Nuclear Engineer: Tanks of “screaming hot” radioactive sludge from Fukushima reactors could rupture (VIDEO)

Published: September 7th, 2012 at 10:06 am ET
By
Email Article Email Article
35 comments


Interview with Nuclear Engineer Chris Harris
Nutrimedical Report
Sept 6, 2012

Transcript at 24:00 in

Re: Radioactive waste dump in Tochigi Prefecture

Chris Harris, former licensed Senior Reactor Operator and engineer: The highest [level radioactive waste] would still be at Fukushima.

Because there’s no way to move the sludge that they actually are creating by using the water reclamation system that they threw together so they could keep on injecting water and try to recycle it.

The problem with that as we discussed before is the filtration system has residue, and that stuff is screaming hot…

There’s no way to remove that, these tanks could rupture.

They’re running out of room, these tanks could rupture because they’re not seismically built.

Listen to the full broadcast here

Published: September 7th, 2012 at 10:06 am ET
By
Email Article Email Article
35 comments

Related Posts

  1. Nuclear Engineer: Fukushima plant “is a waste generation facility… with no off switch” (VIDEO) October 5, 2012
  2. Nuclear Engineer on Recent Fukushima Fire: A couple of things jumped out at me right away (VIDEO) October 26, 2012
  3. Nuclear Engineer Concerned About Unit 4 Support Structure: Is it going to just punch through the floor and through cracks? — What is the load transferred to? Something that’s also flimsy? (VIDEO) July 8, 2012
  4. Nuclear Engineer: New way to locate Fukushima molten fuel “means they’re expecting to find this stuff very deep into the ground”… unless it’s just an experiment (VIDEO) October 19, 2012
  5. Nuclear Engineer: I don’t really understand how concrete chunks got embedded inside fuel assembly removed from Unit 4 pool (VIDEO) August 31, 2012

35 comments to Nuclear Engineer: Tanks of “screaming hot” radioactive sludge from Fukushima reactors could rupture (VIDEO)

  • BreadAndButter BreadAndButter

    To "visualize" the problem once more, see this short NHK clip from August 27:
    "The operator of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant says it will build new tanks to store contaminated water.

    Tokyo Electric Power Company says the plant is producing 400 tons of contaminated water per day. This is partly because groundwater is entering the reactor building through cracks in walls.

    TEPCO says the existing tanks have a capacity of 220,000 tons and are 85 percent full. It says they are likely to be full in around 3 months if water accumulates at the current rate.

    The tanks will boost capacity by 170,000 tons. The utility says that should be sufficient until November next year.
    After that, the utility may have trouble securing space for extra tanks. It will have to flatten wooded land in its compounds."

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n2pLyKbBFiw


    Report comment

  • AGreenRoad AGreenRoad

    There is good reason why not one group, agency nor any pro nuclear apologists have estimated this…..

    Total Fukushima Radiation Released Into Ocean, Air, Groundwater, Storage Tanks; via A Green Road http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2012/02/total-fukushima-radiation-released-into.html

    Renewable Energy Usage And Costs Compared To Nuclear And Coal; via A Green Road
    http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2012/04/why-solar-energy-energy-usage-and-costs.html


    Report comment

  • markww markww

    You can FILTER THIS MESS Mark


    Report comment

    • BreadAndButter BreadAndButter

      Who will CHANGE THE FILTERS BnB


      Report comment

    • I think the "sludge" they're talking about is the accumulated used resins from the Areva filtration system, not the water that has been filtered once-through (and only for cesium), and which is stored in all those many tanks. Because the water in them is still highly contaminated with strontium (and God only knows what else), and they haven't yet developed or installed the 'next' level of filtration with resins that will bind the strontium (et al.).

      The words "sludge" and "water" mean different things.


      Report comment

    • Sickputer

      A good reference for what the Japanese will face later on with their HLW (High Level Waste) is the huge Hanford Site cleanup in Washington State. Already behind schedule about 12 years it is estimated that it will take until 2040 to enclode "most" of the waste. Like the Japanese the American workers (15,000) are struggling with many waste areas that can't be approached by humans. Some of these Single Walled Tanks of waste have been leaking into ground water for years. They began building double-lined tanks 30 years ago, but now they have discovered the inner linings are beginning to leak.

      Here's a good overview of the projected Hanford cleanup in a 14-page August 1994 document by Westinghouse:

      http://www.osti.gov/bridge/servlets/purl/10185348-RnmFaN/webviewable/10185348.pdf

      Excerpts:

      "The wastes are stored in 149 single-shell tanks (SST) and 28
      double-shell tanks (DST). The SSTs are made of reinforced concrete with a carbon-steel liner and can hold 208 m (55,000 gal) to 3,800 m (1 Mgal) of radioactive waste.

