AM – 3 Jun 12
324 CPM, 2.6309 uSv/h, 2.1182 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
3:56 AM – 3 Jun 12
222 CPM, 1.8026 uSv/h, 1.6056 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
3:46 AM – 3 Jun 12
312 CPM, 2.5334 uSv/h, 2.1752 AVG uSv/h, 8 time(s) over natural radiation
3:16 AM – 3 Jun 12
Report Comment
[cont.]
264 CPM, 2.1437 uSv/h, 1.8169 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
3:06 AM – 3 Jun 12
186 CPM, 1.5103 uSv/h, 1.4902 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
2:56 AM – 3 Jun 12
198 CPM, 1.6078 uSv/h, 1.5759 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
2:36 AM – 3 Jun 12
198 CPM, 1.6078 uSv/h, 1.5440 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
2:26 AM – 3 Jun 12
192 CPM, 1.5590 uSv/h, 1.4802 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
2:16 AM – 3 Jun 12
198 CPM, 1.6078 uSv/h, 1.4645 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
1:46 AM – 3 Jun 1
204 CPM, 1.6565 uSv/h, 1.6021 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
12:56 AM – 3 Jun 12
186 CPM, 1.5103 uSv/h, 1.5478 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
12:46 AM – 3 Jun 1
234 CPM, 1.9001 uSv/h, 1.8550 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
12:26 AM – 3 Jun 12
276 CPM, 2.2411 uSv/h, 1.8100 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
12:16 AM – 3 Jun 12
258 CPM, 2.0950 uSv/h, 1.7250 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
11:36 PM – 2 Jun 12
240 CPM, 1.9488 uSv/h, 1.5343 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
10:56 PM – 2 Jun 12
192 CPM, 1.5590 uSv/h, 1.4600 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
10:36 PM – 2 Jun 12
204 CPM, 1.6565 uSv/h, 1.3610 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
10:26 PM – 2 Jun 12
204 CPM, 1.6565 uSv/h, 1.3618 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
9:45 PM – 2 Jun 12
Report Comment
[cont.]
186 CPM, 1.5103 uSv/h, 1.4522 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
9:25 PM – 2 Jun 12
216 CPM, 1.7539 uSv/h, 1.3941 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
9:15 PM – 2 Jun 1
204 CPM, 1.6565 uSv/h, 1.3110 AVG uSv/h, 4 time(s) over natural radiation
8:45 PM – 2 Jun 12
186 CPM, 1.5103 uSv/h, 1.2706 AVG uSv/h, 4 time(s) over natural radiation
7:55 PM – 2 Jun 12
216 CPM, 1.7539 uSv/h, 1.4750 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
6:35 PM – 2 Jun 12
198 CPM, 1.6078 uSv/h, 1.1961 AVG uSv/h, 4 time(s) over natural radiation
6:25 PM – 2 Jun 12
258 CPM, 2.0950 uSv/h, 1.8327 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
5:35 PM – 2 Jun 12
276 CPM, 2.2411 uSv/h, 2.0202 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
5:15 PM – 2 Jun 12
234 CPM, 1.9001 uSv/h, 1.7993 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
5:05 PM – 2 Jun 12
246 CPM, 1.9975 uSv/h, 1.6986 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
4:55 PM – 2 Jun 12
216 CPM, 1.7539 uSv/h, 1.5325 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
4:35 PM – 2 Jun 12
288 CPM, 2.3386 uSv/h, 1.7850 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
4:05 PM – 2 Jun 12
https://twitter.com/#!/LongmontRadMon
Induction Magnetometer, Gakona, AK
http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/cgi-bin/scmag/disp-scmag.cgi?date=latest&Bx=on
HAARP Fluxgate Magnetometer
http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/cgi-bin/magnetometer/gak-mag.cgi
Report Comment
Central New Jersey, Sunday, June 3, 2012.
Reading taken with Inspector Alert+ Geiger Counter at 8:00pm EST.
Approx. 1 Meter above ground, on a wooden railing that sags in one location due to water warping the wood over the years.
Just finished raining.
approx .290 mcSv/hour.
Then I did a 10 minute total count, and averaged 104 CPM.
Anyone that wants to collaborate on a project–including you, Admin–please let me know via email at Bawlby@yahoo.com.
