UPI: ‘Skyrocketing’ cancer cases in Fukushima — AP: ‘Alarming’ cancer rates after nuclear disaster — Times: Child cancers up 5,000% — Radiation doses may be “considerably higher” than estimated — Expert: Cancer outbreak shows officials must now prepare for onset of leukemia, other diseases (VIDEO)

Published: October 8th, 2015 at 4:07 pm ET


The Times, Oct 8 2015 (emphasis added): Child cancers up fiftyfold after Fukushima disaster — Cases of thyroid cancer among children living close to the Fukushima nuclear power plant have increased fiftyfold since the meltdown in 2011, according to Japanese scientists… in one of the most pessimistic assessments of the health implications of the world’s second-worst nuclear disaster. He urged the Japanese authorities to stop quibbling over the interpretation of cancer statistics, and to muster medical resources. “We need to prepare for leukaemia, breast cancer and (remainder of article only available to subscribers)… Photo Caption: 104 cases of thyroid cancer have been identified, a far higher rate than the national average

AP, Oct 9, 2015: Study shows alarming thyroid cancer rates in children living near Fukushima… “This is more than expected and emerging faster than expected,” lead author Toshihide Tsuda said…

UPI, Oct 8, 2015: Fukushima radiation has been linked to a surge in thyroid cancer among children near the disaster area… A team of Japanese researchers led by Toshihide Tsuda, a professor of environmental epidemiology at Okayama University, said cases of thyroid cancer in Fukushima Prefecture have skyrocketed since March 2011… and the culprit was increased radiation exposure since the Fukushima nuclear disaster…

T. Tsuda, A. Tokinobu, E. Suzuki, E. Yamamoto (Okayama Univ.), Oct 5, 2015:

  • Thyroid Cancer Detection by Ultrasound Among Residents Ages 18 Years and Younger in Fukushima… 2011 to 2014
  • The highest incidence rate ratio… was observed in the central middle district of the prefecture… incidence rate ratio = 50
  • … estimated doses ranged from 119 to 432 mSv among mothers and from 330 to 1,190 mSv in their infants for those living 45 to 220 km south or southwest, including Iwaki City in the Fukushima Prefecture, Ibaragi Prefecture, and Chiba Prefecture.
  • … we could infer that the incidence of thyroid cancer in Fukushima rose more rapidly than expected… as estimated by the World Health Organization.
  • The radiation burden to the thyroid in Fukushima Prefecture might have been considerably higher than estimated…
  • The minimum empirical induction time for thyroid cancer is 2.5 years for adults and 1 year for children, according to the [CDC]. Therefore, we considered it possible to detect thyroid cancer… even within the 2011 fiscal year.
  • In Chernobyl, excesses of thyroid cancer became more remarkable 4 or 5 years after… the observed excess alerts us to prepare for more potential cases.

Watch a recent presentation by Prof. Tsuda here

Published: October 8th, 2015 at 4:07 pm ET


Related Posts

  1. Officials: 6,000% cancer rate increase in Fukushima children’s thyroids — Expert: Urgent countermeasures against the suspected outbreak are necessary — Professor: Gov’t stopped me from checking thyroid exposure levels after 3/11 (VIDEO) May 19, 2015
  2. Fukushima Cover-Up: Extraordinary amount of kids have thyroid cancer — Officials say NOT caused by Fukushima since Chernobyl’s cancers took 4-5 yrs to appear — Yet data shows it started soon after ’86 meltdown… number of cases still rising 25 years later September 29, 2013
  3. Fukushima Doctor: Cancer found in over 40 children… We believe it’s related to the nuclear disaster — Physician: Leukemia cases to increase in next few months? (AUDIO) October 11, 2013
  4. Japan Professor: Outbreak of cancer is now underway in Fukushima children; Clear evidence of an epidemic — All of Japan is still being exposed to nuclear radiation — Gov’t Official: It will be ‘disastrous’ if we have to conclude there’s an actual increase in thyroid cancer from Fukushima August 10, 2014
  5. Tokyo Press Conference: Gov’t is committing crimes against humanity; Fukushima children living in war zone and can’t leave — Childhood cancer developing much faster than Chernobyl; Rate now 14 times higher — Parent: “I’m revealing the reality of what’s going on… it’s only way to get rid of the criminals” (VIDEO) August 19, 2014

785 comments to UPI: ‘Skyrocketing’ cancer cases in Fukushima — AP: ‘Alarming’ cancer rates after nuclear disaster — Times: Child cancers up 5,000% — Radiation doses may be “considerably higher” than estimated — Expert: Cancer outbreak shows officials must now prepare for onset of leukemia, other diseases (VIDEO)

  • hbjon hbjon

    There used to be such happy times. There were days and night that went gently by unknowing of evil threats and dangers as the great leaders protected their safety. For the leaders knew from past memory and history, more people always die of disease than are lost on the battlefield. It has always been that way according to most historians. Unnatural diseases such as those that affect the young are MANMADE and could be intentionally or unintentionally given to them. Evil is in firm control and to what end will it use its means?

  • Heart of the Rose Heart of the Rose

    OT. Poetry corner..


    I wish I could reach out
    And touch
    A mind soft and pithy as my own.
    One slightly over-ripened and definitely beyond it's blush
    Perhaps discarded or untouched.

    We could pass the time
    While watching the fruit
    of our sweet minds
    go to waste
    upon the vine.

  • Sol Man

    It was stated earlier today in a conversation that growing old is not a progression, it is a massacre, because everything falls apart at once.

    But, it is not that either because merely living has become a massacre as we are forced, each and every one of us, to live with the radiation everywhere that cooks us inside as well as outside every single moment of our time on earth.

  • Growing old is not a calamity its an opportunity to learn about scarcity and to teach from direct experience how to deal with it.

    Being able to do some extraordinary things shall not make us think we are invincible. The reality is that the body can in certain conditions surpass its normal capacities but its not always the case and it can be done only during short periods of time. Nothing is produced from thin air and if so wont bring much. There’s a price tag attached to it and its paid in vital energy. When you are healthy and have some energy reserves they can be spent to get you out of a threatening situation and the important thing to remember is that the final solution is to get out of it as soon as possible. The wise prevents instead of having to cure, he can sense potential dangers and wont engage in those situations. The best warrior is who never engages in combat.

