WATCH… if you can: Interview with Fukushima woman losing hair, nails, teeth now available (VIDEO)
Video of Emiko Numauchi (“Numayu”) Available at IWJ, EX-SKF, January 11, 2012:
- [Journalist] Yasumi Iwakami is only making [yesterday's video with Sickened Fukushima author Emiko Numauchi] available for his paid subscribers
- For all his work, I suppose he is entitled to make his information available only to people who can support him
- If you understand the language
- Regular subscription is US$13 per month
 SOURCE: Fukushima Diary See also: Journalist interviews sickened Fukushima author: 8 teeth lost -- Nails fell out -- Going bald (VIDEO)
Related Posts
- Watch (free) on Twitvid: Interview with Fukushima woman losing hair, nails, teeth — 87 minutes January 12, 2012
- NHK radiation expert: Sickened Fukushima woman with teeth, nails, and hair falling out has auto-immune disease January 11, 2012
- Journalist interviews sickened Fukushima author: 8 teeth lost — Nails fell out — Going bald (VIDEO) January 10, 2012
- Anonymous Interview: Medical doctors working in Fukushima say lots of people are dying — “Bleeding, losing hair, and having a bad health condition” (VIDEO) April 30, 2012
- Japan Radiation Professor: Women can’t control themselves — Leads to stress, then teeth & hair fall out January 14, 2012
|
Discussion Threads
-
FORUM: Fukushima Webcam Discussion Thread
(5,119 Comments)
-
FORUM: General Discussion Thread (Nuclear Issues)
(5,380 Comments)
-
FORUM: Off-Topic Discussion Thread (Non-Nuclear Issues)
(3,732 Comments)
-
FORUM: Post Your Radiation Monitoring Data Here
(3,272 Comments)
-
FORUM: Alternative Energy — Converting to clean, renewable energy sources
(416 Comments)
-
FORUM: Petitions, Ballot Initiatives, Other Signature Drives (VIDEO)
(173 Comments)
-
FORUM: Upcoming meetings, gatherings, & demonstrations about energy issues
(477 Comments)
-
FORUM: What should be done about Japan burning radioactive debris?
(151 Comments)
-
FORUM: Methods for combating radiation and its effects
(1,065 Comments)
-
FORUM: Effects of low level radiation
(537 Comments)
-
FORUM: Possible Fukushima-related Anomalies — Deformations, Yellow Rain, Metallic Taste in Mouth, etc.
(1,731 Comments)
SUBMIT YOUR NEWS TIPS Your identity will not be made public unless you request it
SUPPORT ENENews ENENews receives no funding from anyone or anything, except 1) People who donate via the button below, and 2) Google, who pays for the two ad spots. Thanks to all who have donated or are planning on doing so, it's nice to know people appreciate your work.
|
sending...
**An explanation involving radiation poisoning is not quite as absurd, but almost. If you’re wondering how enough radioactive material could arrive here and kill Americans within 3 months, you are not alone. And even if it did get here, some sort of geographical pattern of illness and death would logically be expected. Good luck finding it in this data.
For instance, in the 14 weeks following the accident, there were 82 “extra” deaths in New York and 336 in Philadelphia, compared to the same time period in 2010. At the same time, Los Angeles— which is 3000 miles closer to Japan—had 246, while in San Diego there were 137 fewer deaths. And if that doesn’t make sense, consider Houston. Although the city had 484 “extra” deaths during this time, in the 14 weeks prior to the accident there were 1,649 fewer deaths (45%) than in 2010. Must have been a very healthy year there. Or some utterly meaningless data.
[SHORTENED... nice, you kept the paste to only 4 Paragraphs (copyright reasons... long story), but they were so long]
http://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2012/01/1
Report Comment
…eh?!!
Report Comment
Follow link to ridiculous ProNuke rebuttal to 14K death claims.
Report Comment
Hi Anthony. the Forbes article link appears broken? i wonder if it is this same POS shill piece
http://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2012/01/11/garbage-in-anti-nuclear-propaganda-out-the-14000-death-fukushima-lie/
Report Comment
You got it! I found it shocking when contrasted against the mounting evidence (incl. this story) of Fuku related health issues. Who you gonna believe. .. A gal with melting teeth and nails in the vicinity of the poisons or some shill beaking off in an office somewhere?