      Of the older SSTs, 67 have leaked or are suspected to have leaked approximately 3,800 m (1 Mgal).

      In addition to the waste stored in the tanks, significant amounts of 90Sr and 137Cs were removed from the tank waste, converted t o salts,doubly encapsulated in metal containers, and stored in water basins.
      There are approximately 1,900, 6.7 cm (2.6 in.) dia x 52 cm (20.5 in.) long capsules containing approximately 160 MCi.


      Report comment

      • HoTaters HoTaters

        Excellent recent articles here on the status of the Hanford site, and problems with underground leaching of materials from storage tanks, etc. See the archives under the search terms "Hanford," "storage," and "underground." As I recall, there is speculation much of the waste has already leached into the Columbia River, or is well on its way to doing so.


        Report comment

  • moonshellblue moonshellblue

    Hot radioactive sludge not to be confused with Hot Fudge although… I wonder if the sludge is capable of producing an explosive reaction, No, I need to do some research but I'm sure it would not, just thinking thoughts as I type. Ahh, I wish Japan had never built these reactors next to the ocean. If any of you have not seen Arnie's video here on Enenews discussing how the accident was almost 14 meltdowns you should check it out .


    Report comment

  • Time Is Short Time Is Short

    "They’re running out of room, these tanks could rupture because they’re not seismically built."

    Is that on the horizontal axis or vertical axis they'll fail? I'm getting confused.


    Report comment

  • Cataclysmic Cataclysmic

    Let's face it.. nuclear material eats through all known man made substances.. we do not have any material capable of long term storage.. can you say HANFORD???

    The Tri-City Herald reports (http://is.gd/SMnyAi) that more unknown material has been found in a third place between the two shells of Tank AY-102, which went into use in 1971. A photo taken of the same spot in 2006 shows that the area was clean then.

    The finding this week of a third spot increases concerns that the tank, one of Hanford's 28 double shell tanks, has a leak from its inner shell.

    The tanks are needed to hold high level radioactive waste for up to 40 more years until the last of the waste can be treated for disposal.

    Tank AY-102 has a capacity of about 1 million gallons but currently stores about 707,000 gallons of liquid waste and 151,00 gallons of waste sludge.

    http://seattletimes.com/html/localnews/2019047832_apwahanfordtanks.html

    Over the years, more than 1 million gallons of waste has leaked out of 67 single-wall tanks into the surrounding soil.

    http://www.latimes.com/news/nation/nationnow/la-na-nn-hanford-tank-leak-20120821,0,2831821.story


    Report comment

  • norbu norbu

    They must be reptilian. Sorry I just don't no how they can do the things they do to life on earth.


    Report comment

  • TheBigPicture TheBigPicture

    Nuclear must be outlawed. Do not vote for anyone that avoids this issue.


    Report comment

  • Ron

    Maybe what they will end up doing is permanently storing the water and sludge onsite by putting another casing around these tanks and either filling the space in between with concrete or lead. Course that will make it really really really heavy (though it's really really heat now) and hard to move.


    Report comment

  • Ron

    "though it's really really heat now."

    Should be: though it's really really heavy now


    Report comment

    • HoTaters HoTaters

      Yes, and if the ground beneath the plant is already fractured and brittle, how will it handle the weight of the additional fluids TEPCO intends to store there (when new storage tanks are built).

      Many of us have viewed scarey, scarey video footage of steam coming from underground fissures beneath the plant. It looks like there have been many explosions which look like phreatic explosions. A phreatic explosion occurs when hot lava hits groundwater. It can also happen when alahar reaches a glacier on the side of a volcano, for example. In this case, it may be hot corium underground coming into contact with groundwater.

      If these phreatic-type explosions are actually occuring (and there really isn't any other logical explanation for the exposions and steam we've seen coming from the ground), then it's a really bad idea to do anything which would contribute to the instability of the soils and rock underlying the plant.

      TEPCO comes up with yet another brilliant idea …. IMHO they need to find a way to get the stuff transported off-site, even if that means they have to truck it out, or pump it to higher ground, somewhere else. Or? Does anyone else have some ideas? There has to be a better solution than building more on-site storage. TEPCO and those making the decisions for them (TEPGOV now?) really need to start throwing some money at this problem, in earnest. Our very lives may hang in the balance.


      Report comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.