Published: August 21st, 2012 at 12:37 pm ET
|
Title: Plutonium Detected at 10 Locations in Fukushima
Source: Jiji Press
Date: Aug 21, 2012
Plutonium believed to originate from [...] Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant has been detected at 10 locations in four municipalities in Fukushima Prefecture, the science ministry said Tuesday.
The highest reading was 11 becquerels of plutonium-238 per square meter, detected in the town of Namie.
[...]
the ministry said that there is no health hazard.
The other municipalities are the town of Okuma, the village of Iitate [~40km from plant] and the city of Minamisoma [~25km from plant].
Published: August 21st, 2012 at 12:37 pm ET
|
sending...
No health hazard? 58% of beagles disagree:
"Significant lymphopenia was found in 67 (58%) beagles given a single nose-only exposure to 239PuO2"
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/7597146/
Another study:
"The Mayak Production Association (MPA) worker registry has shown evidence of plutonium-induced health effects. Workers were potentially exposed to plutonium nitrate [(239)Pu(NO(3))(4)] and plutonium dioxide ((239)PuO(2)). Studies of plutonium-induced health effects in animal models can complement human studies by providing more specific data than is possible in human observational studies. Lung, liver, and bone cancer mortality rate ratios in the MPA worker cohort were compared to those seen in beagle dogs, and models of the excess relative risk of lung, liver, and bone cancer mortality from the MPA worker cohort were applied to data from life-span studies of beagle dogs. The lung cancer mortality rate ratios in beagle dogs are similar to those seen in the MPA worker cohort. At cumulative doses less than 3 Gy, the liver cancer mortality rate ratios in the MPA worker cohort are statistically similar to those in beagle dogs. Bone cancer mortality only occurred in MPA workers with doses over 10 Gy."
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/19959950/
Report Comment
Dear Sickputer,
'58% of beagles disagree' this is another difficult truth. Thank you for posting it. I love dogs. Sorry, inadequate curse words here… would like to try though #^%@(ZZ(!!**!!!
Aloha.
Report Comment
Alpha Radiation Dangers; Polonium, Radon, Radium, Plutonium, Uraniun; via A Green Road
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2012/04/alpha-radiation-dangers-polonium-radon.html
How Dangerous Is 400-600 Pounds Of Plutonium Nano Particle Dust Liberated By Fukushima? Via A Green Road http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2012/03/how-dangerous-is-400-600-pounds-of.html
Report Comment
Also from the JiJiPress release:
"The figure is about 1.4 times more plutonium than that originated from fallout from nuclear weapons tests abroad."
??Huh??
Their waiting game is probably paying off, I'm afraid. 16 months in, they publish a "tiny" P-Word test balloon to see the reaction of the media/public.
Report Comment
No need to worry because if you do, you'll get cancer. Just take the Science Ministry's word that plutonium is no more harmful than eating two bananas and you will lead a long and happy life. TEPCO and the Japanese government would never lie about something this serious!
Report Comment
Dear Bread and Butter,
Just how scarey and illuminating is this?!!! Folks have been posting this probability since the beginning. If this assumption is now being gingerly, possibly validated …is it possible the truth of the world's impact will be presented? So much shame on those who have been silent all this time.
Oh, my inconceivable meter! Thank you ENENews!
Aloha.
Report Comment
Plutonium hangs around a long long time folks!
Report Comment
So they finally admit the presence of fresh Pu in Namie, Okuma, Iitate and Minamisoma. And all places inbetween and very probably beyond.
Report Comment
They admit the presence but still claim it's not dangerous to human health. Ahhh, words fail me.
Report Comment
Hi moonshellblue
Words fail me also, we know plutonium is dangerous. I think they themselves should prove it, by inhaling and being in contact with it.
"Show me, don't tell me." go test it…I don't care what they say..I've heard it all before.
If it is not right, don't do it; if it is not true, don't say it.
Marcus Aurelius
Report Comment
No sh^t Sherlock. Since the fuel has melted,disintegrated,vaporized and become airborne this has always been known. Same with every other element and isotope in the fuel. The only variable is how hard you look for it. Some of the heavier elements require a more detailed procedure to identify and quantitate, but everyone who knows anything about nuclear power knew it was out there.
This is what makes the human danger much more serious than the Japanese want to admit. Especially for children. And being harder to detect raises many more questions about food safety.
