|
You must be logged in to post a comment.
|
Discussion Threads
-
FORUM: Fukushima Webcam Discussion Thread
(5,237 Comments)
-
FORUM: General Discussion Thread (Nuclear Issues)
(5,462 Comments)
-
FORUM: Off-Topic Discussion Thread (Non-Nuclear Issues)
(4,097 Comments)
-
FORUM: Post Your Radiation Monitoring Data Here
(3,298 Comments)
-
FORUM: Alternative Energy — Converting to clean, renewable energy sources
(419 Comments)
-
FORUM: Petitions, Ballot Initiatives, Other Signature Drives (VIDEO)
(173 Comments)
-
FORUM: Upcoming meetings, gatherings, & demonstrations about energy issues
(477 Comments)
-
FORUM: What should be done about Japan burning radioactive debris?
(151 Comments)
-
FORUM: Methods for combating radiation and its effects
(1,069 Comments)
-
FORUM: Effects of low level radiation
(537 Comments)
-
FORUM: Possible Fukushima-related Anomalies — Deformations, Yellow Rain, Metallic Taste in Mouth, etc.
(1,731 Comments)
SUBMIT YOUR NEWS TIPS Your identity will not be made public unless you request it
SUPPORT ENENews ENENews receives no funding from anyone or anything, except 1) People who donate via the button below, and 2) Google, who pays for the two ad spots. Thanks to all who have donated or are planning on doing so, it's nice to know people appreciate your work.
|
sending...
wind change at 11.50 hrs gmt in london
now from south and bring pulses up to 0.33 mcSv/h with quick peaks to 0.63 mcSv/h lots of quick peaks over 0.42 mcSv/h
average between surges 0.16 in outer london and 0.18 in inner london..
lots of variation/activity on the gieger..
will try to work out whats happening now!
post later..
Report Comment
I have just posted a new update to the free "Geiger Counter Use Guide", with more useful info in it. I have also organized the info better so it makes more sense for those new to this forum.
If you are thinking of purchasing a Geiger counter, or have just purchased one, here is a free resource to help you.
If you are new to this forum. This Basic Guide will provide you with information on how to protect your Geiger Counter from contamination, plus how get the best out of it.
Download it from here. If you have any suggestions or additions to improve the guide, please let me know. It is provided free as a resource for this community.
http://technologypals.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Using-a-Geiger-Counter-to-test-food-for-Radioactive-Contamination.pdf
Report Comment
Nice guide! I feel honored to have my stuff taken to a higher level.
Report Comment
i think this is heavy beta and possible lead..
150 g of dark choclate a day!! oh goodie!
??
Report Comment
a link here to the european massive releases of the 1 june and the 4 june 2012 here.. you need to scroll down a bit
http://enenews.com/forum-post-radiation-monitoring-data-april-30-2012-present/comment-page-5#comments
Report Comment
eurdep is down proper job..
twas a nice try bnb! maybe an email monday morning..
Report Comment
eurdep is working for me now
Report Comment
i cant even get the "i agree" page now!!
Report Comment
@ mubgo.. are the russian federation monitors on??
can you access the isotopes?
Report Comment
Arclight,
You have been certainly reporting lots of detections of radiation over Europe in the last few weeks, not good. Larger detections seem to be happening more frequently. Not all seem to be as a result of Fukushima either.
Report Comment
arc, the russians are not reporting today either….
Report Comment
irelands off too mungo and i can not click on the monitor stations
the earlier ireland spikes i reported were proof that some of the release went to the usa..
on fallout projection maps they undereatimate the distance this stuff can travel.. the iaea are trying to cover the nuke fallout paths i reported.. everyone int the usa with a gieger has missed the chance to stick one on the nuke companies.. and they have more releases too being carefully covered up..
note NILU is now peimarily used to cover up releases instead of plot them..
but we knew that… they have to use the expensive equipment for something eh??
no reply from
greenpeace
duthsinse
uvarious uk antinuke groups
the trident mob
busby
edf
the met police
but am getting a reasonable amount of attenetion from the uk extremist database…
echoes on phone on both sides
computer slows down when i got that "server trace" message from eurdep as i was trying to access the isotopic data..
i am so unhappy that i had to disturb peoples revere…NOT…but it seems they like their revere..
you can lead a horse to water……
peace
Report Comment
oh and interesting that the map was tweaked overnight to make it seem like it was working..
oh and ireland voted for austerity.. most embarrassing and they get the monitor instructions from edf uk!!
the brits telling the irish what to do and the irish doing what the city of london wants them to do anyway.. voluntarily…
my grandparents who fought for a free ireland are turning in thier graves.. uk corp owns ireland!!! and uk nuke is polluting ireland arghhhhhhhhhhhhh!
Report Comment
That very large detection in Indiana a couple days ago. They said it was a false alarm. Except there are four different sources indicating something major had happen. Two different Geiger Counter networks detected very large radiation levels at the same time. There was a local radar signal being excited by something in the atmosphere. I saw that myself on the local radar site at the time. Also, lots of people reported they heard explosions in the area. Some also reported a Hazmat team, and helicopters in the area.
http://naturalsociety.com/nuclear-cover-up-radiation-levels-epa-geiger-counter-dhs-hazmat-team/
http://naturalsociety.com/
Report Comment
I actually saw this radar signal detection of the atmospheric excitation in real time over the internet. This is another persons screen shot.
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-vvTAnnjhwvc/T9DlSxA1-eI/AAAAAAAABoY/DU6ak_VM1Sk/s640/Indiana%2BRadar%2B-%2BRadiation.jpg
Report Comment
More reports of high radiation detections in the area, this time local fire department.
"I called the Traverse City Fire Dept and asked them if they noticed anything unusual, muttered that I was with the "nuclear reddit board". They confirmed they had unusually high readings, and that they reported them to the NRC earlier today."
http://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/uqlq9/reddit_i_think_there_is_a_gi
Report Comment
i just had this view visiting radon.com/maps
http://i1240.photobucket.com/albums/gg499/fukushima3dmap/dosimeter/radon2012-1.jpg
and here is a composite pic of vital1's Radiation.jpg with google earth.
http://i1240.photobucket.com/albums/gg499/fukushima3dmap/dosimeter/indianaradarlevel.jpg
Report Comment
it's all a red-herring really.
a fault with a GC
a flyover, probably military training
and this website ..
http://weather.cod.edu/satrad/index.php?prod=siterad
where if you click on any state, the closer, inner circle will show heaps of activity.
i didn't think it was adding up. that's my view.
Report Comment
Static view update
(Pick a state, any state)
http://weather.cod.edu/satrad/index.php?prod=siterad
Loop update for this recent area of focus.
http://weather.cod.edu/cgi-bin/radarloop.pl?station=IWX&product=BREF1&loopdir=brefs
Look up the town Webster Indiana on google maps, that's where this recording is from.
The imaging is NEXRAD
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NEXRAD
"NEXRAD detects precipitation and atmospheric movement or wind. It returns data which when processed can be displayed in a mosaic map which shows patterns of precipitation and its movement"
Report Comment
Richard,
You are correct, that type of radar systems seems to naturally create that type of radar pattern.