Report Comment
jet stream slamming into California(other states too)now and into the next couple of days.
it is bringing wave after wave of fall out from the recent steam and smoke
events at Fuku. How can we know the severity of what is coming here now?
Be good to get some kind of way to know when to take shelter
from radiological fuku steam and smoke events. any ideas?
Report Comment
thanks for the reminder about Kraftwerk and "Radiation", i had forgotten that one, good call to the poster who mentioned it
Report Comment
No increased levels here during the last few days,
see
http://www.radiation-logger.net/logged_data/logged_data.php
SBM20 Tube Data Logger, located in Bavaria / South Germany
Report Comment
http://blog.safecast.org/maps/
Report Comment
heads up dukelman
repost
"t’s still not clear why the Japanese government has decided against a policy of containing, rather than dispersing, the radioactive debris."
its very costly to glasify instead of incinerate.. i believe the uk and france are following japans lead in this… just a suspicion mind…
sellafield has recently cancelled its glacification disoposal ideas so what are they doing now?? lots of isotopes in the air in the uk and france as well as others and the eurdep radiation system is switched off to exact data..?? coincidence??
the queens jubilee radioactive fireworks night 4 june 2012 23.00 hrs
luv from chinon nuclear power plant! south france
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9EyEYTWvpJU
with forecast of low level winds
Report Comment
yuk again
today the rads dropped when it rained.. otherwise i was getting many up to 0.58 mcSv/h for the last two hours at a rate of 1 every 15 minutes or so
range 0.13 to 0.29 mcSv/h average above 0.16 mcSv/h
range during the rain
0.11 to 0.13 mcSv/h with few peaks to 0.33 mcSv/h inside
winds still coming from france and spreading north and west towards ireland, wales the midland and clipping london too
when will it end
day 9 and still waiting to hear from greenpeace.. 1 day to go!!
not looking good..
nobody is interested in nuclear air pollution.. and its really bad and lots of people are coming down with irritating coughs and developing colds, flus etc
you can lead a horse to water but you cant make them drink ! eh?
arc bangs head against wall
on the upside gieger watch uk is on the up!! 4 part time gieger watchers are passing co-oberating readings.. a slow start but a start!! there are also other resources not tied up yet.. maybe one day
peace light and love
Report Comment
chinon has 3 reactors being decommissioned currently
edf owns the site…
edf owns the sizewell site
i do reckon they are burning the waste as part of the deal with the uk government.. nice and cheap
http://www.radioactivewastemanagement.org/2011/download/16%20-%20SCHNEIDER.pdf
Report Comment
ads not by this site
Aug 20, 2011 radiation check with SOEKS and the DP802i geiger counters on the outskirts of Tokyo
the soeks responds quicker than the dp8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=7TezrkBC9yI
Report Comment
london radiation reading from west london.. at 13.00 hrs gmt 6 june 2012
this morning i got some rises to 0.23 mcSv/h with some peaks to 0.42 mcSv/h but it seems to have settled for now…
getting a steady 0.13 mcSv/h with little variation from that.. will report back later
Report Comment
0.86 peak in a cloud measuring + 0.5 mcSv/h time to drive through about 5 minutes
average since leaving the house 2 and a half hours ago
0.22 mcSv/h with many peaks to 0.42 mcSv/h
winds from south.. this is probably from nearer than chinon npp(i hope)!
eurdep is down and i only get an answer phone in italian now, so no eurdep at all… although i did access some data that showed rosslare getting a hit from chinon too over 24 hours on the 4th or 5 th and this hit was seen diminishing on the monitors as it headed north..
to move the irish monitors it must have been a big hit
the uk monitors are doing what they were designed to do… nothing…
theres a big question mark over hungary?? and no further word from criirad??
im gobsmacked at the extent of this europewide censoring of this info.. even greenpeace wont touch it!! ho hum!!
burning waste seems the most likely scenario.. saving money..
Report Comment
quick update
was getting up to 0.20 mcDv/h with an average of 0.16 from 22.00 hrs but at 23.30 hrs gmt i got a 0.53 peak and the the gieger was reading and average of 0.14 to 0.15 mcSv/h with the odd peak to 0.37 mcSv/h looks like a reprieve but with a high "background" with some particulate or small pockets of gases
winds from south
winds set to change in france by sunday.. winds will be heading east..
Report Comment
ALERT: Update via potrblog
from Show More:
"…extending our Maximum Alert to stay out of the Jet Stream and rain for the following reasons.
