Senator concerned about massive dams upstream from Nebraska nuke plants — Army Corps alludes to ‘issues’ that are being monitored closely

Published: June 30th, 2011 at 11:59 am ET
By
Email Article Email Article
28 comments


Flood test not over for nuke plant, Omaha World-Herald,

Sitting above Nebraska’s nuclear plants are six upstream dams, part of one of the nation’s largest reservoir systems. Failure of any of those dams would send devastating amounts of water downstream. Could the dams fail?

“The short answer is no,” said Brig. Gen. John McMahon, who oversees the corps’ 12-state northwestern division.

“It’s not to say there aren’t issues at different places that we’re monitoring closely. But in terms of the integrity of the dams, that absolutely is not a concern.”

Nelson Asks Corps To Consider Nuclear Plants, WOWT, June 29, 2011:

Senator Ben Nelson is urging the Army Corps of Engineers to make the safety of the Fort Calhoun Nuclear Plant and Cooper Nuclear Plant a top priority for flood management.

“The Corps must make it clear that the safety of the Fort Calhoun and Cooper nuclear power plants is among its highest priorities during the ongoing floods,” Nelson said Wednesday morning. “Nebraskans, Iowans and others throughout the Midwest deserve to know everything is being done to make sure the nuclear plants continue to operate safely.”

Nelson sent a letter to Brig. Gen. John McMahon, who oversees the Missouri River Basin for the Army Corps of Engineers. Nelson expressed his concern over comments from a Corps spokesperson saying the state’s nuclear plants are not being factored into the Corps’ schedule of dam releases. [...]

Nelson’s letter to Brig. Gen. John McMahon:

[...] I wanted to bring to your attention some comments in an article from yesterday’s Omaha World Herald, “Nuke Plant Safe Amid Unique Peril” (copy enclosed). In this article, Corps spokesman Erik Blechinger stated, “Nebraska’s two nuclear plants aren’t being factored into the Army Corps of Engineers schedule of dam releases.” He went on to say, “Flood-risk reduction is our priority right now. We are working closely with OPPD and NPPD, so I would never say that we wouldn’t consider adjusting releases, but I can’t imagine all the possible scenarios. Currently, there is just no flexibility in the system.”

Given our discussion last week on the Corps’ responsibility to protect the people, communities, and infrastructure along the Missouri River, additional concern and caution would seem necessary in addressing the two nuclear facilities. While the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) maintains that both the Omaha Public Power District’s (OPPD) Fort Calhoun Nuclear Generating Station and the Nebraska Public Power District’s (NPPD) Cooper Nuclear Station remain safe, given the current forecasts projected for the Missouri River, there is still concern that the stations would be vulnerable if there is a continued rise in the River’s level, potentially putting the public at risk.

Consequently, I would ask you to clarify whether the Corps will consider the safety of Nebraska’s two nuclear plants adjacent to the Missouri River as dam releases are scheduled. I also wish to learn more as to what steps the Corps is taking in conjunction with the NRC, OPPD, and NPPD to ensure the structural integrity of the structures protecting the Fort Calhoun and Cooper Nuclear Stations. [...]

Published: June 30th, 2011 at 11:59 am ET
By
Email Article Email Article
28 comments

Related Posts

  1. 4 to 5 more inches of water at Nebraska nuke plants after 7% flow increase from dam: Army Corps of Engineers June 23, 2011
  2. Corps stopping releases at Big Bend Dam upstream of nuke plants to check for possible erosion — High release rates have caused erosion around spillways July 1, 2011
  3. Army Corps warns of forecast calling for up to 3 inches of rain in Missouri River basin — Record dam releases to continue as reservoirs “so close” to crest July 11, 2011
  4. Army Corps predicts Missouri River will overflow up to 70 more levees July 10, 2011
  5. NRC says it is “closely monitoring” Missouri River as floodwaters rise at Cooper and Fort Calhoun nuclear plants June 22, 2011

28 comments to Senator concerned about massive dams upstream from Nebraska nuke plants — Army Corps alludes to ‘issues’ that are being monitored closely

  • PoorDaddy PoorDaddy

    Hey, Sen. Nelson! How about introducing legislation to shut down every fucking reactor in the country? They all puke death a little at a time.


    Report Comment

  • PoorDaddy PoorDaddy

    Every time you write to these guys, you get back a form letter about how environmentally aware they are, or how energy conservation is their priority. Or they ignore you.
    Representative democracy is an oxymoron and a LIE. We live in a Corporatocracy riddled with tax loopholes for corporations and corporate welfare flows freely upward. The only thing that “trickles down” is pollution, radioactivity and bullshit.


