|
You must be logged in to post a comment.
|
Discussion Threads
-
FORUM: Fukushima Webcam Discussion Thread
(5,164 Comments)
-
FORUM: General Discussion Thread (Nuclear Issues)
(5,400 Comments)
-
FORUM: Off-Topic Discussion Thread (Non-Nuclear Issues)
(3,940 Comments)
-
FORUM: Post Your Radiation Monitoring Data Here
(3,274 Comments)
-
FORUM: Alternative Energy — Converting to clean, renewable energy sources
(419 Comments)
-
FORUM: Petitions, Ballot Initiatives, Other Signature Drives (VIDEO)
(173 Comments)
-
FORUM: Upcoming meetings, gatherings, & demonstrations about energy issues
(477 Comments)
-
FORUM: What should be done about Japan burning radioactive debris?
(151 Comments)
-
FORUM: Methods for combating radiation and its effects
(1,065 Comments)
-
FORUM: Effects of low level radiation
(537 Comments)
-
FORUM: Possible Fukushima-related Anomalies — Deformations, Yellow Rain, Metallic Taste in Mouth, etc.
(1,731 Comments)
SUBMIT YOUR NEWS TIPS Your identity will not be made public unless you request it
|
Is it my imagination or does the video get more grainy/pixalated shortly after the quake hits?
Report Comment
Not your imagination that was one big quake event, one of the most robust we have seen recently.
Hey..MrTEPCOMAN…those cartoonish white coverups. Did you paint over over the Reactor 2 crane base on purpose? Or do you need more Paintshop training courses?
Report Comment
And the base of the reactor area shown by the webcam..note the almost perfect STRAIGHT lines in the blacked out shrub and base area. Think they are hoping to hide the breakout emissions/fires as best they can. And the white outfitted workers as well.
Report Comment
Wow..and the epicenter..16.25 km. from Fukushima.
From Daini ..21.46 km.
http://hisz.rsoe.hu/alertmap/site/index.php?pageid=seism_critical&rid=297802
Report Comment
There can't be much left connected anywhere on both sites. How would you stop explosions at Daini? Complete venting to air and no cameras? Death threats against any workers there releasing information? A few dead to prove the point?
SOP.
Report Comment
These were miles, not km.
Report Comment
Japan Fukushima Daini Npp 21.46 km
Japan Fukushima Daiichi Npp 16.25 km
http://hisz.rsoe.hu/alertmap/site/index.php?pageid=seism_critical&rid=297802
Report Comment
If you use the coordinates from Japan Meteorological Assoc,
hisz.rsoe.hu is off by even more.
21:48 JST 10 Jan 2013 37.5N 141.5E 40 km 5.0
http://www.jma.go.jp/en/quake/20130110215249391-102148.html
This earthquake is 26.2 mi (42.11 km) from Fukushima Daiichi (#1) Nuclear Power Plant
http://www.movable-type.co.uk/scripts/latlong.html
Fukushima #1 37.422972N 141.032917E
http://hisz.rsoe.hu/alertmap/site/index.php?pageid=seism_index&rid=297802
Report Comment
hisz.rsoe says the earthquake is :
25.24 km (15.68 miles) – of Namie, Fukushima, Japan
http://hisz.rsoe.hu/alertmap/site/index.php?pageid=seism_index&rid=297802
They say they got their info. from USGS which says the earthquake is:
25 km (15 miles) ENE of Namie, Japan
Namie is 4.5 miles north of Fukushima Daiaichi.
Report Comment
Daini reactors are too close to quake action to exclude from a courtesy cam! Daini's R-4 has a cracked containment, now with extra damaged fuel onboard from Daichi R-4. Daichi's R-2 photo-patches can't hide gaseous flow above the reactors. Explosions can be spliced out of the cam video but gas flows increase, causing high pixellation on vids. The latest fuku1live vid, after the eQ, shows fire-like reflections near active rooftop emissions of R-1 to R-2.
For the eQ vid above, what is that light zipping back and forth near the bottom (ground level?) @ 2:17 secs, some sort of emergency action? Also, does it seem that R-3 and R-4 are leaning to the right side, as though the ground may be sinking more? I traced the swarm of offshore quakes in last couple of weeks to find they moved sightly north by 1 deg. latitude and 3 degrees east, then 2 degrees back to the west-
My take is that Honshu continues to be shoved by the Philippine Plate to the south and Amurian Plate from the west side. Further coastline subsidence of Daini and Daichi will only add to structural collapse of the reactor buildings. Is it impossible to shore up the buildings in a meaningful way? R4 frame is to hold the crane I gather but what about the sfp? C-sfp is smoking off/on (Thank You! Nuckelchen) with over 1700 fuel assemblies. Is coolant water lacking? Will it be this year, next year, when…arrgghh.
Report Comment
Yes looks like a flashlight or mutated lightning bug cuddling up to the warmth of corium, but all joking aside, I don't know but it is odd and thanks for pointing it out I initially saw it and thought it was pixelation but it's not.
Report Comment
MAP: http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/Maps/10/140_40.php
1. Magnitude
4.5
Date-Time
• Thursday, January 10, 2013 at 21:26:20 UTC
• Friday, January 11, 2013 at 07:26:20 AM at epicenter •
Location
37.345°N, 143.674°E
Depth
34.5 km (21.4 miles)
Region
OFF THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN
Distances
236 km (146 miles) E of Namie, Japan
239 km (148 miles) ESE of Ishinomaki, Japan
246 km (152 miles) ESE of Yamoto, Japan
249 km (154 miles) E of Iwaki, Japan
This earthquake is 145/1 mi (233.5 km) E from Fukushima Daiichi (#1) Nuclear Power Plant
http://www.movable-type.co.uk/scripts/latlong.html
Fukushima #1 37.422972N 141.032917E
2. Magnitude
4.9
Date-Time
• Thursday, January 10, 2013 at 12:48:21 UTC
• Thursday, January 10, 2013 at 09:48:21 PM at epicenter
Location
37.561°N, 141.269°E
Depth
53.3 km (33.1 miles)
Region
NEAR THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN
Distances
25 km (15 miles) ENE of Namie, Japan
59 km (36 miles) SE of Marumori, Japan
62 km (38 miles) SE of Kakuda, Japan
62 km (38 miles) ENE of Funehiki, Japan
This earthquake is 16.1 mi (25.87 km) NNE from Fukushima Daiichi (#1) Nuclear Power Plant
This earthquake is 21.5 mi (34.67 km) NE from Fukushima Daini (#2) Nuclear Power Plant
Report Comment