Published: February 28th, 2013 at 1:14 pm ET
|
(In light of today’s news from the WHO this report from last May is being reposted)
‘Nuclear Controversies’, an informative video on the health effects from Chernobyl and the relationship between the International Atomic Energy Agency and the World Health Organization:
- 2:30 – Agreement between IAEA and WHO – WHO cannot research health effects of radiation or effects of nuclear accidents if IAEA does not agree
- 7:00 – Former head of WHO admits they answer to IAEA
- 30:50 – UN refutes internal radiation; Norman Gentner, Secretary of UN UNSCEAR (United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation), ~2001 (See Gentner speak at 13:55 — No increase in leukemia, even among liquidators)
- 34:15 – Claims internal or external it makes no difference
See also: "Impossibly High": WHO's initial report estimated Tokyo AND Osaka infant thyroid dose at 10 to 100 millisieverts -- Up to 1 full sievert in Namie
IAEA Exposed on Japan TV before Fukushima:
Three years ago, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)’s research mission visited the contaminated areas. Dr. Shigematsu [Japanese], chairman of the mission, announced “there are no health damages among the residents.” [...]
Mr. Hirokawa, after looking at your video, I wonder what it was that IAEA announced there were no health damages among the residents. [...]
The local people believed a fair research would be done, because IAEA is an agency of the United Nations and a medical scientist from Hiroshima would lead the research. So, they were astounded that the mission had announced the areas were safe.
But, didn’t the mission actually see the situation there?
Well, according to the local doctors, the mission members didn’t enter the heavily-contaminated areas.
Besides, they brought their food, sourced from far away, and didn’t eat anything local.
Still, they declared it’s safe. No wonder the local people are infuriated.
If the mission found local food too dangerous to eat, they should have said it’s dangerous.
The very credibility of the International Atomic Energy Agency is seriously challenged, isn’t it?
Yes. I hear that when the nuclear industry of the former USSR started to do business with the nuclear industry of the US, they probably agreed that downplaying the damages by the accident would be beneficial for both sides.
More on the IAEA: Bloomberg exposes IAEA: Safety division is a "marketing channel" for nuclear technology, reveals secret US docs
“Like having Dracula guard the blood bank”: Watch the video here
Published: February 28th, 2013 at 1:14 pm ET
|
sending...
Like international bankers such as Goldman-Sachs filling the world's top governmental finance posts? Or worldwide energy and nuclear regulatory posts going to people from the nuclear industry?
Oh, sorry, off topic.
Report Comment
Hi Time Is Short
It's not really OT..It was a good example…Plus they act like they are related. They back each other up and finance each other.
Agree with you Time Is Short 100 plus % .
Report Comment
Dear Folks,
I believe, last time I checked, WHO dictates ICD9 and ICDI0 worldwide medical billing codes …hmmmmm.
Keep reading, sharing, posting ENENews… Generating worldwide change 24/7!
Aloha.
Report Comment
Can we now accept the fact that organized crime became the government?
If we allow the corruption to continue we will shortchange the next generation
Nothing is sacred…Everything needs revamping.
Report Comment
I wouldn't want to be the next generation, ij. And certainly not the generation after that.
There is no stopping this.
Report Comment
Dear Time Is Short,
I have limited internet access. If you can, please post again Dr. Sagan's 'The Great Bamboozle' for newcomers?
Mahalo Nui Loa & Aloha.
Report Comment
“One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we’ve been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We’re no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It’s simply too painful to acknowledge, even to ourselves, that we’ve been taken. Once you give a charlatan power over you, you almost never get it back.”
― Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark
http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/85171-one-of-the-saddest-lessons-of-history-is-this-if
Report Comment
Dear anne,
Take good care.
Thank you so much
Aloha.
Report Comment
Nuclear is dangerous, unneeded, and must be outlawed.
Report Comment
Hi TheBigPicture
Totally Agree…Since these plants have been proven they are dangerous, they can wipe out millions of people and wreck our environment. I don't know why they are still legal to build and why they are still around?
Report Comment