Gundersen: Trucks dumping nuclear waste into Tokyo Bay “for many years” to come — Plus a look ahead at 2012 (VIDEO)

Published: December 30th, 2011 at 9:32 am ET
By
Email Article Email Article
140 comments


TEPCO Believes Mission Accomplished & Regulators Allow Radioactive Dumping in Tokyo Bay, Fairewinds, Dec. 29, 2011:

Published: December 30th, 2011 at 9:32 am ET
By
Email Article Email Article
140 comments

Related Posts

  1. Years in prison for CEO charged with dumping fracking waste? Full tanker trucks of toxic fluid released directly into storm drain — Crews monitoring for radioactivity (VIDEO) February 15, 2013
  2. Gundersen: Gov’t dumping radioactive material into Tokyo Bay — Contaminated seaweed found in area (VIDEO) December 22, 2011
  3. Video: I know this sounds incredible… but there’s 40 miles of unlined trenches used for dumping radioactive waste at leaking U.S. nuclear site #Hanford March 5, 2013
  4. Gundersen: Tokyo soil so hot it should be sent to nuclear waste dump — Really severe releases hit city (VIDEO) November 19, 2012
  5. Gundersen’s Latest: Think about ramifications for Tokyo… How would you like kneeling in radioactive waste to pick flowers? Cobalt-60 in majority of samples, up to 1,481 Bq/kg (VIDEO & CHART) March 26, 2012

140 comments to Gundersen: Trucks dumping nuclear waste into Tokyo Bay “for many years” to come — Plus a look ahead at 2012 (VIDEO)

  • James2

    So I watched Arnie’s video.

    Like previous he does take on several serious issues, and follows his agenda.

    However he still completely sidesteps the most important issues. He does not comment on these issues:

    1. Where is the nuclear fuel? Has it melted out, and is it affecting the groundwater

    2. He doesn’t even say the words MOX fuel in the video – which is the most controversial point of the accident.

    3. He focuses entirely on the #4 fuel pool as the primary risk and another large earthquake as a trigger for that risk. This is 100% totally wrong. We all know the site is emitting radiation right now – today. He doesn’t even mention this! The likelihood of another 9.0 earthquake is very low and they’ve shored up the #4 pool – it’s the least dangerous of the fuel pools.

    4. He doesn’t even mention the radiation traveling to the rest of the world.

    I like Arnie – but he’s not my spokesperson.


    Report Comment

    • Whoopie Whoopie

      I can’t go “there” again James. But I respect your view. :)
      Arnie, “YOUR OUR ONLY HOPE” Star Wars.


      Report Comment

      • Whoopie Whoopie

        There are so few addressing this crisis, I can only hope that someday soon, Arnie will address all the concerns you list. Got to HOPE SO. I spaced … but I was going to ask Langley about Arnie. I’d like to see what his view is.


        Report Comment

        • tony wilson

          when..
          tell us arnie where dat mox has gone..
          where can it be..
          you and dr busby say expensive equipment is needed but how about a professional guess.
          is it already twinkling in every lung.
          that stuff is ground up real nice and small perfect if one wants to test the volatilization of plutonium mox and it’s airstream distribution around the planet.


          Report Comment

    • BreadAndButter BreadAndButter

      Hi James, I do’t think Arnie is anybody’s spokesperson – gladly!
      To me, another big earthquake is of biggest concern. And we’ve discussed here a while ago a statement of a Japanese scientist (seismic engineer, if such thing exists in English), who warned about the possibility of another up to 9.0 EQ around years’ end.
      Let’s hope he’s wrong.


      Report Comment

    • anne anne

      James2, Arnie’s video is very important because he points out who is head of the IAEA and says that the people need to be in charge of his group in the coming year if we hope to change the problems of the nuclear industry. His call for action is very important.

      He has in the past said where the nuclear fuel is, has talked about MOX and said that the groundwater in Japan is or will be the most contaminated in the world.

      He has in the past explained why SFP #4 is the most dangerous. He has explained that it has the live fuel for reactor #4 and MOX spent fuel and has no primary or secondary containment.

      It is naive to not expect another large earthquake which has been predicted by a number of experts. There are experts which say that the nuclear power plants are themselves the cause of earthquakes and the cause of the extreme weather events we are having.

