Any scientist worth their test tubes could see that from the very beginning.
Yeah.. the NWO probably did not count on this scale of the problem…just like the GOM situation.
Got a little out of hand didn’t it?
NWO=MORONS
NWO.. needs to get together and figure out this simple science fact.
ALL the weather in the world is interrelated.
So there will be an effect on the whole by trying to control certain portions.
Get Al Gore to head it up.
Go somewhere in secret and THINK.
Most governments don’t think much of their people because most governments are full of the morally corrupt. Yet it is always the strength of the people which sees a nation thru, not the strength of the government.
This is why there will always be people to defend the will of the people.
Our governments are guilty of treason to the people.
And the people will resist.
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.
Thomas Jefferson
Just a hint of “the more subdued view” (possibly an industry view – have to check the writer) on this disaster.
I think, between the drop and the shower, the result is that we’re still being irradiated and that thousands of cancers and other serious ailments will result – especially if the radiation is added to all the other chemical pollutants we are absorbing. Also, keep in mind that no level is safe, that there is a global cancer pandemic and that sperm counts are decreasing by about 2% a year worldwide. http://www.slate.com/id/2140985/
—————– http://www.fairwarning.org/2011/05/japan-disaster-a-drop-in-a-constant-global-shower-of-radiation/
Japan Disaster a Drop in a Constant Global Shower of Radiation
By Patrick Corcoran on May 3, 2011
The crisis at Japan’s Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant has heightened fears about the effects of radiation around the world, but experts say the worries mostly are unfounded.
As The New York Times reports, concerns about radiation emissions have spurred a worldwide spike in the sales of radiation detectors and potassium iodide, which fends off radiation-induced thyroid cancer. But experts say the only people truly endangered are in Japan, particularly the clean-up crew workers who have tried to contain the damage at Fukushima ever since the March 11 earthquake and tsunami that triggered the partial meltdown.
The increase in radiation in most parts of the world is minuscule, a fraction of the radiation emitted by natural sources under normal circumstances. Rocks and cosmic rays, for example, are far larger generators of radiation than Fukushima.
Other sources of radiation, from drums of nuclear waste in the ocean to the radiation lingering in the atmosphere because of Cold War weapons testing, also dwarf the worldwide impact of Fukushima’s leaky reactors. And medical patients are subjected to significant doses of radiation with X-rays and CT scans on a regular basis.
“Most people don’t have a good handle on the risks,” Dr. Fred A. Mettler Jr., a radiology professor at the University of New Mexico and member of a United Nations panel on radiation assessment, told the Times. “They don’t know the magnitude of the sources, so they don’t know how to put the risks in perspective.”
The Fukushima Daiichi disaster emitted about 10 million curies, the standard unit of radioactive emissions, into the atmosphere. This compares to 100 million for the Chernobyl nuclear disaster in 1986, and 70 billion curies from atmospheric weapons tests over the course of the Cold War.
The most likely human health impact is a “tiny increase” in cancer in Japan, according to Dr. Ethel S. Gilbert, a radiation epidemiologist at the National Cancer Institute.
“possibly an industry view” You Think !
mothra
May 1, 2011 at 10:23 am · Reply
After Chernobyl premies increased, live births decreased in the US:
Dr Ernest Sternglass of University of Pittsburg presented the following infant mortality rate for the Pacific states, following chernobyl fallout in May 1986, just one month after Chernobyl:
* May 1986 54% increase infant mortality in Washington state
* May 1986 48% increase infant mortality in California compared to previous June
* June 1986 245% increase deaths per thousand live births in Washington state
* June 1986 900% increse infant mortality rate per live births in Massachusetts
Agencies (ICRP et al) cherry picked risk data for levels they want to stay lower cost in operation despite effects on people – especially infants and high risk groups. They’re flawed models. These low dose risk models have huge error rates. They’ve set aside whole studies proving it – discounted data from whole countries in impact assessments. They’ve known a long time, AGAIN and again they’ve been presented with a lot of information – they still won’t change them. The babies keep dying or contracting illness from atypical pneumonia, cardiovascular to reproductive disruption and developmental defects… On and on. http://www.cerrie.org/pdfs/cerrie_report_e-book.pdf
Claiming they don’t know is a lie. Perpetuating additional “errors” is criminal among other labels I could easily think to type, but I’m trying to keep my language clean, level and on point.
