«  
  »

FORUM: Post Your Radiation Monitoring Data Here

Published: December 4th, 2012 at 12:00 am ET
By
Email Article Email Article
3,272 comments


Previous radiation monitoring thread here: http://enenews.com/forum-post-radiation-monitoring-data-dec-17-2011-present

Published: December 4th, 2012 at 12:00 am ET
By
Email Article Email Article
3,272 comments

Related Posts

  1. FORUM: Effects of low level radiation September 1, 2012
  2. FORUM: Methods for combating radiation and its effects September 1, 2012
  3. FORUM: What should be done about Japan burning radioactive debris? September 1, 2012
  4. FORUM: Fukushima Webcam Discussion Thread February 5, 2013
  5. FORUM: Possible Fukushima-related Anomalies — Deformations, Yellow Rain, Metallic Taste in Mouth, etc. September 1, 2012
December 4th, 2012 | Category: Active Discussion Threads
«  
  »

3,272 comments to FORUM: Post Your Radiation Monitoring Data Here

1 … 5 6 7 8 9 … 25
  • anne anne
    June 17, 2012 at 7:23 am

    82 CPM on radiationnetwork for Colorado at 4:21 AM 6/17/12


    Report Comment

  • vital1
    June 17, 2012 at 6:52 pm

    Australia,
    New South Wales,
    Sydney,
    16th June 2012

    Just in from a contact in Sydney,

    "I've ordered another Geiger counter. So, if both counters spike at the same time, I'll be sure I that I have a true reading. It seems every first drops of rain in Sydney, a huge CPM (well above 100 CPM) spike is perceived. Today, I got one above 200 CPM. Because it seems consistent (every first drops of rain), it seems the worst case scenario is true: my equipment is working properly and readings are true. I'll only be sure when I have 2 counters running at the same time."


    Report Comment

  • vivvi
    June 17, 2012 at 8:00 pm

    Most likely its from the uranium mining in south australia, which stupid people think is safe. Nothing like crushing all that ore to release all that nasty stuff like radon and fine uranium dust. Of course we cannot rule out fuku rads anymore either, since that crap has had plenty of time to mix in the upper atmosphere. Add it to the toxic mess the f&^*ing british pigs nuke spewed all over us back in the 50's and its a wonder anything is alive here in oz.


    Report Comment

  • Bobby1
    June 18, 2012 at 12:06 pm

    Radiation watch, southern Brazil, 2+ uSv/hr in the rain:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8SBKv0JV3Bg


    Report Comment

  • anne anne
    June 18, 2012 at 11:58 pm

    Longmont, CO 18 June 2012
    282 CPM, 2.2898 uSv/h, 1.6334 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
    9:40 PM – 18 Jun 12

    198 CPM, 1.6078 uSv/h, 1.3356 AVG uSv/h, 4 time(s) over natural radiation
    9:00 PM – 18 Jun 12

    186 CPM, 1.5103 uSv/h, 1.2987 AVG uSv/h, 4 time(s) over natural radiation
    8:40 PM – 18 Jun 12

    240 CPM, 1.9488 uSv/h, 1.4801 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
    6:50 PM – 18 Jun 12

    https://twitter.com/LongmontRadMon
    https://pachube.com/feeds/30643

    To see the following websites, copy and paste the url:

    Induction Magnetometer, Gakona, AK
    http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/cgi-bin/scmag/disp-scmag.cgi?date=latest&Bx=on

    HAARP Fluxgate Magnetometer
    http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/cgi-bin/magnetometer/gak-mag.cgi


    Report Comment

  • arclight arclight
    June 19, 2012 at 5:56 am

    sunday the 17 june 2012 london radiation from germany

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WXWjp9NGOBo

    there are more high slow rises or ground level clouds of particulates and gases

    highest spike on the morning of the 19 june 2012 is 0.54 mcSv/h

    still some low readings on occasion.. the best yesterday afternoon
    range from 0.09 to 0.16 with an average of 0.12 mcSv/h

    but it didnt last..

    is there another release going on??


    Report Comment

  • mungo mungo
    June 19, 2012 at 7:51 am

    alert, devon, 470cpm, as seen on eurdep…..
    GB2271 – St Mawgan (United Kingdom) Lat: 50.4ºN, Long: 5.0ºW,
    http://eurdepweb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/PublicEurdepMap/Default.aspx


    Report Comment

  • It's All Lies craigtaylor994
    June 19, 2012 at 11:11 am

    PLEASE don't say East @ Sue! I'm in the east midlands!:(

    Using a couple of online conversion tools and wikipedia (of all places lol) I converted nanosiverts hourly to uSv hourly.
    I'm not quite sure why the use nSv/h but maybe it sounds less?

    In uSv/h the readings are slightly above the annual limit yearly for all non radiation workers in the USA..

    A yearly dose in a hour.. very nice!

    (I might not be at all accurate, still a novice in all of this!)

    Thanks all


    Report Comment

  • It's All Lies craigtaylor994
    June 19, 2012 at 11:35 am

    Exactly Cindy!! They don't need to worry about cultural problems ir issues just straight in there.

    Sucks living in a small country as anything that comes goes everywhere :( But who knows maybe all the contamination will fly over all the cities, not settle and miss everyone :)

    Wishful thinking I thinks!

    We need you Arclight!


    Report Comment

  • NoNukes NoNukes
    June 19, 2012 at 4:35 pm

    Thanks to arclight and everyone here, we finally got a Radiation Alert Inspector. Now we got a geiger in the (SF) Bay. Today a 10 minute count showed 37.8 CPM. Vital1, I am very grateful to you for your guide!

    We got it right before we were fools and flew to Portland for a graduation. At 37,000 ft, we did a 10 minute average and it was 1, 060 CPM on the way there (6/6), and 1, 072 CPM on the way back (6/10). Our readings were very similar to those described on Enviroreporter back in January, Collins states that it is supposed to be about 200 CPM. Following Collins, we wore the N95 masks just in case they might help (my husband said, "we have now crossed the over the line into crazy"), but no one blinked an eye, it made me wonder how common it is now.

    I have been so sick since, had the "stomach flu," thyroid swelling, swollen glands, fatigue, now 9 days later, finally feel better.

    http://www.enviroreporter.com/2012/01/seasons-readings/

    Our lowest readings in Berkeley and San Francisco have been 32 CPM with sun and the highest 41.8 CPM with very light rain (6/4). Generally, about 37 CPM.


    Report Comment

    • arclight arclight
      June 19, 2012 at 9:13 pm

      @ nonukes
      "..we finally got a Radiation Alert Inspector.."

      many happy returns

      looks like global safecast might come a reality.. (with softer averaging software hopefully)

      we will pin these nuke polluters down soon!!

      banzai!

      :)


      Report Comment

    • bluerthanblu bluerthanblu
      June 19, 2012 at 9:59 pm

      Yeehaw, thanks for your post! Don't have money yet for a geiger counter north of SF Bay. I'm working on it. Sonoma County may be getting more or less than SF Bay proper. We'll see- ;) There are spots on leaves, brown pyracanthus after watering, and an old rose bush with half of plant with normal stems/one flower and the other half with two thick stems and multiple flowers on short stems on top of the two stems. There's more interesting variation in fruits and veggies in the supermarkets. We are early on the bio-accumulation, excepting fish, waiting on the progress of the jet stream carrying increased Fuku radiation from Guchol (shown on Fukushima Diary). When you mention radiation around here, it's pretty much a 'huh' answer. If alpha, beta, or gamma rads were high, someone would inform us- right? In the eyes of EPA and nuclear boys&girls, any amount of radiation decay seems to be considered 'natural.' Ah well, this too shall pass, and pass, and pass. In the words of Kevin Blanch, we are all post ignorance and I'd say, post innocence too.


      Report Comment

      • NoNukes NoNukes
        June 21, 2012 at 4:11 pm

        bluerthanblu,

        I'm a better American than you, I charged the geiger on my credit card, lol. Is Goldman Sachs/etc. looking for the "Radiation Bubble" to be the next financial/credit boom, after they milk the college students dry? I bet that Sonoma isn't too different, I was surprised by how similar Portland was to SF Bay. Sorry to hear about the destruction to the plant life. Have you noticed a dearth of snails, slugs, worms in the rain? I will try to post with some regularity, and promise to post any abnormal readings immediately.


        Report Comment

  • arclight arclight
    June 19, 2012 at 5:02 pm

    great i go for a sleep and all hell breaks loose.. :)

    the readings stop at about 3 pm yeaterday… ??

    the readings are compatible with readings i am getting in london with surges to 0.48 mcSv/h

    will need to check some stuff out

    well spotted mungo

    this is near hinkley and may be some coastal wind spreading the decommissioning but rememeber smoke and mirrors, the friend of the pro nuke…

    will get back later with any findings

    highest quick spike in london today was at 0.63 mcSv/h with very erratic readings and some periods when range was nearly in the normal area..

    lots of quick spikes above 0.42 mcSv/h

    only four more years of this until the EU agreement for burial.. until then

    GET A GIEGER PEOPLE!! :(

    thanks for the shout everyone.. will get back with a response..

    luv u all arc!
    peace..