    • DUDe DisasterInterpretationDissorder

      I have lived a foolish life , and there is a biological pricetag to that..i always knew that and made my choice..

      But nothing makes me feel old and tired as learning about the true nature of the powers that shouldent be..but are..doing nothing but making decisions and laws behind smokescreens to increase their reach on all facets of all life on this planet..and the logical conclusion it holds for the future of all..

  • Well the background is a lie out of the gate, as you can see in this link. Its not 2 or 3 in USA, unless you are

    sucking down radium and radon. Both of which I have in my environment, but easily mitigated with a radon pump and a softener and RO.

    So an average background is really less than 1 mSv per year, unless you stupid, live at altitude, or both


    So ya, I believe that 100 years of background (100 mSv)could result in a cancer rate of 6 in 100 like we had in 1900AD

    • CodeShutdown CodeShutdown

      There were other causes of cancer too, and perhaps plenty enough to account for all the cancers. Danger (or no danger) of background, especially internal radiation is not known.

      Heres a distinction; we dont have radiation in us, we ARE radioactive.


    Fukushima, South Carolina


    Jocassee Dam was at risk prior to the ongoing rain/floods [link] Lake Keowee dam is also a threat. There seems to be a media blackout by the NRC.


  • Troll Rebuttal To Pointing Out All the Children With Cancer and pre-Cancerous Nodules
    Finally a troll with some MOXy, some game! But it all devolves into lies.

    After pointing out a peer reviewed study showing 2000% to 5000% more cancer in kids in Fukushima, the pro nukist responded with the below. Appreciate any debunks that anyone wishes to submit.
    – See more at: http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.com/2015/10/troll-rebuttal-to-pointing-out-all.html#sthash.QY3ipWLk.dpuf

  • To all great researchers out there….please find information.
    send to me directly, or post on my page, posting it here I probably won't see it. Mahalo!

    Risks of low level Radiation – A Compilation of Links
    I am going to start this off with Ian Fairlie, a great researcher and author….

    stock here….I am looking for the highest quality studies that show cancer and other disease risk from low dose radiation.

    1) This needs to be gathered somewhere on the internet
    2) I will use it as part of the knock punch for the comment period for the NRC "radiation is good for us" debunk.

    • Dr. Anne Lee Tomlinson Maziar PraisingTruth

      You can go through the forum here on effects of low dose radiation.

    • Dr. Anne Lee Tomlinson Maziar PraisingTruth

      Zimmerman Paul. 2009-08. A Primer in the Art of Deception: The Cult of Nuclearists, Uranium Weapons and Fraudulent Science. 796 pp.
      pp. 155-168:
      “To fully appreciate the controversy that has arisen over the Life Span Study, it is necessary to revisit the horrific events of Hiroshima and its aftermath. At 8:16:02 AM on the morning of August 6, 1945, the “Little Boy” atomic bomb exploded over Hiroshima. At the moment of detonation, a flash of gamma radiation and neutrons showered the target area and irradiated the entire population. In a microsecond, a thermal pulse baked the
      city and ignited a conflagration, and a pressure wave smashed most structures to smithereens. Exact casualty figures are not known. Perhaps 100,000 people died from combined injuries from the direct effects of the blast: immense quantities of irradiation,
      burns, and a vast array of trauma injuries. It is estimated that by the end of 1945, total casualties had climbed to 140,000 people. By 1950, the death toll had reached over
      200,000. What had once been Hiroshima was left in radioactive ruin. Radiation contaminated the soil and the water. This created an environment where internal contamination became possible for all who entered the area for years afterward. In the immediate after-
      math of the bombing, people who had either lived outside the city or who had left the city center prior to the detonation reentered the city looking for family and friends….

      • Dr. Anne Lee Tomlinson Maziar PraisingTruth

        These people, not exposed to the detonation, subsequently became contaminated by internal emitters. Nevertheless, they were later included in the control group of the Life Span Study repre-
        senting people who were not exposed to radiation.

        "This brief portrait provides all the information the reader needs in order to understand the overwhelming number of errors inherent in the atomic bomb survivor study. Never lose sight of the fact that, in the hands of the ICRP, this study provides the foundation for current models of the risks to health from radiation exposure, and via extrapolation, the hazards of low-dose exposure to internally emitting radionuclides. At a meeting of the European Parliament in February 1998, a number of attendees expressed criticism of the ICRP and the Hiroshima data on radiation effects. These were summarized in the first publication of the European Committee on Radiation Risk (ECRR).

        1. Professor Alice Stewart faulted the Hiroshima research on the grounds that the study and control groups were not representative of a normal population. Those included in the study were survivors of the stresses of war who had endured an overwhelming atrocity. Between the end of the war and the establishment of the Life Span Study, as many as 100,000 people succumbed as a result of blast injuries, irradiation, conventional illnesses,
        and internal contamination from fallout and tainted food and water. …

        • Dr. Anne Lee Tomlinson Maziar PraisingTruth

          As a consequence, the study omits tens of thousands of radiation-induced deaths that took place in the first seven years after the dropping of the bomb. Thus, any results of the LSS will inevitably underestimate the hazards of radiation exposure. Due to the multiple stres-
          sors of the bombing and its aftermath, a natural selection process was set in motion whereby unfit people, the physically and psychologically weak, succumbed and were weeded out of the study population. A “healthy survivor effect” thus biased the study. By the time the Life Span Study got underway, those studied made up an atypical population that could not
          adequately represent the delayed effects of radiation exposure for the entirety of mankind.