      With so many ionospheric heaters around the world, they are the cause of large earthquakes.

      With so many dams holding water, this is a cause of the large earthquakes.

      The Coronal Mass Ejections from the sun, unusually active in the coming year is a cause of the large earthquakes.

      If you look at the volcano activity in the south of Japan which has other volcanoes which have also been active in the recent past you can see that the earth is very active and is a cause of large earthquakes.

      The polar shift is a cause of earthquakes.

      The methane melting in the north of Siberia and around nuclear power plants is a cause of large earthquakes.

      All the linear accelerators and experimental reactors in Japan and elsewhere are a cause of large eathquakes.

      All the fracking is a cause of large earthquakes. I posted an article that cited the use of nuclear explosions as being used for fracking, and a underground nuclear explosion in 2009 by the US in the Mississippi basin, and no one said even a word.

      It seems you only read some posts partially, and many other not at all.


      Report Comment

      • anne anne

        TYPO: this group (the IAEA)


        Report Comment

      • lam335 lam335

        re: “he points out who is head of the IAEA and says that the people need to be in charge of his group in the coming year if we hope to change the problems of the nuclear industry. His call for action is very important.”

        I agree with this statement, but I am frustrated because I’m not sure how citizens (of the country or of the planet) might go about achieving this. I wish AG would have offered some suggestions. To whom should people write/petition about making the IAEA be more transparent? It is an international entity that has effectively gagged the WHO. Who might have sufficient interest to respond to such demands and sufficient leverage to be able to exert the pressure needed to change things?

        Our present executive is owned by the nuke industry and has been complicit in downplaying/suppressing information about Fuku’s fallout since March. Our Secretary of State showed more concern for economic relations with Japan than public health in the US. Edward Markey has a good record as a watchdog for the domestic nuclear industry, so maybe he’d be a good person to start with? He probably would take seriously these concerns, but I’m not sure what kind of leverage a single congressman could have with a powerful UN agency.


        Report Comment

      • mikael

        Do you or others for that matter, rember 2 decades back, and think.
        See in your mind from those days or even better of you have images, and see for your self.
        I have asked people repetedly, wasnt the SUN Yellow, and Not White as it is to day.
        For within a frame of one or possibly to decades our Sun have changed collor and gon to be More vibrant and Stronger.
        what has happened.
        And what is ongoning right now, with our sun.

        Copple that with the Soth Atlantic Magnetic anomality, we are hedding into strange times. Times only spocken of in Myths and we are right now in it.
        I am NO domsdayapostel, becouse I dont belive it will happened, but something is, just what is stil lurking in the shaddows.

        Contradictory to what people may belive, its also possible that our Earth is infact growing(aka:expanding in size, like when one blows up a balon). And that growt is causing all the weird eathquakes, everywhere.
        Hell, even in Sub-Artic zones where its usaly quiet.
        Iceland is almoust Jumping up and down, and Ketla is in the back of Every Icelandic head.

        peace


        Report Comment

      • Cindy

        Earthquakes are caused by the fact that the crust of the ground you are standing on is not solid, it is floating on the molten core of the earth, and is constantly spreading apart , suggesting you read about ‘Plate Tectonics”

        Science is cool.


        Report Comment

      • James2

        If I’m naive and another big earthquake like the one that occurred in March is imminent, then we need to take precautions at every other plant in Japan today…

        I don’t think that’s an immediate concern right now. The real concern is how you get the current meltdown to stop releasing radiation and how do you protect those who have been affected already.


        Report Comment

        • HoTaters HoTaters

          There is a concern for N.America, U.S. West Coast, too.

          Washington, Oregon, and California all sit on top of the Cascadia Subduction Zone. It extends all the way from Canada southward through Baja California. The subduction zone extends southward, along the coast of South America. It technically is not considered part of the Cascadia zone. The faults lie in a more or less continuous system along the coastline of North and South America.

          The offshore Pacific subduction zone in South America what causes the huge EQ’s in Chile. The same system of subduction zones extends to Alaska and the Aleutian Islands. If one looks at fault systems lying along the entire Pacific Ring of Fire, it becomes clear the entire Pacific is rimmed by oceanic trenches and subduction zones. Humans have only mapped some of the fault systems, so it can be hard to understand how the tectonic dynamics work.