    Report Comment

    • Sue
      June 19, 2012 at 5:46 pm

      Couldn't find a St. Mawgan in Devon but there is an RAF Air Base at St. Mawgan nr. Newquay, Cornwall, which is quite a long way from Hinkley Point, Somerset (approx 135 miles). If it was Hinkley, wouldn't there be an alert closer than Cornwall?
      Also, could someone please tell me what 0.40mcSv/h is in CPM's.
      Ta


      Report Comment

      • vital1
        June 19, 2012 at 7:33 pm

        The free Geiger counter Use Guide has a chart on the first page that will provide you with a quick conversion guide. Multiply uSv/hr by 120 to get a rough estimate in CPM, or divide CPM by 120 to get uSv/hr. Remember the decimal place of the uSv/Hr in your calculations, example 0.50 uS/hr x 120 = 60 CPM

        http://technologypals.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Using-a-Geiger-Counter-to-test-food-for-Radioactive-Contamination.pdf

        Strictly speaking CPM and uSv/Hr are different types of measurements. uSv/hr is representative of the biological effects of the radiation on the body, and CPM is simply the number of detections made by the Geiger counter.


        Report Comment

        • eatliesndie eatliesndie
          June 19, 2012 at 8:13 pm

          It is quite impossible to accurately calculate uSv/h (u=micro) simply from CPM without first knowing the conversion rate for the type of geiger tube or counter the counts were taken on.
          eg: gammaScout has an LND712 tube with a conversion rate of 123.14. So if you register 25cpm on your gammaScout, divide counts 25 by conversion rate 123.14 and your answer in uSv/h is 0.203
          The geiger counter I use to log background on my laptop has two Russian tubes with a total conversion rate 575, so if they count 83cpm – 83 divided by 575 = 0.144uSv/h


          Report Comment

          • eatliesndie eatliesndie
            June 19, 2012 at 8:36 pm

            and vice versa, same applies when you try to convert uSv/h to cpm. This is the reason for the standard unit of uSv/h being applied to nearly all geiger counter devices as opposed to CPM


            Report Comment

          • vital1
            June 19, 2012 at 8:54 pm

            eatliesndie,

            Yes, I agree because different Geiger Counters have different sensitivities. A Geiger counter with more sensitivity will have a much higher CPM detection rate in the same Environment. Scintillator CPM are vastly higher in the same environment.

            When comparing industry Geiger Counters that are based around Caesium 137 certification they will at least provide uSv/Hr readings that are relatively close in the same environment.

            It is all very confusing to the average person.

            Manufactures use different Geiger tubes, these tubes can very in sensitivity from each other. Even a different batch, or model made by the same manufacturer can very slightly. They can vary in their detection abilities across the the radioactive frequency spectrum!

            For the average person I would suggest that the newer model made by a well known manufacturer would be more accurate because they have just been tested, and certified.

            I am not sure about newly manufactured Japanese models at present. Comments made by posters at enenews recently suggest that they are being alerted in some way at manufacture. Just a rumor who knows? They said that Japanese shops where instructed to only supply Japanese manufactured Geiger models.

            It is definitely not a perfect world when it comes to Geiger counters. At best they will tell you if your local background radiation levels are going up or down.


            Report Comment

      • arclight arclight
        June 19, 2012 at 8:53 pm

        hi sue

        did a bit of checking on the wind maps and it looks like the wind was coming from france..

        criirad has noted a radon progeny (natural) peak in france on the 19th but i am unable to see the info on the charts.. ie alpha, beta and gamma lines, though i can access the pdf.. (now thats really clever)

        i am thinking that nuclear power stations or decommissioning plants could also be a cause for this radon, especially decommissioning/furnace stuff.. imo

        we had a rain washout of radon in london, as well as the other isotopic particles and gases the nuke pukers have to offer us all..

        my best guess is La hague.. though the monitor remains at the same range there was some small movements that might suggest some activity above the norm.. and remember criirad scrubb the radon data, so the la hague monitor would be radon resistant as well as generally resistant to anything actually! ;)

        so the wind for the days of peaking generally are coming from france where there ihas been some slow moving winds that have cut across cornwall and tripped the monitor there.. could be more than radon but radon probably caused the trip or spikes imo

        i have been getting heavy beta in london and short sharp quick spikes. it is possible that this is caused by the gamma from radon, these are very small quick hits, the beta stuff gets up to 0.26 mcSv/h in gentle slow pulses..

        interesting..

        gotta kip now

        hope that helps

        wonder why uk puke still have the monitor off?? :)


        Report Comment

      • mungo mungo
        June 20, 2012 at 5:03 am

        sue, the coordinates from eurdep,Lat: 50.4ºN, Long: 5.0ºW, actually take you into the bristol channel, i dont get it


        Report Comment

  • TruthBTold
    June 19, 2012 at 10:01 pm

    I wanted to post this one more time. If you or anyone you care about take Iodoral brand iodine/potassium iodide supplement in either 12.5 mg or 50mg, please take note. We tested ours with Int'l Medcom Inspector and found both strengths 450% above background radiation. Between 185 CPM and 214 CPM. Please inform all that might apply to. The possible health ramifications disturbs us greatly.


    Report Comment

    • arclight arclight
      June 19, 2012 at 10:10 pm

      hi truthbtold
      anychance of uploading some video evidence of that? maybe with a control sample of lower value..

      also, contact antiprotons if your in the usa as he can put it on his spectrometer.. it may be natural pottassium K40 being less harmful than iodine 131 .. the actual measurement is not too high

      you raise an interesting observation

      now really gotta crash and see what others think..

      peace

      was your reading gamma or beta?


      Report Comment

    • vital1
      June 19, 2012 at 10:13 pm

      TruthBTold,

      "The possible health ramifications disturbs us greatly." Agreed, children could be been given this in good faith.

      Thanks for posting this info. After I saw your last post I tested both brands of Iodine supplement we had purchased, different brands to the Iodoral brand, and they tested clean.


      Report Comment

      • arclight arclight
        June 19, 2012 at 10:22 pm

        different brands to the Iodoral brand, and they tested clean.

        were they the same size and strength vital1?

        wonder what happened in the manufacture then??

        nasty!
        need video evidence of that and maybe a spectrometer test to work out the content..

        what are the manufacurer dates on the pills of vitat and truth?
        need some data and evidence.. dot the i`s and cross the t`s sort of thing.. maybe a second gieger check before the spectrometer and a video so antiprotons might get interested..?

        citizen contamination busters..


        Report Comment

        • vital1
          June 19, 2012 at 10:30 pm

          Archlight

          Tested with Geiger Counter then ran a scintillator spectrometry test over both brands that where purchased here in Australia. One was brand was Nascent Iodine 30ml, and other was Molecular Iodine Colloid 10ml.

          These batches where clean but can say future ones will be. These where purchased just after 3/11.


          Report Comment

  • anne anne
    June 20, 2012 at 2:01 am

    Longmont, CO 19 June 2012
    204 CPM, 1.6565 uSv/h, 1.4822 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
    10:55 PM – 19 Jun 12

    192 CPM, 1.5590 uSv/h, 1.3080 AVG uSv/h, 4 time(s) over natural radiation
    10:45 PM – 19 Jun 1

    318 CPM, 2.5822 uSv/h, 1.7633 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
    9:44 PM – 19 Jun 12

    204 CPM, 1.6565 uSv/h, 1.8683 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
    8:44 PM – 19 Jun 1

    282 CPM, 2.2898 uSv/h, 2.0800 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
    8:34 PM – 19 Jun 12

    192 CPM, 1.5590 uSv/h, 1.8703 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
    8:24 PM – 19 Jun 12

    324 CPM, 2.6309 uSv/h, 2.1815 AVG uSv/h, 8 time(s) over natural radiation
    8:14 PM – 19 Jun 12

    228 CPM, 1.8514 uSv/h, 1.7320 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
    8:04 PM – 19 Jun 12

    216 CPM, 1.7539 uSv/h, 1.6127 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
    7:54 PM – 19 Jun 1

    234 CPM, 1.9001 uSv/h, 1.8225 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
    7:34 PM – 19 Jun 12

    234 CPM, 1.9001 uSv/h, 1.7449 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
    7:24 PM – 19 Jun 12

    216 CPM, 1.7539 uSv/h, 1.5897 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
    7:14 PM – 19 Jun 12

    234 CPM, 1.9001 uSv/h, 1.5356 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
    6:54 PM – 19 Jun 12

    186 CPM, 1.5103 uSv/h, 1.6639 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
    6:24 PM – 19 Jun 12

    186 CPM, 1.5103 uSv/h, 1.3537 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
    5:54 PM – 19 Jun 12


    Report Comment

    • anne anne
      June 20, 2012 at 2:02 am

      [cont.]
      204 CPM, 1.6565 uSv/h, 1.1771 AVG uSv/h, 4 time(s) over natural radiation
      5:04 PM – 19 Jun 12