          2. Several participants at the meeting of the European Parliament criticized the ICRP for failing to adequately address the subject of internal contamination. The surviving Hiroshima population was modeled on the basis of everyone receiving an instantaneous barrage of gamma and neutron irradiation at the moment of detonation of the bomb. Completely ignored by the study is the fact that the surviving population was exposed to
          fallout that compounded external radiation from beta and gamma emitters. Further, soil and water were contaminated by radionuclides creating the opportunity for the ongoing
          accumulation of internal emitters through the diet. As a consequence, dose estimates, upon which the whole study rests,

          • Dr. Anne Lee Tomlinson Maziar PraisingTruth

            are meaningless. To make matters worse, when those outside
            the city during the time of the bombing entered the city to see what had happened and to
            look for families and friends, they likely received internal contamination. Thus, the “con-
            trol” population was also contaminated with radioactivity. What effect does this have on
            the Life Span Study if both the study population and the control population were exposed
            to radiation? It will make the incidence of cancer among the study population appear
            much lower than if a valid comparison were made between those exposed and another suit-
            able control population totally unexposed. By basing the study on an inappropriate control
            population, radiation is made to appear less hazardous than it actually is.
            3. Dr. Chris Busby argued, as has been revealed previously in this chapter, that the
            model used by the ICRP to model the physiological impact of high levels of external radi-
            ation is totally inappropriate for accurately predicting the effects of internal contamination
            delivered in low doses at a low dose rate. And yet, this is exactly how the Japanese data is used to estimate health risks and derive permissible levels of exposure from internal emitters. According to Busby, by relying on faulty models to assess the risk of internal emitters,
            the ICRP has failed to accurately determine the true hazards of internal contamination.

            4. Dr. David Sumner criticized the ICRP for utilizing the…

            • Dr. Anne Lee Tomlinson Maziar PraisingTruth

              (equivalent to 100 rem) as a unit of measure. According to his argument, the quality factors introduced into equations to account for differences in the physiological impact of different types of radiation are value judgments and not physical units. To say, for instance, that alpha radiation produces ten times as much biological effect as electromagnetic radiation is not sufficiently rigorous to be used to evaluate the risk from different types of exposure.

              5. Dr. Rosalie Bertell challenged the very legitimacy of the ICRP to represent before all mankind the hazards to health of ionizing radiation. “The ICRP is profoundly undemocratic and nprofessionally constituted. It is self-appointed and self-perpetuated” (Bertell, February 1998). Since its inception with some original members drawn from the Manhattan Project, the ICRP has been filled with people who are biased in favor of the
              nuclear establishment. “ICRP is organized by its By-Laws to include only users and national regulators (usually coming from the ranks of users) of radiation” (Bertell, February 1998). Membership has remained balanced between 50% physicists and 50% medical doctors. About 25% of the doctors have been medical administrators in countries possessing nuclear weapons who set radiation protection standards in their respective countries and another 15% have been radiologists. The remaining 10% of doctors has consisted of one pathologist, two geneticists, and a biophysicist…

              • Dr. Anne Lee Tomlinson Maziar PraisingTruth

                Women have been completely excluded. The rules of the main committee responsible for making decisions explicitly exclude participation of an epidemiologist, occupational health specialist, public health specialist, oncologist or pediatrician. According to their own mandate, the job of the ICRP is not to protect workers or public health. Rather, their self-appointed purpose is solely to make recommendations as to what represents a sensible — i.e., “permissible” — tradeoff between the benefits and risks to society of pursuing technologies that result in people receiving exposure to ionizing radiation. Thus, the standards set by the ICRP for what constitutes acceptable exposure are infused with value judgments made by a select few with ties to nuclear weapons and other nuclear technologies.

                "In terms of its own claims, ICRP does not offer recommendations of
                exposure limits based on worker and public health criteria. Rather, it offers its own risk/benefit tradeoff suggestion, containing value judgments with respect to the “acceptability” of risk estimates, and decisions as to what is “acceptable” to the individual and to society, for what it sees as the “benefits” of the activities. Since the thirteen members of the Main Committee of ICRP, the decision makers, are either users of ionizing radiation in their employment

                • Dr. Anne Lee Tomlinson Maziar PraisingTruth

                  , or are government regulators, primarily from countries with nuclear weapon programs, the vested interests are clear. In the entire history of the radiologist association formed in 1928, and ICRP, formed when the physicists were added in 1952, this organization has never taken a public stand on behalf of the public health. It never even protested atmospheric nuclear weapon testing, the deliberate exposure of atomic soldiers, the lack of ventilation in uranium mines, or unnecessary uses of medical X-ray.

                  "The ICRP assumes no responsibility for the consequences attributa-
                  ble to a country following its recommendations. They stress that the
                  Regulations are made and adopted by each National Regulatory Agency, and it merely recommends. However, on the National level, governments say they cannot afford to do the research to set radiation regulations, therefore they accept the ICRP recommendations. In the real world, this makes no one responsible for the deaths and disabilities caused! (Bertell, February 1998).
                  In reference to the Hiroshima research, Dr. Bertell made similar observations as the other presenters to the European Parliament:
                  It [the LSS] has focused on cancer deaths, is uncorrected for healthy
                  survivor effect, and is not inclusive of all of the radiation exposures of cases and controls (dose calculations omit fallout, residual ground radiation, contamination of the food and water, and individual medical X-ray), and fails to include all…

                  • Dr. Anne Lee Tomlinson Maziar PraisingTruth

                    relevant biological mechanisms and endpoints of concern.
                    “It is normally claimed that the biological basis of the cancer death risk estimates used by ICRP is the atomic bomb studies. However, these studies are not studies of radiation health effects, but of the effects of an atomic bomb. For example, the radiation dose received by the Hiroshima and Nagasaki survivors from fallout, contamination of food, water and air, has never even been calculated. Only the initial bomb blast, modified by personal shielding, is included in the US Oak Ridge National Laboratory assigned “dose.” This methodology is carried to an extreme. For example, one survivor I know lived within the three kilometer radius of the hypocenter, but was just beyond the three kilometer zone, at work, when the bomb dropped. As soon as she could, she returned home after the bombing and found her parents and brother dead. Then she stayed in her family home for the three following days, not knowing where to go and filled with grief.
                    “Although she suffered radiation sickness and many subsequent forms of ill health, she is counted as an “unexposed control” in the atomic bomb data base. By using the “not in the city” population which entered after the bombing as “controls”, many of the cancers attributable to the radiation exposure in both cases and controls are eliminated from the outcomes considered related to the bomb (Bertell, February 1998).

