Published: May 24th, 2011 at 11:29 am ET
|
Radiation dose, Unit 1 nuclear power plant Hukushima, atmc.jp, May 24, 2011:
[Link currently offline, see cached version here]
Drywell
5/24 @ 192 Sv/hr
5/23 @ 201 Sv/hr
5/22 @ 196 Sv/hr
5/21 @ 36.2 Sv/hr
5/20 @ 46.5 Sv/hr
5/19 @ 36.3 Sv/hr
5/18 @ 45.4 Sv/hr
Published: May 24th, 2011 at 11:29 am ET
|
sending...
SCARED
Report Comment
Notice it says:
“Status: Instrument failure”
is this the measuring instrument? or the reactor?
Report Comment
”When I use a word,’ Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, ‘it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less.’
‘The question is,’ said Alice, ‘whether you can make words mean so many different things.’
‘The question is,’ said Humpty Dumpty, ‘which is to be master — that’s all.’
Report Comment
Okay so is it safe to conclude then the emissions have also risen accordingly by five times in the same seven day period?
Report Comment
You are making a big mistake.
It’s not “japan” that changed the data. It’s the website !
The original data from tepco website were not changed !
Everything is explained here :
http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=480200&page=504
**************
The graphs on that site are not good, plenty of errors.
For a start for unit 1 they say that one CAMS reading is from D/W and other from S/C. Its not true, both the sets of data they are showing are for D/W, and they are not showing any S/C readings. TEPCO publish 2 D/W readings and 2 S/C readings, and it is important to note that the unit 1 D/W readings were unavailable for many days due to presumed sensor problems, and indeed the sensor that has recently shows 201 Sv/h has also spiked to high values in the past, so dont know whether to trust it.
As for Units 5 and 6, the site is complete rubbish, it is using wrong data. There are no CAMS readings for reactors 5 and 6, and I have worked out what data it is using by mistake. These numbers are the reported temperatures of the spent fuel pools at units 5 & 6 and should certainly not be in Sv/h. Here is the raw data that I can get to match up, eg look at pool temps at 12:00 on 21st and they match the bogus Sv/h readings on that graph site:
http://www.tepco.co.jp/en/nu/fukushi…data_56u-e.pdf
So I would not recommend using that atmc.jp site, use TEPCOs data.
http://www.tepco.co.jp/en/nu/fukushima-np/index-e.html
As for why some of the real numbers are also high, well this equipment is inside containment and is designed to detect fuel melting, so its not surprising that some numbers are high. Yes if many of these higher numbers were from outside containment then this would indeed be cause for great alarm, but they arent, so dont panic.
Report Comment
What containment?
Report Comment
These spreadsheets may be hard to figure out.
Besides wonder which data is properly updated, I can’t seem to find a way to translate from the Google spreadsheets the same site ties to. (Can’t copy/paste the text to a translator because its a picture).
But it it looks pretty (makes graphs and things, as well as having data)
The 5th button on the bottom seems to be the unit 1 pressure history.
https://spreadsheets0.google.com/ccc?authkey=CP6ewJkO&hl=ja&key=t5VrTdLDZDbX39YK-iFb0Iw&hl=ja&authkey=CP6ewJkO#gid=8
Report Comment
Thank You, Chris, these are the facts.
Report Comment
These are unsubstantiated theories.
Report Comment
YOU HAVE THE POWER STOP THE SILENCE MAKE FUKULEAKS VIRAL!
http://newsmedicalworld.blogspot.com/2011/05/medicalconspiracies-fukuleaks-cover-up.html
link to Steve Wozniak re the NEW Japanese Wikileaks FUKULEAKS reveals that all the media and scientists were threatened/and or paid off and has the missing radiation readings and tons of MAJOR DIRT! It names names. See below.
FUKULEAKS:http://translate.google.com/translate?tl=en-+us&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww47.atwiki.jp%2Fgoyo-gakusha%2F
Report Comment
Thank You Stu….
for those who didn’t get to see the link,
Steve Wozniak is involved in blogging about FuKu, and posted a note
from a lady in LA, Cali….she has a special low-dose detector, and she
says she is picking up .5 REM per hour.
That’s 500 millirems per hour.
On the streets of Los Angeles. Today.
Thank you.
Report Comment
Speaking of Wikileaks and shills and activists
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iKnzyLeU21s
All the world’s a stage, ya know.