          It isn’t safe to place a nuke plant ANYWHERE on the coast of a Pacific nation. Japan just happens to be more seismically active than some other places. It can be argued it’s just as crazy to put a nuke plant in California, Washington state, or Chile, for that matter ….

          There are nuclear power plants and spent fuel sitting all along the U.S. West Coast. Consider what sits at the Eureka, CA decommissioned nuke plant, the Hanford site, etc. If there was another Cascadia event, predicted at 9.0 +/- we would have potential multiple Fukushima type events on the U.S. West coast.


          Report Comment

      • HoTaters HoTaters

        Anne, I read your posts, and agree there appears to be a link between fracking and other activities and earthquakes. It has been known for a long time removal of oil from soils, for example, destablilizes the areas around fault zones, and causes EQ’s.


        Report Comment

    • Bobby1

      Arnie is not following what is going on at the plant anymore, and has no interest in global contamination. There is nothing here that we don’t know already.


      Report Comment

    • James2 and Bobby1

      I am very frustrated by the lack of talk of ongoing criticalities also. Further, I think James2 and others may be right about the spent fuel pools.

      Radiation levels are really skyrocketing in some areas of the US. Bakersfield was recently off the beta charts, literally.

      However, I think Arnie did mention some level of ongoing releases. This is what I heard: “buildings are still giving off billions of becquerels of radiation every day” and Fukushima is still leaking tons of highly radioactive water into ocean. quoted in Radio EcoShock, hosted by Alex Smith. http://209.217.209.252/~esnet/downloads/ES_111228_Show_LoFi.mp3

      correct me if I’m wrong on that…


      Report Comment

      • Heart of the Rose Heart of the Rose

        hi..majia…that’s kind of the point.I think….A person has to search for real info in Gundersens..work…truth should be more obvious…


        Report Comment

        • dharmasyd

          @majia…That’s the quote I heard from Arnie also. He did not deny nor minimize the ongoing radiation release, neither by air nor sea. And he did not emphasize that SFP #4 waas his only worry.


          Report Comment

      • HoTaters HoTaters

        Sacramento, CA had beta levels above the 10,000 (top measurement) level on Oct. 30, also.


        Report Comment

        • HoTaters HoTaters

          Not only that but some of the Alaska and Washington stations are showing no beta data at all since sometime in November or December. Hmmn ….


          Report Comment

        • HoTaters HoTaters

          Excuse me, that’s 1,000 level. The Gamma goes up to 10,000.


          Report Comment

        • James2

          Don’t they grow a lot of our food near sacramento?


          Report Comment

          • HoTaters HoTaters

            Yep. The only good thing to be said about it is there are lots of heavy clay soils in the CA Central Valley. The clay soil is much harder to get to produce because the clay binds minerals very tightly. It also “grabs onto” a lot of radioactive isotopes as well, which is good because there is less uptake into the plants from the soil. I live in the Central Valley near Suisun Bay. It was a relief to find out our heavy clay soils bind with a lot of the isotopes. Nonetheless, I’m following Anne’s advice and am now gardening under plastic and using a greenhouse. Will be putting as much zeolite into my soil as possible, very soon.

            Further post will be put into rad protection area. IMHO we should be contacting farmers/dairy producers and requesting they add zeolite, sodium borate, etc. to soils as is being done in parts of Washington state, and Hawaii.


            Report Comment

            • HoTaters HoTaters

              Someone (Anne?) posted awhile back saying isotopes in rain water are absorbed directly through plant leaves — generally more of a concern than uptake from the soil.

              Haven’t done a great deal of study on this, yet, but it’s an area of interest for me. When I get some data, will post it at the radiation protection area.

              And Anne, if I’ve misquoted you, please forgive me. Am doing so much reading on radiation safety it’s hard to remember where I saw a lot of this info.


              Report Comment

          • Bobby1

            http://www.beachcalifornia.com/california-food-facts.html

            California has been the number one food and agricultural producer in the United States for more than 50 consecutive years.

            More than half the nation’s fruit, nuts, and vegetables come from here.

            California is the nation’s number one dairy state.

            California’s leading commodity is milk and cream. Grapes are second.

