Published: January 23rd, 2013 at 4:47 pm ET
|
Title: Astro Boy and Uran’s Encyclopedia of Current Terminology / decommissioning
Source: The Yomiuri Shimbun
Date: Jan. 24, 2013
Astro Boy and Uran’s Encyclopedia of Current Terminology / decommissioning [...]
Uran [Astro Girl]: What must be done to decommission the reactors and their related facilities?
Answer: [...] The decommissioning project will require the fuel in question to be carefully and slowly removed using special equipment in an effort to avoid a leak of nuclear fuel while also preventing the fuel from triggering a nuclear reaction. This will be close to an unprecedented undertaking. [...]
See also: Watch: Children Play at Nuclear Theme Park in Japan -- Characters sing that it's very safe, efficient and good for you -- Photographer kicked out (VIDEO)
Published: January 23rd, 2013 at 4:47 pm ET
|
sending...
M5.2 – 22km SSE of Nemuro, Japan 2013-01-23 21:34:32 UTC
About 500-600 miles from Fuku
Report Comment
And another earlier 4.9 less than 50 miles
M4.9 – 59km NE of Namie, Japan 2013-01-23 21:31:06 UTC
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/usc000euhy#summary
Report Comment
PattieB PattieB
January 23, 2013 at 2:09 pm · Reply
http://maniacworld.com/underground-nuclear-explosion-fail.html
A fukushima preview!
Report Comment
majia
January 23, 2013 at 2:42 pm · Reply
Hi Pattie
Some people think the melted corium will eventually cool and pool, as with the "elephant's foot" at Chernobyl
I'm interested in why you think it will go "bang." Doesn't the geometry have to be pretty tight for that to happen?
Just wondering…
Report Comment
PattieB PattieB
January 23, 2013 at 4:33 pm · Reply
The difference is that this corium at Fuku is Plutonium! It just needs the proper type reflector to go critical again.
Report Comment
PattieB PattieB
January 23, 2013 at 4:35 pm · Reply
It would need engulfment in water, or to hit bedrock. Both would cause enough bounce-back of neutrons to cause a chain-up to criticality.
Report Comment
PattieB PattieB
January 23, 2013 at 4:39 pm · Reply
If it was just Uranium…? The chance of re-critical bang would be negligible. As you need to work at triggering Uranium… gun/implosion. Plutonium…? Just get more than 5 kilo in one place, and BANG!
Report Comment
PattieB PattieB
January 23, 2013 at 4:59 pm · Reply
They say it's over 10 kilos.. but we have a few tons in this case anyhow! But the key is, specifically the PU-240/241.. and that's 5.2 kilo. You have to look at it from the standpoint of the…
Report Comment
You have to look at it from the standpoint of the highest reactive substance that's present in the mass of corium. That's going to start the chain-up.
Report Comment
PattieB PattieB
January 23, 2013 at 5:03 pm · Reply
The fact we have out-gassing, and visual radiations… that's the PU-241 that's giving us the light shows.
Report Comment
PattieB PattieB
January 23, 2013 at 5:08 pm · Reply
http://ieer.org/resource/factsheets/plutonium-factsheet/
240 can cause fizzle… but 241? That stuffs nasty dirty rad-wise and goes "off" if you look at it wrong!
Report Comment
PattieB PattieB
January 23, 2013 at 5:10 pm · Reply
The longer that stuff is a molten mass of corium… the more P-241 you shall have created. Also, the more U-235… coincidentally… and that's not a stable mix.
Report Comment
Yes, I've been thinking a phreatic type explosion might occur.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phreatic_eruption
What you posted re: the reactivity of certain Plutonium isotopes when a mass of molten corium meets (or becomes surrounded by) water confirms my suspicions.
That's why I'm curious about geologic strata and possible landfill around plant, and any corium outside containment.
Report Comment
Meanwhile, it's raining in Nor. California and I'm very, very itchy today. Ha ha. Who knows whether or not there is any connection. Radiation Network showing lower readings than we were getting between November and early January.
