Video: Over 60 Bq/kg of radioactive cesium in dried plums OUTSIDE Fukushima Prefecture

Published: May 31st, 2013 at 2:07 pm ET
By
Email Article Email Article
47 comments


Source: MIRMC REPORT 25
Published by: guardianofmiyagi
Date: May 29, 2013

60 Bq/Kg of Radioactive Cesium NOW ON SALE in Miyagi ( Store, COOP Miyagi ) Contamination Level of UMEBOSHI [Japanese salt plums] from Kakuda City, Miyagi

  • Cs-134: 21.95 Bq/kg
  • Cs-137: 38.17 Bq/kg

Watch the video here

Published: May 31st, 2013 at 2:07 pm ET
By
Email Article Email Article
47 comments

Related Posts

  1. Report: Over 200,000 Bq/kg of radioactive cesium in dust from outside Fukushima Prefecture January 6, 2013
  2. ‘First Time’: Radioactive rice with more than double gov’t cesium limit found outside Fukushima Prefecture January 10, 2013
  3. TV: 70% of children tested are contaminated with radioactive cesium — All of them from outside Fukushima Prefecture (VIDEO) October 3, 2013
  4. Study: Radioactive cesium in 25 of 26 food samples from Fukushima prefecture January 3, 2013
  5. “They Know All”: Over 5,000,000 Bq/m² of Cesium-137 in Fukushima City (VIDEO) February 16, 2013

47 comments to Video: Over 60 Bq/kg of radioactive cesium in dried plums OUTSIDE Fukushima Prefecture

  • cbuchner1

    60 Bq/kg isn't really a lot.


    Report comment

    • Lion76 Lion76

      The large quantities of cesium-137 produced during fission events pose a persistent hazard. Its half-life of about 30 years is long enough that objects and regions contaminated by cesium-137 remain dangerous to humans for a generation or more, but it is short enough to ensure that even relatively small quantities of cesium-137 release dangerous doses of radiation (its specific radioactivity is 3.2 × 1012 Bq/g). [2-4]

      Along with its intermediate half-life, a combination of high-energy radioactivity and chemical reactivity makes cesium-137 a particularly dangerous fission product. Cesium-137 undergoes high-energy beta decay, primarily to an excited nuclear isomer of Barium 137, which in turn undergoes gamma decay with a half-life of about 150 seconds. [4] The energies of both the beta decay of cesium-137 and the subsequent gamma decay of the excited barium 137 are 512 keV and 662 keV, respectively. [4] In addition, cesium is much more chemically reactive than many of the transition metal fission products. As a group 1 alkaline metal, elemental cesium is quite electropositive, and is readily oxidized by water, forming highly soluble Cs+. [5] For this reason, elemental cesium-137 may contaminate large volumes of water during nuclear accidents, which are difficult to contain or process. [6]

      http://large.stanford.edu/courses/2012/ph241/wessells1/


      Report comment

      • That all sounds good, but what about bio accumulation?

        Every step up the food chain, the radiation amount concentrates and increases further.

        Low Level Nuclear Radiation In Food And Water
        http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/p/low-level-nuclear-radiation-in-food-and.html

        Plutonium And Cesium Bio-Concentrates 26,000 Times In Ocean Algae, Up To 5,570,000 Bq/Kg in Land Algae; via @AGreenRoad
        http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2013/04/plutonium-and-cesium-bio-concentrates.html

        Bottom line, what the authorities may claim is 'safe' for adults, may be deadly for children or a fetus, which is 2,000 times more sensitive to the same dose.

        The key question is; how much radiation is bioaccumulating from what is taken in? Is that amount going to exceed 40 Bq/kg? If yes, it means lesions in the organs and glands and heart issues as well, resulting in death eventually.

        50 Bq/kg seems to be the threshold for children for obvious toxic and deadly body signs to appear, according to Russian researcher who was jailed for going public with this information..


        Report comment

    • Jay

      … it takes only one cancerous cell to start a tumor … let's stop playing with numbers , let's concentrate on how to minimize them .


      Report comment

  • cbuchner1

    source: http://www.lgl.bayern.de/lebensmittel/chemie/kontaminanten/radioaktivitaet/

    Natural levels of radioactivity:

    40-60 Bq/l in Milk
    30-140 Bq/kg in pork
    Veggies and fruit 30-150

    of course those numbers are very location specific. Figures cited are for Bavaria, germany.

    Thresholds (i.e. not safe to circulate or consume) in the EU: 370 Bq/kg in milk and baby products, 600 Bq/kg in anything elsse.


    Report comment

  • cbuchner1

    What I am trying to point out here is that this web site occasionally exaggerates the alarmist tone.

    There are definitely bigger radiation-induced food safety issues in Japan than 60 Bq/kg in plums. And mind you these plums already had their water content removed, so that would have concentrated the radiation from some much lower levels originally present in the fresh fruit.


