Professor: Fukushima twice as strong as Chernobyl when comparing species of birds found in both places — We don’t know why they are doing even worse in Fukushima (VIDEO)

Published: November 21st, 2013 at 7:52 pm ET
By
Email Article Email Article
34 comments


Presentation by Dr. Timothy Mousseau, professor in the Department of Biological Sciences at the University of South Carolina, July 2013 — published by Satoshi Narisawa (h/t redbuttonstudios):

At 1:00 in

Dr. Timothy Mousseau, professor in the Department of Biological Sciences at the University of South Carolina:

There are many fewer birds in the contaminated areas of Fukushima than there should be, and the pattern is very similar to what we see in Chernobyl.

In fact, if we compare — it turns out there are 14 species of birds that are found both in Chernobyl and in Fukushima — and if we look just at those 14 species of birds, the strength of the effect is twice as strong in Fukushima as in Chernobyl.

This is some unpublished data which is a comparison between what we found in July 2011 to July of 2012. We just finished July of 2013 but we don’t have the data analyzed yet. […] What it says is that the birds are doing worse in the second year than in the first year.

So why are the birds in Fukushima doing worse than the birds in Chernobyl? Perhaps the birds in Chernobyl have adapted the radiation. And so perhaps the birds of Fukushima will also adapt in the future, but we don’t know.

Watch Mousseau’s presentation here

Published: November 21st, 2013 at 7:52 pm ET
By
Email Article Email Article
34 comments

Related Posts

  1. MSNBC: Fukushima radiation “much higher than expected” says biologist — Negative effects to happen quicker than at Chernobyl… and be worse April 20, 2012
  2. Caldicott: Fukushima much worse than Chernobyl — Nuclear engineers say there’s no end in sight to this — I predict they’ll never be able to fix it (VIDEO) October 5, 2013
  3. Study finds Fukushima worse than Chernobyl on bird population — “Dramatically” elevated DNA mutation rates and extinctions — Insect life significantly reduced — Shows immediate consequence of radiation February 2, 2012
  4. Former Prime Minister of Japan: I realized Fukushima disaster could have been 100 times worse than Chernobyl (VIDEO) October 8, 2013
  5. *Experts on Fukushima Unit 4* CNBC: “Far from under control, could get a lot worse” – Japan Times: “Could very quickly get much worse” – CNN: “Could still get a lot worse” — “Tokyo, Yokohama, even neighboring countries at serious risk” (VIDEO) August 30, 2013

34 comments to Professor: Fukushima twice as strong as Chernobyl when comparing species of birds found in both places — We don’t know why they are doing even worse in Fukushima (VIDEO)

  • jump-ball

    "Wet birds don't fly at night"…


    Report comment

  • RonM

    Perhaps the radiation is twice as deadly at Fukushima, it is three meltdowns and a cooling pond explosion on the pacific shore compared to 1 meltdown on land that was more quickly entombed than the ongoing catastrophe at Fukushima.


    Report comment

    • Fall out man!

      +100 to that. If the same sort of animals are twice as sick, that indicates greater contamination. After Chernobyl, soviet military and the 500,000 workers who took part in the clean up were issued orders on how to report radiation levels… what ever level you read… divide by 5. By contrast, the Japanese government learned from that, and where they could be checked up, were dividing by 100 or even 10,000 in the early days of the Fukushima melt downs. While the biology professor provides useful information, it pays to interpret that information for oneself. If this guy wants to keep his funding, there is a limit to what he can say and touch upon. The big discovery in recent years is that most mutations cannot be selected out individually (individually most will have very little or no detectable effect, only slightly negative), so they just build up collectively as genetic load. That decay of the genome eventually will lead to the extinction of all life on earth. His speculation that Chernobyl's birds may have just adapted to their genetic destruction is a desperately positive spin having seen in other articles here (likely even from the same researcher) the very serious genetic damage accumulating in wild life around Chernobyl. If they animals look worse at Fukushima, then as you say, the logical explanation is that the contamination is worse. To suggest the animals are adapting (like spiderman?) to the radiation with no proof, defies all logic.