      186 CPM, 1.5103 uSv/h, 1.5386 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
      4:24 PM – 19 Jun 12

      222 CPM, 1.8026 uSv/h, 1.5668 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
      4:14 PM – 19 Jun 12

      372 CPM, 3.0206 uSv/h, 2.0597 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
      3:44 PM – 19 Jun 12

      288 CPM, 2.3386 uSv/h, 1.6776 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
      3:04 PM – 19 Jun 12

      192 CPM, 1.5590 uSv/h, 1.4521 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
      2:03 PM – 19 Jun 12

      198 CPM, 1.6078 uSv/h, 1.3452 AVG uSv/h, 4 time(s) over natural radiation
      1:53 PM – 19 Jun 12

      186 CPM, 1.5103 uSv/h, 1.0444 AVG uSv/h, 3 time(s) over natural radiation
      12:33 AM – 19 Jun 1

      204 CPM, 1.6565 uSv/h, 1.4558 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
      11:23 AM – 19 Jun 1

      294 CPM, 2.3873 uSv/h, 1.7074 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
      10:53 AM – 19 Jun 12

      192 CPM, 1.5590 uSv/h, 1.3018 AVG uSv/h, 4 time(s) over natural radiation
      10:13 AM – 19 Jun 12

      186 CPM, 1.5103 uSv/h, 1.3669 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
      9:22 AM – 19 Jun 12

      240 CPM, 1.9488 uSv/h, 1.7161 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
      9:02 AM – 19 Jun 12

      210 CPM, 1.7052 uSv/h, 1.4835 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
      8:52 AM – 19 Jun 12

      270 CPM, 2.1924 uSv/h, 1.7631 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
      8:12 AM – 19 Jun 12


      Report Comment

    • anne anne
      June 20, 2012 at 2:03 am

      [cont.]
      234 CPM, 1.9001 uSv/h, 1.3337 AVG uSv/h, 4 time(s) over natural radiation
      8:02 AM – 19 Jun 12

      258 CPM, 2.0950 uSv/h, 1.8024 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
      7:11 AM – 19 Jun 12

      258 CPM, 2.0950 uSv/h, 1.5097 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
      7:01 AM – 19 Jun 12

      228 CPM, 1.8514 uSv/h, 1.5578 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
      5:41 AM – 19 Jun 1

      234 CPM, 1.9001 uSv/h, 1.4033 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
      5:11 AM – 19 Jun 12

      240 CPM, 1.9488 uSv/h, 1.7388 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
      4:21 AM – 19 Jun 12

      258 CPM, 2.0950 uSv/h, 1.5288 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
      4:11 AM – 19 Jun 12

      192 CPM, 1.5590 uSv/h, 1.4204 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
      3:21 AM – 19 Jun 12

      192 CPM, 1.5590 uSv/h, 1.5892 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
      3:01 AM – 19 Jun 12

      240 CPM, 1.9488 uSv/h, 1.6194 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
      2:51 AM – 19 Jun 12

      258 CPM, 2.0950 uSv/h, 1.5547 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
      2:21 AM – 19 Jun 12

      198 CPM, 1.6078 uSv/h, 1.2829 AVG uSv/h, 4 time(s) over natural radiation
      1:21 AM – 19 Jun 12
      https://twitter.com/LongmontRadMon

      https://pachube.com/feeds/30643

      Data Index
      http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/haarp/data.html


      Report Comment

  • Sue
    June 20, 2012 at 5:18 am

    Thanks to those who gave me info.
    Arclight – I was hoping that the St. Mawgan alert was just a blip, however, if you travel directly North from there, you will arrive at Milford Haven. Do you remember that big purple spot on Milford Haven a couple of weeks ago. Any thoughts?
    I know Milford Haven is a large port and petrochemical hub but did you know that large quantities of radioactive waste was dumped off the coast there many moons ago. Makes you think.
    Buckey balls anyone…


    Report Comment

  • TruthBTold
    June 20, 2012 at 1:17 pm

    arclight,
    how do we contact antiprotons?
    thanks


    Report Comment

  • arclight arclight
    June 20, 2012 at 4:22 pm

    300 mcSv/h

    another high peak , this time italy

    19 june 2012

    lots of action from finland to greece

    ITPM2111 – Cesana Torinese (Italy)

    the cornwall hit was seen in irelands east coast

    http://eurdepweb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/PublicEurdepMap/TimeSeries.aspx?loc=11821&end=201206201930&int=W1&rad=1&test=0


    Report Comment

  • anne anne
    June 20, 2012 at 8:37 pm

    Longmont, CO 19-20 June 2012
    228 CPM, 1.8514 uSv/h, 1.7559 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
    6:05 AM – 20 Jun 12

    228 CPM, 1.8514 uSv/h, 1.6604 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
    5:55 AM – 20 Jun 12

    336 CPM, 2.7283 uSv/h, 2.2081 AVG uSv/h, 8 time(s) over natural radiation
    5:35 AM – 20 Jun 12

    186 CPM, 1.5103 uSv/h, 1.6879 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
    5:25 AM – 20 Jun 12

    258 CPM, 2.0950 uSv/h, 1.8655 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
    5:15 AM – 20 Jun 12

    246 CPM, 1.9975 uSv/h, 1.6360 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
    Collapse
    • Reply
    • Retweet
    • Favorite
    5:05 AM – 20 Jun 12

    342 CPM, 2.7770 uSv/h, 2.1590 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
    4:45 AM – 20 Jun 12

    198 CPM, 1.6078 uSv/h, 1.5410 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
    4:35 AM – 20 Jun 12

    222 CPM, 1.8026 uSv/h, 1.4742 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
    4:25 AM – 20 Jun 12

    216 CPM, 1.7539 uSv/h, 1.9522 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
    3:55 AM – 20 Jun 12

    396 CPM, 3.2155 uSv/h, 2.1504 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
    3:45 AM – 20 Jun 12

    216 CPM, 1.7539 uSv/h, 1.5475 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
    2:35 AM – 20 Jun 12

    246 CPM, 1.9975 uSv/h, 1.6589 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
    2:15 AM – 20 Jun 12

    186 CPM, 1.5103 uSv/h, 1.4026 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
    1:35 AM – 20 Jun 12


    Report Comment

  • NoNukes NoNukes
    June 21, 2012 at 4:03 pm

    6/20 SF, CA 35.7 CPM (Sunny)

    6/21 Berkeley, CA 41.3 CPM (Foggy)

    Radiation Alert Inspector.


    Report Comment

  • Insight
    June 22, 2012 at 8:17 pm

    6/22 Los Angeles, CA
    114 CPM
    Indoors
    Radiation Alert Inspector


    Report Comment

  • Jebus Jebus
    June 22, 2012 at 8:39 pm

    The wave today…

    GQ Geiger Muller Counter Data Logger
    Date Time uSv/h CPM
    6/22/2012 7:58 0.12 24
    6/22/2012 7:59 0.085 17
    6/22/2012 8:00 0.11 22
    6/22/2012 8:01 0.075 15
    6/22/2012 8:02 0.115 23
    6/22/2012 8:03 0.09 18
    6/22/2012 8:04 0.4133 124
    6/22/2012 8:05 0.69 207
    6/22/2012 8:06 0.7133 214
    6/22/2012 8:07 0.5667 170
    6/22/2012 8:08 0.79 237
    6/22/2012 8:09 1.095 292
    6/22/2012 8:10 1.125 300
    6/22/2012 8:11 1.1363 303
    6/22/2012 8:12 0.6667 200
    6/22/2012 8:13 1.065 284
    6/22/2012 8:14 0.43 129
    6/22/2012 8:15 0.4333 130
    6/22/2012 8:16 0.43 129
    6/22/2012 8:17 0.5267 158
    6/22/2012 8:18 0.3333 100
    6/22/2012 8:19 0.56 168
    6/22/2012 8:20 0.41 123
    6/22/2012 8:21 0.49 147
    6/22/2012 8:22 0.4667 140
    6/22/2012 8:23 0.265 53
    6/22/2012 8:24 0.36 108
    6/22/2012 8:25 0.3367 101
    6/22/2012 8:26 0.3133 94
    6/22/2012 8:27 0.41 123
    6/22/2012 8:28 0.24 48
    6/22/2012 8:29 0.3067 92
    6/22/2012 8:30 0.3633 109
    6/22/2012 8:31 0.3267 98
    6/22/2012 8:32 0.28 84
    6/22/2012 8:33 0.45 135
    6/22/2012 8:34 0.9075 242
    6/22/2012 8:35 0.42 126
    6/22/2012 8:36 0.7433 223
    6/22/2012 8:37 0.78 234
    6/22/2012 8:38 0.6367 191
    6/22/2012 8:39 0.6267 188
    6/22/2012 8:40 0.9262 247
    6/22/2012 8:41 0.56 168
    6/22/2012 8:42 0.61 183
    6/22/2012 8:43 0.5567 167
    6/22/2012 8:44 0.47 141
    6/22/2012 8:45 0.5067 152
    6/22/2012 8:46 0.63 189
    6/22/2012 8:47 0.5967 179
    6/22/2012 8:48 0.6067 182
    6/22/2012 8:49 0.58 174
    6/22/2012 8:50 0.4367 131
    6/22/2012 8:51 0.3867 116
    6/22/2012 8:52 0…


    Report Comment

  • yogda yogda
    June 22, 2012 at 8:54 pm

    Just now I see Seattle at 77CPM on Radiationnetwork


    Report Comment

  • ChasAha ChasAha
    June 22, 2012 at 9:21 pm

    Message re: alert from Rad Network on 6/19/2012 100 cpm detected in Wisconsin.

    from message:
    "…surpassed 100 CPM for only a minute, more than twice normal background, but that maximum reading was at the apex of a classic ebb and flow pattern often associated with a passing radioactive system. In fact, there were scattered thunderstorms in the area, along with a flash flood watch."

    me:
    'CLASSIC… passing of a radioactive system.' (?)
    You mean this happens often?

    from message:
    "…the big question is, 'What caused the elevated radiation reading. Was it Radon washout or something more sinister?'"

    me: Guess what? They are going to get back to us 'later' with those results. In the meantime lets try to create some 'plausible credibility'. (doubt)

    me: They also 'joke' about a possible apocalypse. I find that unprofessional and in bad taste.

    full message from 6/19/2012
    http://radiationnetwork.com/Message.htm
    _______________________

    My understanding is that 'radon' presence can be determined. Using a simple rad detector and then testing a sample 30 minutes or so later. This not as specific, but it would tell us something right away. One would think they would know that.

