Published: September 19th, 2011 at 1:19 pm ET
|
SOURCE: Digital Globe
Japanese Researcher: Recriticality in July and August? (UPDATED), EX-SKF, September 17, 2011:
[Emphasis Added]
Part from Shukan Playboy Japan (9/12/2011):
… Indeed, there are some inexplicable numbers reported on the air radiation levels by the government agencies. That is, a big rise in the radiation levels from late July to mid August. [...]
[Dr. Yoyo Hinuma of the University of California San Diego said,] “I think there was a recriticality in which the melted fuel started a chain reaction again in one of the reactors at Fukushima I Nuclear Power Plant, and that the largest amount of radioactive materials since April was released from the plant. It may have happened twice. The first was between July 28 and 31. The second was between August 19 and 21. That the large amount of radioactive materials were released can be clearly seen in the radiation survey data in Tokyo and Yokohama City, where it is suspected that the announced radiation levels are lower than the actual levels. So it’s a scientific fact.” [...]
“Further analyzing the data, we find that August saw a more definite rise than July. It may have been caused by the so-called “prompt criticality” which is bigger and lasts longer. The large amount of radioactive cesium and radioactive iodine released as the result may have reached the Tokyo Metropolitan area, raising the air radiation level”, says Dr. Hinuma. [...]
We’d have to admit that there is a high possibility that the recriticality happened this summer at Fukushima I Nuclear Power Plant, at least twice, and fresh radioactive materials are being released. [...]
Hinuma cites some examples
- Tokyo Metropolitan government data showed air radiation level on August 19 was 0.0865 microsievert/hour (maximum), 1.4 times as high as the previous day.
- On the same day, Yokohama City measured 0.051 microsievert/hour, the level last recorded in late March.
- Since the end of July high level of iodine-131 have started to show up in the “dehydrated sewer sludge” in Tokyo and Kanagawa Prefecture. Half life of iodine-131 is 8 days, so it couldn’t have come from the criticality happened in March.
- In August, radiation that exceeded the safety standard was detected in tens of sandboxes in the parks where children play, and the use of the sandboxes was prohibited until the sand was replaced. But before July, air radiation at most of these sandboxes measured lower than the safety standard.
Read the report here. (Please consider donating a couple dollars via the PayPal link on the EX-SKF site)
h/t Anonymous tip
Published: September 19th, 2011 at 1:19 pm ET
|
sending...
These numbers are not very high (0.0865 microsievert/hour, etc.). I am not pro-nuke. I am just saying.
Report Comment
If I remember right they measure the air quality many feet above people’s heads. When you go down to 4 feet and lower (kid hieghth) it really concentrates. .0865 microsievert/hour is a bad number then.
Report Comment
Those are rooftop radiation readings. They don’t reflect the situation as to where the radioactive contamination is, on the ground, where people are walking and living.
They do reflect new radiation falling down from the Fukushima NPP though. In this context, rooftop readings are appropriate here.
Report Comment
yes, rooftop readings are for the fresh incoming stuff.
you don’t want to contaminate the air reading by being too close to the ground.
the ground is a good place to get cumulative readings.
if one were to put a fresh cloth down onto a new plastic on a picnic-table, one could start a fresh cumulative square-yard sampling, and by crunching up the cloth into a clean plastic sandwich-baggie, one can preserve the square-yard sample and read it through the baggie. store in clean place.
the rooftop readings are a must if one is taking readings around their place; this will give you that-day’s-air-reading to compare with your cumulative ground-readings.
Report Comment
Ummm…I think these readings reflect a 1.4 times increase in radiation in air landing on Tokyo over the course of one specific 24-hour period (Aug 19). (Not, Bobby, in air landing on Fukushima NPP)
Report Comment
@officerdave that figure seems really low still… thats normal background radiation in london…i also take air samples as i ride my bike and find little differences in the readings due to height, however i shall try to get readings from the top of buildings.. if i get the chance… still seems a bit low considering the pollutants…
oh and this from the exskf link
http://twitpic.com/66brvb
the analysis only showed ceasium and not iodine (or at least under 10 beq/kg, i think?)…doesnt gibe with the recriticality theory/fact very well? scratches head!?
Report Comment
But considering what is in that radiation any of those numbers, low or not, are bad. Just like when they try and compare the radiation dose we’ll get is like an xray.. uhh i dont remember my last xray bombarding me with plutonium or uranium lol
Report Comment
And that link shows cesium to be over 63,000 becquerels per kilogram
Report Comment
Wasn’t there an article somewhere months ago on enenews that they also pick and choose what kind of isotopes they are measure thus making the “total” radiation level lower than if they measure for ALL radioactive isotopes?