Report Comment
That very large detection in Indiana a couple days ago.
european fallout?? perfect timing for it
Report Comment
measured 0.20 μSv/h at my desk this morning.
usually been ranging from 0.16 to 0.18 μSv/h
Sydney, sunday morning.
Report Comment
Not a big change but kind of high overall.
Report Comment
5.31 micro Sv/h, Hitachinaka Sea Side Park, "Vantage Hill" foot, ground level, June 2012
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tjEAyLl3XAU&feature=player_embedded
Report Comment
london radiation update
still getting strong pulses of up to 0.22 mcSv/h average sometimes 0.16 mcSv/h or drops to 0.13 mcSv/h
choppy at the moment.. inside reading .. im not going back out there yet!!
in recovery mode still! 
Report Comment
the incriminating video posted on the 8 june 2012 is still holding at 262 views… hmmm!?? will post when it starts to move again..
Report Comment
3 hits at 16.58.. its rolling again
about 12 hours without a view.. interesting?
Report Comment
from 16.30 hrs gmt getting a steady reading up to 0.29 mcSv/h low end 0.26 mcSv/h
the releases continue…
keep yer windows closed england!! and france and ireland.. maybe canada and usa next?? or it might come back home??
gieger dropped to a steady 0.16 mcSv/h after 15 minutes
there will be more…
Report Comment
i am starting to think that something has gone dreadfully wrong somewhere??
Report Comment
0.58 mcSv/h peak after 5 minutes at 0.16 returning to 0.24 mcSv/h inside hepa on…
get back later…
Report Comment
still getting the odd 0.42 mcSv/h quick peak with 0.23 mcSv/h rises
not alot of lows for the twenty minutes..
time now 16.50 hrs gmt
Report Comment
oops! meant time now 17.50 hrs not 16.50
Report Comment
just done a video as the rads dropped a bit and while uploading i got another 0.42 spike then after that a 0.54mcSv/h quick spike.. the readings are quite erratic
range 0.09 to 0.25 mcSv/h
will post video of the drop from the higher levels
currently avearge between 0.14 to 0.17 mcSv/h not including peaks of course
peak frequency about every 5 to 10 minutes and just got another 0.54 mcSv/h as im typing!!
what the bloody hell is going on??
are they burning waste illegally to save money and quicken up those de-commissioning contracts.. they say theres money in brass…
seriously though if not these weeks of releases are crazy and "not likely to cause seirious health issues" according to the new uk dose level algorythm as posited by allinson wade, richard wakeford and others..
most nasty
no more independent research either…
Report Comment
….or journalistic investigation
thank heavens for the web!!
and thank heavens for enenews.. thanks for being there.. somewhere?.. admin
Report Comment
indeed that cannot be repeated enough,
thanks, admin !
Report Comment
only 50 grams of fairtrade dark chocolate to go!! but headache gone
see zinc.. my friends got worse headaches 
lab lemming out!
Report Comment
5.31 micro Sv/h, Hitachinaka Sea Side Park, "Vantage Hill" foot, ground level, June 2012
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tjEAyLl3XAU&feature=plcp
Report Comment
Reality in Fukushima 4
http://fukushima-diary.com/2012/06/reality-in-fukushima-4/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+FukushimaDiary+%28Fukushima+Diary%29
Radiation levels ..outside Koriyama schools June 10 2012
Report Comment
london radiation reading
it started raining and i went out for the run around town,,
range 0.11 to 0.23 mcSv/h
most of the hits were between 0.14 and 0.19 mcSv/h
there were 6 slow rises and drops to 0.23 mcSv/h
there were just 3 quick peaks 0.33, 0.37 and 0.46 mcSv/h
the 0.46 was in a shelterd tunnel and i think the particulates were collecting there having been pushed there by the rain imo…
the whole journey took 2 hrs and about 60 miles
the readings did not change if i was on top of a hill or at the bottom except for the low sheltered tunnel..
i think as these pulses came in waves and with values similar to earlier (less peaks) that the rain has had somewhat of a cleansing effect but not much…
edf are using the rain to cover there emmissions imo… they can tell the monitor staff it is radon washout (like criirad has to do) and they delete the rises, that is if the monitors spikes need to be deleted
they are still polluting the air and for a while as i was driving the areas either side of the windpipe got a slight ache again?? otherwise im ok… arc pours a glass of apple juice, breaks of some fairtrade choclate and wishes he had extract of seaweed… just wot is going on??
Report Comment
oops! time of journey
22.00 hrs to 00.00 hrs gmt
nighty night hope the FUEL fleas dont bite!
Report Comment
I was wondering : do any of you have any documents, information about the links between the evaporation of the oceans and radioactivity ?
Maybe somewhere on this forum exists already a thread about the increase of the atmospheric pollution caused by the evaporation cycle of the pacific ocean?
Report Comment
hi margot
you have jogged my memory on this one.. busy doing a rain test on hot rain possibly and generally making the nuke uk`s life a living hell! (i wish)
marc kaloften (i think its spelt) has studied fallout dispersal and has done a book on it i believe.. but no video info nor internet info generally on this.. you gotta buy the book..
the thing that stopped me getting it was the reference he made to smaller than 0.25 PM particulates not having an effect as they go in and out quickly,
this is nuke uks position too.. yep wade wakeford thomas etc of 100 millisievert a month fame.. no inhalation allowed..
kings collge london are currently debating this as new evidence has come to light about small particulates being able to access the bloodstream easily through the lungs… so his info is unreliable
imho.. maybe oneday he will come to enenews to straighten me out.. but that is my position on marc… very diplomatic.. but he has done a good job for the japanese antinuke cause i believe, so he has my respects.. all air fallout info seems to be blurry to say the least..
finding out is on my list of things to do, i am concentrating on ground and low level air pollution from npps and need that info! i will post any findings on this forum… if you or anyone come across any links i would appreciate a heads up!
peace
Report Comment
@arclight:
Here's a video of Maggie Gundersen interviewing Kaltofen about the where/what/how/why/when of Fukushima fallout dispersal…
http://fairewinds.org/content/where-all-fukushima-radiation-going-and-why-does-it-matter
Report Comment
Thank you, arclight!
This is because of my Soeks, I have a sordid impression that progressively the average readings are going up every month – and that they are not going to come down again.
you are rightly pointing out many sources of european pollution, and besides that I have an irresistible impression that after each nuke-cloud passing overhead my average readings never really go down to the ancient background level
Report Comment
YES! ASK YOUR GOVERNMENT!
Report Comment
sorry for the caps Margot. frustrated. I have no answers for you.
Report Comment
I fully understand.