    They show a photo of this guys Geiger setup. I also find it hard to believe that someone with that kind of equipment doesn't have a spare 'analyzer' or two in his basement.


    Report Comment

  • anne anne
    June 23, 2012 at 1:32 am

    Longmont, CO 22 June 2012
    186 CPM, 1.5103 uSv/h, 1.4978 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
    10:59 PM – 22 Jun 12

    288 CPM, 2.3386 uSv/h, 1.9464 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
    10:29 PM – 22 Jun 12

    210 CPM, 1.7052 uSv/h, 1.5541 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
    10:19 PM – 22 Jun 12

    228 CPM, 1.8514 uSv/h, 1.4907 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
    9:59 PM – 22 Jun 12

    192 CPM, 1.5590 uSv/h, 1.6756 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
    9:39 PM – 22 Jun 12

    228 CPM, 1.8514 uSv/h, 1.7921 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
    9:29 PM – 22 Jun 12

    324 CPM, 2.6309 uSv/h, 2.1988 AVG uSv/h, 8 time(s) over natural radiation
    9:09 PM – 22 Jun 12

    348 CPM, 2.8258 uSv/h, 2.2181 AVG uSv/h, 8 time(s) over natural radiation
    8:49 PM – 22 Jun 12

    234 CPM, 1.9001 uSv/h, 1.6104 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
    8:39 PM – 22 Jun 12

    186 CPM, 1.5103 uSv/h, 1.3207 AVG uSv/h, 4 time(s) over natural radiation
    8:29 PM – 22 Jun 12

    246 CPM, 1.9975 uSv/h, 1.7264 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
    8:08 PM – 22 Jun 12

    210 CPM, 1.7052 uSv/h, 1.5463 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
    7:48 PM – 22 Jun 12

    186 CPM, 1.5103 uSv/h, 1.3619 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
    7:28 PM – 22 Jun 12

    204 CPM, 1.6565 uSv/h, 1.8330 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
    6:58 PM – 22 Jun 12

    330 CPM, 2.6796 uSv/h, 2.0095 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
    6:48 PM – 22 Jun 12


    Report Comment

    • anne anne
      June 23, 2012 at 1:32 am

      [cont.]
      300 CPM, 2.4360 uSv/h, 2.1904 AVG uSv/h, 8 time(s) over natural radiation
      6:18 PM – 22 Jun 12

      294 CPM, 2.3873 uSv/h, 1.9448 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
      6:08 PM – 22 Jun 12

      216 CPM, 1.7539 uSv/h, 1.5023 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
      5:58 PM – 22 Jun 12

      318 CPM, 2.5822 uSv/h, 2.1131 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
      5:18 PM – 22 Jun 12

      210 CPM, 1.7052 uSv/h, 1.6439 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
      5:08 PM – 22 Jun 12

      234 CPM, 1.9001 uSv/h, 1.5827 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
      4:58 PM – 22 Jun 12

      312 CPM, 2.5334 uSv/h, 2.0434 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
      4:38 PM – 22 Jun 12

      216 CPM, 1.7539 uSv/h, 1.5533 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
      4:28 PM – 22 Jun 12

      186 CPM, 1.5103 uSv/h, 1.3527 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
      4:18 PM – 22 Jun 12

      204 CPM, 1.6565 uSv/h, 1.5226 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
      3:38 PM – 22 Jun 12

      198 CPM, 1.6078 uSv/h, 1.3886 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
      3:28 PM – 22 Jun 12

      240 CPM, 1.9488 uSv/h, 1.9508 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
      2:48 PM – 22 Jun 12

      312 CPM, 2.5334 uSv/h, 1.9527 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
      2:38 PM – 22 Jun 12

      354 CPM, 2.8745 uSv/h, 1.9315 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
      2:08 PM – 22 Jun 12

      204 CPM, 1.6565 uSv/h, 1.7621 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
      1:38 PM – 22 Jun 12


      Report Comment

    • anne anne
      June 23, 2012 at 1:33 am

      [cont.]
      294 CPM, 2.3873 uSv/h, 1.8676 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
      1:28 PM – 22 Jun 12

      234 CPM, 1.9001 uSv/h, 1.4455 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
      12:58 PM – 22 Jun 12

      210 CPM, 1.7052 uSv/h, 1.6523 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
      11:57 AM – 22 Jun 12

      192 CPM, 1.5590 uSv/h, 1.5995 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
      11:47 AM – 22 Jun 12

      186 CPM, 1.5103 uSv/h, 1.6399 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
      11:37 AM – 22 Jun 12

      192 CPM, 1.5590 uSv/h, 1.7696 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
      11:27 AM – 22 Jun 12

      360 CPM, 2.9232 uSv/h, 1.9801 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
      11:17 AM – 22 Jun 12

      https://twitter.com/LongmontRadMon

      https://pachube.com/feeds/30643

      Data Index
      http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/haarp/data.html


      Report Comment

  • vital1
    June 23, 2012 at 7:26 pm

    Australia,
    Queensland,
    Caloundra,
    24 June 2012

    Everything has been quiet here. There has been no significant detections locally, so there has been no need to send out any alerts for the local area. Although locally it has been quiet over this period, contacts have reported significant detections in Sydney, Melbourne, and Dunedin in New Zealand. See monitoring site for more details about these events.

    http://sccc.org.au/archives/2630

    Just in from contact in Sydney, 23 June detection.

    "6:44PM, my counter recorded the highest reading so far. At this precise time, my Geiger was recording 1.5uSv/h and above 400CMP This is the first time ever I see it above 400 CPM"

    Other detections where on the 16th June, of 200 CMP in Sydney, and 70 CMP in Dunedin New Zealand, on the 23 June. Also, some bread and plastic buckets where detected with significant contamination, with a contact's Geiger counter in New Zealand.

    ——————————————–

    Get the message out there on how serious the Fukushima nuclear disaster is
    quickly, and efficiently. You don’t need to explain anything just distribute the lifesaver.pdf. (or create your own), hand it out, mailbox it,or email it.

    http://technologypals.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/lifesaver.pdf


    Report Comment

    • eatliesndie eatliesndie
      June 23, 2012 at 8:19 pm

      Remember this : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8SBKv0JV3Bg ? If this is from Angra then it is about the right time for it to be arriving in southern Australia. There's a brief exchange further up in this forum….


      Report Comment

    • richard richard
      June 23, 2012 at 8:51 pm

      Thanks vital1 for the update.

      I'm curious about your sydney report as I've not detected anything of note around the inner west for about a week.

      As you've said about your area, there's been "no need to send out any alerts"

      If I'd seen 1.5 I would be very concerned, and my dosimeter alarm would have gone off. But no such levels in this part of Sydney for me.


      Report Comment

      • eatliesndie eatliesndie
        June 23, 2012 at 9:11 pm

        I was wondering about you, Richard. Maybe this event is local then (Lucas Heights or ?) and vital1's contact may be down wind? Other factor may be difference in specific monitoring location. One monitor may be indoors in a well sealed dwelling and another open and breezy (like mine). Either way, reading 1.5 in the same city is a worry. Does your counter log?


        Report Comment

        • richard richard
          June 23, 2012 at 9:18 pm

          @eatliesndie – yes, many factors may affect a reading, wind and location, weather even. (currently a bright and sunny winters day).

          my device doesn't log. but it's close to me every where (yeah, ok, so i'm a bit crazy :) )

          admittedly, there are certainly times when I am not around, so I could have missed it.

          but that raises another question for me.. if radiation is so 'light' that it travels quickly in the wind, then how can it be a 'permanent' problem ? i would have thought there would be latency in the 'exit' time of an event. the decay time. anyway.. just thinking about it.. to me it's a paradox that hasn't really been answered.


