Film: World Health Organization beholden to nuclear interests — Physician: “Like having Dracula guard the blood bank” (VIDEOS)

Published: February 28th, 2013 at 1:14 pm ET


(In light of today’s news from the WHO this report from last May is being reposted)

‘Nuclear Controversies’, an informative video on the health effects from Chernobyl and the relationship between the International Atomic Energy Agency and the World Health Organization:

  • 2:30 – Agreement between IAEA and WHO – WHO cannot research health effects of radiation or effects of nuclear accidents if IAEA does not agree
  • 7:00 – Former head of WHO admits they answer to IAEA
  • 30:50 – UN refutes internal radiation; Norman Gentner, Secretary of UN UNSCEAR (United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation), ~2001 (See Gentner speak at 13:55 — No increase in leukemia, even among liquidators)
  • 34:15 – Claims internal or external it makes no difference

See also: [intlink id=”impossibly-high-whos-initial-report-estimated-tokyo-osaka-infants-thyroid-dose-between-10-100-millisieverts-1-full-sievert-namie” type=”post”]{{empty}}[/intlink]

IAEA Exposed on Japan TV before Fukushima:

Three years ago, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)’s research mission visited the contaminated areas. Dr. Shigematsu [Japanese], chairman of the mission, announced “there are no health damages among the residents.” […]

Mr. Hirokawa, after looking at your video, I wonder what it was that IAEA announced there were no health damages among the residents. […]

The local people believed a fair research would be done, because IAEA is an agency of the United Nations and a medical scientist from Hiroshima would lead the research. So, they were astounded that the mission had announced the areas were safe.

But, didn’t the mission actually see the situation there?

Well, according to the local doctors, the mission members didn’t enter the heavily-contaminated areas.

Besides, they brought their food, sourced from far away, and didn’t eat anything local.

Still, they declared it’s safe. No wonder the local people are infuriated.

If the mission found local food too dangerous to eat, they should have said it’s dangerous.

The very credibility of the International Atomic Energy Agency is seriously challenged, isn’t it?

Yes. I hear that when the nuclear industry of the former USSR started to do business with the nuclear industry of the US, they probably agreed that downplaying the damages by the accident would be beneficial for both sides.

More on the IAEA: [intlink id=”bloomberg-exposes-conflicted-iaea-safety-division-is-a-marketing-channel-for-nuclear-technology-reveals-secret-us-docs” type=”post”]{{empty}}[/intlink]

“Like having Dracula guard the blood bank”: Watch the video here

Published: February 28th, 2013 at 1:14 pm ET


Related Posts

  1. “Shameless”: New World Health Organization report shockingly downplays health risks after Fukushima — “WHO and other organisations must stop hiding the impact” February 28, 2013
  2. National Geographic: Fukushima considered world’s worst nuclear accident — Physician: Fukushima remains a “global health concern” — Kaku: “It’s so bad, they don’t even have a picture of melted core… the agony is unending” (VIDEO) April 14, 2014
  3. Gov’t Report: Urgent that effects of radiation on human health be reduced — Experts need to investigate residents with ‘negative health effects’ — ‘Fallout is worrying people not only in Japan but also around the world’ May 29, 2012
  4. Physician: Does Fukushima fallout explain rise in blood clots? — Circulatory diseases one of most widespread consequences after Chernobyl October 27, 2011
  5. TV: Gov’t reports large spike in health problems for Fukushima nuclear workers — 400% of levels seen previously — Unhealthy white blood cell counts (VIDEO) September 21, 2013

10 comments to Film: World Health Organization beholden to nuclear interests — Physician: “Like having Dracula guard the blood bank” (VIDEOS)

  • Time Is Short Time Is Short

    Like international bankers such as Goldman-Sachs filling the world's top governmental finance posts? Or worldwide energy and nuclear regulatory posts going to people from the nuclear industry?

    Oh, sorry, off topic.

    • WindorSolarPlease

      Hi Time Is Short

      It's not really OT..It was a good example…Plus they act like they are related. They back each other up and finance each other.

      Agree with you Time Is Short 100 plus % .

      • andagi andagi

        Dear Folks,
        I believe, last time I checked, WHO dictates ICD9 and ICDI0 worldwide medical billing codes …hmmmmm.
        Keep reading, sharing, posting ENENews… Generating worldwide change 24/7!

  • ion jean ion jean

    Can we now accept the fact that organized crime became the government?

    If we allow the corruption to continue we will shortchange the next generation

    Nothing is sacred…Everything needs revamping.

    • Time Is Short Time Is Short

      I wouldn't want to be the next generation, ij. And certainly not the generation after that.

      There is no stopping this.

      • andagi andagi

        Dear Time Is Short,
        I have limited internet access. If you can, please post again Dr. Sagan's 'The Great Bamboozle' for newcomers?
        Mahalo Nui Loa & Aloha.

  • TheBigPicture TheBigPicture

    Nuclear is dangerous, unneeded, and must be outlawed.

    • WindorSolarPlease

      Hi TheBigPicture

      Totally Agree…Since these plants have been proven they are dangerous, they can wipe out millions of people and wreck our environment. I don't know why they are still legal to build and why they are still around?