Report Comment
Chrisk9, from your professional view: is there anything that could be done in terms of decontamination? Thanks for your input on this board. It's great to have you around.
Report Comment
Hi B+B Decontamination of what? The plant itself? Or the communities outside the plant?I spent a few years supervising teams of deconners so that is an area that I am very experienced. The main issues:
If the plant is still emitting radioactive material, which it is, any outside area can be cleaned up to reduce the amount of contamination, but will never be really clean until the emissions stop. That said I am not sure why more effort is not spent in the outside area of the reactors to get rid of the worst stuff there.
Any decontamination in the communities could be helpful, but will never get all the material inside cracks and crevices and other hard to get to areas.
Inside the plant itself general walkways and access and egress areas could be cleaned fairly well. But again here it would take an army of workers to get everything. In any area with primary, or emergency cooling piping most likely are not work areas you could even stop in due to the dose rates. Since they dumped water into the turbine building any area that has seen primary water will never be cleaned. And there is no chance that any decontamination work will ever happen inside the torus or drywell areas. NEVER!!!!
When they talk about decommissioning the plant I hope that they are smart enough to know that it will never happen.
Report Comment
Dear crisk9,
Thank you so much for posting!
Aloha.
Report Comment
Repost, but I guess it fits here:
This is what someone from the industry has to say about Plutonium:
"Years ago, as a part of my career in engineering, I had the occasion of working on yet another weapons system for Uncle Sam — this project took me out to Lawrence Livermore to help out in the development of the next generation of nuclear weapons — smaller, lighter, more powerful. The building in which my team worked was totally dedicated to plutonium — it was more of a containment bunker than a lab. To get into the building to work, you had to undergo a two day training session that included things like wearing a respirator facial mask, emergency evacuation procedures, and most important — safety procedures to avoid any kind of exposure to the Pu. We were instructed that ANY amount of Pu inhaled, swallowed, or in any way introduced into the blood stream would kill you – ANY AMOUNT – there was NO minimum dosage that could be tolerated by the human body. Period. Any effort to down-play the danger of Pu in the discharge at Fukashima is purely a public relations effort to minimize public panic. Now you know."
that was a comment under a truth-out article.
Report Comment
B+B Your PU knowledge is completely correct. I have also lived in Livermore and had friends and family that worked at the lab. Also lived in Sunol, and had friends at Vallectos, and that's how I got into the business.
The respect that Plutonium has in the industry was shown to me at Hanford. We had urine tests and whole body counts before and after our work there, and it was much more serious about internal depositions than any nuclear plant. I actually got a little Americium from that job.
Report Comment
Calculate the scope of the problem. 4 reactors with each having 1 ton of plutonium. One millionth of a gram of PU can or will induce cancer.
28gm/oz x 16oz/# x 2000#/T x 1,000,000 doses/gm x 4 reactors (1T/reactor)=
3.584 12 – millionth of a gram quantities in Plutonium alone
Serious bad.
Report Comment
The size of the reactor buildings is very difficult for me to wrap my head around as is the absurdity in having these exterminators built in the first place. NO NUKES
Report Comment
Dear moonshellblue,
Me too. This is so challenging.
Aloha.
Report Comment
Many years ago,Ralph Nader was quoted as stating that a pound of plutonium dust spread into the atmosphere would be enough to kill eight billion people..
Report Comment
Rj sez: "Many years ago,Ralph Nader was quoted as stating that a pound of plutonium dust spread into the atmosphere would be enough to kill eight billion people."
SP: And a single bullet can kill ten people if they are all lined up heart to heart.
I'm the slight optimist here…the world is a big entity. Divide the atmosphere, land, and ocean by the volume of all the plutonium vaporized and there are a lot of hidey-holes and many are permanent. Now if the plutonium mass was the size of Mt. Fuji I would be more worried.
Granted the odds of inhaling plutonium into a person's lungs is much greater within the confines of Japan and the 5,000 miles downwind from Unit 3 at Fukushima.
But I am hoping my personalized death dose of plutonium flew under a rock on Mt. Whitney or latched onto the underside of a great sea turtle (no harm intended).
I can't make a guess on how many finite plutonium particles will be inhaled by humans. But I am hoping far more are lost than found and the human race will not become extinct.
Report Comment
All it takes is one particle Sickputer.