Only this week I found out that this spring one of my colleagues have developed the allergic rhinitis at the age of 34 , and another one had found out that from now on she is suffering from hyperthyroidism.
infuriating and heartbreaking
Report Comment
For those new to enenews rad monitoring tools collected for you…
http://realitycheck.no-ip.info/forum/index.php/board,24.0.html
Fukushima fallout forecasts & other radiation updates
http://realitycheck.no-ip.info/nnn.html
Please share with loved ones and these folks still needing to know
http://www.usa.gov/Contact/Elected.shtml
Report Comment
Rad Network Last Night 80 CPM in Minnesota. Held upper 70's for several hours throughout the late evening. This looked 'out of place' to me and it continued to be the highest reading in the country for quite some time.
Here's some screen shots. Heavy rains were moving through. I took a screen shot of that too.
79 cpm – http://dl.dropbox.com/u/2099954/Rad%20Network%2079%20in%20MN.jpg
78 cpm – http://dl.dropbox.com/u/2099954/Rad%20Network%2078%20in%20MN.jpg
80 cpm – http://dl.dropbox.com/u/2099954/Rad%20Network%2080%20in%20MN.jpg
weather – http://dl.dropbox.com/u/2099954/Rad%20Minn%20Weather%20Radar%20001.jpg
Times on the Radiation Network screen are Pacific Time. (approximately 9:30 to 10:30 June 10, 2012 for these screen shots)
Report Comment
"…very UNUSUAL radioactive fallout reading this morning. It started storming around 9am and blew through by 10:30 am. At 10:45 we went outside to take a sample." – potrblog
I read this 'after' my above post. hmmm…???
Airborne Radiation + Ground Shine
at 3x Above Background Radiation :
http://pissinontheroses.blogspot.com/2012/06/max-alert-continuation-airborne.html
Report Comment
I expected to see a lot of reports of increased radiation yesterday. When that did not happen, I thought it was because it was a weekend and reports such as yours would appear today.
I only received my Geiger counter 3 weeks ago. I have several steps to take before I can confidently report the numbers, however, the counts have matched reported numbers until yesterday.
In Portland, Oregon and all the way from Portland, Oregon to Cascade Locks, Oregon, my Geiger Counter was spiking continuously higher than 100 CPM with a maximum reading of 202 CPM. The average of the highs was around 80 CPM. The average for the day was 41 CPM. The majority of the days, the reading runs between 12 and 24 CPM. The readings remained consistent outside, inside the house and inside the car. Generally, the readings are lower inside the house and inside the car. That did not hold yesterday.
Today, the readings are continually over 70 CPM inside my living room.
Report Comment
Interesting. Thanks for adding in brainheart. Keep going with that new Geiger Counter.
I trust independent peoples readings over that of Radnet any day.
Getting higher than normal counts inside the house and/or car is not good. The glass on your car is fairly dense.
Teaching Aid, Alpha Beta Gamma:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ec8iomUS34U
Report Comment
I will attempt to link a chart of all the readings to-date. This is my first attepmted link, so I hope that it works.
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/brainwithheart/7362619380/" title="Geiger Readings">
Report Comment
Thank you 'un mille fois.' Now I know why I can't access the Radnet Query Interface for SF information beyond 6/4/12. The rads surely followed the coastal jet stream in the last two weeks. They've pulled all the 'beta' data. For what purpose? To show their lack of transparency, their lapdog obeyance to higher nuclear counsels? Maybe their equipment failed again, or, this is a 'peek-a-boo' data game to annoy the hell out of people who actually care about their work.
Over time I expect the (erm) "radon" readings to be much higher, especially low level gamma energy levels. Remember that there is a two year delay (if I've got this right) in a gamma burst, AFTER an initial alpha deposition. However, what I see on your log is an increase in the background count following more beta release events from Fukushima. The fast build up in count possibly lines up with increasing worry about reactor 4's increasing heat. They need to get that 60 ton cover on quick to at least offset 'sky shine' (as some suggest) upon collapse, that would otherwise render the plant inaccessible. Pray for all the workers to get this done a.s.a.p and to reduce the hydrogen build-up in reactor 1! Otherwise, you're log is going to make history- ;( If I'm in error in my estimation, please correct me!
Report Comment
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/brainwithheart/7362619380">
Last attempt
Report Comment
This link worked.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/brainwithheart/7362619380/
Good chart. Thanks! Shows a 'steady' increase over those last couple of days too.
Stay aware.
Report Comment
Thank You for the working link. I plan to post the readings more often now that I have a FLICKR account.
Report Comment
Thanks brainheart for being another radreader. keep an eye out for vital1, he has a guide and other information that may help you (see above).
This is so great, the peoples' rad network is building. The NPP wont be able to hide their 'venting' and other 'events'.
I wonder how we'll get MSM to pay attention to the details we are all beginning to gather.
arclight does a lot of work too, but now that I think of it, I'm not sure if the data has been published publicly.
anyway, welcome to the chain gang
Report Comment
brainheart,
Yes, great chart. Just post the link address as you would type it into a web browser web address box, minus the html code. This web forum will create a click-able link out of it automatically.
Report Comment
Damn! Thats too high, much above 25 I get thinking and staying inside with HEPA
Report Comment
latest news release on dock washed ashore at agate beach oregon
http://www.newslincolncounty.com/?p=53424
still no definition on what negative radiation means
world may want to take notice of how the uneducated curious
respond – 1000's flocking to see, touch, feel, wonder from Japan
have radalert 100 on order
also see – Government Ignores Debris Field 3 Times Size of US headed for West Coast
http://www.infiniteunknown.net/2012/06/09/government-ignores-debris-field-3-times-the-size-of-the-united-states-heading-for-the-west-coast/
Report Comment
Hi papacares, sorry if I'm repeating myself, I did answer your question about 'neg rads' on an earlier post of yours.
Basically, there is no such thing. Average numbers are around 0.10 micro sieverts.
So no report can ever say 'negative' as there is always something.
We must push to get the numbers, not the subjective opinion. 'neg rads' should just be ignored, laughed at even.
Report Comment
thanks Richard – appreciate the word up – so it would appear the OR Dept of State Parks do not want to commit to a straight up answer – but it does sound very good to the unitiated when an as yet un-named source says it was tested and came up negative for radiation – it is almost as if one has entered the twilight zone
Report Comment
'the twilight zone' – yes, i've heard that often since 3/11
I also wanted to repeat what I had mentioned earlier ..
If someone says 'neg rads' it simply means they haven't tested and / or they do not actually know what they are talking about.
If they do actually know a real number, but still only provide a subjective answer, they are being patronizing and deserve contempt.
'below levels of concern', 'negative rads', 'no immediate threat' .. all these terms are an insult to the general community – and to those of us that know better – they speak of corruption.
Report Comment
Scene Twilight Zone. (pretty sure)
"Something's wrong, that something's in the air, something's going to happen and everybody's afraid…"
"Far too late, they ask themselves the question… Why?"
(30 sec clip. )
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yg1Znycu5u0&list=PL89C3EBC75D1471F4&index=19&feature=plpp_video
Report Comment
great clip
thanks for sharing
Report Comment
@papacares – as a local, maybe you could apply some pressure and get real readings. If they can't give you real numbers, ask why. It would be good to force them to admit what ever shortcoming they have in the approach to rad readings.
just a thought.