Report Comment
This is a hatchet job, pure and simple. Dumber than the Scientific American piece. No one died in Japan? Source? Almost all was I-131? Even Tepco and the Japanese govt deny this.
Bloom is from some fringe anti-environment organization no doubt founded by polluters. Here are some publications by this group:
A new report published today by the American Council on Science and Health (ACSH) counters claims by an environmental activist group that chemical exposures have led to numerous “disease clusters” throughout the country.
Year in and year out, agricultural pesticides have been the subject of considerable fear-mongering, leaving the typical consumer with the impression that these chemicals taint much of our food supply and are harmful to human health. In fact, just the opposite is closer to the truth. The published scholarly literature has failed to turn up evidence of adverse human health effects from use of modern pesticides in the real world.
http://www.acsh.org/publications/pub_listing.asp
Professional liars.
Report Comment
The American Council on Science and Health publishes pseudo-scientific studies paid for by corporations. The group recently published a study paid for by pharmaceutical corporations which had flawed methodology and supposedly found vitamins and supplements to be harmful! READ: SHILL ARTICLE Go figure!
From Wikipedia:
Funding
ACSH stopped reporting its funding in the early 1990s.[5] Their 1991 report shows that many corporations contributed funds.[5] In 1996, Congressional Quarterly’s Public Interest Profiles stated that ACSH received more than 75 percent of their funding from the chemical and pharmaceutical industries….
While ACSH does not currently disclose their funding, Whelan described ACSH’s contributors to John Tierney of the New York Times in 2007: “ACSH has a diverse funding base – we receive donations from private foundations and individuals and unrestricted (usually very small) grants from corporations. The fastest-growing segment of our funding base is individual consumers who are sick and tired of the almost daily baseless scares – and they write us checks to help support our work.”
Issue advocacy
ACSH frequently defends industry against claims that its products create risks of injury, ill-health or death, although this contravenes the precautionary principle which is a statutory requirement in some legal systems.[7] ACSH criticizes some industries for making unscientific and overstated health claims, promoting dangerous natural supplements, or otherwise failing to tell the truth about scientific issues. Scientific and professional journals routinely publish ACSH’s work, including: Medscape,CRC Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences, Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, Journal of Health Communications, Clinical Therapeutics, and Technology ….
Report Comment
I think this individual does not have the facts. There has indeed been deaths and cancer is not the only disease caused from radiation. As for the following, I suggest he interview the residents living with this disaster and then decide whether nuclear power are the “safest cleanest and most practical options we have…. NO NUKES “I happen to believe that, given the available technology, nuclear power is among the safest, cleanest and most practical options we have. Other people have different yet reasonable opinions on this issue, which is fine. However, when garbage like this gets into the scientific literature, some people will actually believe it; the discussion then becomes contaminated with false information, and a reasonable conversation about nuclear power becomes even more difficult to come by. Propaganda that poses as science is irresponsible. And as for the editors of the International Journal of Health Services: Shame on you.” Wow this is one inept journalist. talk about not having the facts, read the entire article it’s quite revealing as to the mind set of the pro nuckies.
Report Comment
In the words of D.H. Lawrence’s character from Women in Love, “I have prostituted myself to the bitch goddess of success.” That should be the disclaimer/subtitle appearing below the author’s name, on any article published by the American Council on Science and Health.
Report Comment
Agreed or they have the facts and Deliberately invites everyone along for a ride.
Report Comment
Can we overlay the jet stream at the times and states to see if they have a pattern that I think may be there !
Infant mortality would also be a consideration with the jet stream and dosed areas hit hard !
Report Comment
+1000 … paging ene cartologists …
Report Comment
http://zardoz.nilu.no/~flexpart/fpinteractive/temp/DEBUG
http://zardoz.nilu.no/~flexpart/fpinteractive/temp/FLEXplot.cntrl
this is beyond me, but this is from 1/5/2012
Fukushima I-131 Tracer, Continuous…
Any Flexpart Experts on board?
Report Comment
Yeah, “realspin” — they’ve got that right!
Report Comment
If you think no one died in Japan you are a complete moron. Wake up! This is how and why Nuclear is so HEINOUS. Hard to prove but you KNOW it kills.
Report Comment
@anthony…..
Some info here is far-fetched but most isn’t.
I just know for a fact that elevated levels of radiation is not good for living beings.