Report Comment
Toxic plutonium is created even in non-MOX reactors as a byproduct. And how many MOX units are running worldwide? 50? The leakage from those plants alone probably has surpassed Fukushima releases many times over in the past 60 years.
The cancer deaths close to Hanford, Sellafield, Chernobyl, Oak Ridge, Los Alamos, etc… People died from those particles. But not everyone is dead yet.
Hopefully the merchants of death will shut down before everyone above the equator is dead or dying. Mankind should survive the nuclear threat. Even if 7 billion people die in this decade from raduation illness. Some people will survive far south.
Report Comment
Dear Rambojim,
Have been living in PNW since right before 03/11/11. Was walking everday in the rain for fitness and to keep 'aloha spirit'. No doubt, was heavily dosed.
I haven't stopped reading ENEnews. All of you have brought me to simply realize and appreciate my mission in life (continue helping others, no matter what), still believe in people and in science, and keep loving folks (like you all) exponentialy
Am so thankful to all brilliant folks posting here. You are making a difference!
Aloha.
Report Comment
andagi,
Thank you for your kind words..
Keep the faith (:
Report Comment
Dear Rambojim,
With you, and all here.
Takr good care,
Aloha.
Report Comment
oops- of course, 'Take good care'
Aloha.
Report Comment
Which was one very good reason to vote for him, which i did. Twice.
Report Comment
One hot particle spells slow gruesome death. And already spread in the wind thousands of miles around the world. And stays dangerous for thousands of years. Nuclear technology must be outlawed. It is no good.
Report Comment
If there is a knife in your chest:
There is no health hazard until it reaches your heart…
h.
Report Comment
Fukushima is the biggest disaster in human history because of the amount of uranium and plutonium released
http://enenews.com/quite-extremely-radioactive-sample-tokyo-air-filter-1…
Quite Something’: Extremely radioactive sample from Tokyo air filter — 150 times more uranium than expected — “This is from Fukushima” -Busby Apartment on 20th floor located 300 meters from the Tokyo Tower
A gamma spectrum of the sample scraped from the filter
According to the sample information at the bottom of the spectrum: Taken June 15, 2012
Collected June 18, 2012 At 4:45 in
So what we can say about this sample is that its extremely radioactive… It contains high levels of uranium and lead-210 and cesium-137.
All substances which are inside an apartment on the 20th floor of a block 300 meters from the Tokyo Tower. Isn’t that quite something? It’s quite something.
Rhodium-102 this is a fission product from Fukushima.
There’s far too much uranium there, there’s about 3,000 becquerels per kilogram. There should be about 20.
So this is from Fukushima as well.
Which means there’s particles of Uranium floating around in Central Tokyo.
Report Comment
One source suggests that unit 3’s reactor core contained a range of 164 to 32 mox assemblies. The low-end estimate of 32 mox assemblies is from France’s Areva, which provided the fuel for unit 3. As the French Fukushima 3/11 Watchdog group points out, the low-end estimate of 32 mox assemblies translates into 5.5 tons of fuel containing more than 300 kg of plutonium: “300 kg is therefore equivalent to 300 billion lethal doses.”
Fukushima 311 Watchdogs. MOX fuel-Corium-Plutonium in Fukushima Daiichi, http://www.fukushima311watchdogs.org/biblio/9/Mox%20fuel-corium-plutonium%20in%20Fukushima%20Daiichi.pdf.
Report Comment
6,291 Assemblies in common spent fuel pool in March of 2010. (http://www.nirs.org/reactorwatch/accidents/6-1_powerpoint.pdf)
Compare to known 1331 assemblies in reactor 4 spent fuel pool
Report Comment
Modelling Study of P-239
http://www.datapoke.org/blog/89/study-modeling-fukushima-npp-p-239-and-np-239-atmospheric-dispersion/
Report Comment
majia, as you know this study is from late 2011. Have you found any academic followup to it yet – any pushback/denials or confirmation/corroboration? Did it just fall on deaf ears, as it were? I did notice the two comments at the end of the article.