Report Comment
@richard
thanks for the input
not many are aware the NOAA Pacific Fleet Headquarters are located a few miles to the south of where the dock from Japan washed ashore
all the local agencies are trusting NOAA to perform the due diligence research so the pat answer is ask NOAA
to the best of my knowledge nobody is willing to submit the actual results of testing – who performed the testing – what equipment was used in testing
this could be for fear of legal recourse at some time in the future – remember there are 2 sides to legal recourse being one for warning and another for not warning so could be a catch-22
Report Comment
from "So Terrifying" link translated by google translate – these readings are terrifying
Fukushima Prefecture Disaster Prevention and Countermeasures Headquarters Why were you doing?
"Before, Fukushima Prefecture Disaster Prevention and Countermeasures Headquarters"
http://mak55.exblog.jp/15644973/
"Kenchomae. That was more than ten thousand in the center forecast -300 shame!"
http://mak55.exblog.jp/15629638/
① "to everyone in Fukushima"
http://mak55.exblog.jp/15623674/
②
http://mak55.exblog.jp/15632007/
③
http://mak55.exblog.jp/15640349/
④
http://mak55.exblog.jp/15678217/
2,970,000 nail field below Odaka, Kanaya district Minamisoma
Odaka, nail field below 522,000 Kanaya district Minamisoma
5,570,000 Odaka district Minamisoma
793,000 on the district town Odaka Minamisoma
Odaka district Honcho 430,000 Minamisoma
Odaka district Honcho 580,000 Minamisoma
Hirono-machi 43,917
247,136 (Hirono town office) Hirono-machi
142,794 (Hirono Station) Hirono-machi
Shimokitaba 255,161 Hirono-machi
239,325 (Miharu Dam) west Chuno-nai Miharu-machi
Kamegai 2,061,446 Nihonmatsu
Odaka, 565,767 in Nihonmatsu
Nakae 227,315 Nihonmatsu
Fukushima 3,148,238 Sugitsuma town (in the prefectural government site)
Yarai 398,995 Motomiya Motomiya City
Flat character Takamori town Sarashina Bandai 34,600 (SA Bandai)
757,000 a holy town
Miyamoto Fushiguro 431,917 Date City
Tamai 565,767 Otama village
563,824 (near Central Library) Hayama Koriyama
253,292 (in the…
Report Comment
continued
253,292 (in the vicinity of the district court, Fukushima) Koriyama Hayama
____________________
(Bq / Kg total value of the cesium 134 Tasu137)
Also also strontium plutonium
Becquerel various total radiation
How much would it be done?
Report Comment
london radiation radon but low measures
the rain today was hot.. did a test on the rain and got 0.32 mcSv/h average of a rain swipe that had particulates from the weekend as well
after 1 hour dropped to 0.21 mcSv/h
is this progeny from the particulates or a slower moving wave of radon?? not sure about that.. the low level winds and rainfront are coming from france/belgium and there are 2 fronts and wind directions battling over london.. i got some lower values earlier this morning inside but outside in the rain it was much higher.. meaning rain and not air..
as the rain stopped the rad levels dropped then as the water started to evaporate the rad levels caught little clouds of 0.21 mcSv/h gaseous isotope likely radon.. the rain stopped and started..
i did a second swipe over the same area and got a lower max value showing that the weekends particulates were still active on the first dirty swipe..
interestingly the second swipe looked nearly as dirty as the first and the time between the 2 was 1 hour, showing that radioactive or non radioactive particles were in the rain as well!!
so the radon findings in the usa are interesting from a reactor or waste processing? from usa, canada or as i posited europe?
800 millisieverts/h is alot of bequerels/litre eh?
will be posting video evidence..
slurps apple juice, munches on fairtrade dark chocolate hmmmmm!
boots up video editing software
Report Comment
at
http://odlinfo.bfs.de/
going west from Berlin – Dresden to Dusseldorf – Leipzig – Hannover – Bremen for the last few days there has been a smattering of stations reporting .> 0.600 mSv/h
the average across that range appears to be .> 0.140 mSv/h
Report Comment
cheers papa
looks like the same contamination as france and england..
just drove out in the rain again .. this time same range 0.11 to 0.23 mcSv/h
average about 0.15 mcSv/h with a just a few peaks to 0.33 mcSv/h
rain easing of
winds have been changing drastically alot..
winds are slow with gusts and with still patches..
the northerly front is trying to come south still at 12.30 hrs gmt with the rain stopping..
got a 0.09 low in maidstone kent this morning
the rain is not so hot and is mixed with cleaner patches.. maybe some radon progeny left too!
check back later..
Report Comment
BREAKING.. 1,200 mcSv/h on the czech monitor on eurdep
CZ1406 – CHEB (Czech Republic) Lat: 50.1ºN, Long: 12.4ºE, HoL:–m., HoS: 470 m.
5 hour event
16.00 hrs to 21.00 hrs CET
http://eurdepweb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/PublicEurdepMap/TimeSeries.aspx?loc=803&end=201206121330&int=D1&rad=1&test=0
missing data later in germany (the graph looks messed about best to put polyline on to see the missing data points)
DEZ3138 – Hohenberg a.d.Eger (Germany)
http://eurdepweb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/PublicEurdepMap/TimeSeries.aspx?loc=2981&end=201206121330&int=D1&rad=1&test=0
LOOKS LIKE THE NUKIES ARE MAKING UP FOR THE COVERUP OF NUKE POLLUTION AND ITS EFFECTS ON CLIMATE CHANGE OF LAST MONTH… GRRRRRRRRRR!
and everryone is as quite as a mouse
sucking up the rads
letting their children suck up the rads
letting our children suck up the rads
oncology anyone? most effective at destroying a young childs personality and is likely to last only 10 years..??
arghhhh!
Report Comment
Can someone recommend a good geiger. I got about $600 usd. for one. I seen the rad alert and that a pancake was perferred. Just curious what you guys were using.
Thanks
Report Comment
@candlebox – please see vital1's notes .. here is a start ..
http://enenews.com/forum-post-radiation-monitoring-data-april-30-2012-present/comment-page-4#comment-256952
and
http://technologypals.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Using-a-Geiger-Counter-to-test-food-for-Radioactive-Contamination.pdf
I use an Ekotect from Russia, it was about $400 on the *bay.
But I'm no professional, so I'm just passing on what I've experienced.
But I do trust my Ekotect, seems to be doing a good job.
Here is a link to a recent one, it sounds very inexpensive, not sure if that's a good thing.
http://enenews.com/forum-general-discussion-thread-nuclear-issues-june-2012/comment-page-4#comment-260940
Report Comment
I was looking earlier at some on Amazon. S E International has some there starting @ $530. The Inspector General seems to be a popular model. Is your username in reference to the band?
Report Comment
@Richard- I did read that article. I guess ill go with the inspector as well.
@dogleg- Yes, it is. Ive used it as my screen name forever…
Report Comment
It has a nice tough protective cover you can buy for it as well. Its on the way now.
Report Comment
Total Boxhead here. One of my all time favorites.
