No. 2 reactor “is not being cooled”… water not getting into core — Containment and reactor do not have integrity, gases being emitted out of top (VIDEO)

Published: April 19th, 2011 at 1:51 pm ET
By
Email Article Email Article
15 comments


Gundersen Discusses Current Condition of Reactors, TEPCO Claim of “No Fission” in Fuel Pool, and Lack of Radiation Monitoring in Fish, Fairewinds Associates, April 19, 2011:

Transcript Summary, starts at 2:20 in

  • What they’re measuring in Unit 2 is not water or steam at all
  • It is hot air or hot hydrogen and that’s a problem
  • It tells me that unit 2 is not being cooled
  • We should be very concerned that we’re exhausting hot gases out the top of that reactor
  • Unit two has no pressure at the bottom of containment
  • Graph clearly shows that containment is leaking
  • Previous two graphs show unit 2 is not getting water in the core
  • Mainstream media has not really addressed that
  • Containment does not have integrity and reactor does not have integrity

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eV6bkMl00XQ

Published: April 19th, 2011 at 1:51 pm ET
By
Email Article Email Article
15 comments

Related Posts

  1. Gundersen: Possible melted core will get through containment and hit water (AUDIO) December 25, 2011
  2. Nuclear expert: “Water is literally pouring out of the side” of reactor containment (VIDEO) April 25, 2011
  3. AUDIO: US gov’t experts think melted fuel rods landed in water under Reactor No. 2, causing STEAM explosion — Pressure dropped dramatically at same time — Clear indications primary containment lost March 2, 2012
  4. Experts assuming Reactor 2 had cracked containment vessel that allowed releases directly from melted nuclear core — Radioactive plume was blown south (VIDEO) July 24, 2012
  5. Scientist: “The melted core cracked the containment vessel, there really is no containment” at Fukushima reactors (VIDEO) February 25, 2013

15 comments to No. 2 reactor “is not being cooled”… water not getting into core — Containment and reactor do not have integrity, gases being emitted out of top (VIDEO)

  • radegan

    Very important you take time to look at this –

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BnRMS71OpCY

    Ignore the opening, poster is mistaken but doesn’t matter. Go to 10:10 where the poster shows a direct comparison between the Cs137 NILO map for US, marked for public use (and used repeatedly on this website), and a second different map, not for the public, but accessed through a now closed back door. I hope this is a hoax.


    Report Comment

  • misinformed

    So now what do we do?


    Report Comment

  • screwed

    I guess all we can do is put our head between our legs and kiss our butt’s good bye!!!!!


    Report Comment

  • I love radiation

    I’m not limber enough to kiss my own butt.So I’ll just grin & bear it;)Yummy Money.It’s so safe there is nothing to worry about.I also have some ocean front property @ Arizona bay for sale if you believe that.I’m going to go drink my fluoride now read my bible & keep my mouth shut.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UD0HxwMDQGA&feature=share http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GhD-oKJI69o&feature=share http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6_G2Ji432cs&feature=share


    Report Comment

  • Japanese Atomic Plume Will Pose No Serious Threat to U.S. Coast
    Bloomberg | March 17, 2011, 5:40 PM EDT

    … Weather patterns over the ocean will bring it to the U.S. today or tomorrow, said Jeff Masters, co-founder of Weather Underground Inc. in Ann Arbor, Michigan.

    … dilution of the radiation by the Jet Stream and Pacific winds is likely to prevent harmful radiation from reaching the West Coast, said Thomas McKone, an adjunct professor in the Department of Environmental Health Sciences at the University of California, Berkeley.

    See, we’re all better now. Everyone go back to sleep. :(


    Report Comment

  • Noah

    Decontamination Protocols

    Post 311 lifestyle changes

    One of the simple methods of decontamination of clothing is washing.

    When contamination (caught in downpour for prolonged periods) is suspected consider washing clothing three times, with double rinse cycles.

    Consider using a presoak (many washers have this) using baking soda.