1. Recent large Iodine 131 detections in Japan
2. Multiple individual reports of high AIRBORNE radiation along the Jet Stream
3. EPA Radnet data showing high, multi hour, AIRBORNE radiation"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mVXgC3-wdAs&feature=youtu.be
Report Comment
See the 'Line Graph' at 7:00 minutes in. AMAZING!
Report Comment
Radiation Network & Black Cat Rad Maps showing HIGH reading in Indiana 10:15 pacific time.
Radiation network over 7000
Black cat over 3500
…at this time.
Doesn't seem like a malfunction since they're separate systems.
Report Comment
BCat: http://www.blackcatsystems.com/RadMap/map.html
RadN: http://www.radiationnetwork.com/
Report Comment
Thanks, ChasAha. Are we sure they are indeed separate, meaning different people using different Geiger Counters, are both getting high readings?
Could the same person and Geiger counter be hooked up to BOTH systems? Could be possible…
I hope this is the case and these are both false positives/system malfunctions…
Interestingly, however: when I tried clicking on the link you gave to blackcatsystems using my Opera browser in my smartphone, it redirected to a long url filled with gobeldygook…Then, when I tried pasting the link directly into my browser, it did the same thing.
It was only when I searched for the link by pasting it into the Startpage.com search engine ("The World's Most Private Search Engine"), then clicked on it, was I able to get to the radiation map…
This has happened to me previously in similar circumstances. It's hard not to suspect my browser has some strange censoring code in it somehow? Why else would this happen? Anyone with programming background know?
Here's the gobeldygook I got when it redirected automatically in my Opera browser:
http://xn--www-4m0a.blackcatsystems.com/%E2%80%8BRadMap/map.html
Report Comment
"…Are we sure they are indeed separate, meaning different people using different Geiger Counters…" (?) I am not sure of that. Good point. Hopefully you're right.
3000 to 7000 plus cpm would not be good for anyone or anything in that vicinity.
Report Comment
Ahhh…I feel MUCH better. Both readings on blackcat and Radiationnetwork are back down to normal (18 and 34 or so, respectively).
Report Comment
West Central Michigan Elev. 1073 ft Time Zone: EDT Low radon area
10 min count taken with Inspector Alert @ 2.5 ft indoor with many windows open:
26.7 CPM @ 1:44
This is one of my lowest counts ever… will take the Inspector outside and do a 10 min count and report the results.
Report Comment
I think they said it might be from switching geigers and not changing the setup tab. Dosen't make sense to have such a dynamic result w/ non elevations a few hundred miles away.
Report Comment
35.7 CPM @ 2:01 am EDT.
Report Comment
Radiationnetwork.com just showed 7,087CPM count. It's been up and down 3000-7000 all night. RadChick Radiation Research & Mitigation had a FaceBook ALERT
Report Comment
3552 cpm @ Indiana, U.S.A.
http://www.blackcatsystems.com/RadMap/map.html
Report Comment
7126 cpm Indiana http://www.radiationnetwork.com/
Report Comment
969 cpm cpm @ Indiana, U.S.A.
http://www.blackcatsystems.com/RadMap/map.html 2,558 cpm http://www.radiationnetwork.com/
Report Comment
Posted by Gonviral
“What do the Radiation Network CPM numbers mean with regards to health risk?
“With the examples of radiation dose listed above, we can correlate how long it would take to experience those effects based on a hypothetical Geiger counter CPM number.
“So, let’s use the number 100, since this is the threshold that the Radiation Network website has chosen. The Cs137 calibration factor listed above (120 CPM) was converted to obtain the proper factored results listed below (0.83x). Higher CPM numbers are also listed for relevancy.
“Days compared with the avg. annual human exposure (U.S.)
207 (at 100 CPM)
42 (at 500 CPM)
14 (at 1,500 CPM)
2 (at 10,000 CPM)
“Days to receive dose for increase cancer risk of 1 in a 1,000
432 (at 100 CPM)
86 (at 500 CPM)
28 (at 1,500 CPM)
4 (at 10,000 CPM)
“Days for earliest onset of radiation sickness
25,937 (at 100 CPM)
5,187 (at 500 CPM)
1,729 (at 1,500 CPM)
259 (at 10,000 CPM)
http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message1891577/pg5
Report Comment
Thank you anne
Report Comment
Does anyone know what could be going on in Indiana? Son, wife, and baby just moved there.
