|
|
Discussion Threads
-
FORUM: Fukushima Webcam Discussion Thread
(5,233 Comments)
-
FORUM: General Discussion Thread (Nuclear Issues)
(5,444 Comments)
-
FORUM: Off-Topic Discussion Thread (Non-Nuclear Issues)
(4,087 Comments)
-
FORUM: Post Your Radiation Monitoring Data Here
(3,298 Comments)
-
FORUM: Alternative Energy — Converting to clean, renewable energy sources
(419 Comments)
-
FORUM: Petitions, Ballot Initiatives, Other Signature Drives (VIDEO)
(173 Comments)
-
FORUM: Upcoming meetings, gatherings, & demonstrations about energy issues
(477 Comments)
-
FORUM: What should be done about Japan burning radioactive debris?
(151 Comments)
-
FORUM: Methods for combating radiation and its effects
(1,069 Comments)
-
FORUM: Effects of low level radiation
(537 Comments)
-
FORUM: Possible Fukushima-related Anomalies — Deformations, Yellow Rain, Metallic Taste in Mouth, etc.
(1,731 Comments)
SUBMIT YOUR NEWS TIPS Your identity will not be made public unless you request it
|
lots of news today!
Report Comment
Hurrah for the opera! What a tremendous example to set.
Report Comment
opera is not my thing…..they cam go if they like
Report Comment
@arclight
Ah, arclight, opera was invented to display the beauty and range of the human voice. I agree with the Bavarian performers though, I would not be willing to risk serious exposure to radiation.
Report Comment
While not an Opera, I loved hearing and singing
with Timothy Noble on the “Elijah” Oratorio by
Felix Mendelssohn.
What a Baritone!
The guy Shook the big Methodist church, with pipe-organ,
when he did his solos.
A Great piece to musically dwell on, for these times.
Elijah-Atlanta Symphony–Robert Shaw.
Get one and play it.
–His Mercies on Thousands Fall…
Report Comment
Future of Chernobyl health studies in doubt
“How much radiation is 'unsafe' for humans? For those exposed to fallout from the disaster at Japan's Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant, the question is all too real. But there is still no good answer: the accident has highlighted the enormous difficulties in estimating the long-term health risks of relatively low doses of radiation.
A group of leading researchers in Europe had hoped that a fresh round of studies on people exposed to radiation after the Chernobyl nuclear disaster in 1986 would finally begin to help fill this yawning science gap (see 'Lessons from the past'). But their proposal is now looking increasingly unlikely to proceed.”
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=future-of-chernobyl-health-studies-in-doubt
not paid your subscription to scientific american admin
?
Report Comment
Don’t know why the link to Scientific American (which I will not be reading again) when the article appeared in Nature…????
Report Comment