            California’s leading export crop is almonds.

            Nationally, products exclusively grown (99% or more) in California include almonds, artichokes, dates, figs, kiwifruit, olives, persimmons, pistachios, prunes, raisins, clovers, and walnuts.

            From 70 to 80% of all ripe olives are grown in California.
            California is the nation’s leading producer of strawberries, averaging 1.4 billion pounds of strawberries or 83% of the country’s total fresh and frozen strawberry production.
            Approximately 12% of the crop is exported to Canada, Mexico, United Kingdom, Hong Kong and Japan primarily. The value of the California strawberry crop is approximately $700 million with related employment of more than 48,000 people.

            California produces 25% of the nation’s onions and 43% of the nation’s green onions.


            Report Comment

            • HoTaters HoTaters

              IMHO we should mount a campaign to educate farmers and ranchers, and press for testing and soil remediation with sodium borate, zeolite, etc.


              Report Comment

              • lam335 lam335

                I agree. It would be great if there were an organized effort to persuade/pressure them to test and, if need be, remediate their fields. I spoke to a food company’s customer service lady about fallout-related concerns a couple of weeks ago, and she said I was the only person who has ever raised such concerns with them.

                We need to get food producers to see that many people ARE concerned about it. I’m just not sure what the best way to organize such an effort is


                Report Comment

          • StillJill StillJill

            Yes James2 we do! :-( I’m 80 miles out of Sac,….have been for the better part of 20 years.


            Report Comment

      • HoTaters HoTaters

        Has anyone else noticed as soon as EPA posts a spike in Beta, the graphs immediately show a drop to 0 levels (flatlining) or they drop WAAAAY down. It’s like someone is skewing the data. Instead of just taking the stations offline, it looks like they just skew the data downward by many levels. Maybe there’s nothing to this observation, but I’ve been observing it for about six months, now.


        Report Comment

    • HoTaters HoTaters

      ‘Only so much material one can cover in one video.

      That being said — the waste repository in Texas, it can be argued, will not necessarily SAFELY store radioactive waste for 300 years. Supposedly laws were changed in Texas to allow the repository to be built. And it is supposed to sit over the aquifer supplying water to nine (9) U.S. states.

      Probably a good idea to re-post this in the U.S. section. Something people in the U.S. should be considering and voicing our views on.

      Yes, we must force the regulatory agencies to do their jobs right, and to protect people. Or have them disbanded.

      Unclear if we have much of a window of time there for people to keep the Texas project from going through ….


      Report Comment

      • HoTaters HoTaters

        Read about proposed Texas repository and likely aquifer contamination:

        http://motherjones.com/environment/2011/03/texas-nuclear-waste-dump

        Here’s a quote:

        “State engineers and geologists strongly objected to licensing the the dump. Concerned that radioactive material could contaminate groundwater, three staffers at the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality resigned rather than sign off on the licenses. In a 2007 memo, four TCEQ engineers and geologists concluded that the site’s proximity to the water table ‘makes groundwater intrusion into the disposal units highly likely’ and suggested that it not be approved. One of the resigned staffers, an engineer named Encarnacion Serna, told the Texas Observer’s Forrest Wilder that the site’s geology made it unfit for storing nuclear waste. Nevertheless, he explained, ‘I started getting the idea that these people are going to license this thing no matter what. I felt that in clear conscience I couldn’t grant a license with what was being proposed.’ ”

        Public citizen report April 2011, from Texas Nuclear Safety website:

        http://texasnuclearsafety.org/


        Report Comment

  • There are so many issues to cover, it is almost impossible to cover them all..

    Dumping radiation and toxic stuff in the ocean
    Dumping radioactive water in the ocean
    Spraying radioactive water into the forests
    Leaking radioactive water into groundwater
    Leaking three MOX? nuclear cores worth of radiation, no monitoring
    Explosions times three, four, ? more, none monitored for radiation
    No radiation readings downwind
    No ‘vent’ stack radiation readings
    No monitoring of radiation released by ANY nuclear agency
    No verified figures of ANYTHING since the ‘accident’ in March

    If this were the airline industry, there would be teams of people flying in and scientifically analyzing EVERYTHING, and finding out what happened specifically, and how much radiation was released via black boxes that work even if the power is out..