                    • Dr. Anne Lee Tomlinson Maziar PraisingTruth

                      “Testifying before the United States Senate Committee on Veterans’ Affairs in 1998, Dr. Bertell dropped a bombshell. The team that had assigned dosages in 1986 to Japanese survivors assigned a dose of ZERO to anyone with a calculated dose less than 10 mGy (1 rad). This represented a total of 34,043 participants in the study: 37.3 percent. These people, purely by definition, were assigned to the “not exposed” control group. This decision effectively destroyed the possibility of any detection of heightened incidences of illnesses from those who actually received low-level exposure. Further, by lumping those exposed into the unexposed control group, the LSS is weighted to underestimate the health effects of radiation due to an unsuitable control population. These irreparable errors invalidate any possible conclusions of the LSS as they pertain to low-level exposure. Radiation protection standards are grounded on the research from Japan. What is thought to be the effects of low doses of radiation are extrapolated mathematically from the observed high dose effects discovered by the Life Span Study. As a result of Dr. Bertell’s revelation, however, it is clear that the Atomic Bomb research can have no relevance to any discussion about the health effects of low doses of radiation. Those who supposedly received low doses had their exposure nullified. If honesty prevailed, this fact alone would shake the radiation protection community. A cornerstone of…

                    • Dr. Anne Lee Tomlinson Maziar PraisingTruth

                      current approaches to radiation safety holds that the hazards posed becoming “eminent” in medical circles. The list is much longer, including Directors and Vice-Directors up until 1990, scientists known to have conducted military experiments on humans (Shingo).
                      “Returning to the subject at hand, the European Committee on Radiation Risk has compiled its own list as to why the Hiroshima research is totally incapable of providing relevant information on the effects of low levels of internal contamination:
                      “1. The Hiroshima study includes an inappropriate control population. Both the study group and ontrols were internally contaminated.
                      “2. Mathematical extrapolation from high doses to low doses fails to account for known cellular processes. The ECRR is highly critical of the methodology of mathematcally deriving risks to health created by low doses of radiation from data on high doses. According to their rationale, this process fails to address well-established biological phenomena that have been observed at low doses. To offer just one example here (others will be offered in Exhibit D), at high doses there is a greater likelihood of cell killing among targeted cells while at low doses delivered at a low rate, which occurs from internalized radioactivity, there is a greater likelihood that cells injured by radiation will survive but in a mutated form. As a consequence, cancer incidence from internal exposure to low levels of radiation would be greater…

                    • Dr. Anne Lee Tomlinson Maziar PraisingTruth

                      than that predicted from a simple linear extrapolation from acute dosages of external radiation.
                      “3. In making extrapolations from an acute one-time exposure, as in the case of Hiroshima, to chronic repetitive low-dose exposures that occur from particles of internally embedded radionuclides undergoing radioactive decay, the ICRP model fails to address the fact that a variation in cell sensitivity is introduced into a cell population after initial exposure. Cells once exposed to radiation exhibit increased sensitivity to alteration following subsequent exposure.
                      4. The ECRR mentions another major flaw in extrapolating from external to internal exposure. When the bomb detonated over Hiroshima, an enormous barrage of photons was ejected in all directions. Those photons passing through human bodies delivered a homogeneous, whole-body dose of radiation to each victim. While traversing through body cells, each photon followed a single track, creating molecular disruption along its path until its energy was expended. Photons are said to have low LET, linear energy transfer. Along their path, they transfer, “on average,” less energy per micrometer than alpha or beta particles. This has the effect of creating a sparse pattern of ionization through a cell, i.e., ionizing events are spaced further apart along a track compared to the more dense patterns of ionization created by alphas and betas. Consequently, the photons released from the bomb possessed a…

                    • Dr. Anne Lee Tomlinson Maziar PraisingTruth

                      relatively low probability of multiple tracks intersecting at the same critical structures within the same cell, i.e., the DNA molecules. In contrast, radionuclides within the body’s interior represent a different phenomenon. Cells in close proximity to embedded particles are vulnerable to being repeatedly hit by the tracks of alpha and beta particles ejected during radioactive decay. Further, these particles have high LET. They create a denser pattern of molecular disruption within a cell. Depending on the radionuclide involved, the nuclei of neighboring cells are more likely to be hit by multiple tracks created during critical times in the cell’s life cycle either as a result of multiple hits from atoms of the same radionuclide or from sequential decays of the same atom. As a consequence, internal emitters are more likely to create multiple tracks through the same cell’s nucleus and create more molecular damage in and about the DNA. For this reason, internal radiation will have a much greater chance of altering cell function and inducing mutation than that caused by external radiation. Under this scenario, low doses from internal emitters are vastly more hazardous to cellular well-being than higher doses delivered to cells externally.
                      “5. Currently, the ICRP embraces the model in which biological damage is directly proportional to dosage. Once again this assumption is based on extrapolation from high doses. This is what is called the Linear…

                    • Dr. Anne Lee Tomlinson Maziar PraisingTruth

                      No-Threshold Hypothesis. Based on the biological response of cells to low doses of radiation, the ECRR holds that this assumption is “patently not true.”
                      “6. The ECRR maintains that the Life Span Study is not representative of other populations of people all over the world. It is an incorrect extrapolation to assume that the findings from Hiroshima are equally valid for all human beings since research has established that different populations manifest different levels of susceptibility to radiation injury.
                      “7. The ECRR also faults the Hiroshima study because the study group is made up of war survivors. This, once again, is an expression of the healthy survivor effect. The Japanese survivors were selected by the pressures of war and the bombing due to their increased resistance, and thus, cannot be suitably compared to populations that have not endured similar stresses.
                      “8. The Life Span Study has built-in inaccuracies due to the fact that it was started too late and missed many of the early deaths caused by radiation. This has had the effect of skewing the statistics to making radiation appear less hazardous than it in fact actually is.
                      “9. The Life Span Study confines itself to the study of radiation-induced “fatal” cancers. Confining itself to this focus, the total health detriment induced in the surviving population is completely ignored. Once again, this misrepresents the true impact of ionizing radiation on human health. In addition…