If anyone is familiar with geologic strata around the Fukushima plants, would you please post a link here?
Report Comment
Fuku nukes were built on excavated mudrock (a sandstone), HT. The area was leveled, and the foundations were poured on a thin layer of aggregate fill used to bring the foundation back up to the desired level. The site was carved out of native rock, there is no landfill nearby. The mudrock is layered, sloping downward towards the Ocean. I'm sure you've seen this link before.
http://ddata.over-blog.com/4/37/62/00/The-Geology-of-Fukushima.pdf
Water is abundant. Two surface "streams" were channeled under the plants. The water table is at the basement level. The corium has abundant cooling/moderating water flowing around it and into the Harbor.
Nice discussion, HT and Pattie.
Report Comment
Pattie B., am thinking if you add water to the mix of a Pu type explosion or corium/fuel goes critical again, it could get really messy with a phreatic type exlosion. That's assuming any of the fuel is melted into lava-like blobs in the pools.
Report Comment
http://www.4shared.com/photo/aD6cTgE6/coupe-geol-est-ouest—copie.html
The lay of Fuku-land
Report Comment
http://www.4shared.com/photo/jyPYCck2/coupe-geol-nord-sud-fukushima-.html
Report Comment
Beautiful! You're amazing. Thanks.
Am having a bit of difficulty in viewing it. Do I need to join in order to download?
Is that a .jpeg file, or is in done in GIS? What type of rendering is it?
Folks, THIS is the type of thing IMHO we need to collectively put our brainpower to work on analyzing. Risk/threat analysis, that is. This could make the potential terrorist threat pale in comparison. Well, maybe not, if one considers the potential sabotage of spent fuel pools (compromised power/cooling, fires).
I'm not certified/credentialed scientist, but I have technical background & tech writing/editing skills, professional exposure to GIS, seismology, and civil engineering.
If there is truly danger of PU criticalities, even phreatic type explosions, then IMHO there needs to be study done to assess the risk.
Are governments, Japan's and US's nuclear agencies, the DOE, nuclear laboratories, and Universities looking at this? If not, they should be.
Were a phreatic explosion to occur and launch the corium into the atmosphere, it could be absolutely devastating. I hope this is not just my overactive mind and imagination visualizing something that couldn't or wouldn't occur.
Report Comment
Or maybe we can collectively make a convincing argument to have SOMEONE throw some $$ at a serious threat analysis.
Report Comment
TEPCO and JNES seem to be arguing over how far the melted fuel ate into the concrete at the bottom of Containment1,2,&3. The discussion is whether TEPCO's "conservative" view or the "less conservative" JNES view of the situation is correct.
http://www.aec.go.jp/jicst/NC/sitemap/pdf/P-4.pdf
The US NRC and DOE are defering to Japanese leadership, and are being kept at arm's length by the Japanese. The Japanese do not consider that a melt-out of corium into the mudrock has occurred in any of the three reactors. If anyone in the world is looking into what is actually happening with the corium, it is definitely not NRC/DOE/TEPCO/JNES. I have found no better discussion of the future of the corium than at ENEnews.
My current view, as a non-nuke-professional is this:
Corium1,2,&3 are located in mudrock under Units1,2,&3.
The corium is being cooled by the continuous flow of abundant ground water.
The flow of highly contaminated ground water into the Pacific Ocean is IMO the most serious aspect of the ongoing Fuku Calamity.
Ground water moderation of neutrons creates criticalities in the corium from time to time.
Some venting of steam or smoke from the ground between the reactors has occurred.
Continuous outgassing as the corium spits and sputters is evident in radiation readings (I saw 425 cpm near the plant on a radiation map recently).
There have been no further explosions at Fuku, after Units1,3,&4 were demolished.
Report Comment
I'm assuming the strata is more dense, as one goes downward. Wish I could read and interpret what I'm seeing.
Can you tell us where the original data was found?