    If the airline industry crashes a jet with 200 people killed, it is headline news all the way through to the end, with a cause and specific analysis.

    If the nuclear industry has a melt through, it is ignored, denied, spun, minimized, and finally covered up completely, by declaring it ‘cold shutdown’, even though the accident is ongoing and never ending, releasing massive amounts of radiation from three or more reactor melt throughs.

    It is illuminating that the nuclear industry has NO BLACK BOXES like the airline industry does, but it can kill thousands, millions or even BILLIONS of people, without every disclosing a thing or being in the news.


    Report Comment

  • Or maybe it should be said there is plenty of glowing radioactive testimony, revealing the power of the radioactive lobbying industry, it’s media control and ability to cover up what is really going on.


    Report Comment

  • Bobby1

    Arnie: There was a big radiation release in Japan in March. They’re burning the radioactive debris from that and dumping it in Tokyo Bay. It’s against international law. Plus there are few hot particles in Seattle and the Cascades got contaminated.

    Fine.

    But radiation in Namie has gone from 36 uSv/hr to 330 uSv/hr since April. The contamination isn’t just continuing, it is getting worse. What about radioactive food and water in the US? Did Arnie mention the study that had 14,000 dead in the US? Nothing about re-criticalities, nothing about recent iodine. What about iodine in Europe? Has he seen the webcam? Anything about underground coriums? Any mention of winter weather patterns that bring it all over the US? Any warnings to pregnant women, children, the vulnerable, the sick?

    A Fuku Lite message guaranteed to not offend anyone in power in the US.


    Report Comment

    • anne anne

      I think that when you take on the IAEA you are taking on TPTB directly. You are showing how the Yakuza is running much of our country. I.e., who do you think is running GE, Westinghouse, and hence also the MSM? Who is holding a large portion of our national debt? Why do you think the Republican candidates sound so irrelevant? Why do you think that there are more medically uninsured since Pres. Obama took office?


      Report Comment

      • HoTaters HoTaters

        Ron Paul doesn’t follow “the status quo” in the Republican party. The MSM has done their best to try to shut him up and discredit him.


        Report Comment

        • anne anne

          However, Ron Paul thinks nuclear energy is the best kind of energy possible. He’s in favor of subsidizing the nuclear industry. He is not in favor of any environmental concern for the planet.


          Report Comment

          • HoTaters HoTaters

            He is not in favor of nuclear proliferation overseas, but alas, you are correct. He thinks it’s a “clean” technology. I wonder if that view has changed since Fukushima?


            Report Comment

          • HoTaters HoTaters

            On the other hand, he’s in favor of “green technologies” and favors the legalization of hemp production in the U.S. If hemp were legalized, it could go a LONG WAY toward solving our energy problems.


            Report Comment

  • anne anne

    Arnie isn’t blogging with an Anonymous name. The chicken-hearted shouldn’t be criticizing him. Arnie gives us information that we wouldn’t have otherwise. Incinerating radioactive waste and dumping radioactive waste in the ocean and using it for landfill are extremely deadly issues.


    Report Comment

  • Heart of the Rose Heart of the Rose

    Arnie isn’t telling the whole truth.. it’s easy to give one’s real name.
    The possibility of….losing your life is part of the truth-telling..
    Know it or get out of the business….
    Anonymity is awesome.


    Report Comment

  • Whoopie Whoopie

    Dont usually do this but found this comment at HP interesting:
    “This is a paper industry – investment­s and deeds and contracts – with dire physical consequenc­es. In the first 10 years of Nuclear Power, there was study and investigat­ion to see just how it would actually work – and almost immediatel­y the folks pushing the paper and collecting the checks began taking over. A British Engineer and Sociologis­t studied the ACTUAL costs in pounds and in energy consumptio­n needed to get a plant up and running, making electricit­y. He found and published that the amount of money and the amount of resources (energy – Oil, Electricit­y, Coal, etc.) was so large just to build the plant that it would take 20-30 years to break even. Worse he found that the subsidized cost over-runs and the time it took to run at full capacity meant that the electricit­y actually cost the society several times what convention­ally produced electricit­y would have cost. The extra money – he surmised – and the time (10 years at least) would have been more efficientl­y used cleaning stacks and developing other energy sources such as Wind, Solar and Geo-Therma­l and would result in a better outcome.