    During wash cycle add borax. This chemical additive is used in cooling ponds to mute nuclear activity, and may be effective against radiation accumulating on clothing to help detach and lift radioactive particles off the down the drain.

    Use radiation detector to take reading before and after washing. If you do not have a detector, consider purchasing one. In the post 311 world it must become your constant companion. Take it along like you would your cell phone. With the whole world saying, “What’s a little radiation?”, use your detector on everything. Carry your detector under normal circumstances.

    You are at a fine restaurant, place your wine order. A pre-311 vintage please, (Avoid Chernobyl harvest years, 1986-1987) yes an excellent choice. Main course arrives, take readings. Abnormal levels, complain to server. Reduce tip accordingly, higher the radiation level, the lower the tip.

    You are at the super-market. Scan over the produce. Avoid hot produce. Prefer pre-311 stock and southern hemisphere product.

    You must begin to see the world beyond the visible light spectrum. A good detector with adequate range sensitivity will provide you a window into this invisible world.

    A Russian publication, Chernobyl, concludes that 985,000 excess deaths occurred between 1986 and 2004 as a result of radioactive contamination from the event.

    This 311 event, is “Mad Max, Beyond ChernobylcontainmentDome”.

    What’s a little radiation? One million dead. Take time to protect oneself and your family by lifestyle changes.


    Report Comment

    • stockdude

      Where can one buy a radiation detector, what are the different type, aren’t they called Geiger counters?


      Report Comment

      • ZombiePlanet

        GeigerCounters.com


        Report Comment

      • dan

        Lots of ‘em on ebay. But be careful what you buy. Some of them will only measure high levels of radiation, and not the low levels we’re getting. The high level detectors are good for a nuclear attack, but aren’t designed for nuclear fallout from a reactor meltdown. The good ones are getting pretty expensive, but you should be able to find a good deal, if you’re patient. And I’m guessing the prices will come back down after a while.


        Report Comment

      • dan

        I just got a Russian DP-5V, made during the cold war. It got good reviews, but I haven’t tried it yet. I think it’s sensitive enough to pick up background radiation. And it has a wide range. I just got some batteries for it today, and I’ll be trying it out pretty soon.


        Report Comment

  • ZombiePlanet

    The 9.0 earthquake in Japan…

    also caused an unusually severe and widespread shift in soil through liquefaction…

    Japan’s liquefaction occurred over hundreds of miles, surprising even experienced engineers who are accustomed to seeing disaster sites…

    Geeesh… “Hundreds of Miles.” What next. Japan sinks and is gone?

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/livescience/20110419/sc_livescience/japanquakecausedsurprisinglyseveresoilcollapse


    Report Comment

  • informed

    Kashiwazaki Kariwa, Onagawa nuclear plant

    The reactor at Kashiwazaki Kariwa, the world’s biggest nuclear station, Three of seven reactors at the Kashiwazaki Kariwa station are closed while Tepco strengthens structures to improve their resistance to earthquakes. Work could continue at two units while unit 3 was restarted, Mr Shimizu said.

    Local government approval is required for a restart. There would be no progress on starting the reactors until Tepco resolved the problems at Fukushima,
    http://www.smh.com.au/environment/nuclear-firm-says-it-has-no-blueprint-to-resolve-crisis-20110414-1dfwg.html
    - -
    Aftershocks higher than expected at Onagawa nuclear plant.
    An April 7 aftershock that struck Tohoku Electric Power Co.’s Onagawa nuclear power plant in Miyagi Prefecture was stronger than the maximum seismic guidelines, the utility said.

    The intensity of the Great East Japan Earthquake and aftershocks that have exceeded assumed maximum levels will likely lead to a review of the 2006 seismic guidelines, sources said.
    On Wednesday, the Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency, a regulator of Japan’s nuclear industry, instructed the power company to conduct a detailed analysis.
    A quake with an intensity of…
    http://www.asahi.com/english/TKY201104140281.html


    Report Comment

  • Steven R. Lonien

    why bother posting ? does a reply matter ? this lethal radiation will have its effects without them. the posting deletions will not make even the richest of the rich safe anywhere


    Report Comment