I also know for a fact that Fukushima is still belching this shit and will be for the foreseeable future.
Run whatever info you want through your own filter and come up with your own answers, but you won’t convince anyone here that Fuku is puking hershey kisses and skittles.
Report Comment
True enough, we know its difficult to sort the pepper from the flyshit, but Forbes? I am thinking flyshit.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2012/01/11/garbage-in-anti-nuclear-propaganda-out-the-14000-death-fukushima-lie/
Report Comment
I figure most around here can filter well and we keep aware of ALL sides of the story…even (especially) the enemy’s side.
Report Comment
Agreed,however I did and do feel the 14 k death claim was shaky at best.
Report Comment
No me as we went through this earlier last month. I remember finding many flaw in the pro nuke theory. The numbers were stated incorrectly. If you look back at an older article under this headline you should find it. NO NUKES
Report Comment
I dont often find myself on the side of the pronuke types, but on this one I was not convinced. I looked closely at it, at the time Hartmann had a guest that claimed data in my home province of British Columbia supported the notion. From what I gathered there was no confirmation of deaths by radiation exposure in both the US or Canada. If you have data or can point to a link that actually confirms the deaths as due to radiation exposure I would very much like to see it.
Report Comment
Kevin, many discussions here on ene about immunity…which rads are known and PROVEN to attack.
http://realitycheck.no-ip.info/forum/index.php?topic=152.0
Forbes numbers are old, this topic covered long ago on ene
http://www.google.com/cse?cx=partner-pub-7394524324300608%3At8ragrdpdz5&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=14%2C000+deaths&sa=Search#gsc.tab=0&gsc.q=14%2C000%20deaths&gsc.page=1
and cover a short period of time. What do YOU suppose caused the spike and what are the excess numbers now…hmmmm?
Report Comment
I am not refuting it, I am saying that I was unable to completely assure myself of the findings.
The closest I came was this.
http://www.hastingsgroupmedia.com/121911FukushimaUShealthimpacts.mp3
Which is good, (hard to listen to but I cant find a better audio of it).
Can you provide the ENENEWS link you refer to?
I have read everything on this site since day one so I would be surprised if I missed it, but I might have.
I do know that infant death is the focus as it is here in BC. However I have not been able to confirm if they have correlated the deaths to the exposure from Fukushima.
Clearly there are impacts but the excess deaths are not definitive. I am simply requesting something that says these deaths were confirmed as a result of Fukushima. That is all.
Report Comment
You can’t prove the excess deaths are due to radiation, by statistical methods. (Or not that I’m aware of anyway!)
Since many thousands of excess deaths (over “expected values”_ has been a pattern after such events as Chernobyl, there is apparently a cause-and-effect relationship. But proving “causation” is difficult at best.
Since it’s so difficult to radiation exposures cause increased or “excess” deaths above expected values, the nuclear industry and nuclear “experts” turn that to their advantage. They claim harm isn’t being done.
The only harmful effects they recognize, in general (and just cannot deny), are deaths to to acute radiation poisoning. Anything else they can write off as being death due to some other cause ….
As for this article, even the deaths due to acute radiation exposure (such as the five (5) workers said to have received lethal doses of radiation during the first week of the incident) are being denied.
BTW, did anyone ever hear of what happened to those five (5) workers? Did they in fact die later? I don’t recall ever hearing about them again.
Report Comment
I see your point…wanna know something? A close relative of mine died suddenly this summer. Of course there are probably fourteen different conditions which may explain her sudden massive death….but since 311 I cannot help but wonder if……. How she passed might at least fit radiation. There are many thorns in this problem.
Report Comment
Yes Anthony, I think many of us are looking back at recent deaths,….pretty suspicious at best. I mean, sometimes 2+2 really does equal 4.
Report Comment
My circle of friends and family experienced a number of cases of recurrent cancers and auto-immune diseases in April and May of this year.
Report Comment
3rd paragraph: “Since it’s so difficult to PROVE radiation exposures ….” Sometimes my hands can’t keep up with my train of thought ….
Report Comment
If the creator did not supply this planet with an ozone protective shield from the sun’s radiation you just would not just get a sun burn you would not be here at all. So what is protecting the planet from man made radiation??? Everyone knows what the Planet Mars looks like has no atmosphere or ozone protective shield.
Report Comment