          Report Comment

          • eatliesndie eatliesndie
            June 23, 2012 at 9:36 pm

            Nothing crazy about carrying your GC around with you. I have managed to help my kids avoid exposure on a number of occasions thanks to doing the sane thing – carrying my counter.
            re: Radiation light? I think there are different size "pieces" at different densities in the air, starting at several atoms, to as big as will carry. A contaminated cloud will always leave something behind, it's just how much that seems to vary. Depends on shape, size, weight, charge, temp, etc… of the pieces


            Report Comment

  • anne anne
    June 24, 2012 at 12:47 am

    Longmont, CO 23 June 2012
    336 CPM, 2.7283 uSv/h, 2.6233 AVG uSv/h, 9 time(s) over natural radiation
    9:12 PM – 23 Jun 12

    342 CPM, 2.7770 uSv/h, 2.5182 AVG uSv/h, 9 time(s) over natural radiation
    9:02 PM – 23 Jun 12

    192 CPM, 1.5590 uSv/h, 2.2595 AVG uSv/h, 8 time(s) over natural radiation
    8:52 PM – 23 Jun 12

    456 CPM, 3.7027 uSv/h, 2.9599 AVG uSv/h, 10 time(s) over natural radiation
    8:42 PM – 23 Jun 12

    270 CPM, 2.1924 uSv/h, 2.2170 AVG uSv/h, 8 time(s) over natural radiation
    8:32 PM – 23 Jun 12

    264 CPM, 2.1437 uSv/h, 2.2416 AVG uSv/h, 8 time(s) over natural radiation
    8:22 PM – 23 Jun 12

    318 CPM, 2.5822 uSv/h, 2.3396 AVG uSv/h, 8 time(s) over natural radiation
    8:12 PM – 23 Jun 12

    246 CPM, 1.9975 uSv/h, 2.0969 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
    8:02 PM – 23 Jun 12

    300 CPM, 2.4360 uSv/h, 2.1964 AVG uSv/h, 8 time(s) over natural radiation
    7:52 PM – 23 Jun 12

    258 CPM, 2.0950 uSv/h, 1.9568 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
    7:42 PM – 23 Jun 12

    234 CPM, 1.9001 uSv/h, 1.8185 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
    7:32 PM – 23 Jun 12

    288 CPM, 2.3386 uSv/h, 2.0124 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
    7:12 PM – 23 Jun 12

    258 CPM, 2.0950 uSv/h, 1.6863 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
    7:02 PM – 23 Jun 12

    198 CPM, 1.6078 uSv/h, 1.4834 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
    6:42 PM – 23 Jun 12

    324 CPM, 2.6309 uSv/h, 2.1290 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
    5:42 PM -…


    Report Comment

    • anne anne
      June 24, 2012 at 12:49 am

      [cont.]
      270 CPM, 2.1924 uSv/h, 1.6270 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
      5:32 PM – 23 Jun 12

      294 CPM, 2.210 uSv/h, 1.7052 AVG uSv/h, 1.6848 time(s) over natural radiation
      5:12 PM – 23 Jun 12

      240 CPM, 1.9488 uSv/h, 1.6205 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
      5:02 PM – 23 Jun 12

      234 CPM, 1.9001 uSv/h, 1.8119 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
      4:22 PM – 23 Jun 12

      246 CPM, 1.9975 uSv/h, 1.7238 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
      4:12 PM – 23 Jun 12

      216 CPM, 1.7539 uSv/h, 1.6820 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
      3:52 PM – 23 Jun 12

      204 CPM, 1.6565 uSv/h, 1.6101 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
      3:42 PM – 23 Jun 12

      252 CPM, 2.0462 uSv/h, 1.5638 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
      3:32 PM – 23 Jun 12

      228 CPM, 1.8514 uSv/h, 1.9678 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
      3:11 PM – 23 Jun 12

      264 CPM, 2.1437 uSv/h, 2.0842 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
      3:01 PM – 23 Jun 12

      276 CPM, 2.2411 uSv/h, 2.0246 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
      2:51 PM – 23 Jun 12

      258 CPM, 2.0950 uSv/h, 1.8082 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
      2:41 PM – 23 Jun 12

      330 CPM, 2.6796 uSv/h, 2.2365 AVG uSv/h, 8 time(s) over natural radiation
      2:11 PM – 23 Jun 12

      234 CPM, 1.9001 uSv/h, 1.7935 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
      2:01 PM – 23 Jun 12

      240 CPM, 1.9488 uSv/h, 1.6869 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
      1:51 PM – 23 Jun 12


      Report Comment

    • anne anne
      June 24, 2012 at 12:50 am

      [cont.]
      234 CPM, 1.9001 uSv/h, 1.4249 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
      1:41 PM – 23 Jun 12

      216 CPM, 1.7539 uSv/h, 1.6039 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
      12:51 PM – 23 Jun 1

      270 CPM, 2.1924 uSv/h, 2.1770 AVG uSv/h, 8 time(s) over natural radiation
      12:31 PM – 23 Jun 12

      348 CPM, 2.8258 uSv/h, 2.1616 AVG uSv/h, 8 time(s) over natural radiation
      12:21 PM – 23 Jun 12

      246 CPM, 1.9975 uSv/h, 1.4974 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
      12:11 PM – 23 Jun 12

      234 CPM, 1.9001 uSv/h, 1.4098 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
      11:51 AM – 23 Jun 12

      204 CPM, 1.6565 uSv/h, 1.5087 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
      11:01 AM – 23 Jun 12

      324 CPM, 2.6309 uSv/h, 2.1402 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
      10:11 AM – 23 Jun 12

      228 CPM, 1.8514 uSv/h, 1.6495 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
      10:01 AM – 23 Jun 12

      252 CPM, 2.0462 uSv/h, 2.2343 AVG uSv/h, 8 time(s) over natural radiation
      9:31 AM – 23 Jun 12

      336 CPM, 2.7283 uSv/h, 2.4223 AVG uSv/h, 8 time(s) over natural radiation
      9:21 AM – 23 Jun 12

      330 CPM, 2.6796 uSv/h, 2.1162 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
      9:11 AM – 23 Jun 12

      186 CPM, 1.5103 uSv/h, 1.5528 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
      9:01 AM – 23 Jun 12

      192 CPM, 1.5590 uSv/h, 1.5954 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
      8:51 AM – 23 Jun 12

      246 CPM, 1.9975 uSv/h, 1.6317 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
      8:41 AM – 23 Jun 12


      Report Comment

    • anne anne
      June 24, 2012 at 12:51 am

      [cont.]
      216 CPM, 1.7539 uSv/h, 1.6547 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
      8:21 AM – 23 Jun 12

      306 CPM, 2.4847 uSv/h, 2.1294 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
      7:51 AM – 23 Jun 12

      198 CPM, 1.6078 uSv/h, 1.7740 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
      7:41 AM – 23 Jun 12

      216 CPM, 1.7539 uSv/h, 1.9403 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
      7:31 AM – 23 Jun 12

      306 CPM, 2.4847 uSv/h, 2.1267 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
      7:21 AM – 23 Jun 12

      246 CPM, 1.9975 uSv/h, 1.7687 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
      7:11 AM – 23 Jun 12

      192 CPM, 1.5590 uSv/h, 1.5398 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
      7:00 AM – 23 Jun 12

      258 CPM, 2.0950 uSv/h, 1.5206 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
      6:50 AM – 23 Jun 12

      246 CPM, 1.9975 uSv/h, 1.5923 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
      6:20 AM – 23 Jun 12

      192 CPM, 1.5590 uSv/h, 1.4933 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
      5:00 AM – 23 Jun 12

      264 CPM, 2.1437 uSv/h, 1.7347 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
      4:40 AM – 23 Jun 12

      228 CPM, 1.8514 uSv/h, 1.5513 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
      4:10 AM – 23 Jun 12

      318 CPM, 2.5822 uSv/h, 1.8736 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
      3:30 AM – 23 Jun 12

      252 CPM, 2.0462 uSv/h, 1.7195 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
      2:50 AM – 23 Jun 12

      228 CPM, 1.8514 uSv/h, 1.4212 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
      2:30 AM – 23 Jun 12


      Report Comment

    • anne anne
      June 24, 2012 at 12:52 am

      [cont.]
      234 CPM, 1.9001 uSv/h, 2.0914 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
      1:29 AM – 23 Jun 12

      366 CPM, 2.9719 uSv/h, 2.2826 AVG uSv/h, 8 time(s) over natural radiation
      1:19 AM – 23 Jun 12

      240 CPM, 1.9488 uSv/h, 1.5934 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
      1:09 AM – 23 Jun 12

      288 CPM, 2.3386 uSv/h, 1.5723 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
      12:29 AM – 23 Jun 12

      234 CPM, 1.9001 uSv/h, 1.6160 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
      11:59 PM – 22 Jun 12

      222 CPM, 1.8026 uSv/h, 1.6251 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
      11:29 PM – 22 Jun 12

      198 CPM, 1.6078 uSv/h, 1.4477 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
      11:19 PM – 22 Jun 12
      https://twitter.com/LongmontRadMon
      https://pachube.com/feeds/30643
      Data Index
      http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/haarp/data.html


      Report Comment

  • arclight arclight
    June 24, 2012 at 3:38 am

    london radiation carch up 24 june 2012

    yesterday saw some strong clouds wafting over london, the rain cleansed the air last night and the rads were getting nearer the 0.15 average, earlier the averager got to 0.19 mcSv/h

    after the rain overnight the rads are now 0.11 to 0.20 mcSv/h with an average nearer 0.12 mcSv/h

    sorry bout the delay in reporting from uk.. having a slight digital holiday… need to rethink my approach now.. the video evidence of an largely innacurate eurdep and possible waste burning increases are getting me nowhere as most online citizen giegers are concentrating on fuku falllout from on high.. i maintain that in europe it is more than swamped by the new emmissions increase by edf etc.. i think i proved contamination from chinon getting 3500 miles into the heart of russia and to canada and northern usa.. i could get no usa citizen monitors to trace the low level winds to concour my findings.. i did ask around..

    lastly, the uk gieger scene seems fixated on fuku fallout.. so nothing practical can be organised in the uk to monitor radiological airborne, low level wind contamination…

    NO uk antinuclear org will touch this issue with a bargepole..

    so time i stopped wasting my time.. the evidence is documented and its time for me to do something that works.. hope i might have inspired others to use the techniques and i may re-edit the series into a documentary at some time.. if someone doesnt do it first..

    will be still posting on enenews


    Report Comment

    • arclight arclight
      June 24, 2012 at 3:39 am

      got 1 more video to go on this

      the summary of my findings

      peace


      Report Comment

      • mungo mungo
        June 24, 2012 at 4:56 am

        cheers arclight, will you still put up your london readings though? pretty please? :-)


        Report Comment

        • arclight arclight
          June 24, 2012 at 5:43 am

          no problem mungo.. it will be a bit easier as i will have more time to spare..

          off to work now


          Report Comment

          • vital1
            June 24, 2012 at 7:06 pm

            arclight,

            Without the information you have provided, I and many others here would not have realized how many serious radioactive releases there have been in Europe, plus how big the coverup has been, and still is. This is important information that everyone should know about.