Report Comment
“uhh i dont remember my last xray bombarding me with plutonium or uranium” here u there
but the analysis doesnt show iodine in any great number, the ceasium could well be from burning, building and demolition being redistributed….and there is evidence for recriticality according to Dr. Yoyo Hinuma…wonder where his spectroanalysis is? anybody?
Report Comment
@dave: I don’t remember that but that is what they’re doing. They’re not testing for things like potassium-40 which has a half life of millions of years. I dont know the exact number i’ve seen 4 million and ive seen one billion. But if you can get to the EPA testing page, which is hard to do i’ve only gotten to it once and i didnt bookmark it, they only test for like iodine 131 in water or milk and if you click on their results for iodine 131 it will say no data. It’s actually quite funny how blatantly they’re hiding this yet nobody wakes up. If we could get together like the Japanese did and protested that would be powerful. It would be even more powerful if we got people to drastically reduce their consumption, which will hurt the pockets of nuke plants. But we can’t get enough people to do that unless a huge event like a meltdown happens then ppl will wake up which is pretty fuckin sad that nobody comes together to prevent anything they only come together after it happens. pisses me off
Report Comment
You’re probably right Arclight. If you look at the live camera at night you can see an area lit up in the right corner. It’s a facility and I think that’s where they might be burning shit. It also could be Daini but I’ve looked at google earth a lot and it’s hard for me to determine if that could be Daini. The problem is we don’t know shit. We can only speculate as to what they’re doing. I don’t know of anybody here who has any background in this kind of stuff so it’s all our amateur opinions from what we read on the internet. We need to stop thinking, though, that every article and every number we read is true. I’ve been talking to a lot of really educated people about this, also my dad works at Aerospace and he works with scientists who say there isn’t a major threat. What I believe: Yes it is a threat. No it is not an extinction level event… not for North America at least. We are getting doses but sitting on the computer spreading the word isn’t doing anything. Most people don’t know how much Mother Earth gives to us. There are so many herbs and remedies for radiation detox, protection and rebuilding dna. Also, these people on youtube using their geiger counters have absolutely no idea what they’re doing or talking about. Their counters are already contaminated before making those videos. I’m not pro-nuke, far from it, but I’m just a little upset with everyone spreading unnecessary panic while the Japanese are going through absolute hell. Instead of…
Report Comment
saying how screwed we are why dont we take this opportunity to unite and take action against our nuclear industry? We all know how big of a threat it is yet people keep insisting on sending emails and all that bs. Think these people need us a hell of a lot more than we need them. What do they need most form us? money, so how do we take their money away? We drastically reduce our power consumption, which would take the whole nation to make a large enough impact to change anything… but that won’t happen unless a catastrophic event happens like in Japan, which is very frustrating
Report Comment
@stukncali i was thinking that the burning must be outside the heavily polluted zone or someone would have detected plutonium? the ceasium deposits seemed to have travelled further than the plutonium though! brain starting to hurt again lol…
Report Comment
@stukncali – Hi, it’s not just reduce consumption, which is a massive mindshift.
It’s also about being aware of where your money goes, your domestic energy supplier; brown or green. Your bank, nuclear or ethical.
Work locally, buy local food, put the music on and dance when you’re cold. Paint banners and put ‘em on your car, make leaflets and put ‘em in the library.
There is enough popular support yet it is disparate and marginalised, governments have taught us to ‘shut up and stay indoors’ – well bollocks to that!
We need to come together.
All of these are things we have control over.
We can move our money.
We can protest and communicate in a peaceful manner.
We can support our Green politicians, and get the word out.
This is a fight.
in a good way, for love, for sustainability, for everyone. We need to develop empathy and kindness and compassion for all. We are one.
We are warriors
Report Comment
http://enenews.com/a-sign-that-a-grave-contamination-is-in-progress-in-tokyo-2300-bqkg-of-radiation-detected-in-koto-ward
Article that says they are measure the air for radiation up way to high.
Parents urge Tokyo to rethink radiation monitoring, Japan Times, June 8, 2011:
A group of Tokyo parents filed a request Tuesday asking the metropolitan government to change the way it determines radiation levels in the capital after their own study found relatively high levels of contamination around Koto Ward. [...]
