|
|
Discussion Threads
-
FORUM: Fukushima Webcam Discussion Thread
(5,231 Comments)
-
FORUM: General Discussion Thread (Nuclear Issues)
(5,444 Comments)
-
FORUM: Off-Topic Discussion Thread (Non-Nuclear Issues)
(4,078 Comments)
-
FORUM: Post Your Radiation Monitoring Data Here
(3,295 Comments)
-
FORUM: Alternative Energy — Converting to clean, renewable energy sources
(419 Comments)
-
FORUM: Petitions, Ballot Initiatives, Other Signature Drives (VIDEO)
(173 Comments)
-
FORUM: Upcoming meetings, gatherings, & demonstrations about energy issues
(477 Comments)
-
FORUM: What should be done about Japan burning radioactive debris?
(151 Comments)
-
FORUM: Methods for combating radiation and its effects
(1,069 Comments)
-
FORUM: Effects of low level radiation
(537 Comments)
-
FORUM: Possible Fukushima-related Anomalies — Deformations, Yellow Rain, Metallic Taste in Mouth, etc.
(1,731 Comments)
SUBMIT YOUR NEWS TIPS Your identity will not be made public unless you request it
|
We are Fucked
Report Comment
not necessarily. be of good cheer. no doube some of us will live.
Report Comment
http://tinyurl.com/attn-urgent-4u
Report Comment
Hey Faust,
that link didn’t work from my Safari/MacBook…
Report Comment
Don’t work for IE either !
Report Comment
Faust, can you briefly, or thoroughly, explain what the LINK
was telling us?…the one you posted gave an extended,
over-length URL.
Meanwhile, here in Hawaii, wondering if they will let folks
fly home, to the US mainland, or, also, the poor Japanese, fleeing
for their lives,
if they start doing radiation checks, like those two
Japanese who were stopped at entry point to China.
Northern Cal, Oregon, Washington, loaded with produce and
DAIRY FARMS.
If you didn’t cleanse your diet before, you sho ’nuff wanta
cut out Dairy Products Now….
Report Comment
Jack is right–dairy is the worst for spreading internal contamination…
CA, especially, is such a fantastic agricultural gem for the whole nation.
Uh-OH!!!!
What is the game plan for TEPCO anyway?
Report Comment
That CRC quote (“Although xenon is not toxic, its compounds are highly toxic — CRC handbook of chemistry”), while accurate, is misleadingly irrelevant.
Xenon is a noble gas. That means it doesn’t ordinarily form chemical compounds at all.
In fact, Xenon was discovered in 1898, but it wasn’t until 1962 that it was discovered that it can form chemical compounds under special circumstances.
You can breath xenon safely — if it’s of the stable isotopes. This is not, of course, coming from a nuclear reactor. But it’s the radioactivity that’s relevant, not the chemistry. So you can ignore that CRC quote, and just worry about the nuclear aspect.
Fortunately, the concentrations are extremely low, and it’s not long-lived, or easily absorbed and concentrated. It does show which way the wind is blowing, however.
For perspective — we exploded two atomic bombs over Japan, including one made of plutonium, and many, many atmospheric tests in the Pacific and in our own country. An atmospheric explosion is highly effective at getting the reaction products into the air for transport. And we’ve had core meltdowns here, on a smaller scale, but right outside LA.
In other words, we’ve already done far worse to ourselves, radiologically, than what we can expect from this disaster here in the US.
Not that it’s OK — there’s a reason we negotiated a ban on atmospheric tests. But it’s not a catastrophe here.
In Japan, however — even without widespread nuclear contamination this is a huge blow.
Report Comment