      Report comment

  • SophieQ

    "So why are the birds in Fukushima doing worse than the birds in Chernobyl?"
    Duh. How about: Chernobyl was a limited exposure event. Thousands of soldiers lost their lives to protect the lives of everybody else in USSR/Russia/Europe by filling/sealing the reactor and building a sarcophagus.
    Fukushima on the other hand is the gift that keeps giving. Since March 2011 there is a continued release of radioactivity into the environment. The Chernobyl release was suppressed with aforementioned methods and can not be compared to an unmitigated spewing nuclear torch in Fukushima.
    Without getting into it, I recommend to look into Quantum Mechanics and the notion of a 'Unified Field of infinite possibilities'. Which means that there could be somebody conjuring a new way to remove radioactive isotopes out of the environment – including detoxification of humans and animals.
    Humankind was always quick to deploy damaging schemes to enrich the rulers. Solutions to mitigate the wrought damages took sometimes a hundred years or more.
    Connect with the Collective Consciousness – this is where the solutions are.


    Report comment

  • snukey

    In regards to removing radioactive isotopes, I saw a video the other day maybe on GLP about using crystals from the earth. The lady in the video said they are shipping crystals to Japan to help mitigate the radiation. I'm not sure if the crystals absorb or neutralize the radiation somehow. It would be awesome if this was true.


    Report comment

    • We Not They Finally

      Zeolite is said to be able to do that — to what degree, don't know. But even if it would help, how many tons of it would it take to be effective at all? And how could it even be placed in huge areas of the site that no one can even enter due to radiation?

      Out of containment actually means just that, and for a phenomenally huge amount of radioactive fuel. I think it's good for people to volunteer to do whatever they can, but they can also WAY underestimate the problem.


      Report comment

  • retali8 retali8

    my Japanese friend recently applied for "refugee visa" in "Southern Hemisphere", as that's the only visa going for anything radiation related (anyone know others?) and the immigration people just keep saying its not true and jp gov wouldn't do that to its people,, they manged to shock *this person* enough *this person* lost all there words and they couldn't even say there 10 page memo, absolutely dumb founded, i feel so sorry for this person, what hope is there for Japanese anyway? just to get a skill and work abroad maybe the only chance before they are banned in all countries..


    Report comment

  • ftlt

    Different isotopes, more volume and burning of debris of releasing them twice


    Report comment

  • Kassandra

    Timothy Mousseau is a hero in my book.

    He traveled to Japan to collect samples at personal risk.

    His research dramatically calls into question the validity of the ICRP model.

    He has to scrounge for funding for his research because it so upsets the dominant framework.

    I'm so grateful to him and other scientists who work for the public welfare.


    Report comment

    • Kassandra, your point is well taken. Any scientific study showing ill effects of fuku radiation is good. But why do these scientists who are supposed to be so smart sound so dumb? When someone says, quoting from above "Perhaps the birds in Chernobyl have adapted the radiation. And so perhaps the birds of Fukushima will also adapt in the future, but we don’t know." Look I admit I'm not university trained in nuclear science but when any scientist implies that any life can adapt to high levels of radiation he so totally loses all credibility with me. But to be fair Mouseau probably has kids to feed or a retirement to fund and must try hard not to step on too many toes within his proffesional community. The only plausible reason I can think of as to why he would say such a thing.


      Report comment

  • Shammalammadingdong

    Um, maybe because the Russians had more of a sense of honor than the Japanese?

    When they found levels of radiation that would kill a robot, they did the only thing possible. They figured maximum lifetime doses for people and started conscripting them for work.

    They worked their 4 minutes and went home.

    Spread out the dose to the country responsible, not the entire world. Yeah, people died. Nobody gets out alive.