                    • Dr. Anne Lee Tomlinson Maziar PraisingTruth

                      to fatal cancers, inheritable damage, and IQ retardation which is considered by the ICRP and other risk agencies, the ECRR advocates inclusion of other health effects including nonfatal cancers, benign neoplasms, infant mortality, birthrate reduction, and low birthweights. General reduction in the quality of life and non-specific life shortening are further consequences that must be included when evaluating the health effects of radiation exposure.
                      “10. Genetic damage created by the bombing in Japan is modeled on gross abnormalities manifested in births of subsequent generations. The study overlooks more subtle genetic effects that nevertheless may have profound impact on the health of progeny over time.
                      “As if these criticisms were not enough to convince anyone that the results of the Life Span Study are seriously corrupted, two further objections have been raised. One is mentioned by Busby in Wings of Death. He observed a large discrepancy between the cancer statistics published by the Atomic Bomb Casualty Commission for the period 1957-8 and those released by the Hiroshima Cancer Registry. According to the ABCC, the incidence of non-leukemia cancers among those survivors who were located within 1,500 meters of the hypocenter of the atomic bomb detonations was 338. In contrast, the Hiroshima Cancer Registry, for the twenty-month period between May of 1957 and December of 1958, reported that the same population had developed 1502 non-leukemia…

                    • Dr. Anne Lee Tomlinson Maziar PraisingTruth

                      leukemia cancers. Adjusting this data for a twelve month period to offer a basis of comparison, Busby derived a figure of 90 non-leukemia cancers. When the incidence of these cancers was compared to the control population, the results were striking:
                      “Comparison of these two sets of results for the same population, for the same period makes for a curious sense of having fallen through the looking-glass. This feeling is one which is often experienced when attempting to follow published reports relating to the health effects of radiation. The Hiroshima Cancer Registry shows a 400 per cent increase in non-leukemia for the highly exposed group; the ABCC finds only a 30 per cent increase in the highly exposed group. It was the ABCC figures that were used as the basis of risk assessment: no one has ever explained the discrepancy.

                    • SadieDog

                      Just post the goddamn article! It's comments not essays. Nobody is gonna read all your shit. Stop!

                    • Dr. Anne Lee Tomlinson Maziar PraisingTruth

                      “An even more disturbing problem with the A-Bomb study has been unveiled by John Gofman in his book Radiation-Induced Cancer from Low-Dose Exposure: An Independent Analysis, 1990 . In the fifth chapter of this book, Gofman provides a detailed history of the Life Span Study. Wading through technical minutia to explain the study’s structure and how it has been managed over the years, Gofman reveals highly disturbing practices in the conduct of the study that may have well destroyed the usefulness of the study for providing “objective” information about the effects of ionizing radiation on human health. What has taken place is major manipulation of the data in ways contrary to the standard and acceptable practices for conducting epidemiological studies.
                      “Gofman relates four fundamental rules followed by epidemiologists all over the world to prevent bias from contaminating and ruining their studies.
                      “Rule One: Once a study begins, the original input cannot be altered. The importance of this rule is to ensure that, as the outcome of a study becomes known, those who might not be pleased with the findings cannot change the original input to produce a more desirable result.
                      “Rule Two: To further ensure that no bias creeps into an epidemiological study, those investigators in a position to ignore rule one and alter the original input should not have access to the results of the study as these begin to accumulate. Only those who are blind to the outcome are…

                    • SadieDog

                      Why don't you start that website you said you were gonna make? Stop clogging up enenews. How many times do you have to be told?

                    • SadieDog

                      You suck! I'm out. I will avoid posting like usual when you you are wallpapering to death this forum. You don't care about others, anti nuke movements or anything else, you fucking detrimental, lying, artificial activist troll. I can't stand you.

                    • Dr. Anne Lee Tomlinson Maziar PraisingTruth

                      in a position to fairly alter the input once it has been established.
                      “Rule Three: If retroactive alteration of the input is required part-way through a study, the credibility of results can only be safeguarded if investigators meticulously justify the scientific need for any changes and prove unequivocally that bias has not been introduced into the final results.
                      “Rule Four: The original cohorts of a study must be kept intact. Continuity of the original structure of a study is the strongest defense against the insinuation of bias into a study’s outcome. Shuffling people from one cohort to another as the results of the study begin to be tallied totally destroys the study’s integrity and credibility and invites doubts as to the accuracy of the results.
                      “While reviewing the chronology of the A-Bomb Study and the changes introduced to it over time, Gofman evidences major violations of these rules. One disturbing trend throughout the course of the study has been a continual shifting of the input by changing the make-up of the study population. At one time, thousands of new survivors were added to the study population. At another time, thousands of others were suspended. As Gofman comments:
                      “’’It seems as if RERF has been conducting one public study, with 80,000 survivors on view, plus another study with over 34,000 additional A-bomb survivors in reserve, who are followed-up and selelectively added to the public study as needed…

                    • Dr. Anne Lee Tomlinson Maziar PraisingTruth

                      “’’Simultaneously there has been an ongoing process of reassigning dosages of radiation received by each survivor. The revision in dose estimates have ostensibly been introduced for the purpose of improving accuracy to the study. Unfortunately, those involved in this process have not been blind to the emerging incidence rates of leukemias and cancers and to the make-up of the shifting cohorts.’
                      “The Life Span Study is plagued by ongoing, fatal problems. As time passes and the population of Japanese bomb survivors ages and dies, the incidence of cancers is being recorded. While this is occurring, an ongoing process of retroactive altering of the study is being undertaken, changing the make-up of the study population and the dosages these people received. This is a high stakes game. The conclusions of this study will be referred to for generations as the definitive study of the relationship between ionizing radiation and cancer hazard. Mankind’s trust in the safety of nuclear enterprises way into the future will be heavily influenced by the outcome of this single study. Unfortunately, those who uphold disinterested science as the final arbitrator in the quest for truth will be hard pressed to believe that bias has not hopelessly infected the A-Bomb Study to produce a predetermined outcome which makes radiation appear less hazardous than it actually is.
                      “It does not take an epidemiologist to recognize that the Life Span Study is hopelessly flawed…