Report Comment
Rad alert is great, but I wish I had spent the extra 300 for the pancake deal.
Report Comment
high radon washout in london 11th june 2012
a radon testing epic with weather charts of low level winds!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1_0tAFdputc
Report Comment
Friends here is chance to make difference
FYI,several student groups are joining up with a project out of Seattle that incorporates students and teachers going to Japan for volunteer work with the disaster – with that intro comes this
@Sue posted this story and the info below. If you really are as disgusted as you say you are, please call the number below and let them know. This is a chance to actually do something! PLEASE CALL and let them know that many of us are aware of what is really happening in Japan.
We have to look out for these childre. Wouldn't you want someone to look out for your child? If anyone would like to contact the Kizuna Project regarding the above American/Japanese exchange programme (I think that other countries are also participating in these fully-funded programmes), please call Megan Bernard in Seattle on 206 367 2152.
http://www.laurasian.org/kizuna/index.htm
The Kizuna Project is supported by UNESCO.
Megan also has email- kizuna@laurasian.org
with the help of this forum the whole world now has the opportunity to cause awareness – phone calls are great, cost prohibitive? – then email – with 5,058 members enenews should flood the Seattle office
Report Comment
"They will then travel 3 nights/4 days to a location in one of the areas struck by the tsunami – Miyagi, Iwate, Ibaragi, or Fukushima – and will engage in volunteer activities with community members who have been impacted by the March 11 disaster. Such activities might include doing presentations in shelters, elementary, middle or high schools, libraries, plant trees, or help clean the beaches, homes, parks, and other areas.
(These activities will not take place nor have participants pass through areas established as Restricted Zones, due to the Fukushima nuclear accident. Nor will participants engage in any activities that could in any way be construed as dangerous)"
That's reassuring, the volunteers will not enter the Holy Restriction Zone designed by the Wise Japanese Authorities in order to protect the People ! Gee, that's a good news! No danger at all!
and supported by ONU, that's reassuring as well!
Report Comment
i will be sending an email this weekend with links to
Child Rights International
ACRO france (sample data and warning on food contamination)
the EURACTIVE website link to the April 12 warning to pregnant women and the media censorship that ignored it, including this link
http://f-pj.org/e-news0308.html
that describes a fifty percent drop the week before the warning to pregnant women and young children in europe
a link to physicians for responsibility website
also, CRIIRADS warning about contamination in budapest that is going unheard
just a quick brainstorm
green action japan will get a mention with various campaigns
and i need to think about the rest of the evisence
it needs to be consise and accurate with "valued" organisations
i suggest the info for any emails might be placed here
off to post on the forum now
nice petition harassment there there papa sue and margo
http://enenews.com/forum-petitions-ballot-initiatives-other-signature-drives-video
Report Comment
@arclight
fantastic – thank you very much
Report Comment
I know portblog posted his video about raised radiation level in Indiana area, so is this cover-up true?
http://www.naturalnews.com/036158_nuclear_explosion_Indiana_radiation.html
Report Comment
Hi andii
I don't know, would like to know though.
My thought on this is: "Maybe" something did happen.
"Maybe" there were spikes, just not as high as reported?
With those high of readings, wouldn't people be falling dead some where?
I look at Geiger Counters as giving us an idea of levels, they are good at warning us when something is not right.
I don't believe they are always accurate, I do believe there are false readings. Always good to have more than one.
With those high levels, I hope there would be more independent people reporting on it.
I would not be surprised if there was an event somewhere.
I would not be surprise if there were spikes in the readings
I would be shocked/surprised if those reported extremely high readings were true.
Report Comment
I can no longer run gamma and beta charts at the EPA's envirofacts website.
I've noticed Alexander Higgins' charts stop at May 19.
I wasn't even able to run retrospective charts. The entire system is no longer available.
All i could do was search for specific radionuclides, e.g., cesium 137.
I used the electronic communication option at the EPA's site to ask for help. this is the response:
Thank you for your response to the Envirofacts Warehouse Website. Envirofacts is an EPA program undergoing continual research and enhancement, so your feedback is greatly appreciated.
The Envirofacts website (http://www.epa.gov/enviro/) is only a web tool that makes data from several EPA data systems available to the public via an online query format. Users specify the criteria by which multiple EPA databases are searched for environmental information. Please note that Envirofacts can only provide the information that is contained within the databases. The data retrieved through these queries are both collected and maintained by the individual program system offices.
Unfortunately your message falls outside the scope of Envirofacts. For issues concerning the CDX, we suggest contacting the CDX Help Desk at http://www.epa.gov/cdx/contact.htm . For Radiation Program Contact Information, go to http://www.epa.gov/rpdweb00/contact.html .
If you have other questions and comments concerning Envirofacts, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Thank you again for your…
Report Comment
majia, EPA Radnet query is still working. Looks like 3 days are missing though, in Phoenix. Hmm wonder why.
https://cdxnode64.epa.gov/radnet-public/query.do
Report Comment
Operators on holiday maybe, Bobby1? In Luxembourg, we never get readings on public holidays or Christmas days.
Priorities, eh?
Report Comment
13June2012report
12June2012 notice rising cpm in coastal areas of Oregon
up from mid 20's to 47 now down to 34 close to 40 still in Portland area
have independant station reporting from LA USA area using Gamma Scout unit with low reading of .085 mSv/H and high of .202mSv/h
should translate to under 12 cpm so consistent with current radnet reporting
Report Comment
German ministry confirms higher NPP releases during refueling. The Grohnde NPP is refueled tomorrow. The article says:
"the daily dose on the thyroid for adults rises from the usual 0,62 E-10 Millisievert to 3,18 E-10 Millisievert. For children between 1 and 2 years of age the daily uptake rises from 1,15 E-10 to 5,98 E-10 Millisievert."
(imagine effects on unborn)
The IPPNW recommended families with children to leave the area during the refueling week a while ago.
http://mobil.abendblatt.de/region/niedersachsen/article2306408/Gruene-schlagen-Alarm-wegen-Strahlungsanstieg.html
Report Comment
13June2012
morning readings from Korea Town (near downtown LA). The meter readings are fluctuating as usual, but are coming in in the low range at about 0.115 micro-Sievert and at the high end at around 0.183 micro-Siev. The majority of the readings are around 0.158 m.S.
also anyone monitoring Osaka Bay Fukushima Diary is reporting it is turning yellow
http://fukushima-diary.com/2012/06/osaka-bay-looking-yellow/?tw_p=twt
Report Comment
at: http://www.ubalert.com/Jsz
Nuclear Event – North-America – USA
USA Severe // Nuclear Event
The Palisades nuclear power plant is shut down. Officials at the plant removed it from service due to what is being described as a "small leak" in the plant's safety injection and refueling water tank. That tank holds as much as 300-thousand gallons of water that is used remove heat from the reactor's core in the event of a coolant accident and to increase "shutdown safety margin." It's not known how long the troubled facility will remain out of service. Palisades has been ranked by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission as one of the four worst nuclear plants in the nation.