    Report comment

  • Why no mention of birds in the USA or worldwide for that matter? ;)

    This video is from a guy who studied birds in California after Chernobyl.

    FUKUSHIMA FALLOUT – Lessons from Chernobyl

    Dr. Dave DeSante is the founder of the Institute for Bird Population in Point Reyes, California.

    After the radioactive cloud from Chernobyl passed over the U.S. West Coast in the spring of 1986 his research uncovered a severe die-off of young birds.

    VIDEO: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1hcBGSr9QGk&list=PL69D1BB4DB0D8F834&index=5

    · v ·

    …So it would only 'add up' that the affect of Fukushima is and has been far worse here than has been or is being reported.

    Times 10 or 100 maybe?

    What I do know is this.
    The Fallout has circled the globe and continues to circle it with accumulated radioactive contamination on a daily basis from 3 melted cores.


    Report comment

    • Fall out man!

      Thanks ChasAha – That is a fascinating video. If anyone wants to know the effect of Fukushima on other countries (the US in particular). See that video. It talks about the effect of Chernobyl on the USA. The effect of Fukushima will surely be worse. Absolutely amazing impact on west coast bird life. Shows just how evil the open air nuke testing was and how many babies must have died as a result. Remember, even if a plant does not melt down, people are still suffering genetic damage for miles around a normally operating nuke plant. Anyway, I recommend the video, I found it fascinating.


      Report comment

  • Heart of the Rose Heart of the Rose

    " Fukushima twice as strong as Chernobyl when comparing species of birds found in both places — We don’t know why they are doing even worse in Fukushima "

    One of the dumbest statements ..I've ever heard.


    Report comment

  • Heart of the Rose, perhaps even dumber;"Perhaps the birds in Chernobyl have adapted the radiation. And so perhaps the birds of Fukushima will also adapt in the future, but we don’t know."

    Of course we know. You don't adapt to radiation you get sick and die from radiation.

    Maybe this guy still has hopes for government funding?


    Report comment

  • We Not They Finally

    Species just "adapt to radiation"? A scientist is saying that?


    Report comment

  • Socrates

    The canaries in this coal mine are dying off twice as badly ergo this coal mine is twice as bad.


    Report comment

  • TheBigPicture TheBigPicture

    Won't need to wonder these things after we abolish nuclear.


    Report comment

  • DisasterInterpretationDissorder DisasterInterpretationDissorder

    Those specialist's that are orally farting in public should be examined by specialists themselves… and removed from influence to the max , they should not be allowed near children either , they're deseased corruption might affect the children's capability to think (and seek happiness) for themselves…..


    Report comment

  • unincredulous unincredulous

    Hey if we can adapt to slave conditions, why can't birds adapt to radiation? As a matter of fact, I believe birds are ready and want to fly into space, but there are no worms up there.


    Report comment

  • Bird flying into the wall of the new structure at Reactor 4.

    via the web cam forum…

    "I have watched that segment in very slow motion. It is definitely a bird that crashes." – brainheart

    Video: (credit user brainheart)
    bird @ 4:02 minutes in on recording
    (Between frames @12:18:4x to :5x jst clock)
    - Nov 19th, 12:18:xx jst
    http://s1331.photobucket.com/user/brainheart/media/Video/2013-11-1912_14_00thru12_20_00JSTTEPCOWebcam_zps0dda8d72.mp4.html

    IMO – People should know this.
    This IS what Nuclear Power does to innocent things.

    The bird is easily seen flying in from the south then curving into and hitting the west wall of R4. Where it obviously flails as it plummets. :(

    Screen shots:
    Zoom:
    https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2099954/FukuBird%202013%2011%2019%20R4%20wall%20crash%2003.JPG

    Source: (credit brainheart)
    https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2099954/FukuBird%202013%2011%2019%20R4%20wall%20crash%2001.jpg

    This is not the first time I have observed the 'bird fallout' phenomenon.


    Report comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.