                    • Dr. Anne Lee Tomlinson Maziar PraisingTruth

                      and unable to provide any definitive conclusion on radiation effects to the human body. Yet, it continues to serve as the foundation for regulatory agencies with regard to what constitutes permissible levels of exposure to ionizing radiation. Why? By this time, the answer should be obvious. It fulfills a political agenda. It is an instrument of an intentionally crafted disinformation campaign designed to keep the public unaware of the long-term health effects of nuclear weapons, nuclear power plants, radioactive waste, depleted uranium munitions, and so on. That the worldwide radiation “protection” community adheres to the validity of this plagued study is self-damning, raising legitimate questions about the impartiality and objectivity of its members. With so many “authoritative” bodies upholding this deeply flawed scientific work as the ultimate revealer of truth about radiation effects, the public is condemned to be submerged in lies, herded in ignorance, and deterred from formulating informed opinions about the genuine health effects of nuclear and radiological weapon programs. Think to the political ramifications of the corrupted Hiroshima data. It’s all about people who survived a nuclear weapon. It is fabricated so as to offer testimony that the survivors of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were not subjected to undue suffering or catastrophic health consequences as a result of exposure to ionizing radiation. If these people emerged unscathed by…

                    • Dr. Anne Lee Tomlinson Maziar PraisingTruth

                      by radiation, what basis does anyone have to complain about emissions from nuclear power plants or depleted uranium scattered over people’s homelands? Further, the A-Bomb Study, focusing on fatal cancers to the exclusion of all other health effects, makes the aftermath of atomic warfare appear relatively benign. With high rates of cancer already in existence, what’s the big deal if cancer rates creep imperceptibly higher? The mentality that sponsors and endorses the Life Span Study is the same mentality that advocates that nuclear war is winnable, tactical nuclear weapons are useable, and radiological weapons have a place on today’s battlefield. This dogma is dangerous, a product of corrupted thinking perpetrated by the Cult of Nuclearists, that may very well draw the entire world over the edge into limited or total thermonuclear war. …”

  • unincredulous unincredulous

    With the nuclear industry saying that fear of radiation being more dangerous than radiation itself, why do they not try to debunk the "Veterans Today" radiation readings.

    — Are they afraid?

  • Heart of the Rose Heart of the Rose

    Just floating in my mind out toward Mars like Matt Damon.
    (I'll do anything than cut the lawn.)
    NASA says we should be able to get to Mars in 6 months.

    There are 4383 hours in 6 months ..Mars is 140 million miles away.


    31941.5925 per hour.

    Sure, man, sure..

    • DUDe DisasterInterpretationDissorder

      🙂 ..

      And then when they arrive to begin the next absurd fairytale..bomb it to life..nuclear that is , hormesis bs of a planet , village idiot lunacy to the xtreme lol

      • Heart of the Rose Heart of the Rose

        Who can afford to be wondering what is going on 140 million miles away?.
        NASA perhaps.
        Perhaps ..the supposed smartest guy on the internet.. Neil deGrasse Tyson ..(bought and paid for)

        What an unearthly distraction..
        What bullshit..

    • Thats about the speed that Pluto spacecraft was kicking at.

      But I agree, all the "Mars" in the news is a ploy to get people to turn off their brains and stop worrying about the fact that this earth is being toasted quickly.

      If people think, in the back of their minds, hey we can just leave….then they don't have to think about the current reality. Then corporate greed can continue without a revolution to stall profits.

    • Sickputer

      Mars in opposition is much closer, 1/4 the 140 million miles figure of the extreme orbits.

      "The next successful mission to Mars was Mariner 6, which blasted off on February 25, 1969 and reached the planet on July 31, 1969; a flight time of only 156 days. The successful Mariner 7 only required 131 days to make the journey."


      • Heart of the Rose Heart of the Rose

        Oh, a mere 35 million ..and receiving clear communication ..sure.
        We just hired an EPA type officer for Mars.

        Taxpayer dollars being used to protect the environment on Mars
        Oct 11 2015
        Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

        • Sol Man

          Great! Send him or her up there!

          If there is water they can just watch us pump process water into it, or the air is good for any radionuclides or voc's!

          Treat the babies to the myriad of poisons- wherever you are!

        • DUDe DisasterInterpretationDissorder

          I wish they where this equally technollogical impressive as achieving a speed in safety-fying their nuclear toy's here at home..where there IS proven life sort of speak..i guess That advanced level of technollogy challenging is even out of the smartest of the smartest their possibilities ..what in hell are we looking fore in space then..baiting our own tail on a dead nuclear rock..only faster..the fact that it is a distraction with spectacle sealed the deal..the show will go on..including the one that all is peachy with the planet..and that economy will grow..without renewables..and smothering togheter with all life around to death is hormesis.. i object..

          • DUDe DisasterInterpretationDissorder

            smothering..in radioactive soup..biological plasma we live in..our biosphere..our surroundings and our innerds..biological plasma Blob..Life !…ever further saturating..in Tatal..

          • DUDe DisasterInterpretationDissorder

            "That advanced level of technollogy challenging is even out of the smartest of the smartest their possibilities.. "

            specially also when spychopathic..and there is no profit..can't cut down on the bonuses…

        • Sickputer

          The speed of a deep space probe can be amazing… A launch in 2018 is expected to reach 450,000 miles an hour. You could travel to the moon in 30 minutes at that dpeed. Solar Probe Plus will come within 3.7 million miles of the sun. Heliocentric velocity is the big speed factor.


        • unincredulous unincredulous

          That's one hell of a stupid thing for me to read just before going to sleep. Me, unemployed, knowing how tough it is going to be and someone gets a job like that.

          Jeffrey Immelt, Presidential Economic Advisor, you are an idiot. Or just evil. Insert invective of your choice here —> ____ you.

      • Heart of the Rose Heart of the Rose

        11132.3155 per hour

        • Heart of the Rose Heart of the Rose

          Isn't there some sort of g-force involvement?…lol

          • DUDe DisasterInterpretationDissorder

            G-force yeehaaa the fun part of jumping forward future here i come lol..:) Those speeds are truely fascinating to imaging..or imaging what we can do if really interested..imaging all that brainforce truelly looking top focused to fix our manmade extinction..
            Or even..if i may dream..truely searching for a sustainable symbiose..and maintain or improve our conditions to reach knowledge and happiness in return..and health..all health of Earth..imaging we started the technollogical revolution with that Quest..and that brainpower..focused..on absolute Symbiose as a species..with every surrounding..
            with a different kind of technollogy..
            But still advanced..
            3D printers on pure solar as resource delivering a big coverage of our basic needs..stuff like that..