    Report Comment

  • Discordian

    Disagree about reliability of the dam(n) system. Check out the Crisis Jones Report for insight into the structural integrity of the dams.


    Report Comment

  • “being monitored”
    That is the same story we are hearing on all these nuke plants having real problems causing Hot and Cold shutdowns from floods, tornado’s lightings and a host of weather nature related, as well as equipment and human failure’s before and in aftermath !


    Report Comment

  • patb2009

    “There is no flexibility in the system” means that all the dams and levees are running at 99.9% capacity.

    They can’t hold water at any of the dams, if they do, the dams overtop and fail.

    The levees are within a foot of the top, or at their pressure ratings at the bottoms and if they increase release rates from the levees, they will flood somewhere. The rivers can’t take any more flow.

    That means, what they need to do is open a relief gate and start flooding. Pick some county with lots of farm land,
    and cut a relief opening, and let out millions of acre feet of water

    That ruins some large farm sections for a few years, but
    it’s cheaper then losing the nukes, or flooding a city.

    That the corps won’t do this, speaks to, the power of the redneck farmers.

    These levees won’t hold forever. Another 10 days and i expect they will burst anyways.

    better to make a plan, evacuate equipment, livestock, people, homes. Pick a 60×60 mile patch, evac it fast and blow the levees. Put about 8 feet of water in there, and relieve the river.


    Report Comment

  • theypoisonus

    According to this email

    http://www.truthwinds.com/siterun_data/environment/water_flooding/news.php?q=1309367488

    they plan on blowing up the damn dam, as it is cracking anyhoo!

    NOTE: Again, as in godlikeproductions, it is wayyyy religious, but over time, I have investigated eveything I have found there to be spot on. Just ignore the other stuff and read the email for a man close to Omaha, NE. who seems to know what he is talking about.
    Hope he knows how to swim. :(


    Report Comment

  • Elenin Velikovsky Elenin Velikovsky

    Wow, maybe you oughta cross-post this link to
    the newest thread, also.
    It sounds credible, the guy reporting that explosives
    have already been placed on the cracking face of
    Gavin’s Point… to supposedly “save” most of the dam,
    while blowing some key top-point away.
    Wonder of there are any other reeports about this.


    Report Comment

  • J.F. Sebastian

    Nukes, spuriously threatened by fire and floods, are a distraction from the existential threat of Fukushima.


    Report Comment

  • Elenin Velikovsky Elenin Velikovsky

    Well, J.F….If they actually blow Gavin’s
    point dam, it means a big flood, and no
    mention of saving Calhoun and Cooper from
    this big flood.
    On the Fuku front, of course we are being bombed.
    I raised the info with some church guys, who once
    had military and professional nuke experience.
    They are choosing to not talk it up with me.
    I say, what about a community leader, charged
    with a certain responsibility, just ignores the real
    radiation threat, all the Civil Defense stuff we were
    taught? There is a certain sense of “Oh well, what
    can you do about it?”….
    Noah and some of the others telling us of their
    preparations have been real leaders in waking
    up somebody, I Hope.
    Not really me, though, as far as air filter-protection,
    all the water filters, health stuff…
    But for those with kids, I’m afraid they are going
    to ignore early warnings, wait till it’s too late, then
    blame me for not DOING SOMETHING HONEY!!!


    Report Comment

  • nuclearpowerisdeath

    St. Louis Post-Dispatch is covering up the fact that there are two Nuclear power plants (Ft. Calhoun and Cooper) surrounded by flood waters and Los Alamos threatened by an out of control wildfire, and removing people who post stories about it in their forum or comments

    http://stltoday.com

    http://interact.stltoday.com/forums/viewforum.php?f=6

    Not only are they covering it up and trying to humiliate me about it, nearly all these cretins think RADIATION is safe and happy and as American as apple pie and torture.

    These two power plants are within 6 hours of St. Louis, so surely its newsworthy. Instead they run stories on American Idol.

    If you care about the future of the country, we need to realize the media DOES NOT CARE ABOUT US. As this demonstrates, even when there is a massive threat to a specific area they still do not run the truth.


    Report Comment

    • blackmoon

      The MSN and the Government don’t care about the well being of the public. Their only concern, is that we stay asleep and keep spending, until they load us into body bags.


      Report Comment