            I understand your sense that Fukushima has taken precedence in most peoples minds. I personally feel your information is important to this community

            I think everyone in this forum appreciates what has been a single-handed effort on your part, and understand the large number of man hours you have put into this.

            Whatever you decide is your best course of action at this point, I personally would like to thank you.


            Report Comment

            • richard richard
              June 24, 2012 at 7:19 pm

              i'm with vital1. i read your info as a regular update to what's going on in europe. i've never commented as it's out of my scope.

              it would seem there are more people in Oz monitoring readings then there are in the UK. curious.

              i've watched your vids too. but i know how much work it takes.. so I can understand your need to take a break ;)

              keep well. and thanks.


              Report Comment

            • arclight arclight
              June 24, 2012 at 9:27 pm

              @ vital and richard

              thanks for your support..

              i am considering a new format and will be posting on this thread.. anything major will get a video.

              enjoyng the digi rest.. its given me time to work out other anti nuke related annoyances for the nukecorp and thier media pr and banking buddies… :)

              gotta crash now

              i will be back!

              oh and we are still getting strong clouds of contamination from la hague, settling in london for the tennis.. err actually, might do a video covering that.. lol!??!!

              wimbledon rad watch.. kinda catchy

              and its definately particulate and likely larger micron sized particles as i get a BIG 0.05 mcSv/h drop when i entered an industrial hepa filtered environment.. highest peak at 0.42 in a cluster on peaks above 0.20 mcSv/h

              range0.10 to 0.23 mcSv/h

              london was particularly smeggie and i will report tommorrow on the nights aftermath from wimbledon..

              at the moment i wouldnt recommend any heavy physical activity.. like plying tennis for example.. and after this months euro emmissions i would avoid the cream (recent iodine contamination in norfolk courtesy of edf).. oh and the strawberries might be cobered in Pblead..

              just saying… ;)


              Report Comment

  • anne anne
    June 24, 2012 at 7:55 am

    Longmont, CO 23-24 June 2012
    216 CPM, 1.7539 uSv/h, 1.8226 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
    5:13 AM – 24 Jun 12

    306 CPM, 2.4847 uSv/h, 1.8913 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
    5:03 AM – 24 Jun 12

    408 CPM, 3.3130 uSv/h, 2.1085 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
    4:43 AM – 24 Jun 12

    222 CPM, 1.8026 uSv/h, 1.9595 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
    4:13 AM – 24 Jun 12

    300 CPM, 2.4360 uSv/h, 2.1164 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
    4:03 AM – 24 Jun 12

    294 CPM, 2.3873 uSv/h, 2.3269 AVG uSv/h, 8 time(s) over natural radiation
    3:43 AM – 24 Jun 12

    306 CPM, 2.4847 uSv/h, 2.2665 AVG uSv/h, 8 time(s) over natural radiation
    3:33 AM – 24 Jun 12

    270 CPM, 2.1924 uSv/h, 2.0484 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
    3:23 AM – 24 Jun 12

    276 CPM, 2.2411 uSv/h, 1.9043 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
    3:13 AM – 24 Jun 12

    198 CPM, 1.6078 uSv/h, 1.5675 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
    3:03 AM – 24 Jun 12

    186 CPM, 1.5103 uSv/h, 1.5929 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
    2:43 AM – 24 Jun 12

    240 CPM, 1.9488 uSv/h, 1.6754 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
    2:33 AM – 24 Jun 12

    450 CPM, 3.6540 uSv/h, 2.4900 AVG uSv/h, 9 time(s) over natural radiation
    2:03 AM – 24 Jun 12

    264 CPM, 2.1437 uSv/h, 1.7750 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
    1:43 AM – 24 Jun 12

    234 CPM, 1.9001 uSv/h, 1.4064 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
    1:33 AM – 24 Jun 12


    Report Comment

    • anne anne
      June 24, 2012 at 7:56 am

      222 CPM, 1.8026 uSv/h, 1.6018 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
      12:53 AM – 24 Jun 12

      192 CPM, 1.5590 uSv/h, 1.4009 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
      12:43 AM – 24 Jun 12

      240 CPM, 1.9488 uSv/h, 1.7548 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
      12:22 AM – 24 Jun 12

      234 CPM, 1.9001 uSv/h, 1.5608 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
      12:12 AM – 24 Jun 12

      186 CPM, 1.5103 uSv/h, 1.2214 AVG uSv/h, 4 time(s) over natural radiation
      12:02 AM – 24 Jun 12

      228 CPM, 1.8514 uSv/h, 1.6591 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
      10:52 PM – 23 Jun 12

      270 CPM, 2.1924 uSv/h, 2.1052 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
      10:32 PM – 23 Jun 12

      336 CPM, 2.7283 uSv/h, 2.6233 AVG uSv/h, 9 time(s) over natural radiation
      10:12 PM – 23 Jun 12

      192 CPM, 1.5590 uSv/h, 2.2595 AVG uSv/h, 8 time(s) over natural radiation
      9:52 PM – 23 Jun 12

      456 CPM, 3.7027 uSv/h, 2.9599 AVG uSv/h, 10 time(s) over natural radiation
      9:42 PM – 23 Jun 12

      270 CPM, 2.1924 uSv/h, 2.2170 AVG uSv/h, 8 time(s) over natural radiation
      9:32 PM – 23 Jun 12

      264 CPM, 2.1437 uSv/h, 2.2416 AVG uSv/h, 8 time(s) over natural radiation
      9:22 PM – 23 Jun 12
      https://twitter.com/LongmontRadMon
      https://pachube.com/feeds/30643
      Data Index
      http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/haarp/data.html


      Report Comment

  • ChasAha ChasAha
    June 24, 2012 at 2:25 pm

    Uh oh! TODAY Fukushima High School. 20,000 x background detected.
    (Re-post from another thread.)

    What it's like to live in Japan. (graphs)
    http://new.atmc.jp/#p=07b606bf92456e9be9
    (credit BnB)

    Hoping this is a malfunction.


    Report Comment

  • norbu norbu
    June 24, 2012 at 7:53 pm

    Got my Inspector extreme. Started monitoring, Nevada city, California went to town average 33cpm today sunday 6-24-2012. Se international, ordered and got it in less than 24 hour's. Happy to be monitoring, will monitor all over Northern California.


    Report Comment

  • norbu norbu
    June 24, 2012 at 8:10 pm

    thank's Richard happy to help.


    Report Comment

  • anne anne
    June 24, 2012 at 8:36 pm

    Longmont, CO 24 June 2012, highest reading so far today: 486 CPM, 3.9463 uSv/h, 2.5418 AVG uSv/h, 9 time(s) over natural radiation at 1:44 PM – 24 Jun 12
    294 CPM, 2.3873 uSv/h, 1.9119 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
    6:25 PM – 24 Jun 12

    246 CPM, 1.9975 uSv/h, 1.9473 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
    6:05 PM – 24 Jun 12

    270 CPM, 2.1924 uSv/h, 1.8970 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
    5:55 PM – 24 Jun 12

    192 CPM, 1.5590 uSv/h, 1.6016 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
    5:45 PM – 24 Jun 12

    246 CPM, 1.9975 uSv/h, 1.6442 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
    5:34 PM – 24 Jun 12

    210 CPM, 1.7052 uSv/h, 1.4121 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
    5:04 PM – 24 Jun 12

    192 CPM, 1.5590 uSv/h, 1.6991 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
    4:34 PM – 24 Jun 12

    342 CPM, 2.7770 uSv/h, 2.2654 AVG uSv/h, 8 time(s) over natural radiation
    4:14 PM – 24 Jun 12

    360 CPM, 2.9232 uSv/h, 2.2896 AVG uSv/h, 8 time(s) over natural radiation
    3:54 PM – 24 Jun 12

    234 CPM, 1.9001 uSv/h, 1.6560 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
    3:44 PM – 24 Jun 12

    270 CPM, 2.1924 uSv/h, 1.7986 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
    3:14 PM – 24 Jun 12

    276 CPM, 2.2411 uSv/h, 1.9162 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
    2:44 PM – 24 Jun 12

    258 CPM, 2.0950 uSv/h, 1.8671 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
    2:24 PM – 24 Jun 12

    186 CPM, 1.5103 uSv/h, 1.9144 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural…


    Report Comment

    • anne anne
      June 24, 2012 at 8:37 pm

      [cont.]
      186 CPM, 1.5103 uSv/h, 1.9144 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
      2:04 PM – 24 Jun 12