“This should be taken as a sign that a grave (contamination) is in progress in Tokyo,” Ayako Ishikawa, the leader of the group, said during a news conference.
The metropolitan government checks levels of radioactivity at an elevation of 18 meters in Shinjuku Ward, where the maximum hourly reading was about 0.06 microsievert on Tuesday. But Ishikawa insists such readings are unreliable and should be taken at about 1 meter above the ground. [...]
[Kobe University professor Tomoya Yamauchi], an expert on radiation physics, said high levels of contamination were detected in soil, especially around a plant in Koto Ward that produces sludge, an ingredient in cement, where the level reached 2,300 becquerels per kilogram [in late May]. [...]
Report Comment
@ officerdave thanks for that…
o.o6 mcsievert/hr reading.. interesting!
Report Comment
Anytime, Arcy!
Report Comment
arc,
the I131 was found in dried consolidated sewage samples; this is from an air reading on a rooftop in Tokyo. The article above gives a figure of just under 1 microsievert an hour, but the main point is the increase in radiation levels. If there is 0.0865 microsieverts an hour for 24 hours, tha’s 2.076 microsieverts day in the air way above Tokyo, 365 days a year, which 757.74 microsieverts/yr, so well under the health physics standard limit for members of the public of 1 millisievert per annum (although the risk factors involved even at that level are still debatable, partly because it says nothing about internal radionuclides).
However, I think there must be other questions we must ask of this and other readings like this: was it a sunny day or a rainy day? how fast was the wind blowing and from which direction? how long was the counting period? exactly how many meters above ground level was the measuring instrument? We must also ask, how important is an external gamma reading 300 meters above the ground on an easterly, windy clear day (possibly)? (Bureaucrat says to inferior: “quick, go take a reading!”)
If the nukers emphasize external gamma, it it much easier to make the probability of widespread internal contamination disappear.
I repeat a comment I made earlier: where are the March 2011 figures for I-131 in Japan’s cow milk? Why weren’t these ever in the news? What else are they hiding?
Also, I do not think we can trust official readings as far as…
Report Comment
(cont’d)
Also, I do not think we can trust official readings as far as we can spit. Sixty-six nuclear years of repeatedly proven deceptions and knowledge gaps should alert even the dullest of us, surely! So, analyze the reading by all means, but take it for what it is worth if it is an official government figure. There is almost nothing else a UCSD researcher could actually go by, I think.
Report Comment
you make some valid points! the methodology of the testing…time of day would be a factor too! thanxs!
Report Comment
Just reduce your consumption of electricity alone will sock their revenue ! OUCH !
Report Comment
oh shit listen to what chris busby has to say. this is how the japanese government will get out of compensation http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_fiWE9_SvT8&feature=feedu
also tomorrow im going to go hit up every library around here and see if i can some how get a legal case against tepco or the japanese government. been saying i was going to do that but ive been busy so tomorrow im getting to it
Report Comment
Dear reVivre
if you scroll down to bottom of article, it probably is showing a VIEW ALL COMMENTS. If you click that, all the comments will appear. Hope to see you there reVivre!!
POSTED this new article HERE
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/19/nuclear-power-protests-tokyo-japan_n_969385.html
Report Comment
So the Potrblog guy is St. Louis was right weeks ago. Using only his little bitty rad detector.
wtg – Potrblog!
Maybe now that someone from a University states it, some people might start to believe it.
Report Comment
Yes,…and the numbers of infant deaths, and elderly, sickly, spiked commensurately also!
My liver almost failed in July, late,…and then starting mid August on,…I have had terrible muscular/skeletal pain!
I have FELT the spikes-
Report Comment
lOOKEE HERE!
EPA chief on verge of quitting after Obama rejected pollution proposal
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/epa_air_rage_at_bam_HB4xP0FSqv2aCNQvzqaFCN#ixzz1YQKkMvZy
Report Comment
can we do anything about it?
http://signon.org/sign/increase-government-support.fb1?source=c.fb&r_by=548645
Report Comment
Thanks Gebby! I’ll post to HP!
Report Comment
2011.08.19 00:00-01:00 Lots of smoke or steam, the radiation (article above “The second was between August 19 and 21″) was clearly from burning nuclear waste.
http://www.youtube.com/user/fuku1long#p/u/768/Q0fxOGgR84E
Report Comment
I think the burning of nuclear waste is worse then radiation released by a meltdown as the hot smoke rises high into the air (within radiation particles) and the wind blows it all to USA and Europa..