        • obewanspeaks obewanspeaks

          Will they have to fill out any stupid tax forms over there at Mars?

          Bobby hates stupid tax forms. 🙁

          Bobby is entering every check, ATM purchase, along with breaking down each/every receipt on any credit card purchases for tax purposes right now. Bobby has been entering it into a computer program now for many, many, hours so a summary report can be printed out/generated, so that precious summary data can then be deciphered and then put/transferred into/entered into another separate IRS program for proper accounting functions and payment of federal and state taxes.

          Combined nearly 70 hours will be required along with extra ink cartridges and several trees will be cut down to comply with this pencil neck bullshit.. 🙁

          Have to go dig for those receipts from home depot somewhere in my work truck right now..honey do you have that receipt..I need it? Didn't we buy a coffee maker for the office?

          Oh man here comes a tsunami..run!

          Honey grab that tax crap in that box over there.. and leave the baby.

    • unincredulous unincredulous

      We'd make a great couple, Rose. You ignore the lawn and I'll ignore the dishes.

      That was a good movie. Good survival tips:Oone man can remove 20 cubic meters of soil in 3.2 seconds when sick of disco. (pathfinder) Lesson: never leave home without disco.

  • Veteran's Today Not Doing Justice to Radiation Reporting
    Sheesh! I had a long detailed response and lost it.

    Simple version, Veterans today is presenting total gamma from very sensitive gamma detectors in a total of 8 ranges, this will always be higher than the CPM from a simple Geiger.

    But there mistake is trying to compare the CPM from a Gamma Scint, to the CPM from a standard Geiger Counter. The only comparison that can be generally stated is that the Gamma Scint will be way higher.

    The problem comes up when people try to compare a Gamma Scint to a "Safety Table" such as the one I produced.
    – See more at: http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.com/2015/10/veterans-today-not-doing-justice-to.html#sthash.p0Fsq1Yp.dpuf

  • dunkilo

    I have invented freeze dried water!!Think of all the weight saved in space travel!All you do is open the pack and add water and shake!
    water…..mmmmmmmm I will get back to yall on that.:/

  • wearethefilter wearethefilter


    Sorry if this has been posted.

    "The Blob" pops his head up in this article. Maybe I should make a Blob toy quick and cash in but that might infringe on a movie or two.

  • Heart of the Rose Heart of the Rose

    I lost your post about putting off the chores ..DID.
    Bonding through procrastination always a plus.
    An unabashed flirt and a hopeless romantic.
    Ya ..we're quite a couple.

    The Sunday night jam.. Dream well ..DID.
    Dream well ..Enenews..

    Tell Me If You Still Care – SOS Band


    • DUDe DisasterInterpretationDissorder

      Dear Heart.. Thank You ! I'm caught totally ofguard with this
      post..i was not expecting you to still be interested in me
      personally..i was convinced of the opposite..i was sure you cut me
      loose..despising me..for quit some time now.. lately i'm just trying
      , when i have enough words to say something , to "stil standing
      beside you" "working togheter".. still wanting to be the bigger man..hoping i would not sink below the level of a
      somewhere on the net appreciated but strange and unpredictable friend/spirit..and out of principle..and also
      bounded by our mutual enemy/problem..and because i still care..

      ..insecure i am..sensitive to every possible pattern that can be
      fabricated from all the comments here.. "sharing does not
      strenghtening me" gave me a nice cut after trying to say something usefull..been many like that..
      being vulnerable/caring with all my flaws became too painfull..now i'm not sure anymore if it was ever your intent..but very often your post's are difficult to read or decipher with many sublevels..and in my insecurity i probably end up totally wrong about the message being negative about me..
      but even with that selfknowledge..it still is my experience..you (but also everybody i care about)
      sure can demand what i can't deliver..when brushing "reflective" and then lash out..those are pattern's staring at me from the screen..what can i say or do..


      • DUDe DisasterInterpretationDissorder

        A while ago now..when waking up..my subconscience whispered to

        me .."send me a bouqet of roses"..

        Initially i thought..message from my intuition..if i manage to do

        that somehow.. find that bouqet to send..reconnection could maybe

        occur..be on Your caring side again..

        a time passed thinking about it..then i went searching and find that

        e-bouqet on youtube..it hit and crushed me like a train..sealing my

        fate..there was already a name tag on that bouqet..it was adressed

        at ME..


        PS: i did never heard that song before..or knew it existed..

        PS2 : to explain how sensitive i'm , how easy to reinforce my sense of worthlessness/hopelessness ..
        Some good folk who i'm also a bit symphatetic to and therefor to his opinion recently made a comment about John Lennon not being a good person , but therefore capable of understanding humanity so well..

        Well..i had an avatar of John..and i sure do exhibit all the flaws of humanity too and use my selfknowledge to see the world..

        That's enough for me to experience it as a fingerpointing..i had to log out for a day..

        PS3 : it means alot to me that you recently stopped avoiding posting in the same space as me..i want you to know that..i'm thankfull.. (to others too) , if y'all only knew..


        • DUDe DisasterInterpretationDissorder

          PS4 : let me crack the inside joke between me myself and i lol about how i managed to stay alone in this life..

          " i'm so ugly in and outside that you have to be a pervert to be interested in me..and i don't like pervert's that kind of depraved lolol.."

          PS5 : I found your post about depression and car-less painfull ankles too many day's late , and was not willing to invite some more cutting..imagined/selfinflicted or not..that combination kept me silent..

          PS6 : I suck at flirting..i shot already all the musical gunpowder i had..and i have no complimentgenerator like other people seem to have for those times..but that does not say anything about being in my special place or not..that's difficult without ever meeting in person/flesh and be able to talk or explain normally..without that..its all pretty exhausting..and that's what wins in the end at my side it seems..

          PS7 : I still do care alot about your opinion of me..but i'm also scared of you..the two are related in magnitude..

          PS8 : Exposing myself in public is painfull as vivisection plain and simple.. a lot less when i'm floating on anger aka ranting to the world as a whole..