Report Comment
With all of the water they’ve been pouring into the (leaking) reactor, wouldn’t there be water even in the drywell? Why aren’t we seeing steam?
Reactor No 2 is very steamy, so its obvious the corium is in water. But No 1 and No 3 are hot and dry, so where is the corium?
Report Comment
so tepco and the physics forum (the fox news of pro-nuclear industry shills) say don’t worry about radiation so high it will kill you in 2 minutes, because it’s ‘contained’ within the vessel they’ve already admitted has holes melted through and is breeched
don’t worry – tepco knows what they’re doing !
Report Comment
The physics forum….a disgrace to science..they should SHUT UP.
Report Comment
Citoyenne
“Why aren’t we seeing steam?”
If the corium has melted through and is beneath the ground level, mud above the corium may be cooling the steam and absorbing some of the heat or much of it, when the pressure builds up enough steam pressure builds up causing a BURP through the muds from waters (past article spoke of mud/clay building up in pits) falling in behind the hole being burned by core, it may be enough for some or all of it to reach the surface of the pit to cause some steam becoming visible at times !
Report Comment
The cooling waters mixed with mud will become more dense mud as the water is steamed off so mud/clay may be on top of the core and becoming harder from the heat that is being produced !
Report Comment
Mud building up in the reactor was making it harder for them to get water on it, the same may be taking place down under, but when it does reach the water table and steam is created each drop will become @ 1700 times it size instantly…
Report Comment
Elements reach recriticality..explode
Rinse and repeat ad finitum.
Report Comment
Can anyone explain why we keep getting CESIUM clouds in Northern CA since May 6? We used to get cesium clouds every 3rd week, with some days off in between, in March and April. But since beg of May, we have continuous orange clouds rolling over CA continuously. We had 2 days break last week when it rained, but they came right back last Friday. We need some time off to see blue sky again. What’s happening — why is it different in May? Is the fission increasing?
Report Comment
The NILU (hidden) projections show the cesium concentrations ramping up-constant coverage of Western Coast. California is taking a wallop… and don’t expect any more full disclosure than you got from the sexy (or sex-crazed) Gov. Terminator.
The more cesium clouds that you see also corresponds to the latest CA milk tests..:(
Report Comment
Jerry Brown is our Governor now.
Fukushima is chronic, low dose in nature.
Report Comment
The once forward-thinking Gov. Brown should do something for you people! All you see is your most recent 2 term Gov. in the news daily!
Report Comment
Can you get photos and satelite ones that show such clouds
Report Comment
Hey can anyone tell me whether California is one of the main growing areas for Asparagus? I’ve noticed that here in Auckland, NZ the local supermarkets, in my case Countdown in Quay St, have been putting large amounts of Asparagus from the USA on sale at less than half the normal price. And from what I remember our local Asparagus season starts around August so we haven’t started harvesting yet.
So I’m wondering where this USA Asparagus is coming from and whether I should be weary of it if it’s come in recently?
Report Comment
One of the largest world producers for Asparagus is Peru, which should be safe from radiation, anyway. Mexico has a big crop as well.
What do you have to worry about in New Zealand? What kinds of veggies and fruits do you or do you not produce there???
Thanks, in advance.
Report Comment
Ok, so the fuel is outside the containment and in the dry well, how long will it now take before the fuel melts through to the ground below and we have a big boom?
Or is it more likely that we will have an “elephant’s foot” situations like Chernobyl and this will all peter out (reaction-wise)
Does anyone, anywhere have a clue?
Just like TMI & Chernobyl the people in charge are scratching their heads.
Report Comment
No. Nobody has a clue.
This has never happened before. There are only conjectures and theories from here on out, until the facts from this situation are known, which apparently is not until several months after they occur.
Report Comment
Shell game. Watch TEPCO switch the peas around. Place your bets. You bet your life.
Report Comment
nice one old friend, it specifically states that teppco made a change in operations, without naming one. does this mean you went from 15tons of water to 20 an hour?
Report Comment
Like the mud-cover concept. We can have Old Faithful geyser, cycling
like Heart O’ Rose says. cook up a lotta pressure, boil it up, steam it up,
and Boom, Spray, Woosh, splash, more million-Becquerel Bathing!
Report Comment
Why today are they now posting instrument failure in #1… another cover up?
Unit 1 nuclear power plant Fukushima (204 Sv / h) Instrument failure
Report Comment