Report Comment
Burning nuclear waste and melting reactors both release radioactive particles. The molten cores are extremely hot and hot steam and smoke will also carry the radioactive particles high and far.
I’m not sure if there is any difference between the particles from the waste and the corium lava.
I just want to avoid them if possible.
What’s your favorite particle? (Just joking)
Report Comment
Polonium
Report Comment
Why save lives when you can save money…
Report Comment
Uranium-238: why save lives when you can make weapons for free?
Report Comment
It’s occurred more than twice, here it is again fissioning as recently as 9/2/11. http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=nTEIn_sSlCw#!
No report on this one as of yet.
Report Comment
It looked to me that it was happening outside the containment vessel.
Report Comment
That’s because there is nothing left in the containment vessel for months already.
Report Comment
That’s a strange video because the intense light is coming from uphill from the reactor buildings, not from within them.
The effect of the timelapse video makes it hard to see the flickering of a flame, but it does vary quite a bit. The shadow on reactor 1 building is pretty steady in terms of location, so its not a moving source. The pylons to the rear are lit by the light, so its in front of those, and seems to radiate all around, unlike a working light which is usually well directed.
There is some sign of dark smoke among the passing fog. Wind direction is inland. Not good.
The source of light seems to be just uphill of and outside reactors 2 and 3. An unlikely direction for corium to travel, but maybe the contents of a spent fuel pond has slid out of one of the buildings?
It could be working lights, but it seems way too strong for that, and (since this is a pretty casual 9 to 5 work site with no deadlines to meet, it seems) its out side normal working hours.
My best guess is that they are having a bonfire, burning some stuff. But I can’t imagine what mass of flammable material they may have collected that would burn that big or that long.
Hard to understand. Any other guesses?
Report Comment
Do you think that the molting mass or China syndrome be pushing its way back out? Maybe taking the path of least resistance? Up instead of down? Or creating geysers from below ground? Radio Active Geysers – sounds like a tool Dr. Evil would use with his sharks with lasers.
Report Comment
In my opinion the bulk of reactor 1′s spent hot fuel (the core)Is currently resting embedded in the bedrock (roughly) 3 ft below the reactor. It is likely releasing atmospheric contamination via cracks in the concrete foundation on site, as well as the majority of contamination being distributed into the ocean via the water table.
I believe that the hot fuel is embedded in the bedrock and each and every earthquake and ground movement creates a down pour of coolant above; Creating even larger atmospheric releases. A combination of both resting coolant in the reactor, as well as saturated soil is the primary cause for atmospheric releases from the fuku 1 reactor.
In my opinion the fuel has some distance to travel before it becomes a candidate of an impending implosion. This is because the fuel is resting in the bedrock and not in the ground water pool below.
I also feel tepco knows this, and is simply unable to alter the situation. That is why we are seeing such large releases on dates corresponding with seismic activity. As well as why we are not hearing anything more on the events (china syndrome) taking place on site…
Report Comment
There is a great risk of an explosion in the event the fuel becomes(hyper-critical) should the fuel reach the ground water I feel the conditions for the situation will be met…
I feel tepco fully acknowledges this;
As well as all world nuclear powers…
Why they have failed to tell the citizens of japan Is typical. If they did there would be complete anarchy. The slinky is slowly creeping closer to the bottom stair…
Thus the ticking time bomb is ticking away, with no viable solution to diffuse it.
Report Comment
Any reading between 1ft up and 50,000 feet will show Low level radiation…
This is because you only can analyze ariel gamma radiation due to beta and alpha levels having too low of an emittance strength to register in open aerial monitoring…
We only detect gamma radiation using a gamma radiation detector. Which is high end (in comparison to the alpha and beta geiger counters you see in the videos)..
If a plutonium particle was in a glass of water, you would not detect it with a standard Geiger counter because the water would make the radiation impossible to detect in light of its sensory. Now if you breath that particle (thats another story).
The problem we are seeing in regard to this particular media release is that the particles, being emitted, are likely decay from plutonium and uranium. That is in no way should be in any comparison to normal background radiation.
So I would take this report very seriously, as the particles they are detecting are of obvious danger to human health. (not to be confused by the insignificance of the amount of radiation detected).
Emmy.