    SHUT THEM ALL DOWN!


    Report Comment

    • Whoopie Whoopie

      HE CONTINUES:
      “Oh – I forgot to mention that the British Scientist who studied this and came to those conclusion­s was stripped of his position in the British Society Of Scientists and lost his professors­hip too.


      Report Comment

      • Mack Mack

        Maybe it’s true what Dr. John Gorfman said:

        “My view is, there exists a group of people in the world that have a disease. I call it the “power disease.” They want to rule and control other people. They are a more important plague than cancer, pneumonia, bubonic plague, tuberculosis, and heart disease put together. They can only think how to obliterate, control, and use each other. They use people as nothing more than instruments to cast aside when they don’t need them any more.”


        Report Comment

        • or-well

          Psychopaths. Para-human. Predators.


          Report Comment

          • Labels are just words we use to put things into neat little boxes. Humans have always been predators, and their prey has always included other humans. What I’ve been wondering is whether we are seeing a substantial increase in human predators over the past ~40-50 years. Don’t guess anybody keeps statistics on that, do they? Maybe it’s a mutation that is spreading through populations in the normal manner of things evolutionary. A fatal flaw we won’t survive.

            Then I get REALLY depressed and think humans are nothing but an evolutionary plague – the means by which the ‘experiment’ of complex life comes to an end via a genetic time bomb. Lord knows we are inordinately proud of our ability to “defeat nature” by making ourselves (and most other life forms) extinct just by pushing a button. That’s why nukes exist, after all.


            Report Comment

            • or-well

              @JoyB
              I despise the opener “There are two kinds of people…” and all the misleading superficiality of handy categorisation.

              BUT….

              I do believe psychopathy needs to be much more thoroughly studied and discussed and our preconceptions that it’s only about standard-issue criminals re-examined.

              If it is a neurological hard-wired variation in the species we really need to “get it”. That’s why I chose “para-human”.

              It gives a different angle to the idea of the “1%”.


              Report Comment

            • Mack Mack

              Maybe the mutations are caused by man-made radionuclides.


              Report Comment

            • HoTaters HoTaters

              Helen Caldicott says it’s a fault in the reptilian brain of at least those in the nuclear industry. It appears it’s there in the brains of Monsteranto execs, big oil, big pharma, big chem as well …. Apparently lots of politicians have this fatal flaw, too. They definitely deserve Social Darwinism Awards ….


              Report Comment

          • StillJill StillJill

            Yes,…I learned and posted a few months ago, that the DSM-5, psycho-social disorder book,..that narcissism has been dropped in the newest version that comes out in March I think. They state that narcissism is no longer ‘abnormal’, to think overly much about oneself.

            People use one another as if the other is an ‘extra’ on a movie set,…the MOVIE OF THEM, their lives. When you don’t follow the script,….you get TEPCO’d!


            Report Comment

            • LetThemEatYellowCake LetThemEatYellowCake

              omg wow Jill – norms changing so much. You know I heard the same thing regarding weight. The title was something like “is overweight the new normal?” as unfortunately so many have issues with that now. It definitely has trickled down too to application as I haven’t changed a bit but because of size changes (and being on the bottom of the scale), many regular stores don’t carry my size without special order anymore.

              And that is totally creepy yet fitting an explanation for people’s reactions to this fiasco as well. So many write-offs, particularly this year, of people who don’t fit in their fantasy. Just knowing someone is worried about them possibly breathing plutonium is apparently reason enough to ridicule, attack and/or never speak to someone again. Being so widespread boggles the mind.


              Report Comment

        • HoTaters HoTaters

          Yes, and and remember what people like Henry Kissinger have to say about the value of young men and women in the military — ostensibly to serve their countries.

          “In Haig’s presence, Kissinger referred pointedly to military men as ‘dumb, stupid animals to be used’ as pawns for foreign policy.”

          – Bob Woodward & Carl Bernstein, The Final Days, p. 208


          Report Comment

  • Gotham

    When the next shoe drops – the world will shudder like a rung bell. The IAEA folks will all seek a safe haven in which to hide – along with the NRC and the folks at the U.S. state department.