      258 CPM, 2.0950 uSv/h, 2.3184 AVG uSv/h, 8 time(s) over natural radiation
      1:54 PM – 24 Jun 12

      486 CPM, 3.9463 uSv/h, 2.5418 AVG uSv/h, 9 time(s) over natural radiation
      1:44 PM – 24 Jun 12

      198 CPM, 1.6078 uSv/h, 1.4800 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
      1:14 PM – 24 Jun 12

      270 CPM, 2.1924 uSv/h, 1.9249 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
      12:54 PM – 24 Jun 12

      246 CPM, 1.9975 uSv/h, 1.9993 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
      fs12:34 PM – 24 Jun 12

      222 CPM, 1.8026 uSv/h, 2.0012 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
      12:24 PM – 24 Jun 12

      288 CPM, 2.3386 uSv/h, 2.1997 AVG uSv/h, 8 time(s) over natural radiation
      12:14 PM – 24 Jun 12

      276 CPM, 2.2411 uSv/h, 2.0608 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
      12:04 PM – 24 Jun 12

      282 CPM, 2.2898 uSv/h, 1.8805 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
      11:54 AM – 24 Jun 12

      282 CPM, 2.2898 uSv/h, 1.7241 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
      11:34 AM – 24 Jun 12

      384 CPM, 3.1181 uSv/h, 2.5387 AVG uSv/h, 9 time(s) over natural radiation
      11:04 AM – 24 Jun 12

      252 CPM, 2.0462 uSv/h, 1.9593 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
      10:54 AM – 24 Jun 12

      216 CPM, 1.7539 uSv/h, 1.8723 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
      10:44 AM – 24 Jun 12

      288 CPM, 2.3386 uSv/h, 1.9906 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
      10:34 AM – 24 Jun 12


      Report Comment

    • anne anne
      June 24, 2012 at 8:37 pm

      [cont.]
      240 CPM, 1.9488 uSv/h, 1.6427 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
      10:23 AM – 24 Jun 12

      204 CPM, 1.6565 uSv/h, 1.4554 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
      10:03 AM – 24 Jun 12

      216 CPM, 1.7539 uSv/h, 1.7027 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
      9:23 AM – 24 Jun 12

      252 CPM, 2.0462 uSv/h, 1.6515 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
      9:13 AM – 24 Jun 12

      252 CPM, 2.0462 uSv/h, 1.7143 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
      8:43 AM – 24 Jun 12

      210 CPM, 1.7052 uSv/h, 1.4494 AVG uSv/h, 5 time(s) over natural radiation
      8:23 AM – 24 Jun 12

      312 CPM, 2.5334 uSv/h, 1.9975 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
      7:53 AM – 24 Jun 12

      300 CPM, 2.4360 uSv/h, 2.0460 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
      7:33 AM – 24 Jun 12

      234 CPM, 1.9001 uSv/h, 1.9478 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
      7:13 AM – 24 Jun 12

      330 CPM, 2.6796 uSv/h, 1.9955 AVG uSv/h, 7 time(s) over natural radiation
      7:03 AM – 24 Jun 12

      186 CPM, 1.5103 uSv/h, 1.3115 AVG uSv/h, 4 time(s) over natural radiation
      6:53 AM – 24 Jun 12

      246 CPM, 1.9975 uSv/h, 1.6893 AVG uSv/h, 6 time(s) over natural radiation
      6:33 AM – 24 Jun 12

      210 CPM, 1.7052 uSv/h, 1.3005 AVG uSv/h, 4 time(s) over natural radiation
      6:13 AM – 24 Jun 12
      https://twitter.com/LongmontRadMon
      https://pachube.com/feeds/30643
      Data Index
      http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/haarp/data.html


      Report Comment

    • stock stock@hawaii.rr.com
      June 24, 2012 at 8:50 pm

      Anne, those are scary big numbers, can you just move?


      Report Comment

      • anne anne
        June 24, 2012 at 10:28 pm

        I own my house, and all my savings are tied up in it. Also, one of my daughters, the one who had cancer two years ago, is here with her 3 children and her 4 grandchildren and the 5th due in September. And I don't know any place that is safe anymore anyway. 7,000 cpm in South
        Bend, Indiana, doesn't sound good. We have no temperature inversions here or smog, which I hope helps some.


        Report Comment

  • jec
    June 24, 2012 at 8:38 pm

    Why is this not being reported as an Alert? Anything over 100 CPM is an alert level. Of course, if reported as alert by EPA or DOE (? both monitor radiation) then something would have to be done..head in sand syndrome. Its the same in USA as Japan. Until too late….Just Saying..


    Report Comment

  • arclight arclight
    June 24, 2012 at 10:35 pm

    Cesium 137 Detected in my Rain! (Radioactive Rain Detected)

    "..Published on Jun 24, 2012 by antiprotons
    As you all know, I have always maintained that there is Fukushima fallout in the rain… but that the levels (even if they are unsafe) are too low for a Geiger counter to detect.

    My sensitive Gamma Spectrometer has now (I believe) detected Cs137 in a rain water collection bucket which concentrates, or so it seems, the Cs137.
    .."

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m0LYYRyDflI


    Report Comment

  • arclight arclight
    June 25, 2012 at 1:50 am

    BREAKING
    13 mcSv/h in france… EURDEP MONITOR SWITCHED OF AND BELOW ARTICLE HAS BEEN PULLED!!

    at 12.00 hrs 24 june 2012 .. a spike to 8 mcSv/h then at 18.00 hrs a 13 mcSv/h spike, then a switch off.. the monitors are suppressed so the spikes were probably higher..

    the oldest plant in france!!

    EDF: Fire At Fessenheim Nuclear Plant Rapidly Extinguished
    Published April 25, 2012
    Dow Jones Newswires

    " A fire at the Fessenheim nuclear plant in Eastern France broke out in the building of the second reactor, but was rapidly put out, had no impact on the nuclear reactor's safety, the surrounding environment, or power output, French power group Electricite de France SA (EDF.FR) said Wednesday.
    The fire broke out at 0630 GMT on a part of the cooling system within the reactor's machine room, outside the nuclear element of the installation. The plant's own crew quickly extinguished the fire, EDF said in a statement on its web site, noting firemen were also called on site and confirmed the incident was over…"

    http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:-zIlvqtoV5YJ:www.foxbusiness.com/news/2012/04/25/edf-fire-at-fessenheim-nuclear-plant-rapidly-extinguished/+&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=uk

    FR2358 – FS0KRS938MA – 68 – SIT – GM (France) Lat: 47.9ºN, Long: 7.5ºE,

    http://eurdepweb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/PublicEurdepMap/TimeSeries.aspx?loc=12869&end=201206250510&int=D1&rad=1&test=0


    Report Comment

    • arclight arclight
      June 25, 2012 at 1:57 am

      AVOID WIMBLEDON TENNIS

      POSSIBLE MELTDOWN IN FRANCE??
      BIG COVER UP!!
      LOCK UP YOUR DAUGHTERS!!

      london inside reading (hepa filtered sweet air!!

      average has dropped to 0.15 mcSv/h with some peaks

      will be going OUT THERE to report on the actual state of contamination by edf of wimbledon lawn tennis.. i will try to get a gieger on the "hallowed turf"

      wimbledon has been flamvilled!! merde

      no nukes!
      avoid the cream!!
      arghhhh!


      Report Comment

    • arclight arclight
      June 25, 2012 at 1:59 am

      "… noting firemen were also called on site and confirmed the incident was over…"

      the french firemen have gieger counters?? coool!!


      Report Comment

    • arclight arclight
      June 25, 2012 at 2:06 am

      repost of last nights drive around london

      wimbledon rad watch.. kinda catchy

      and its definately particulate and likely larger micron sized particles as i get a BIG 0.05 mcSv/h drop when i entered an industrial hepa filtered environment.. highest peak at 0.42 in a cluster on peaks above 0.20 mcSv/h

      range0.10 to 0.23 mcSv/h

      london was particularly smeggie and i will report tommorrow on the nights aftermath from wimbledon..

      at the moment i wouldnt recommend any heavy physical activity.. like plying tennis for example.. and after this months euro emmissions i would avoid the cream (recent iodine contamination in norfolk courtesy of edf).. oh and the strawberries might be cobered in Pblead..

      just saying…


      Report Comment

    • richard richard
      June 25, 2012 at 2:13 am

      we really need a contact in france .. can we do a canadian/english/french translation somewhere.

      where's our french equivalent of you, arclight ?

      (oh, sweden is another country fully laden with nukes too, i've learnt thru enenews)

      i note that the cooling system was what caught on fire. so that's been put out, ok – how long will the cooling system be compromised until repairs now ? sounds like fuku. any oceans nearby ?


      Report Comment

      • arclight arclight
        June 25, 2012 at 2:24 am

        hi richard as they have pulled the article from the web (nearly) and so quickly i think that they might be re-editing it to say .." and there is no health impact to lemmings etc" or they have pulled it to completely cover it up so the new president doesnt find out and give them a good spanking… as we say en englategrr!! :)

        the french media is pretty crap! so the french should have google translated enenews for up to date pollution advice!!

        you heard it here first!! ;)

        aurevoir mon amis
        off to check the air for the international tennis players.. what is their oxygen intake by volume during a match?? maybe they need lead boots to protect them from ground/grass shine??

        on a serious note though i hope no one is hurt.. might be the other reason the original story was pulled?? :(
        hope not


        Report Comment

      • Pu239 Pu239
        June 25, 2012 at 2:40 am

        Vous voulez une traduction de quoi exactement richard1?

        Je ne suis pas français mais je peux parler et écrire en français, si j'ai assez bu.