Thank You
Report Comment
South Bend @ 30 CPM right now on radiationnetwork.com
Report Comment
For what it's worth, I live in South Bend, and my GC is indicating normal levels (from the mid-20s to 40s in CPM).
My theory is that the same person is submitting the readings to both of the radiation map sites that are showing high numbers, but that person's equipment or software is malfunctioning. Anne posted this link, in which somebody does seems to mention that they submit readings to both sites (or at least they did at the time it was posted): http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/radiation_detection/message/308
The person who wrote the posting at that link says:
"There are many differences between both Mineralab Radiation Map Network and
the Black Cat Radiation Map Network. I love em both, and I feed them both.
Using only one Geiger from my South Bend Station I feed both map sites at
the same time using port sharing software."
Based on this, I'm thinking that this one person's system is malfunctioning and they are submitting their information to both radiation map sites, in which case the high readings on both sites could be erroneous.
I'm hoping that this is all that is going on here. I could be wrong, but my own geiger counter right now is showing normal readings.
Report Comment
Thank You lam335..Glad to hear your geiger counter right now is showing normal readings.
I think you are right that a system is malfunctioning.
Nothing like getting an old lady's heart pumping
Report Comment
Now reading are 28cpm from http://www.radiationnetwork.com/ and 14cpm @ http://www.blackcatsystems.com/RadMap/map.html
Report Comment
I did a search on EPA RadNet for Denver:
https://cdxnode64.epa.gov/radnet-public/query.do
I had to paste this url.
The Gross Beta Count Rate for Denver was over 220 on June 5,2012.
Report Comment
reading back up to 1249 (was 8k something but refreshed as the page opened…) on radiationnetwork… now 677 CPM
Report Comment
BlackCat was 146 — now 883 CPM
Report Comment
blackcat over 3,000
Report Comment
7089 on radiation network.
Report Comment
No explanation here:
http://radiationnetwork.com/Message.htm
Report Comment
The map at radiation network has been taken down:
http://radiationnetwork.com/
Report Comment
882
http://www.blackcatsystems.com/RadMap/map.html
Report Comment
still reading over 2,000 at radiation network
Report Comment
See Iam's explanation above. It is most likely a system malfunction.
Report Comment
radiation network back up, 2807
Report Comment
what do you think?
Report Comment
radiation network 35, blackcat still high, 1,821
Report Comment
now radiation network over 3,500
Report Comment
i have 3063 w/refresh @ radnet
Report Comment
over 4,000
Report Comment
RAD ALERT 7000 CPM S. Bend IN – Call to NRC Hotline 12:30 am 6.7.12 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jycRtJCTc7M
Report Comment
Thanks for the youtube link, rollbuff. I really didn't see why the NRC was asking her how often she checks the page at radiation network. Like there's no problem with Fukushima, like its suspect if someone would be looking at this page. And he didn't even know the page himself.
Report Comment
can someone please verify what is going on.
Report Comment
Video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jycRtJCTc7M RAD ALERT 7000 CPM S. Bend IN – Call to NRC Hotline 12:30 am 6.7.12
Report Comment
903
Report Comment
Youtube ALERT South Bend VIDEO: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jycRtJCTc7M Thank you radchick!!!!!!!!!
Report Comment
Wow guys, what's going on where you are??
Homeoffice day, eh? Take care…
Over here, we don't know what's going on, as the European Radnet has been switched off for days, as arclight mentioned earlier.
Just wrote to the operator….
Report Comment
Oh wow, hew already answered.
"We are aware of the situation, and are working to normalise the situation.
The EURDEP Public Map should be working normally again latest this afternoon."
not too convinced here.
Report Comment
@bnb
nice job! i couldnt get through on the phone!
posted the recent reading on the new thread..
Report Comment
Hi arc, I told him I'd be happy if EDF could also be working on normalising "the situation". No reply since
*peace lemming
Report Comment
radnet just went from 25 to 887 and blackcat from 12 to 446… crazy
Report Comment
They taken the monitor off radiation network.
Report Comment
2292, http://www.blackcatsystems.com/RadMap/map.html
Report Comment
I guess they don't know there is another map to look at.
Report Comment
Now it's down to 16.
Report Comment
B&B do you think they are telling the truth? It's strange now at 35? Up and down all over the place. strange.
Report Comment