Report Comment
Residents Respond to New Problems at Palisades Nuclear Plant
The plant is being shutdown for the third time in recent history
+ Video
Palisades, Mich.—
Those who live near the Palisades Nuclear Power Plant near Covert are responding to the news that the plant was closed to repair a water tank leak.
FOX 17 talked to a woman who lives just about half of a mile from the plant in a cottage on the beach. She says that she wishes the plant would give her some warning before it shuts down.
"It is a little disconcerting, to all of a sudden hear a screech and see all of this stuff coming out
of the plant," says Margaret Roche, Palisades Park resident.
She says when the plant shuts down, loud steam is released from the facility.
"It's loud, the steam is very loud. Last fall when they had that mishap there it was frighteningly loud, and it was very fast."
http://www.fox17online.com/news/lakeshore/fox17-palisades-nuclear-plant-leak-plant-shut-down-for-repair-20120613,0,3544929.story
Report Comment
Is that plant near the Indiana boarder? Close to where those high readings came in a few nights ago?
Report Comment
via the map at the ubalert site – looks as if that is a yes
Report Comment
Looking at a map it's 55 miles north of south bend IN.
Report Comment
Palisades, The Oldest Nuclear Plant in the World: A Conversation with Kevin Kamps
Kevin Kamps of Beyond Nuclear (www.beyondnuclear.org) talks about the aging Palisades Nuclear Power Plant in Van Buren County, Michigan, on the shores of Lake Michigan. His conversation with the Peace Education Center took place in Lansing, Michigan, on May 2, 2012.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Q3ArohWWsQ
Report Comment
High radiation readings in Longmont, CO, at same time as 7,000 + cpm recorded in South Bend, Indiana. HAARP had a very high amount of activity at the same time. I just put the highest readings here, because of time constraints. June 7-8, 2012. I posted a few readings on June 7th earlier.
306 CPM, 2.4847 uSv/h, 1.9280 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
4:49 PM – 8 Jun 12
246 CPM, 1.9975 uSv/h, 1.6220 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
4:29 PM – 8 Jun 12
252 CPM, 2.0462 uSv/h, 2.0058 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
4:09 PM – 8 Jun 12
462 CPM, 3.7514 uSv/h, 2.3229 AVG uSv/h, 8 time(s) over natural radiation
3:49 PM – 8 Jun 12
306 CPM, 2.4847 uSv/h, 2.1793 AVG uSv/h, 8 time(s) over natural radiation
2:59 PM – 8 Jun 12
282 CPM, 2.2898 uSv/h, 1.8738 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
2:49 PM – 8 Jun 12
300 CPM, 2.4360 uSv/h, 2.1360 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
2:29 PM – 8 Jun 12
234 CPM, 1.9001 uSv/h, 1.8360 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
2:19 PM – 8 Jun 12
264 CPM, 2.1437 uSv/h, 1.7719 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
2:09 PM – 8 Jun 12
240 CPM, 1.9488 uSv/h, 1.8974 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
1:39 PM – 8 Jun 12
312 CPM, 2.5334 uSv/h, 1.8461 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
1:29 PM – 8 Jun 12
306 CPM, 2.4847 uSv/h, 1.8773 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
12:39 PM – 8 Jun 12
Report Comment
[cont.]
300 CPM, 2.4360 uSv/h, 1.8278 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
11:59 AM – 8 Jun 12
240 CPM, 1.9488 uSv/h, 1.5266 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
10:29 AM – 8 Jun 12
294 CPM, 2.3873 uSv/h, 1.9686 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
9:28 AM – 8 Jun 12
294 CPM, 2.3873 uSv/h, 1.9794 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
9:08 AM – 8 Jun 12
258 CPM, 2.0950 uSv/h, 1.6099 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
8:28 AM – 8 Jun 12
282 CPM, 2.2898 uSv/h, 2.0632 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
7:58 AM – 8 Jun 12
330 CPM, 2.6796 uSv/h, 2.4742 AVG uSv/h, 9 time(s) over natural radiation
7:28 AM – 8 Jun 12
360 CPM, 2.9232 uSv/h, 2.2689 AVG uSv/h, 8 time(s) over natural radiation
7:18 AM – 8 Jun 12
342 CPM, 2.7770 uSv/h, 2.3499 AVG uSv/h, 8 time(s) over natural radiation
6:28 AM – 8 Jun 12
264 CPM, 2.1437 uSv/h, 1.9228 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
6:18 AM – 8 Jun 12
336 CPM, 2.7283 uSv/h, 2.0396 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
5:58 AM – 8 Jun 12
330 CPM, 2.6796 uSv/h, 2.4466 AVG uSv/h, 9 time(s) over natural radiation
4:58 AM – 8 Jun 1
324 CPM, 2.6309 uSv/h, 2.2136 AVG uSv/h, 8 time(s) over natural radiation
4:48 AM – 8 Jun 12
378 CPM, 3.0694 uSv/h, 2.1900 AVG uSv/h, 8 time(s) over natural radiation
4:08 AM – 8 Jun 12
252 CPM, 2.0462 uSv/h, 1.8611 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
3:28 AM – 8 Jun 12
Report Comment
[cont]
330 CPM, 2.6796 uSv/h, 2.3482 AVG uSv/h, 8 time(s) over natural radiation
2:48 AM – 8 Jun 12
306 CPM, 2.4847 uSv/h, 2.2694 AVG uSv/h, 8 time(s) over natural radiation
2:18 AM – 8 Jun 12
378 CPM, 3.0694 uSv/h, 2.4029 AVG uSv/h, 8 time(s) over natural radiation
1:58 AM – 8 Jun 12
246 CPM, 1.9975 uSv/h, 1.6213 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
1:38 AM – 8 Jun 12
246 CPM, 1.9975 uSv/h, 2.0422 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
12:47 AM – 8 Jun 1
252 CPM, 2.0462 uSv/h, 2.0869 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
12:37 AM – 8 Jun 12
288 CPM, 2.3386 uSv/h, 2.1276 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
12:27 AM – 8 Jun 1
252 CPM, 2.0462 uSv/h, 1.9820 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
12:07 AM – 8 Jun 12
288 CPM, 2.3386 uSv/h, 1.9178 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
11:57 PM – 7 Jun 12
324 CPM, 2.6309 uSv/h, 2.1884 AVG uSv/h, 8 time(s) over natural radiation
11:27 PM – 7 Jun 1
264 CPM, 2.1437 uSv/h, 2.1617 AVG uSv/h, 8 time(s) over natural radiation
10:37 PM – 7 Jun 12
318 CPM, 2.5822 uSv/h, 2.1797 AVG uSv/h, 8 time(s) over natural radiation
10:27 PM – 7
276 CPM, 2.2411 uSv/h, 2.0930 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
10:07 PM – 7 Jun 12
9:57 PM – 7 Jun 12
264 CPM, 2.1437 uSv/h, 1.7947 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
9:47 PM – 7 Jun 12
270 CPM, 2.1924 uSv/h, 2.2580 AVG uSv/h, 8 time(s) over natural radiation
9:27 PM – 7 Jun 12
Report Comment
312 CPM, 2.5334 uSv/h, 2.3237 AVG uSv/h, 8 time(s) over natural radiation
9:17 PM – 7 Jun 12
306 CPM, 2.4847 uSv/h, 2.1139 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
9:07 PM – 7 Jun 12