    Report Comment

    • James2

      That shoe is dropping – slowly.

      That’s why I am frustrated with Arnie’s political correctness. It’s very clear that political correctness got us here and isn’t gonna get us out.


      Report Comment

      • anne anne

        Arnie definitely isn’t politically correct. He is certainly educated and knowledgeable. Why not pick a pro-nuke person to criticize? Arnie’s all we have to testify and argue against the nuclear industry. Labelling is usually prejucidial and doesn’t consider the whole person. Only the industry will benefit by criticizing Arnie. James2 you almost all the time sound like an industry shill. Only an industry shill would say that we don’t need to worry about earthquakes. This is what TEPCO has said for 40 or 50 years. They are still saying it because they want to build nuclear and MOX power plants in Turkey and the rest of the world including the US.

        James 2, what continent do you live on?


        Report Comment

    • WindorSolarPlease

      We will be shaking in our boots.

      Our disasters keep getting bigger and bigger.

      World is changing, we should not have something as dangerous as Nuclear Power. They are accidents waiting to happen, without anyone having any control of these monsters.

      I think there are those who think they are invited to safety, but when the rush comes, they also will be left out blowing in the wind.


      Report Comment

      • James2

        there is no safety from this.

        This will affect the rich and the poor equally. There is no safe spot on earth.

        Those with means might be able to delay the inevitable for a short time, but not avoid it.

        The deed is done. We are all in the pot and it’s beginning to heat up. You can’t hide, you can’t jump out.


        Report Comment

  • anne anne

    I posted a video yesterday that an elite whistleblower made before Mar 11. He talked about the radiation around the Northern Hemisphere as a method for depopulation. The elite, he said, would be in bunkers and South America. He talked about the equator and the reverse wind and the radiation staying north of the equator. He said that this plan was made years ago, that the reason they let every one know about it is that they think they have already won.


    Report Comment

  • Kevin Kevin

    I mistakenly posted this in another thread so I will repost here where I originally intended.

    What fascinates me about Fukushima is that over the last deceade since the time of 9/11 a large and relatively global movement has grown typically referred to as “conspiracy theorists” or “truhters.” This has involved a great many people who have worked to unearth details not commonly associated with the official versions of events on a wide array of topics, some even obscure. Oddly, virtually none of them have picked up the events of 3/11 with the rigour and tenacity we have seen with not only 9/11 but a host of other occurrences. Fukushima, undboutedly, presents great fodder for this community. An occurrence with global implications and a seemingly unending, highly questionable retelling of events. Its not that these people have shied away from opposing powerful forces in our midst or steered their attention away from occassions with deadly and horrifying impacts. In the abscense of the scrutiny typically applied as a result of this community’s attention to this issue the opportunity arises for people like Mr Gunderson to fill the void and indeed he has. In fact he has become the go to guy for many of the truther crowd who dare skim the surface of this issue. This has allowed Arnie to in fact fulfill the role of a gate keeper and when we see videos like this one it becomes apparent that regardless of Mr Gunderson’s intention he has indeed slipped into this role, if even by default. Which ultimately results in the further burying of details and issues consistently referred to on these pages and the impact is such that the proper scrutiny required to bring up the profile necessary in order to properly discern them generally does not arise


    Report Comment

    • American academics are to blame in many ways. They have failed to rise to the occasion (although there are a few exceptions).

      We need people with expertise to speak out and debate findings.

      I find the silence very troubling on many levels…


      Report Comment

      • Kevin Kevin

        I completely agree Maija, however a reliance on acedemics is shaky at best. In fact here in Canada of the lectures I have watched on the topic from academic institutions, each and every one were complete and utter damage control exercises so horrifically slanted in favour of the industry it was embarassing just watching them.

        That said, Architects and Engineers on the 9/11 stuff have forwarded a credible effort that, if anything, deconstructs the official narrative and the commission report specifically.

        I wont hold my breathe for the academic community but I am surprised the less credentialed and wild west like truthers have not been all over this.

        We also discussed in the past the abscence of any realy scrutiny from the ENGOS which I find reprehensible. Of all the issues that these groups busy themselves with this one should be paramout and for me it underscores my understanding of these organizations to be largely efforts in controlled opposition and often simply green window addressing for the brownest agendas known to man.


