Gundersen: Everybody’s focused on Unit 4, but structure of Unit 3 thought to be weaker (VIDEO)

Published: May 12th, 2012 at 12:27 am ET
By
Email Article Email Article
26 comments


Arnie Gundersen Interviewed by Mike Adams
May 11, 2012

“Gundersen is chief engineer of energy consulting company Fairewinds Associates and a former nuclear power industry executive” -Wikipedia

At 25:00 in

Everybody’s focused on Unit 4, and rightfully so, but Unit 3 had a more severe explosion and is likely structurally weakened more than Unit 4.

See also: Gundersen: No. 3 fuel pool worse off than No. 4 -- Mechanically it's rubble, the pool is rubble -- Nobody has even gotten near it yet (VIDEO)

Published: May 12th, 2012 at 12:27 am ET
By
Email Article Email Article
26 comments

Related Posts

  1. Gundersen: Cover at Fukushima Unit 3 looks like a mall superstore — Reactor building so severely damaged it can’t support structure (AUDIO) November 19, 2012
  2. Gundersen: Up to 3 explosions hit Fukushima Unit 4 after 3/11 — Study: There was fire in its spent fuel pool — NPR: Big worry since fire weakened building’s structure (AUDIO) November 21, 2013
  3. Gundersen: Extensive damage in Fukushima Unit 3 spent fuel pool (VIDEO) September 3, 2012
  4. Gundersen: “Discovery of neutron sources off site means Unit 3 fuel was broken by Unit 3 detonation” — “I said that 18 months ago, and it looks like the NRC agrees” January 16, 2013
  5. Gundersen on ‘high level’ radiation around Unit 3: “Can’t just be activation products” — This supports my detonation theory September 12, 2012

26 comments to Gundersen: Everybody’s focused on Unit 4, but structure of Unit 3 thought to be weaker (VIDEO)

You must be logged in to post a comment.