264 CPM, 2.1437 uSv/h, 1.9757 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
8:47 PM – 7 Jun 12
282 CPM, 2.2898 uSv/h, 1.9590 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
8:27 PM – 7 Jun 12
384 CPM, 3.1181 uSv/h, 2.6665 AVG uSv/h, 9 time(s) over natural radiation
7:37 PM – 7 Jun 1
354 CPM, 2.8745 uSv/h, 2.2150 AVG uSv/h, 8 time(s) over natural radiation
7:27 PM – 7 Jun 12
342 CPM, 2.7770 uSv/h, 2.1354 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
6:37 PM – 7 Jun 12
258 CPM, 2.0950 uSv/h, 1.8822 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
6:07 PM – 7 Jun 12
360 CPM, 2.9232 uSv/h, 2.3645 AVG uSv/h, 8 time(s) over natural radiation
5:47 PM – 7 Jun 12
252 CPM, 2.0462 uSv/h, 1.8277 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
5:07 PM – 7 Jun 12
414 CPM, 3.3617 uSv/h, 2.7992 AVG uSv/h, 10 time(s) over natural radiation
4:16 PM – 7 Jun 12
radiation
4:06 PM – 7 Jun 12
246 CPM, 1.9975 uSv/h, 1.9801 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
3:46 PM – 7 Jun 12
https://twitter.com/LongmontRadMon
http://radmon.stan4d.net/
https://pachube.com/feeds/30643
Induction Magnetometer, Gakona, AK
http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/cgi-bin/scmag/disp-scmag.cgi?date=latest&Bx=on
HAARP Fluxgate Magnetometer
http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/cgi-bin/magnetometer/gak-mag.cgi
Report Comment
Hmmmm… look at the spike at Longmont, it looks like it happened on June 3, or 3 days before the Indiana radiation event.
https://api.cosm.com/v2/feeds/30643/datastreams/USVAVG.png?width=730&height=250&colour=%23f15a24&duration=30days&show_axis_labels=true&detailed_grid=true&scale=auto
Report Comment
Actually, these dates are from 3:46 PM June 7 to 4:49 PM June 8.
Report Comment
I see what you mean the spike on the graph at:
http://radmon.stan4d.net/
as opposed to the individual readings on June 7-8 on
https://twitter.com/LongmontRadMon
I wonder if the large booms people heard are a kind of fracking or opening up of oil deposits by means of deep earth tomography by HAARP. It's going to keep up if they have to keep people from seeing the readings of the activity out of the HAARP facility in Alaska. The forecast of weather for this coming Saturday is for possible severe thunderstorms.
Report Comment
The link to HAARP say's "Forbidden" got a better link. thank you for the info.
Report Comment
These are the same links we've been looking at for months. They've just now been banned.
Report Comment
It did not like my IP blocked. got it with chrome. Ixquick is the best search.
Report Comment
readings from LA, Korea Town, taken between 0930 and 1215 14June 2012:
Low: 0.093 micro-Siev.
High: 0.154 micro-Siev.
There was a spike yesterday around 19:30 of 0.270 mSv
Report Comment
I-131 detected from mushrooms from Iwaki in May.
Whatever TEPCO or govt might say, Fukushima recriticality is likely.
Report Comment
Longmont, CO, 14 June 2012
210 CPM, 1.7052 uSv/h, 1.4809 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
10:07 PM – 14 Jun 12
186 CPM, 1.5103 uSv/h, 1.3441 AVG uSv/h, 4 time(s) over natural radiation
9:47 PM – 14 Jun 12
258 CPM, 2.0950 uSv/h, 1.4788 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
9:27 PM – 14 Jun 12
258 CPM, 2.0950 uSv/h, 1.6158 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
8:07 PM – 14 Jun 12
210 CPM, 1.7052 uSv/h, 1.4775 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
6:47 PM – 14 Jun 12
186 CPM, 1.5103 uSv/h, 1.2498 AVG uSv/h, 4 time(s) over natural radiation
6:37 PM – 14 Jun 12
192 CPM, 1.5590 uSv/h, 1.1601 AVG uSv/h, 4 time(s) over natural radiation
5:37 PM – 14 Jun 1
192 CPM, 1.5590 uSv/h, 1.1444 AVG uSv/h, 4 time(s) over natural radiation
5:07 PM – 14 Jun 12
198 CPM, 1.6078 uSv/h, 1.3829 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
3:47 PM – 14 Jun 12
198 CPM, 1.6078 uSv/h, 1.5175 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
3:06 PM – 14 Jun 1
210 CPM, 1.7052 uSv/h, 1.6167 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
2:36 PM – 14 Jun 12
222 CPM, 1.8026 uSv/h, 1.5949 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
2:16 PM – 14 Jun 12
210 CPM, 1.7052 uSv/h, 1.4589 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
1:56 PM – 14 Jun 12
222 CPM, 1.8026 uSv/h, 1.3533 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
1:36 PM – 14 Jun 1
204 CPM, 1.6565 uSv/h, 1.4382 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
12:26 PM – 14 Jun 12
Report Comment
[cont.]
186 CPM, 1.5103 uSv/h, 1.3301 AVG uSv/h, 4 time(s) over natural radiation
11:46 AM – 14 Jun 12
204 CPM, 1.6565 uSv/h, 1.5991 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
11:05 AM – 14 Jun 12
228 CPM, 1.8514 uSv/h, 1.5417 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
10:55 AM – 14 Jun 12
186 CPM, 1.5103 uSv/h, 1.5385 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
10:35 AM – 14 Jun 12
252 CPM, 2.0462 uSv/h, 1.7691 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
10:15 AM – 14 Jun 1
258 CPM, 2.0950 uSv/h, 1.6687 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
9:55 AM – 14 Jun 1
264 CPM, 2.1437 uSv/h, 1.2424 AVG uSv/h, 4 time(s) over natural radiation
9:45 AM – 14 Jun 12
https://twitter.com/LongmontRadMon
https://pachube.com/feeds/30643
Looks like we’re getting ready for the severe weather predicted for Saturday.
Report Comment
15 June 2012 :1700 wind North at 5-10 Temp 60F weather clear
Newport OR average cpm 11-14
just received delivery of radalert 100 today so immediately went
to Agate Beach to test the dock from Japan that washed ashore
the readings at the dock were
side one 10 cpm
end with bumper link 11 cpm
side two 9 cpm
from the readings above a theory is in mind that whomever tested the dock originally then decided to report the dock had negative radiation was using the background cpm level for the area as the standard and subtracted the dock cpm, if so they would then deduct a lower cpm level than background or a so-called negative radiation level
since thousands of people have come to the beach to touch and marvel at this dock it gives me peace to know it is not hot
because there are so many small children visiting the site with their parents and grandparents
Report Comment
This website is back up:
Induction Magnetometer, Gakona, AK
http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/cgi-bin/scmag/disp-scmag.cgi?date=latest&Bx=on
Report Comment
Well I saw it for one minute. Now it is forbidden again.
