Published: September 27th, 2012 at 1:40 am ET
|
The SimplyInfo research team provides a short analysis of the newly released underwater footage from inside the Unit 3 spent fuel pool at Fukushima Daiichi:
In the videos of the pool a couple of things of interest show up. One bent piece of steel may be a fuel assembly storage box. It is not fully confirmed since it is only partially visible in the video but it bears the same general shape and size to the other assembly boxes around it.
[...]
Other portions of the videos show either red paint that is wearing off or some sort of red rust or algae buildup. The steel pool wall is also covered is [sic] some sort of corrosion or buildup.
The photo on the right has a basic levels adjustment intended to give a more accurate representation of the wall’s appearance.
Sources: SimplyInfo (L); ENENews (R)
Published: September 27th, 2012 at 1:40 am ET
|
sending...
So it is certainly obvious that from such a strong explosion, pool zpaliwem 3 is certainly a lot more damage and creates a greater threat than the fuel pool No. 4. Particularly the case may be at risk when the next earthquake. It can accurately see that due to radiation, its lower part, it does not mean that severe damage is not. I think it is a miracle that the water still in it keeps …
Report Comment
Therefore, as the fall 1000-pound scrap into the pool, it is śmieryelnie dangerous, because it can take the shock of such a gap, and the duty of the pool water will run away …
Therefore, all work should be done, perhaps slower, but no big shock. 'Cause it's really deadly …
Report Comment
http://www.apperlo-zerlegung.de/index_en.html
Report Comment
something to do with Tepco covering up this? maybe?
Result of Pu nuclide analysis in the soil Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station
http://nuclear-news.net/2012/09/27/result-of-pu-nuclide-analysis-in-the-soil-fukushima-daiichi-nuclear-power-station/
Report Comment
The material on the walls of the SFP is stainless steel. Saltwater corrosion may have caused the color change reported here.
Report Comment
As I see massive construction that are to demolish the building of Reactor No. 3 is me shivers go ..
Certainly the building suffered the most, because it was the biggest explosion. So the walls are certainly very weak, and it seems to me that the water in the pool of fuel remains a miracle there is to do there can not be inspected, that does not mean that the building is sturdy ..
Therefore, demolition should in my opinion not cause additional shocks, and be carried out as gently as possible … Heavy construction equipment, rather they should not be used …
They are after all modern methods, such as cutting concrete with water. The company offers cutting up to 3 meters ..
http://ajaks.eu/en/services-for-civil-engineering/hydrodynamic-demolition-of-concrete–hydrodynamic-robots.html
I do not want to think what would have happened, if as a result of the vibrations, the resulting leaks in the fuel pool and the water came out of it … Almost as a result of radiation inside the building and its three filling remains, you can not to re-seal it. ..
Therefore, even mild disturbances such methods may be used: diamond cut rope ..
http://www.hilti.com/data/editorials/-14620/ds-wss%2030%20leaflet%20e.pdf
https://www.hilti.co.uk/fstore
Report Comment
https://www.hilti.co.uk/fstore/holuk/techlib/docs/DS-WS10%20en.pdf
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lZ04OdpmJ84
http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&feature=endscreen&v=N54madabs9s
http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&feature=endscreen&v=GVI8Z5grdOw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=I8xoHvhiA2k
Report Comment
http://www.new4stroke.com/fukushima3.jpg
Andrew
Report Comment