Published: July 19th, 2012 at 2:02 pm ET
|
First layer on Unit 5-6 side of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station
Second layer on Unit 5-6 side of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station
Published: July 19th, 2012 at 2:02 pm ET
|
|
||||
Tepco completes covering seafloor with layers of cement mix — More coating used at Reactors 5 & 6 than for Reactors 1, 2, 3 & 4 combined (PHOTOS & VIDEOS)Related Posts
16 comments to Tepco completes covering seafloor with layers of cement mix — More coating used at Reactors 5 & 6 than for Reactors 1, 2, 3 & 4 combined (PHOTOS & VIDEOS)You must be logged in to post a comment. |
6:38 AM EDT, May 24The fukiuchi viewer on Android app is still workung for me.Comment on FORUM: Fukushima Webcam Discussion Thread 5:10 AM EDT, May 24Yeah, YOU GO KEVIN! Au, you missed the s _ _ _ word,...Comment on Expert: "Incipient collapse" of radioactive waste tanks possible at U.S. nuclear site (AUDIO) 4:41 AM EDT, May 24BTW, Anne, one of my hobbies is studying what people are trying to...Comment on Expert: "Incipient collapse" of radioactive waste tanks possible at U.S. nuclear site (AUDIO) 4:38 AM EDT, May 24Anne, several of those "rainbows& quot; have been spotted just before huge earthquakes. I'm...Comment on Expert: "Incipient collapse" of radioactive waste tanks possible at U.S. nuclear site (AUDIO) 4:36 AM EDT, May 24AFTERSHOCK, I have thought about that song every time I've read of your...Comment on Expert: "Incipient collapse" of radioactive waste tanks possible at U.S. nuclear site (AUDIO) 4:11 AM EDT, May 24The TBS/JNN cam link is still not working for me. Anyone else, or...Comment on FORUM: Fukushima Webcam Discussion Thread 3:56 AM EDT, May 24Ghostly Rainbow Floats Over Washington OurAmazingPlane t Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:19 CDT http://www.sott .net/article/23 0007-Ghostly-Ra inbow-Floats-Ov er-Washington ...Comment on Expert: "Incipient collapse" of radioactive waste tanks possible at U.S. nuclear site (AUDIO) 3:27 AM EDT, May 24Normally a berm wouldn't be so important because if the salt dome failed...Comment on FORUM: Off-Topic Discussion Thread (Non-Nuclear Issues) 1:55 AM EDT, May 24Hi HoTaters Why do we never get an answer When we're knocking at...Comment on 'Amazing': Plutonium leak at U.S. nuclear site hidden from public -- Official: "A... 12:57 AM EDT, May 24Ha, thanks, I was just about to look it up Comment on Expert: "Incipient collapse" of radioactive waste tanks possible at U.S. nuclear site (AUDIO) |
|||
|
|
||||
sending...
Per TEPCO Reactors 5 and 6 HAD NO DAMAGE..right? So why the concrete. SUBSIDENCE? That dirty little word? And those reactors 5 and 6 are in cold shutdown..right? Or are we starting on the slow drip drip of info before the REAL story comes out…?? TEPCO you are a piece of work..At least we can point to TEPCO when we complain to OUR LOCAL nuke plant companies. TEPCO could not cover the accident costs/problems..so what is the new and improved plan for OTHER nuke companies? One lesson learned..they need more MONEY and MORE INSURANCE!
Report Comment
Poor… Cover… Poor some more… Cover up some more…
Report Comment
kinda lends new meaning to sweeping it under the carpet…
Report Comment
LOL
Sweeping it under the cement flooring…
Report Comment
Now we know where they're going to dump everything.
It's all PR at this point. Scrape what they can and get it into the ocean as soon as possible. Once the site is scraped clean and pretty, most people will think everything is over.
Until the euthanasia vans start rolling . . .
Report Comment
And all those funny looking black containers which were placed/dropped into the water..just COVER those things up with LAYERS of CONCRETE. Next generation can worry about it. Sadly, Mr. TEPCOman, one has to ask WHAT next generation will be healthy enough to work the problem?
One question to ask..what happened at Reactors 5 and 6 to require as much concrete or MORE than Reactors 1-4? Were more containers dumped into the ocean? More meltdown corium heading for the ocean..or is the ground so unstable..I hope its not the last. Subsidence(loss of ground HEIGHT) could be raising its ugly head. That is bad– almost as bad as Reactor 1-4 "payloads."
Also note the non-concern of "radiation" going out into the OCEAN. What do they think the ocean is? An endless pit? Its not.
Report Comment
Next comes the COREXIT.
Report Comment
someone told me recently that they knew people who STILL went surfing at Fukushima. now with a concrete floor, that's what I'd call surfing between a rock and a hard place. if you are crazy enough to surf a fukushima you should hope for a quick death plunge. Bonzai!!!
Report Comment
Any one wanna post the 5-6 payloads, its too sad for me…..
They are significantly larger than 1-4….Tho they have less latent fuel, as they are newer, their fuel load was larger..
Report Comment
Unit 5 Reactor Fuel Assemblies ..548
Spent Fuel Assemblies ..946
Fuel UOx
New Fuel Assemblies ..48
Unit 6 Reactor Fuel Assemblies..764
Spent Fuel Assemblies ..876
Fuel UOx
New Fuel Assemblies..64
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fukushima_Daiichi_nuclear_disaster
Report Comment
Monday, January 30, 2012 Reactor 6 loses 7 tons of water. So we know it is still leaking..just like the others.
"Tokyo Electric said 7 tons of water had leaked from the No.6 reactor."
http://dailymessenger.blogspot.ca/2012/01/fukushima-reactor-6-has-lost-7-tons-of.html
Report Comment
http://enenews.com/tepco-frozen-water-ruptures-pipes-at-fukushima-plant-cooling-system-stops-at-spent-fuel-pool-no-4
Report Comment
http://enenews.com/tepco-uses-radioactive-water-from-reactors-no-5-and-6-to-spray-throughout-fukushima-plant-over-100-tons-a-day-tanks-close-to-overflowing
A daily amount of 100 cubic meters of water will be sprayed
The move is aimed at preventing trees felled on the plant compound from catching fire and dust containing radioactive materials from scattering, the utility said.
Report Comment
http://enenews.com/reactor-no-6-now-has-over-6-feet-of-contaminated-water-in-turbine-building-water-in-reactor-building-may-cause-cooling-system-to-fail
Report Comment
Thank you Maiden.
Report Comment
hmmm… this looks more like bulkhead stabilization than "covering soil" – it abuts retaining walls and if memory serves correctly, the original geotechnical sections submitted to get the permits illustrated a fracture – the fracture has probably been rocked by the corium "earthquakes" of late. Chances are they are trying to make sure the 6 reactors don't go swimming. Typical engineering solution -
Report Comment