    Report comment

  • Lion76 Lion76

    In 2002, sixteen years (about one half of a cesium 137 half life) after the Chernobyl disaster, a 4,000 km2 area still contained too much cesium-137 to be inhabited or used for agricultural purposes.

    A much smaller nuclear accident involving cesium-137 occurred in Goiânia, Brazil, in 1987. A thorough account of the entire affair was published by the International Atomic Energy Agency in 1988. [8] The accident was initiated when two men who were looking for old equipment to sell for scrap broke in to an abandoned medical clinic. There, they found a radiation therapy device left behind when the clinic closed. Upon ripping apart the device, the men discovered about 30 g of 137CsCl. After several people involved with the looting of the device and the release of the 137CsCl fell morbidly ill with radiation sickness, Brazilian authorities declared a local state of emergency, and within days, the vast majority of the cesium-137 had been contained. In contrast to the large disaster at Chernobyl, only a few people were killed or sickened by cesium-137 in Goiânia. Without the prompt and well-executed response of the Brazilian government, this incident could have harmed many more people. The Goiânia incident shows that failure to properly account for seemingly small quantities of cesium-137 can be deadly. http://large.stanford.edu/courses/2012/ph241/wessells1/


    Report comment

  • pinksailmatt pinksailmatt

    Newest from BBC…there will be NO rise in cancer from Fukushima.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-22737548


    Report comment

  • haizedustrium-1234 haizedustrium-1234

    Odorless, colourless, motionless, timeless – killing me softly ready, steady, go

    The theory is this – surface 2 trees, plums , plumes whatsoever a day won’t show how much is deteriorating right now, yes, right I mean right now

    2 furly rodents a day
    2 natural glows a day
    2 radiation flashes a say
    2 cm of melts a day
    1300000000000000000 injections
    2 emitions
    2 MSM’s a day
    2 solutions a day
    2 million imf a say
    2 evacuees a day
    2 meals a day
    2 natural deaths a say
    2 times the …….. limit per day

    0 firma a day
    Off scale
    Silence please
    Quiet


    Report comment

  • haizedustrium-1234 haizedustrium-1234

    typo d s
    typo I e
    type s e
    type I d


    Report comment

  • haizedustrium-1234 haizedustrium-1234

    Type e “o”
    Type o d
    Type s o
    Type o I
    Type I s
    Type n o


    Report comment

  • TheBigPicture TheBigPicture

    Nuclear contaminates the earth. And all for nothing.


    Report comment

  • obewanspeaks obewanspeaks

    Plums…yuummy!

    http://www.jcancer.jp/english/cancerinjapan/

    Concentrate on the red line and then guess how Japan is fairing these days and how they will fair in the very near future. This technology is only 60 years old and it precedes the "red line".

    There will be no future for the Japanese people and now its just a waiting game at best to see who dies before the rest.

    Someone still thinks the US broke away from England…not hardly. Who was the first country that got the plans for this nuclear technology? Who was it created for? Gee me thinks it must have been the the Queen?

    If you do not have cancer yet, trust me, its right around the corner waiting for you to arrive.

    What is any Nuclear Disaster and its ramifications?
    http://www.ufppc.org/us-a-world-news-mainmenu-35/9836/

    Your being exterminated slowly and some might call this behavior progress, while others might call this behavior practiced eugenics.
    http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2003/pr27/en/


    Report comment

    • HoTaters

      obewan, I think your assertions have validity. Especially have to wonder about behavior practiced eugenics. All you have to do is to look at guys like David Rockefeller or Henry Kissinger to understand what it might look like in practice.


      Report comment

  • Sol Man

    With the radionuclides, gmo, pesticides, herbicides, tainted drugs, voc's, and such, the incrementalism will get everybody.
    TPTB excel in unsound thinking while we all wait for our cancers.


    Report comment

  • obewanspeaks obewanspeaks

    The operating Zeitgeist is very large and growing bigger everyday.

    Very little being shared by any of our controllers is the truth in context and the current conspired and created information control mechanisms are paramount in order to keep the world at large unaware of these truths purposefully being hidden.

    If there exists such a thing as evil… then this earth is currently being draped in its glory.


    Report comment

  • Heart of the Rose Heart of the Rose

    Well said..obewan..TPTB have chosen..
    Note..how quiet it is in the MSM.
    The Nuclear cabal would rather print nothing at all now..knowing the opposition has response.
    Look at the news in general…it's almost sanitized.

    Still..in all their 'glory' they are short-sighted and small.
    Truth will prevail.
    Even if self-evident in horror..because in the psychopathy of our controllers… they forgot to include themselves as victims.


    Report comment

  • nuknomore nuknomore

    I was stunned to hear that Japan refused shipment of GMO wheat from America..
    Is it a pretense ? A front?
    It seems that GMO wheat is preferable to radioactive food they are eating now~!.


    Report comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.