        Report Comment

  • James2

    R1 tent burning up right now


    Report Comment

  • Human0815

    I really doubt that the Tokyo Government
    will allow this, they will fear Regress
    from many Sources!

    And it is forbidden since many Years,
    dumping Radioactive Materials
    into the Ocean is against the international Law!


    Report Comment

    • BreadAndButter BreadAndButter

      Hi Human, I think that’s why they don’t dump it in the ocean (international waters), but into Tokyo Bay.

      The fact that this is happening has been reported in several papers. I think it is happening, though it’s shocking. Just as shocking as the fact that we don’t hear about people protesting.


      Report Comment

    • HoTaters HoTaters

      Did you mean “redress” ?


      Report Comment

  • Human0815

    Oh, many People are very active here in Japan
    but you cant see them so well because they
    are on different Channels,
    the Tags and many use UStream!

    You need to use the Searchwords in Kanji,
    when you do this you will get 1.000ths
    of Results!

    Tokyo Bay is a part of the Ocean,
    maybe there is a mistranslation,
    because i know that they spoke about the use of Radioactive Sludge for the Land-Fills?


    Report Comment

    • BreadAndButter BreadAndButter

      Hi Human, I apologize for my stupid comment. I know there are many concerned people around you doing all kinds of protesting and information – just because I don’t see it in the media I can read doesn’t mean they’re not there.
      Sorry.

      Hmmm, if they use radioactive sludge for the landfills, why not the ashes? It’s both criminal, anyway.


      Report Comment

  • Radnet for Phoenix shows 600 CPM beta today.

    My kids are being poisoned…


    Report Comment

  • StillJill StillJill

    Doesn’t Uncle Arnie remind us that his name is spelled ‘son’, not ‘sen’? With an “O”, Gunderson? People miss spell me from time to time,….and if someone corrects us,…we should get it right, IMO.


    Report Comment

  • lokay5

    anne-

    “and a underground nuclear explosion in 2009 by the US in the Mississippi basin, and no one said even a word.”

    Brown flag! Give me a LINK, PLEASE!


    Report Comment

    • anne anne

      Thanks for responding. I posted this twice on discussion thread:
      What do you know about nuclear fracking? Do you approve of nuclear fracking?

      What do you know about an Aug. 19, 2009 nuclear blast? Do you approve of the US use of nuclear blasts in the Mississippi basin?

      Transmutation on the Ocean Bottom
      June 20, 2011

      “With the large releases of methane under the Gulf of Mexico by deep drilling and nuclear fracking of the basalt plain large quantities of methane ice have piled up on the bottom. Given time the bacteria will eat all the methane keeping the Gulf deep waters cool and making a lot of fish food. The use of Corexit emulsifier sinking the red coloured petroleum to the bottom will in time be transmuted by the bacteria.

      “The radioactivity in the petroleum, fall-out from the August 19 2009 nuclear blast 10 kilometres under the alluvial fan of the Mississippi will also be transmuted by the bacteria. In biological systems radioactivity drops fifteen times faster than in a test tube.

      “The practise of the US Navy to drop decommissioned nuclear reactors in the ocean depths may be the best solution for long term elimination of such materials. The bacteria eats the iron into “rusticles” as seen on the Titanic at 10,000 feet deep and transmutes toxic radioactive elements fifteen times faster than in underground bunkers….”
      http://educate-yourself.org/zsl/transmutationoean20jun11.shtml


      Report Comment

      • anne anne

        It really blew my mind. Hope you can do something.


        Report Comment

      • lokay5

        Nuclear fracking?

        (BROWN FLAG)

        LINK PLEASE


        Report Comment

      • lokay5

        anne

        “What do you know about nuclear fracking? Do you approve of nuclear fracking?

        What do you know about an Aug. 19, 2009 nuclear blast? Do you approve of the US use of nuclear blasts in the Mississippi basin?”

        ************************

        What do I know about nuclear fracking in Mississippi? Well, I know it didn’t happen in 2009. It happened on December 10, 1967, as part of Project Gasbuggy. People familiar with nuclear energy are well aware of the Gasbuggy fiasco. They did, indeed, stimulate gas production, but the gas was too radioactive to use.

        Google Project Gasbuggy


        Report Comment