The first one is especially ironic in light of today's news story:
"A Pro-nuke person asks “Well, it’s pretty much established that there were no plutonium releases from the (fuk) reactors…. « Paul Langley's Nuclear History Blog"
Report Comment
Sorry no new studies on plutonium that I've found…
maybe too political to publish…
Report Comment
Study: Modeling Fukushima NPP Pu-239 and Np-239 Atmospheric Dispersion
Posted on October 27, 2011
A recently disclosed Tepco documentation indicates total emissions estimates of both plutonium 239 and neptunium 239 for the first 100 hours of the catastrophe. This leaked Tepco document [19] suggests a release of 1.2 trillion bq of pu-238,pu-239,p-240 and pu-241 collectively and 76 trillion bq of Np-239 within the first 100 hours of the catastrophe. Our goal with this study included developing atmospheric dispersion plots of these emissions and modeling radionuclide concentrations at receptors worldwide.
http://www.datapoke.org/blog/89/study-modeling-fukushima-npp-p-239-and-np-239-atmospheric-dispersion/
Report Comment
Uranium and Plutonium Launched into Atmosphere Conclusion – Fukushima really blew up, launching TONS of Uranium and Plutonium into the atmosphere.
http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.com/2012/03/uranium-and-plutonium-launched-into.html
Nuke Pro: Plutonium admission by the EPA Mar 25, 2012
http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.com/2012/03/plutonium-admission-by-epa.html
Report Comment
P L U T O N I U M !!!
Yet another reason Nuclear Power Plants should be called Death Machines.
Report Comment
This is only the amount of radiation that was discovered. Imagine all that there really is and how widespread it is, given how hard it really is to keep track of these mercurial particles.
Plutonium is not just toxic….it is the most unsafe particle known to man. They should be ringing the alarm bells and one can only imagine the necrophilia it takes to keep quiet about this.
Report Comment
Has anywhere near this amount of plutonium and uranium ever been released?
NO.
Report Comment
I have been researching and writing about nuclear accidents nearly 50 years. Plutonium from Fukushima is severe and the worst ever for overall radioactive releases, but plutonium releases are actually lower than several other accidents. Gundersen also said several months ago plutonium was not the biggest issue with Fukushima.
Here's are some production and release figures on plutonium.
All nuclear reactors create plutonium. Uranium-238 becomes plutonium-239 when it absorbs a neutron.
"Typically about one percent of the spent fuel discharged from a reactor is plutonium….Worldwide, almost 100 tonnes of plutonium in spent fuel arises each year."
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/MOX_fuel#section_1
20 tons of plutonium leaked into the ocean at Sellafield in 2005:
http://www.bellona.org/english_import_area/energy/renewable/38200
190 tons of nuclear fuel burned at Chernobyl. Over one ton was plutonium.
Each reactor at Fukushima on 311 possessed about one ton of plutonium:
http://www.nuc.berkeley.edu/forum/218/ton-plutonium-was-each-fukushima-reactor.2012-07-30
The 1957 Mayak accident in Russia released 50-100 metric tons. How much was plutonium? A lot: "The plant's original mission was to make, refine, and machine plutonium for weapons. Five nuclear reactors were built for this purpose."
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mayak
Atomic bomb tests over 65 years: 3.5 metric tons released of plutonium
US and Russian surplus plutonium: 35…
Report Comment
Great data Sickputer
I believe Fukushima is the greatest release ever.
I think Arnie Gundersen is minimizing it because of the scale.
I read somewhere that Chernobyl didn't have much plutonium.
?
Report Comment
Reactor 3 had more than 1 ton…
Report Comment
I recall that it was Arnie Gundersen who first said that Reactor 3 was a nuclear explosion and that it needed to be determined how much plutonium was released. What he also said is that since plutonium is one of the heavier isotopes, it was not able to travel as far as many of the others once ionized and that Japan would bear the largest exposure because of this.
Report Comment
Not sure on exact plutonium figures for Chernobyl.. I was using the ratio method. Did find this 2002 document: "The Chernobyl accident released significant quantities of plutonium to the environment, however these were small in comparison to other radionuclide releases form the accident."
http://www.clarku.edu/departments/marsh/projects/community/plutonium.pdf
This author had a higher estimate for plutonium from all the A-bomb tests: 10 metric tons
Another 1996 article:
http://www.uswaternews.com/archives/arcglobal/6poison.html
Excerpt:
"After the nuclear disaster, plutonium was carried into the air with the radioactive cloud and deposited on the countryside. During the cleanup, bulldozers removed top soil, cut down trees, and dismantled buildings. The contaminated rubble was trucked to "temporary storage sites."