My point is: No, it’s not just Japan – it’s global. The largest global nuclear event in history: 1,900 tons. The above links were under 200 tons. If they didn’t know, why are they capitalizing on medical investments for the same ailments instead of warning people or changing? http://enenews.com/cesium-detected-in-breast-milk
March 11, 2011 the containment structures blew up. It was announced that a hydrogen build-up was the cause. The world was told they had about 24 hours to get things under control or there was going to be a mess. We were told a radiation leak would happen if control wasn’t achieved in those 24 hours. How dumb.
They lost control at the first explosion. They already had a radiation leak at that point. The reactors were technically open, and that is where the hydrogen came from, it just didn’t appear, it came from within the now unsealed reactors.
The 24 hours is a sham. All the actual damage at 3 mile Island occurred in less than 7 seconds and only got worse after that. Chernobyl suffered it’s damage in less than 2 seconds from an exposed (uncooled top section) of it’s core from performing sub-minimum load testing that made controlling the water level in the reactor precarious, resulting in instantaneous overheating of catastrophic proportions at the exposed area.
The governments and nuclear industry relies on the public ignorance of what is inside those power plants for mass acceptance of their lies. People who know can’t be lied to, but the unknowing are truly like sheep.
I was thinking, to penetrate the reactors, why don’t they do like the termites do and build protective tunnels that will let them get to the critical areas? Maybe plastic tubing coated with lead on the outside to absorb alpha, beta, and gamma rays, and boron on the inside to absorb neutrons? Something that could be fabricated and deployed fast to get the workers safely where they need to go? It works for the termites here. They’ve really got to put the maximum energy, effort, and resources into getting this extremely dangerous situation under control. The longer it takes, the more devastating and catastrophic it will be.
America should be taking a much more aggressive role, firstly because (apart from Japan), it is the country most affected by radioactive pollution from Fukushima. Secondly, they need the practice for if, (or maybe that should be *when*), something like this happens to one of their own reactors.
Your identity will not be made public unless you request it
Receive Occasional Enenews Newsletters
sending...
SUPPORT ENENews
ENENews receives no funding from anyone or anything, except 1) People who donate via the button below, and 2) Google, who pays for the two ad spots. Thanks to all who have donated or are planning on doing so, it's nice to know people appreciate your work.
Go 'Newsers&# 039;!! Folks, keep reading,...
sending...
Any scientist worth their test tubes could see that from the very beginning.
Yeah.. the NWO probably did not count on this scale of the problem…just like the GOM situation.
Got a little out of hand didn’t it?
NWO=MORONS
Report Comment
NWO.. needs to get together and figure out this simple science fact.
ALL the weather in the world is interrelated.
So there will be an effect on the whole by trying to control certain portions.
Get Al Gore to head it up.
Go somewhere in secret and THINK.
Report Comment
Most governments don’t think much of their people because most governments are full of the morally corrupt. Yet it is always the strength of the people which sees a nation thru, not the strength of the government.
Report Comment
This is why there will always be people to defend the will of the people.
Our governments are guilty of treason to the people.
And the people will resist.
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.
Thomas Jefferson
Report Comment
Just a hint of “the more subdued view” (possibly an industry view – have to check the writer) on this disaster.
I think, between the drop and the shower, the result is that we’re still being irradiated and that thousands of cancers and other serious ailments will result – especially if the radiation is added to all the other chemical pollutants we are absorbing. Also, keep in mind that no level is safe, that there is a global cancer pandemic and that sperm counts are decreasing by about 2% a year worldwide.
http://www.slate.com/id/2140985/
—————–
http://www.fairwarning.org/2011/05/japan-disaster-a-drop-in-a-constant-global-shower-of-radiation/
Japan Disaster a Drop in a Constant Global Shower of Radiation
By Patrick Corcoran on May 3, 2011
The crisis at Japan’s Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant has heightened fears about the effects of radiation around the world, but experts say the worries mostly are unfounded.
As The New York Times reports, concerns about radiation emissions have spurred a worldwide spike in the sales of radiation detectors and potassium iodide, which fends off radiation-induced thyroid cancer. But experts say the only people truly endangered are in Japan, particularly the clean-up crew workers who have tried to contain the damage at Fukushima ever since the March 11 earthquake and tsunami that triggered the partial meltdown.
The increase in radiation in most parts of the world is minuscule, a fraction of the radiation emitted by natural sources under normal circumstances. Rocks and cosmic rays, for example, are far larger generators of radiation than Fukushima.
