Guardian: Fukushima meltdown may be worse than Chernobyl… A MUST READ

Published: April 2nd, 2011 at 4:31 pm ET
By
Email Article Email Article
8 comments


Nuclear’s green cheerleaders forget Chernobyl at our peril, Guardian by John Vidal, April 1, 2011:

[Emphasis Added]

Pundits who downplay the risks of radiation are ignoring the casualities of the past. Fukushima’s meltdown may be worse

Every day there are more setbacks to solving the Japanese nuclear crisis and it’s pretty clear that the industry and governments are telling us little; have no idea how long it will take to control; or what the real risk of cumulative contamination may be.

The authorities reassure us by saying there is no immediate danger… I prefer the words of Alexey Yablokov, member of the Russian academy of sciences, and adviser to President Gorbachev at the time of Chernobyl: “When you hear ‘no immediate danger’ [from nuclear radiation] then you should run away as far and as fast as you can.”

At the end of 2006, Yablokov and two colleagues… estimated in a study published in the annals of the New York Academy of Sciences that 985,000 people had so far died and the environment had been devastated. …

Should we believe the empirical evidence of the doctors; or governments and industrialists backed by their PR companies?…

Fukushima is not Chernobyl, but it is potentially worse. It is a multiple reactor catastrophe happening within 150 miles of a metropolis of 30 million people. If it happened at Sellafield, there would be panic in every major city in Britain. …

Vidal on his trip to the area around Chernobyl five years ago:

I challenge chief scientist John Beddington and environmentalists like George Monbiot or any of the pundits now downplaying the risks of radiation to talk to the doctors, the scientists, the mothers, children and villagers who have been left with the consequences of a major nuclear accident.

It was grim. We went from hospital to hospital and from one contaminated village to another. We found deformed and genetically mutated babies in the wards; pitifully sick children in the homes; adolescents with stunted growth and dwarf torsos; foetuses without thighs or fingers and villagers who told us every member of their family was sick.

This was 20 years after the accident but we heard of many unusual clusters of people with rare bone cancers. One doctor, in tears, told us that one in three pregnancies in some places was malformed and that she was overwhelmed by people with immune and endocrine system disorders. …

Konstantin Tatuyan, one of the “liquidators” who had helped clean up the plant, told us that nearly all his colleagues had died or had cancers of one sort or another, but that no one had ever asked him for evidence. There was burning resentment at the way the UN, the industry and ill-informed pundits had played down the catastrophe. …

Read the report here.

Published: April 2nd, 2011 at 4:31 pm ET
By
Email Article Email Article
8 comments

Related Posts

  1. Study shows soil contamination from Fukushima meltdown comparable to Chernobyl: Kyodo May 24, 2011
  2. Independent: Why Fukushima is worse than Chernobyl; “Now the truth is coming out” — 72,000 times worse than Hiroshima & 1 million+ cancer deaths, says professor August 29, 2011
  3. Nuclear Expert: “I believe Fukushima is worse than Chernobyl and I think I can prove that” (VIDEO) May 12, 2012
  4. Experts: “Fukushima is going to kill 200,000 from increased cancers” — “It’s worse than Chernobyl” April 15, 2011
  5. Nuclear Expert on Major US Radio Show: ‘When I do the numbers, it says Fukushima is as bad or worse than Chernobyl’ (AUDIO) March 31, 2012

8 comments to Guardian: Fukushima meltdown may be worse than Chernobyl… A MUST READ