During the construction of these graves, said Volodymry Holubev, head of radiation protection for Ukraine's Health Ministry, the major issue was not quality of construction but rather, "how to hide" the contamination "as soon as possible."
As a result, no one knows how much waste escaped, or even how many graves were dug. It is also unclear how much fuel, including plutonium, was actually released in the 1986 disaster.
The plant's chief engineer, Vitaly Tolstonogov, concedes that some 50 tons of fuel remain unaccounted for. Just how much burned in the fire and how much was tossed out onto the earth and surrounding rivers is…
Report Comment
unknown."
Report Comment
Dear Sickputer,
There's a kind of hush …all over the world, tonight.
Aloha.
Report Comment
Great song… Long ago I owned that vinyl record from Herman's Hermits.
The people against Nukes are winning…
Another good HH song:
"I'm into Something Good"
Report Comment
Dear Sickputer,
'Something tells me…'
Aloha.
Report Comment
Hi, Sickputer.
"20 tons of plutonium leaked into the ocean at Sellafield in 2005"
That's not what I read in the article you're linking to (http://www.bellona.org/english_import_area/energy/renewable/38200). They seem to say that the leak was fully contained. Further, according to Wikipedia, the "20 tons" figure doesn't seem to be "20 tons of plutonium", but rather: "19 tonnes of uranium and 160 kilograms of plutonium dissolved in nitric acid" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sellafield#2005_Thorp_plant_leak). And given that none of it is said to have espaced into the environment I completely fail to see how that can be compared with actual release into the environment of plutonium at Fukushima.
If there are claims somewhere online supporting the assertion that "20 tons of plutonium leaked into the ocean at Sellafield in 2005", could you provide the links to them?
Report Comment
*espaced = escaped.
Report Comment
They are playing with existance, the crazy mother fu. Ck. ears, all in the name of power, you don't need nuclear bombs, what's the point you can not use land you won
if a party is opposed to you repression, you can not win, take Afghanistan for instance, no one has defeteted them since Alexander the great. Good luck without complete war, the soviets tried.
Take a look at history and observe and modify.
Power to the people we will prevail, never give up, and the meek will.
Report Comment
…35 metric tons (surplus and in storage)
Report Comment
http://www.ccnr.org/max_plute_aecb.html
http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/plutonium-fukushima-made-it-around-planet
http://www.foxnews.com/world/2011/03/18/plutonium-troubled-reactors-spent-fuel-pools/
Report Comment
More research on plutonium…
"MOX Shipments to Japan
"Date: 1999
Ship: Pacific Teal
Leaving Facility: Cherbourg
Ending Facility: Fukushima I (dock at NPP)
Designated Reactor: Fukushima-1-3
Power Company: TEPCO
Number of Assemblies: 32 assemblies – 225kg of plutonium plus several tons of uranium
Installed in Reactor: Yes Sept 2010 installation
Notes: Researcher warned in 2000 that the MOX sent to FUKU was also faulty and would result in catastrophic failure. According to the PDF, TEPCO used the 10 year old MOX in unit 3. What does 10 years in a SFP do to fuel?"
http://www.simplyinfo.org/?p=936
1.8 tons of plutonium went to Japan in 2009:
http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/news/features/stop-nuclear-madness-no-more/
SP: This 2009 shipment was the first MOX transport to Japan in eight years.
http://injagadees.wordpress.com/2009/02/28/largest-shipment-of-plutonium-to-japan/
SP: Japan had only four reactors using MOX including Unit 3 Fukushima. Great article here:
Excerpt page 7:
"The 28 MOX fuel assemblies for Chubu Electric's Hamaoka Unit 4 plant…The Pacific Pintail and Pacific Heron then continued on to the Genkai Unit 3 plant in Saga Prefecture (May 23rd)), meeting with citizen protest, and unloading the 16 assemblies for the nuclear power plant at its port. The remaining 21 assemblies are destined for Shikoku Electric's Ikata nuclear power plant Unit 3 in Ehime Prefecture."
http://www.cnic…
Report Comment
http://www.cnic.jp/english/newsletter/pdffiles/nit130.pdf
Report Comment
we must have plutonium on the brain today
Friday, Dec. 1, 2006
JNFL's MOX-benignity claim hit
Peace groups push IAEA to clarify plutonium-arms link
By ERIC JOHNSTON http://www.japantimes.co.jp/text/nn20061201a4.html
KYOTO — Six Japan-based peace and antinuclear groups Thursday called on the International Atomic Energy Agency to clarify comments made by the head of Japan Nuclear Fuel Ltd. that it is impossible to remove plutonium from MOX fuel, a claim that runs counter to IAEA assertions and the consensus of international experts.