Report Comment
Now I can see it again.
Report Comment
I think it is the link directed from enenews.com that isn't working. When I copy and paste the url, then I can see something.
http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/cgi-bin/scmag/disp-scmag.cgi?date=latest&Bx=on
Report Comment
Same for the other link:
HAARP Fluxgate Magnetometer
http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/cgi-bin/magnetometer/gak-mag.cgi
Copy and past the url to get it.
Report Comment
Longmont, CO 15 June 2012
264 CPM, 2.1437 uSv/h, 1.7353 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
10:00 PM – 15 Jun 12
300 CPM, 2.4360 uSv/h, 1.6945 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
9:10 PM – 15 Jun 12
210 CPM, 1.7052 uSv/h, 1.7173 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
8:40 PM – 15 Jun 12
294 CPM, 2.3873 uSv/h, 2.1919 AVG uSv/h, 8 time(s) over natural radiation
8:20 PM – 15 Jun 12
240 CPM, 1.9488 uSv/h, 1.9965 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
8:10 PM – 15 Jun 12
222 CPM, 1.8026 uSv/h, 2.0442 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
8:00 PM – 15 Jun 12
270 CPM, 2.1924 uSv/h, 2.2857 AVG uSv/h, 8 time(s) over natural radiation
7:50 PM – 15 Jun 1
366 CPM, 2.9719 uSv/h, 2.3791 AVG uSv/h, 8 time(s) over natural radiation
7:40 PM – 15 Jun 12
348 CPM, 2.8258 uSv/h, 2.3545 AVG uSv/h, 8 time(s) over natural radiation
7:20 PM – 15 Jun 12
294 CPM, 2.3873 uSv/h, 1.8833 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
7:10 PM – 15 Jun 12
240 CPM, 1.9488 uSv/h, 1.8636 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
6:40 PM – 15 Jun 12
246 CPM, 1.9975 uSv/h, 1.7784 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
6:30 PM – 15 Jun 12
https://twitter.com/#!/LongmontRadMon
https://pachube.com/feeds/30643
More horrible readings. I’m too tired to copy them.
Report Comment
Fukushima Plutonium Map
http://www.pref.fukushima.jp/j/dojou111129.pdf
Report Comment
london radiation update
well the rads havent changed much..
0.09 to 0.26 mcSv/h with sporradic peaks followed or before these rises to 0.26 , 0.23 etc
this morning i got a 0.08 to 0.16 with an average of 0.12 mcSv/h
this afternoon a return to the higher range average now more like 0.15 mcSv/h
sorry not to have posted sooner but the higher peaks and rises to 0.30 mcSv/h + have finished… for now.. it will be raining later and iw will be doing a video on that with a synopsis of the last few days..
its still mucky out there people!
Report Comment
0.30 mcSv/h – Katsushika-ku, Tokyo on 16th June
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V684OaOH4IA
Report Comment
Andii,
Thanks for the video, and data from Tokyo.
Report Comment
Australia,
Queensland,
Glenview,
14th June 2012
I was inland and west of my normal monitoring base doing computer work on this day. I had taken my Geiger counter with me.
Radioactive cloud event detected at Glenview on the Sunshine Coast Australia, Thursday the 14th June in the afternoon starting at 3 pm the Geiger counter alarm multiple times at over 0.50 uS/Hr. The highest free air visual reading was 0.65 uS/hr. Elevated levels lasted for about three quarters of an hour. Here is the event data log chart.
http://sccc.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Glenview-radioactive-cloud-event-140612.jpg
These events would indicated a mixing is happening in the atmosphere. These small events could be happening everywhere and you wouldn't know about it unless you had a Geiger Counter with your.
My normal radiation monitoring station has be very stable lately, and I have not detected anything significant for a while. So if I hadn't been at this location, which is not that far from my normal monitoring location it wouldn't have been detected.
Report Comment
thanks vital1 for the readings. i think you're right on the small events that may go undetected. vortexs and eddies could swirl around unseen, unnoticed. (hyperthetical, and i'm no scientist on this).
it made me think that having two brands/models of dosimeter can help provide some benchmarking. but that's a luxury too.
there is also the radon map to consider …
http://www.arpansa.gov.au/radiationprotection/factsheets/is_RadonMap.cfm
on a local note – my dosimeter on my desk in sydney has eased back from the 0.20 μSv/h and has been around 0.15 μSv/h the last few days.
Report Comment
Richard,
Yes, if these small events are happening it is a concern because they would be statistically hard to detect without lot of people having Geiger Counters. Anyone, child or adult anywhere anytime could walk through this type of event and breath it in.
Report Comment
Food testing lab set up free guide, first draft, is now available for download.
This first draft is now available for download. Any suggestions to improve the guide are welcome. If you find a section you don't understand let me know. This means someone else probably won't. It is a work in progress, but should be enough to get those started you want to set set up a cost effective food testing lab for home, or their community.
http://technologypals.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/How-to-set-up-a-home-or-community-food-testing-lab-for-radioactive-contamination.pdf
————————————————————–
Get the message out there on how serious the Fukushima nuclear disaster is
quickly, and efficiently. You don’t need to explain anything just distribute the lifesaver.pdf or podcast below. (or create your own), hand it out, mailbox it, or email it.
http://technologypals.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/lifesaver.pdf
This informative podcast on New Zealand radio station GreenPlanetFM carries more weight when trying to convince friends and relatives. It has with mine. So if you can use it as a resource please do. The interview starts after a bit of an introduction on synchronicity.
http://www.greenplanetfm.com/members/greenradio/blog/VIEW/00000001/00000193/Peter-Daley-on-the-Fukushima-Radiation-Cloud-over-Australia–NZ.html#00000193
Report Comment
16June2012
Newport Oregon 14 cpm
Corvallis Oregon 9 cpm
Albany Oregon by I-5 19 cpm
LA readings from Korea Town low reading was 0.093 micro-Siev; the high: 0.226.
Report Comment
Unexpected + 39X Background Radiation 12 AM (central time) 6/17/12
Of special note: The Jet Stream is 100 miles to the north in Minnesota.
potrblog:
http://pissinontheroses.blogspot.com/2012/06/39x-background-radiation-12-am-61712.html
I think things are accelerating and/or accumulating. Somehow..?
Report Comment
Hawaii report
12100 CP 8 hours
that 25 per minute, pretty normal
Geiger interpretation here, my original work
http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.com/2012/04/geiger-counter-interpretation.html
Report Comment
402 CPM, 3.2642 uSv/h, 2.3525 AVG uSv/h, 8 time(s) over natural radiation
9:42 AM – 16 Jun 12, Longmont, CO
https://twitter.com/#!/LongmontRadMon
https://pachube.com/feeds/30643
Report Comment