          PS9 : quite a couple..i guess your on to something to put it mildly lolol..you being extravert, succesfull and secure and all..and me..lolol

          PS10 : i hope this post qualifies as an answer..my faraway special person..

  • You had me at Dream on…

    Lets fly off in a jet powered SOS airship and spread the news


    Maybe people will wake up if they see a blimp with that message on it flying overhead…

  • If the jet powered airship plan does not work out, there is always this..

    backup plan…

    sos band- dont stop the musik

    The earthship may be sinking, but we can still party on!

  • It's ok to party in the daytime too… and hit the hay early.

    The Gap Band – You Dropped A Bomb On Me

    A Bombs all over the place…

  • Heart of the Rose Heart of the Rose

    I see that we have a new story…sigh.
    Just when I was going to torture, DID, with a torch song.

    Regina Belle – Make It Like It Was (Live 1990)


    How are we going to make this world like it was?

  • demise demise

    "world’s second-worst nuclear" Who are they kidding. What can possible make a triple complete meltdown #2?

    The world is full of nuts and flakes.

  • celestinainvestment


    Are you tired of Seeking Loans and Mortgages, have you been turned down constantly By your banks and other Financial Institutions or micro finance scheme. This is to let you know with 100% guarantee that we Offer loans ranging from $ 5,000 to $ 500,000,000 at 3% interest rate per Month. We give out LOANS for developing business a competitive edge/business expansion.

    Be rest assure that We are certified, trustworthy, reliable, efficient, Fast and dynamic. and a co-operate financier for real estate and any kinds of business financing, we give out long term loan for 6 Month to 30 years maximum and all interest rate and calculate and allow to be pay annually.

    We offer the following kinds of loans and many more; We offer the following loans to individuals-

    *Personal Loans
    *Commercial Loans
    *Investments Loans
    *Development Loans
    *Consolidation Loans
    *Student Loans
    *Car Loans
    *Mortgage Loans
    *Acquisition Loans
    *Construction loans

    Business Loans And many More: If you are highly interested in our loan offer, kindly contact us via our e-mail id below. ( celestinainvestment1@gmail.com )

    Mrs. Celestina

  • susi21

    Thank you for sharing of information, I am very pleased with the content of your article is very useful and I wait for the next article to update the information again. http://obatmaag.bestagaric.com/

  • <a href="http://obatbatuk.bestagaric.org/&quot; rel="external">OBAT BATUK</a>
    <a href="http://obatbatuk.bestagaric.com/&quot; rel="external">OBAT BATUK</a>
    <a href="http://obatbatuk.bestagaric.net/&quot; rel="external">OBAT BATUK</a>
    <a href="http://obatbatuk.best-agaric.net/&quot; rel="external">OBAT BATUK</a>
    <a href="http://obatbatuk.agaricpro.info/&quot; rel="external">OBAT BATUK</a>

  • susi21

    Gejala Storoke ringan dan cara menanganinya secara alami harus diperhatikan selalu secara serius , karena saat ini kasus penyakit stroke banyak terjadi dikalangan masyarakat dari mulai stroke ringan hingga stroke berat.
    Meski yang dialami masih gejala stroke ringan tapi penanganannya harus secara tepat karena bisa berakibat fatal jika tidak diatasi dengan obat stroke yang ampuh. Sebelum kita membahas lebih lanjut mengenai pengobatan stroke, maka kita harus mempelajari dulu tentang apa itu penyakit stroke, penyebab penyakit stroke, gejala stroke,
    serta bahaya apa yang bisa muncul? Setelah itu baru kita bisa memilih obat stroke yang tepat yang akan kita gunakan.
    Info lebih lanjut Visit : http://gejalastroke.tasikstore.com/

  • Gejala Hernia, penyakit hernia terjadi karena adanya isi rongga tubuh keluar dan dapat menyebkan tonjolan pada daerah tempat mereka biasa nya terkandung. Gejala hernia memiliki kemungkinan asimptomatik ( tidak mengasilkan gejala )hampir semua jenis ataupun gejala hernia memiliki potensi resiko memotong aliran suplai darah. Yaitu keadaan dimana ketika tonjolan dari (gejala hernia) keluar dapat menyebabkan tekanan yang cukup sehingga pembuluh darah pada lokasi anatomis yang terkena hernia menjadi terbatas suplai darah nya bahkan pada kondisi yang gawat suplai darah tersebut akan terputus.

    Oleh sebab itu penyakit hernia banyak dialami oleh pria, namun ada beberapa kasus yang menimpa wanita. Penyakit hernia tidak memandang usia. Semua usia bisa terserang penyakit hernia ini. Penyakit hernia ditandai dengan usus yang menurun lewat lubang locus minoris. Jika ada suatu tekanan yang besar, maka biasanya usus ini akan keluar lewat lubang tadi. Dan jika hal ini terus dibiarkan maka akan menimbulkan suatu hal yang berbahaya karena usus ini akan menurun dan akan terperangkap atau terjepit sampai mati dan bisa menimbulkan suatu masalah yang besar.

    website kami: http://gejalahernia.agaricpro.net/, http://gejalahernia.agaricpro.biz/,

  • Types of music differ in the types of neurological stimulation they evoke. For example, classical music has been found to cause comfort and relaxation while rock music may lead to discomfort. Music may achieve its therapeutic effects in part by elevating the pain threshold.

  • I have been previously wondering what are the results if i fall short my own dissertation I am aware I am permitted to fall short 60 college credits nevertheless I don't believe that also includes this dissertation.

  • This is a difficult cycle to break out of. When one faction gains power, it feels compelled to do unto the other faction before the other faction can do unto it … http://www.ahlinyaobatherbal.com/eye-care-softgel-green-world/

  • Decent post. I was checking continually this online journal and I'm inspired! To a great degree helpful data extraordinarily the last part I administer to such data a considerable measure. I was looking for this sure data for quite a while. Much obliged to you and good fortunes.

  • I found that they did not either support paging the way I wanted, or did not provide highly flexible theme support, so I decided to give it a shot myself. http://www.ahlinyaobatherbal.com/pengobatan-alternatif-kista-ginjal/

You must be logged in to post a comment.