… There is great controversy over the Rokkasho reprocessing plant in Aomori Prefecture that is expected to begin operating next August.
In May 2005, two separate letters were released, warning that plutonium from Rokkasho could make 1,000 nuclear weapons annually.
The first letter was signed by 150 experts from 17 countries, including Nobel laureates and arms control negotiators. The second letter was signed by former senior officials in the U.S. government, including former Secretary of Defense William Perry and Ralph Earl II, former chief U.S. negotiator for the SALT II Treaty.
Report Comment
Sunday, Jan. 8, 2006
http://www.japantimes.co.jp/text/nn20060108a5.htmlPluthermal to use 6.5 tons a year
Power companies have announced that as much as 6.5 tons of plutonium will be burned annually at nuclear plants after the so-called pluthermal power-generation project gets under way.
…The 11 companies released for the first time their plans on how they will use plutonium, hoping to address possible domestic and overseas concerns that Japan may hold a surplus inventory of a key ingredient for nuclear weapons…
The 11 firms comprise Tokyo Electric Power Co. — the nation's largest utility — nine other power companies that run nuclear power plants and power wholesaler Electric Power Development Co., which is planning to build one….
…The Federation of Electric Power Companies of Japan plans to get the pluthermal power generation under way at 16 or 18 power plants by the end of fiscal 2010
Report Comment
I believe that Anne is correct that more reactors than fukushima had releases.
I also believe that Japan has a secret nuclear weapons program.
I don't think we will ever know how bad the situation really is.
Our illnesses and mortalities will be the only measure.
And high level health authorities will seek to hide the data.
Report Comment
Pluthermal reactors (aka MOX fuel reactors) were highly controversial and didn't get running until Genkai opened in November 2009. Two more would follow in 2010, but the 311 disaster in 2011 put a nail in their coffin. The 16 to 18 plants never made it off the drawing board.
http://m.upi.com/story/UPI-63321267631690/
Report Comment
weren't they planning on running mox in regular boiling water reactors?
How many reactors in Japan were running mox?
How many had releases?
I also found some interesting links about missing plutonium from the Tokai plant.
RE MOX
Mox may be used in boiling water reactors in the US now:
http://majiasblog.blogspot.com/2012/07/nuclear-power-plants-pushed-to-produce.html
Report Comment
"The Fukushima facility began using MOX fuel in September 2010, becoming the third plant in Japan to do so, according to MOX supplier AREVA."
http://www.dcbureau.org/20110315782/natural-resources-news-service/mox-fuel-rods-used-in-japanese-nuclear-reactor-present-multiple-dangers.html
Report Comment
Maybe it's time to find out what the government knows about nano treatment of cancers:
http://nano.cancer.gov/
and current B-17 treatments
http://www.worldwithoutcancer.org.uk/introduction.html
Report Comment
Another Fukushima worker has died today 22/08. He was apparently taking a rest in the break room but found dead by his colleagues. Another heart attack!
Report Comment
Thanks Glow. Do you have a link at all please?
Report Comment
@richard
This is the fifth person to die at Fukushima Daiichi.
http://mainichi.jp/select/news/20120823k0000m040064000c.html
Report Comment
It's like Speed…don't stop working or your body may succumb to the radiation poisoning.
Report Comment
The highest reading was 11 becquerels of plutonium-238 per square meter, detected in the town of Namie.
[...]the ministry said that there is no health hazard
By now any extra radiation is hazardist. How can any added radiatioon not be a hazard, wear is his brians.
Report Comment
Keep on smiling, then there is no danger, according to the pro nuclear medical apologists.
More radiation is GOOD for you.. go get some more Xrays, etc… the more the merrier.
Medical science is working in partnership with the nuclear industry, hand in glove, married and bound for better or worse, because there is no other answer, according to them.
No matter that all answers in medical and nuclear science are expensive and getting more so every day, making it less and less affordable for the masses….
Must get more money, my precious, must get more, my precious…
Report Comment