Other sources of radiation, from drums of nuclear waste in the ocean to the radiation lingering in the atmosphere because of Cold War weapons testing, also dwarf the worldwide impact of Fukushima’s leaky reactors. And medical patients are subjected to significant doses of radiation with X-rays and CT scans on a regular basis.
“Most people don’t have a good handle on the risks,” Dr. Fred A. Mettler Jr., a radiology professor at the University of New Mexico and member of a United Nations panel on radiation assessment, told the Times. “They don’t know the magnitude of the sources, so they don’t know how to put the risks in perspective.”
The Fukushima Daiichi disaster emitted about 10 million curies, the standard unit of radioactive emissions, into the atmosphere. This compares to 100 million for the Chernobyl nuclear disaster in 1986, and 70 billion curies from atmospheric weapons tests over the course of the Cold War.
The most likely human health impact is a “tiny increase” in cancer in Japan, according to Dr. Ethel S. Gilbert, a radiation epidemiologist at the National Cancer Institute.
Report Comment
“possibly an industry view” You Think !
mothra
May 1, 2011 at 10:23 am · Reply
After Chernobyl premies increased, live births decreased in the US:
Dr Ernest Sternglass of University of Pittsburg presented the following infant mortality rate for the Pacific states, following chernobyl fallout in May 1986, just one month after Chernobyl:
* May 1986 54% increase infant mortality in Washington state
* May 1986 48% increase infant mortality in California compared to previous June
* June 1986 245% increase deaths per thousand live births in Washington state
* June 1986 900% increse infant mortality rate per live births in Massachusetts
http://www.radiation.org/reading/ejsternglasspubs.html
Why? Radioactive cesium and iodine (confirmed here) target fatty tissues, thyroid, ovaries and breasts. When it’s not here these occurences improve. Stat.
Agencies (ICRP et al) cherry picked risk data for levels they want to stay lower cost in operation despite effects on people – especially infants and high risk groups. They’re flawed models. These low dose risk models have huge error rates. They’ve set aside whole studies proving it – discounted data from whole countries in impact assessments. They’ve known a long time, AGAIN and again they’ve been presented with a lot of information – they still won’t change them. The babies keep dying or contracting illness from atypical pneumonia, cardiovascular to reproductive disruption and developmental defects… On and on.
http://www.cerrie.org/pdfs/cerrie_report_e-book.pdf
Claiming they don’t know is a lie. Perpetuating additional “errors” is criminal among other labels I could easily think to type, but I’m trying to keep my language clean, level and on point.
My point is: No, it’s not just Japan – it’s global. The largest global nuclear event in history: 1,900 tons. The above links were under 200 tons. If they didn’t know, why are they capitalizing on medical investments for the same ailments instead of warning people or changing?
http://enenews.com/cesium-detected-in-breast-milk
Report Comment
March 11, 2011 the containment structures blew up. It was announced that a hydrogen build-up was the cause. The world was told they had about 24 hours to get things under control or there was going to be a mess. We were told a radiation leak would happen if control wasn’t achieved in those 24 hours. How dumb.
They lost control at the first explosion. They already had a radiation leak at that point. The reactors were technically open, and that is where the hydrogen came from, it just didn’t appear, it came from within the now unsealed reactors.
The 24 hours is a sham. All the actual damage at 3 mile Island occurred in less than 7 seconds and only got worse after that. Chernobyl suffered it’s damage in less than 2 seconds from an exposed (uncooled top section) of it’s core from performing sub-minimum load testing that made controlling the water level in the reactor precarious, resulting in instantaneous overheating of catastrophic proportions at the exposed area.
The governments and nuclear industry relies on the public ignorance of what is inside those power plants for mass acceptance of their lies. People who know can’t be lied to, but the unknowing are truly like sheep.
Report Comment
I was thinking, to penetrate the reactors, why don’t they do like the termites do and build protective tunnels that will let them get to the critical areas? Maybe plastic tubing coated with lead on the outside to absorb alpha, beta, and gamma rays, and boron on the inside to absorb neutrons? Something that could be fabricated and deployed fast to get the workers safely where they need to go? It works for the termites here. They’ve really got to put the maximum energy, effort, and resources into getting this extremely dangerous situation under control. The longer it takes, the more devastating and catastrophic it will be.
America should be taking a much more aggressive role, firstly because (apart from Japan), it is the country most affected by radioactive pollution from Fukushima. Secondly, they need the practice for if, (or maybe that should be *when*), something like this happens to one of their own reactors.
Report Comment