Published: June 16th, 2012 at 10:47 pm ET
|
Follow-up to: Asahi reports on highly radioactive mysterious bacteria around Japan -- Children touching it, baby strollers nearby -- Gov't claims "no immediate effects on human health"
A source in Japan with a background in nuclear engineering writes:
In this case, Asahi’s (AERA’s) report is correct, because [Minamisoma city council member Koichi] Ooyama’s data was about mixtures of the black substance and the black soils. This is a reason why Asahi called the samples “soils.”
Mr. Ooyama himself has not collected real black substances. Still, he is picking samples which are mixtures of the substances and soils, or only soil.
Basically, Asahi’s newspersons are gathering information about the real substance from several other sources. In short, they might know that Mr. Ooyama had only mixtures, not real substances.
Oyama wrote just a few days ago (translation by Dissensus Japan):
I felt a sense of caution over today’s TV-Asahi report and articles of Asahi-affiliated Weekly AERA, as well as those who are involved in such press reports.
The authorities want to make people believe that the black materials, which release an intense radiation, is not a living thing (alga) but the soil. That is why the topic about biological concentration is not covered in media. Do they want to get rewarded by lying to the mass?
[...]
See also:
- Report: Algae is bio-concentrating radioactive material in Japan cities -- Sucking in radiation from walls and asphalt -- Strontium may be absorbed most
- SOS from Local Official: I can't take it any more! "Black dust" over 5.5 million Bq/kg -- They're going to do what? Spring athletic meets? Swimming pool opening?
Published: June 16th, 2012 at 10:47 pm ET
|


sending...
so can we assume that "the real black substances" would be higher radiation based on this info?
Report Comment
That would be my guess,, and I suspect mixing soil in to dilute it was deliberate to give lower readings. Either way, it was totally unscientific.
Report Comment
Apparently people are working on it but nothing conclusive, at least publicly.
Without reporting a nearby soil sample as a control point, it is hard to say what comes first. Is it the fungus collecting/absorbing fallout and transferring contamination to the ground/soil or is the soil so contaminated that the fungus types thrive on it-the contaminated soil?
Could be coincidence or random accumulations just because there is so much fallout.
Types of fungus can survive radioactive fallout, how it survives it is a bit unclear but to many the surprise of it growing amongst the Three Mile Island nuclear leftovers was a first for them.
Report Comment
FUKUSHIMA is more heavily contaminated.
<a href="http://onodekita.sakura.ne.jp/sblo_files/onodekita/image/2012061508.jpg" title="Plutonium Fallout Map /JPG">
<a href="http://radioactivity.mext.go.jp/en/contents/5000/4552/24/268_1130e.pdf" title="Radiation Monitoring of Soil (for Plutonium) in Fukushima Prefecture">
Report Comment
Links are not working…
Report Comment
Rachel Maddow really gets it about the nuke lies, and nuke reality, and she sums it up concisely in a way the average person can understand. Check it out.
http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.com/2012/06/rachel-maddow.html
Report Comment