        Report Comment

        • richard richard
          June 25, 2012 at 2:51 am

          cool, thanks for volunteering ;)


          Report Comment

        • arclight arclight
          June 25, 2012 at 6:05 am

          hi pu 239

          can you find anything on this smoking beasty? my fine french speaking friend!! edf closed sizewell news after the last big sizewell contamination incident.. they dont seem to be very good at this nuke stuff? hope no one has bought shares in this doomed organisation.. bit like a nuclear powered lehmans waiting to happen.. in french… must have ben embarrising importing all that solar electricity when catternom crashed. will they have to do the same again… hope no one tells old camerooon in the uk this dire news! lol! :)

          now where did i put that link to zerohedge again?? .. ;)


          Report Comment

  • arclight arclight
    June 25, 2012 at 5:59 am

    i was incorrect saying the story was pulled

    edf have no statement for yesterdays emissions at all and the eurdep switch off as far as i can tell, maybe they need to cover it because of this.. ??

    The No. 2 reactor at Fessenheim restarted after the ten-year inspection
    The Monde.fr with AFP | 07/03/2012 at 10:45 • Updated 07/03/2012

    "..Components as the reactor vessel and containment have been tested. Others, like the three steam generators, weighing over 300 tons each, were replaced. This project took more than six months of work and intervention until nine hundred technicians and engineers. In autumn 2012, EDF must submit to the Nuclear Safety Authority (ASN) a full report of the safety review conducted…."

    http://translate.google.co.uk/translate?hl=en&sl=fr&u=http://www.lemonde.fr/planete/article/2012/03/07/le-reacteur-n-2-de-fessenheim-remis-en-route-apres-la-visite-decennale_1652935_3244.html&prev=/search%3Fq%3DFessenheim%2Bfrancais%26start%3D10%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DN%26rlz%3D1C1GGGE_en-gbGB440GB445%26biw%3D768%26bih%3D406%26prmd%3Dimvns&sa=X&ei=6jPoT-TvIsrZ8APpvN2TCg&ved=0CGwQ7gEwCDgK

    i hate the sneaky ways of edf.. they are VERY untrustworthy!! imho

    no warning to the local population then?? non!

    is the reactor the same age as fukushima?? qui!

    did they do a comprehensive overhaul with loads of money and manpower ?? details on above article from la monde.. qui!

    are old nuke plants dangerous? qui!

    are edf numpties.. qui
    non de nukes!


    Report Comment

  • Margot Margot
    June 25, 2012 at 8:09 am

    This week I passed twice near the Cruas nuclear power plant, on saturday the 16th and 23th –
    each time the Soeks was showing the values from 0.18mcSv/h – 0.21mcSv/h.

    Other parts of A7 autoroute were more like 0.10mcSv/h – 0.12 mcSv/h.

    Criirad's balise of Montelimar does not show anything, at least I did not find anything.

    ?


    Report Comment

    • arclight arclight
      June 25, 2012 at 11:04 am

      criirad have had to compromise, hence no further hungary or fukushima updates.. i think acro have been kettled too! :(

      this is my opinion based on the last real contacts with these orgs in the last few months.. ie nothing since march.. ??

      nasty air around the nuke plant margo

      cool post!


      Report Comment

  • kunzen
    June 25, 2012 at 10:36 am

    Sydney at this moment, 26/6/2012, 12:32 AM, 0.4uSv/h.

    World Average in wikipedia is 0.27uSv/h:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sievert

    USA Average in wikipedia is 0.42uSv/h:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orders_of_magnitude_(radiation)#cite_note-ORNLtb-1

    At this moment, Sydney is safe.


    Report Comment

  • norbu norbu
    June 25, 2012 at 6:53 pm

    Nevada city from 10:09 to 10:33 average 37 cpm with a 2 minute count of 62 cpm. today. From the car, windows open.


    Report Comment

  • arclight arclight
    June 25, 2012 at 7:53 pm

    DONT PANIC

    only 60 mcSv/h at the french reactor with lots of missing data points

    highest peak in london tonight was 0.78 mcSv/h with peaks at least every 5 minutes with multiple peaks and slow rises to 0.36 mcSv/h low range not getting much below 0.18 mcSv/h

    and average tonight ? at a guess .. about 0.23 mcSv/h at least
    it was so bad today i took my camera out into london and documented it, the wind charts show south to north migration and some into the atlantic that came back on europe/england

    eurdep is down but i managed to get the data available on the 60 mcSv/h spike here

    http://eurdepweb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/PublicEurdepMap/TimeSeries.aspx?loc=12869&end=201206250510&int=D1&rad=1&test=0

    u gotta love edf and the british antinukers.. they just love sucking it up/angry

    hows the bees doing??


    Report Comment

    • eatliesndie eatliesndie
      June 26, 2012 at 4:07 am

      That's too much! entire populations being subjected to, what I can only assume are, regular exposures of such a magnitude.(I am assuming this has happened a bit over the last 40years) And no body seems to give a toss! how many times do you multiply that by to get the CED (Child Equivilent Dose). Nuke industry are totally BONKERS. According to your findings, all in Europe are being continuously nuked.


      Report Comment

    • Sue
      June 26, 2012 at 5:16 am

      For some reason I can't reply to posts anymore – how odd. Arclight, however bad the figures are in France, I think we should also consider the myriad of problems here at home.

      EDF shuts one unit down and restarts another

      http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/06/25/britain-nuclear-hartlepool-idUSL5E8HP14320120625

      If Hartlepool Unit 1 wasn't closing down for planned refuelling,
      how long would the boiler tube be leaking for?
      Dungeness reactor closes down unexpectedly last Friday, another boiler problem and these are just the ones they are telling us about.

      We have to ensure that something like the C.A.N. Rally in Washington is held here in London too. I am sick of reading how British businesses remain hungry for nuclear

      http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/NP-British_businesses_remain_hungry_for_nuclear-2506124.html


      Report Comment

      • arclight arclight
        June 26, 2012 at 1:46 pm

        hi sue thanks for the links

        there must be uk pollution in there too! but the french one was big

        uk eurdep is impossible to trace anything unless the odd monitor trips..

        i have been thinking oabout uk nuke but the only way to cover it is to get other giegers covering other areas outside london, so we can triangulate with wind maps and sometimes eurdep..

        the french release was bigger.. look at the missing data points??

        heres a video of the last nights carnage and some wind map evidence.. we also are getting hit from the north at different times but there is very slow moving/stalled winds to bear in mind

        london radiation alert (again) 25 june 2012 60 mcSv/h from fessenhiem edf

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G9rzUPXizjI

        put your links on the video description..


        Report Comment

        • Sue
          June 26, 2012 at 3:11 pm

          My kids already think I'm radiation mad. I don't think that a Geiger Counter clicking away in the corner of the room makes for a happy and relatively normal up-bringing. Therefore, a GC is out of the question for the time being I'm afraid.

          Also, just wanted to give you a quick update on the Kizuna Project as I know that you were interested in helping to get the word out.
          I've been in touch with Helen Caldicotts office. They were aware of the exchange programme but thought it was for College kids. The lady I spoke with was quite horrified to learn that middle school children will be going to Fukushima and hopefully now, the story may begin to get a little more exposure.


          Report Comment

  • kunzen
    June 26, 2012 at 5:59 am

    Sydney, 26/6, 7:57 PM:
    SOEKS shows 0.15mcSv/h .
    GMC 300 shows 0.33uSv/h .


    Report Comment

  • Margot Margot
    June 26, 2012 at 6:09 am

    Swiss National Emergency Operations Centre released the annual report for 2011 -

    there is no english version available yet, just french

    https://www.naz.ch/fr/downloads/jb2011_fr.pdf

    german

    https://www.naz.ch/de/downloads/jb2011_de.pdf

    and italian

    https://www.naz.ch/it/downloads/jb2011_it.pdf


    Report Comment

  • It's All Lies craigtaylor994
    June 26, 2012 at 10:14 am

    Hi Arclight! Hopefully you can carry on your work after your break as it is so desperately needed and I'm certain everyone on here is extremely grateful!

    You have undoubtedly raised awareness across a variety of countries and I am personally thankful for all the work you have done in the UK and it might at least help me a little to avoid the fallout!

    I've been watching on Eurdep about the Fessenheim fire and the readings from 24 June to the 26 are unreal..was up to 58000 nSv on Sunday, then today it was back from a dip to 65,000 nSv!!!! :O

    Looking at the UK the 'normal' *cough* looks about 120 nSv..

    I thought the fire was "extinguished"!!!!


    Report Comment

  • ChasAha ChasAha
    June 26, 2012 at 10:46 am

    I've been checking this site in Japan for spikes recently.

    As of today…
    Just some of what it's like on the island.

    City : Over Background
    Miyagi 6.6 x
    Fukushima 511 x
    Tochigi 8.5 x
    ____________________________

    Graphs by City:
    (Google translate works well)
    http://new.atmc.jp/#p=07b606bf92456e9be9


    Report Comment

  • kunzen
    June 27, 2012 at 6:19 am

    While I watch http://rt.com/on-air/ , GMC continues around 0.33uSv and the SOEKS continues around 0.15mcSv.

    I think I found a bug in the GMC 300: when you turn off the speaker, the detected radiation spikes. Is there anyone here using GMC 300?

    I'm missing info from South America and Asia. I don't speak Russian nor Chinese. Please share your monitoring data in plain English :-)


    Report Comment

  • norbu norbu
    June 27, 2012 at 1:42 pm

    Nevada city, California 35 cpm average for 30 minutes. Off to town to measure more and pick up supply's. Inspector


    Report Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

«  
  »