Report Comment
Here is another way of looking at it…
I can have a whole plate stemming from the top to the bottom coated in Alpha radiation… And put one piece of paper above it. Then placing a single sheet of paper, 99% of the material will not penetrate the piece of paper due to the alpha particles low level emittance strength…
Now I can do the same thing with beta for teh most part… Possibly with a sheet of 1/4 inch thick piece of plywood…
Now it would take lead sheeting to block gamma radiation…
That is how destructive Gamma radiation is…
Now these roof top sensory detect particles… Atomic particles… ATOMS…
To detect a single atom at any observation point; Leads me to believe that gamma radiation is the culprit.
This is very concerning…
We should be very frightful of these levels of radiation, showing up in our environment (the air we breath). Gamma radiation being the most destructive of the particles, is no laughing matter.
Report Comment
http://www.ndt-ed.org/EducationResources/CommunityCollege/Radiography/Physics/gamma.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiation#Ionizing_radiation
http://www.chacha.com/question/what-is-the-worst-type-of-radiation
Report Comment
http://www.bcm.edu/bodycomplab/Radprimer/radpenetration.htm
Report Comment
http://www.sprawls.org/ppmi2/RADPEN/
Report Comment
I’m at work but I gotta try this, I have mushrooms growing outside I want to try this with. I don’t know if it really works. I just found it on the web.
http://www.southerncompany.com/learningpower/pdf/How%20to%20See%20Radiation.pdf
Report Comment
I agree with Tacomagroove,…WAY too much MINIMIZATION going on! Some of ‘us’ are sounding like as long as it’s ‘just a little’,..well then,..O.K. That is again how the frog got cooked in the pan without his/her consent!
Report Comment
Taco – you’re right. I’ll screen my comments, it is no laughing matter.
Report Comment
So basically this article states:
Japan still being bombarded by fresh fission releases from reactors which obviously have breached all containment…
With no end in sight (be prepared for nuclear winter)…
SO I warn you all again…
Just wait until the winter comes, and trillions of these particles attach themselves to the water molecules in the cloud layer…
Falling to ground level in masse…
Then tell me what your puny beta and alpha detecting geiger counters are showing…
Tell me how you and yours health’s are deteriorating constantly in the blanketing of poison in your yards…
Cause honestly I would hate to tell you, the worst is over…
The worst has just begun…
The needle rain will eventually become atomic blips of murder and rain down on humanity…
But what do I know… Right>>?
Report Comment
So I too live in Washington State.
In Bellingham, near the border and the bay.
What are your plans Tacoma?
Have you bought a gas mask yet for walking outdoors?
Purchased disposable raingear?
Blocked off a de-contamination room in your home?
Installed those Hepa filters?
Put in a reverse osmosos system for your water?
Changed your diet?
Bought a green house?
Going on an extended fast?
I am curious as to what you would suggest.
If it really gets as bad as you predict, I have to ask myself, Do I want to die quickly or more slooowwwly?
I am not attacking you, I truly wish to know, what do you suggest?
Report Comment
I am fully prepared for “what I feel” is “coming”…
I can say: that I do not advise you to share your list of supplies or plans with others… (Especially in the same vicinity as your own)…
In fact I would keep that information hidden from everyone you know…
I do not advise anyone to do anything aside from following their own intuition…
My only advice would be to read as much as you can. Take that information, and do whats best for you and yours… In your own opinion: Maybe the radiation is harmless, (sarcasm); Maybe its not;…
Thats not for me to tell you, Its for you to decide.
(its simply you V.S., your own opinion);
In my opinion: Knowledge is mankind’s most useful tool…
Read everything and everyone’s take on the situation online and prepare yourselves for what “you” feel is to “come”…
Put your trust in only those that you feel are worthy of your trust.
Below I enclose a link to one of many free online nuclear survival guides. I thought you might find this guide a helpful start in your quest for the answers that you seek;
Best wishes to you and yours…
Emmy.
http://www.ki4u.com/guide.htm
Report Comment
You know that might be a good business for someone…”Radiation Proofing Your Home.”
There are people who need help with this. Even though, it is impossible to totally keep the radiation out, these things might help.
Report Comment
Hi Tacomagroove
As much as I want to say you are wrong, and I really hope you are.
I can see this getting a whole lot worse.
Report Comment
Tacoma and Windsolar
I honestly cannot say I know how much worse it can get.
Will people get symptoms of radiation sickness or will they “just” lose 10 plus years of their lives?
I just don’t know what levels of releases we’re talking about and what their effects might be.
I think the people who really understand that are the people who really studied Chernobyl and the other disasters.
I am not disagreeing with either of you.
I JUST WANT TO GET SOME UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT THE RISKS ARE before I disrupt my family and friends further.
