Published: November 17th, 2011 at 6:09 am ET
|
Individual Radiation Exposure Dose Due to Support Activities at Safe Shelters in Fukushima Prefecture, Hirosaki University Study, Published November 16, 2011:
[...] Hirosaki University, just after the first phreatic explosion, sent many of its staff members to the safe shelters that were set temporarily for the residents of the area around the nuclear power station, to support the radiation survey and monitor the contamination of the safe shelters. [...]
The contributions of Te-132, I-131, Cs-137, Cs-134, and I-132 show increased values when approaching the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Station from Osaki, Miyagi Pref. [...]
Table 1. Contribution of radionuclide to dose rate estimated on expressway from Fukushima Prefecture to Aomori Prefecture.
Kunumi, Fukushima Prefecture on March 19; 67 km from meltdowns
- .pdf via http://www.plosone.org
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission and US Department of Energy supported a study that tested the ‘effectiveness’ of iodine-132 compared to iodine-131 (Emphasis Added):
Title: Comparative effects iodine 132 iodine 131 rat thyroid glands
Description: The thyroidal effects of short-lived radioiodines such as 132I, 133I and 135I are not well defined. Upon release from nuclear reactors these radioiodines pose potential risk to human health. The effects of 132I and 131I were compared. The same effect was found in goitrogen-stimulated rat thyroid glands (in terms of 50% suppression of thyroid gland wt increase) at injected activities of 93 .mu.Ci 132I and 13 .mu.Ci 131I. Doses were 3 rad/.mu.Ci 132I and 194 rad/.mu.Ci 131I. The same 50% suppression for thyroid dose occurred at about 280 rad from 132I and 2500 rad from 131I, suggesting an approximately 9-fold increase in radiologic effectiveness of 132I over 131I.
SOURCE: Wolfram Alpha
Published: November 17th, 2011 at 6:09 am ET
|
sending...
Science is very easy to stilt by omission, a favorite tool of the industry shills. When you look at the public list of isotopes released by Daiichi, the omissions outnumber the listed by better than 10:1. Part of it is to cover up the truth to make it look less threatening (saves ¥/$), part to hide the release profile, which can define the cause of the release.
Report Comment
New Tweet
Thursday, Nov. 17, 2011
CHERNOBYL to FUKUSHIMA – Part 2 – Lessons Ignored
http://www.mythclues.com/chernobyl-to-fukushima-part-2-lessons-ignored/
Report Comment
Oops. New Tweet to a seminar/video held at San Francisco State University April 8, 2011
Report Comment
This IS new:
Propaganda And Lies Of The IAEA
Nov 17, 2011
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KOtDGGNw-v0
Report Comment
The CTBTO published very high readings of iodine-135 at Takasaki for March 16:
http://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=en&ie=UTF8&prev=_t&rurl=translate.google.com&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http://www.cpdnp.jp/pdf/110330_Takasaki_report_Mar27.pdf&usg=ALkJrhiJAY0fefJ8v8JqZ5BznFZnh1d3TQ
There were 370,000 mBq/m3 of I-135 vs 15,000 mBq/m3 of I-131. They subsequently retracted the number, saying it was so huge it couldn’t possibly be true.
Report Comment
@Bobby1 – Hi. How do you get the NOAA jet stream animation map? I tried but can’t figure it out. Thank you.
Report Comment
Mack,
Go to http://mag.ncep.noaa.gov/NCOMAGWEB/appcontroller?prevpage=index&MainPage=index&cat=MODEL+GUIDANCE&page=MODEL+GUIDANCE
Click NAMER (for North America), then GFS… then 300_wnd_ht… the animations are under “Loop all”. You’ll need Java installed, I think.
Report Comment
Anyone know why Cs-134 is over ten times Cs-137? That doesn’t match surface contamination.
Report Comment