WSJ: Experts say manipulated radiation readings highlight possible “major staffing problem” at Fukushima Daiichi — ‘Incredible’ if other companies got away with it too -Official

Published: July 27th, 2012 at 2:51 pm ET
By
Email Article Email Article
4 comments


Title: Japanese Firm Manipulated Dosimeter Readings at Fukushima Daiichi
Source: Wall Street Journal – Japan Real Time
Author: Mitsuru Obe and Phred Dvorak
Date: July 23, 2012

Over the weekend, a subcontractor that worked at the devastated Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant confessed to asking some of its employees to put lead covers on their dosimeters in order to keep their radiation exposure readings artificially low.

[...]

“If other companies got away with doing this as well, that would be incredible,” Tatsuya Hariu, a spokesman for Fukushima Prefecture’s Labor Division, which is spearheading the probe into the matter, told JRT. “It would be something that impacted everyone who works at nuclear plants. We’re not just targeting (the one firm) — we’re looking into whether other companies properly recorded radiation exposure.”

The disclosures highlight what experts say could be a major staffing problem as the work of cleaning up one of the world’s worst nuclear disasters stretches on — possibly as long as 40 years. There’s a limited pool of people qualified and willing to work in an environment that’s still highly radioactive in places. When these people hit maximum radiation-exposure levels they are mandated to stop working at the plant. Yet replacement workers — especially in specialized fields — aren’t easy to come by.

[...]

h/t FRCSR

Published: July 27th, 2012 at 2:51 pm ET
By
Email Article Email Article
4 comments

Related Posts

  1. Fukushima Daiichi Employee: Shortage of nuclear workers is becoming real — More and more companies to close as personal dose limits are exceeded July 6, 2012
  2. Japan Engineer: Radiation doses at Fukushima Daiichi to increase dramatically in several years – “But no one talks about that” (VIDEO) September 30, 2012
  3. Ambassador’s News Conference: Fukushima Daiichi “not under control at all” — A security problem for entire world June 7, 2012
  4. US nuclear experts were concerned over Japan’s plan to ‘goop’ Fukushima Daiichi with ‘Fix It’ — “Can form a glue-like material (peanut butter!) and may cause more problems” August 2, 2012
  5. Japan Times: Official told of extremely bad conditions at Fukushima — Workers often abandoned after exceeding radiation limit November 12, 2011

4 comments to WSJ: Experts say manipulated radiation readings highlight possible “major staffing problem” at Fukushima Daiichi — ‘Incredible’ if other companies got away with it too -Official

  • TheBigPicture TheBigPicture

    Even more a grim situation if/when the supply of workers diminishes. Unsettling for the world, to say the least.


    Report Comment

  • dosdos dosdos

    Fodder with high spec tolerances is hard to come by, being naturally a low spec commodity.


    Report Comment

  • Time Is Short Time Is Short

    "…could be a major staffing problem…"

    Really? Could be? These people are completely HUA (police term for really stupid perps – Head Up . . .)

    We all know where this is headed. Complete abandonment of the site in a relatively short amount of time. The radiation levels are just too high. Once the existing crews are dead, who will be stupid enough to go in there?

    Think loss of water pumping, and you'll be headed in the right direction.


    Report Comment

  • Auntie Nuke

    Nuclear power-mongers always lie about radiation readings. In the US, it's "No 'significant' radiation leak," "No 'immediate' danger." It's all significant and as for 'immediate,' they count on the negative effects taking years if not decades to play themselves out so they can raise their eyebrows as they shrug and say, "Hey, WE had nothing to do with THAT!" But cause connects directly to effect, even if it takes dozens of years to play out. They are all liars, playing with hellfire. Do they think their words and spin alone can prevent the harm? All it does is delay awareness in the unwary.


    Report Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.