I feel compelled to warn people but since they don’t want to know I don’t want to press on unless they are facing really imminent risk (beyond losing years of their lives at this point because I think they get that)
Confused…
Report Comment
Majia.
I will never regret telling people to prepare to a level that suites their own personal comfort.
I have my opinions, and they have their own…
However I would truly regret not telling everyone I know, as to what I feel is actually taking place….
In short, I feel Ive never felt I was going beyond the realm of possibility.
It is only your opinion that will suite you and yours levels of preparedness. Never push too far, but never give up pushing…
Emmy.
Report Comment
Tacoma
You know as I do that it takes A LOT to break through people’s COMPLACENCY.
I think unless I tell people to “take shelter,” which I have before, they will not listen to me.
I told them to take shelter after some very bad events in the summer-like major flames at the site on the webcam.
They thought I was crazy…
Report Comment
Hi majia,
I don’t know either how bad this will get.
I just don’t see how this can be healthy.
How long and how much layers can we take of this, I don’t know?
Report Comment
“I don’t know either how bad this will get.
I just don’t see how this can be healthy”
well put maja!
Report Comment
if you cough up, spit not swallow.
Report Comment
ahh not nice…. mid pizza
Report Comment
dully noted
Thanks for the contribution…
Report Comment
This very much confirms, I think, what those of us who have been reading about this horror since Day 1 have been saying, all in our roundabout ways. Some have focused in the I131 levels, others on steam releases, others on temp gauges or on gieger readings from around Tokyo. Between ourselves as a more or less “lay” community, (aside from the learned scientists who occasionally join our discussions), I think over the last few weeks we worked out a lot of what Dr. Yoyo Hinuma of USCD has given scientific credibility to. We owe this brave man a debt. In fact, he should hire a body guard immediately.
Report Comment
Help needed with becquerel wikipedia article!! Currently it has pronuker propaganda written all over it. Listen:
“Therefore, a sample radioactive decay rate is stated with a timestamp for short-lived isotopes, sometimes after adjustment to some specific date of interest (in the past or in the future). For example, one might quote a ten-day adjusted figure, that is, the amount of radioactivity that will still be present ten days in the future. This can de-emphasize short-lived isotopes.[citation needed] The average human body has 4400 becquerels from decaying potassium-40, which is a naturally-occurring isotope of potassium.”
There is an overt emphasis on “de-emphasizing” short-lived isotopes (usually reserved for training in-house propagandists), and there is an immediate switch in the rhetoric into “naturally-occurring” isotopes, something pronuker propagandists must learn in the cradle. These elements are both clear red flags of pronuker propaganda, and they have been since the 1950s. The attempt at scientific obfiscation is also obvious. For example, the author goes on to explain becquerel as “inverse second, s−1″ in a WIKIPEDIA article for general consumption! Instead of the usual relative measurement given, the “half-life,” the author suggests we would all be bettter off understanding it in “ten-day adjusted figures,” or “the amount that will still be there ten days into the future. These abstract mathematical geniuses actually believe that radiation…
Report Comment
Excellent analysis!
Report Comment
always decreases through decay, and never has unanticipated INCREASES. (Fantasy:) “Recently, the CEO of TEPCO and the Prime Minister of Japan issued a joint statement saying ‘we don’t know the amount of radiation that will be there ten days from now becauuse we don’t know where the reactors are and we don’t know when they might go critical again, as they did in July and August.” Signed, TEPCOJAPAN, INC
(for once telling the truth)
THE REAL JAPAN: It will take MORE than 60,000 of you, BUT YOU WILL WIN!
Report Comment
So now what? The government keeps lying, citizens keep working frantically to replace the sand in their sandboxes, it keeps getting contaminated, they keeping replacing it?? How LONG can they keep lying before the data overwhelmingly expose them?!?
Report Comment
I think this is a new Chris Busby video, or, I haven’t seen it before…
http://beforeitsnews.com/story/1119/129/Professor_Christopher_Busby_Urgent_info_Japan_Fukushima_radiation_what_is_being_done.html
Report Comment
Thanks majia! I believe this is recent. It says date of Sept 19th.
Report Comment
Thanks from me too! I like the way Busby addresses the problem!
Report Comment
If some of you think it’s good to keep windows closed then your wrong. Radiation (also from nature) will build up in your home so venting is important. Best is to open a window on the not wind site of your home. As said above if you cough up, spit not swallow because radiation is filtered out of the lungs through slime. Stay out of wind and rain. Eat healthy.
Report Comment