Report Comment
Whatever the several hundred feet in the first layers is composed of, it doesn't look too dense. That's not reassuring.
So — if there is a lot of silica content, and that's present in the top layers, would that tend to form a glasslike substance, when exposed to corium?
Also — water passes fairly easily through sandstone and any substrate (stratum) containing sandy particles (as opposed to clay-like stratum). So it might not be too dim a scenario until the corium begins to meet the denser layers (getting into the red/orange or green areas).
Am picturing the water table being somewhere in the green layers. Or the red layer? If the corium reaches that level, the potential for a phreatic type explosion might greatly increase.
I guess we're all novices when it comes to assessing the behavior of corium underground — except for the people who have analyzed what happened at Chernobyl.
Report Comment
And if there's a glasslike substance forming around the corium, how does that influence the behavior or "flow" of the corium? The viscosity?
Report Comment
My take is that the corium has exhausted itself, and is no longer moving. The exterior is a crust, cooled by ground water. But ground water is able to cool only the exterior crust, while the interior remains quite hot. The corium is now incapable of sustained criticalities. When disturbed, as from an earthquake, the outer crust breaks to expose hot corium underneath to water, allowing new criticalities to occur for a time. The decay heat within the corium might keep the temperature in the middle of the 3 blobs at about 500 to 1,500 F at present. Spreading out of the blobs, as they flowed in the mudrock, would help to reduce the interior temperature of the corium over time.
PattieB, if Units3&4 were using an exotic plutonium fuel (not MOX), what is your opinion of the present location and state of the corium?
Report Comment
Removing spent fuel assemblies presents tremendous hazzards at Fukushima:
Fuel handling cranes were destroyed when Buildings1,3,&4 were blew up.
A new crane support structure, being constructed at Unit4, to allow fuel removal, will take a year to complete.
Buildings1,2,&3 are too radioactive for workers to enter or get near the spent fuel pools.
Building3 used MOX fuel, with a large plutonium component, making this building exceedingly toxic to humans.
Sea water, used as emergency cooling water, corroded spent fuel assemblies, which may begin to fail within the next 3 years or so.
Fuel assemblies at Unit4 burst into flames not once, but twice, and the fires may have destroyed the handles used to pick up the fuel assemblies.
The zirconium cladding of damaged fuel assemblies may fail completely, dumping half a ton of hot fuel pellets onto the floor of a spent fuel pool, causing criticalities.
And there is more.
Report Comment
And wasn't there MOX fuel in the SFP for #4, or was that in the Common SFP? Can anyone remark on this? Can't recall where they were storing the second load of MOX which was to be loaded into the #3 reactor. The first load was supposed to have gone in, in Oct. 2010, and they were (as I recall) going to load up #3 with the second load of MOX in April, 2011. Which didn't happen for obvious reasons.
Maybe part of the concern over the precarious position of the #4 SFP is because there's a bunch of MOX sitting up there?
Can anyone comment on how hazardous that might be, if it's MOX but not spent fuel?
More plutonium. And?
Report Comment
If you have FB.. I just did a show-and-tell on that issue.
https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.475583915810254.99275.260610960640885&type=1
Report Comment
I have photos of July 18th 2010 of them loading #3 and of the pool.
Report Comment
Great, I'll have a look at that.
Report Comment
The zirconium cladding of a damaged fuel assembly may fail completely, dumping half a ton of hot fuel pellets onto the floor of the spent fuel pool.
What will spent fuel pellets do when they are spilled into a pile in a pool of water?
Here is my guess:
The pellets are touching other pellets.
Neutrons are partily moderated by the water between pellets.
The pellets will begin to fission immediately, and heat up.
Prompt moderated criticalities will occur.
Water temperature will rapidly increase.
Radiation will rapidly increase.
Pellets will melt into pools of molten "corium" on the floor of the pool.
Spent fuel pellets probably cannot be vacuumed up, or scopped up, or handled using current technology.
Remote controlled cranes will drop boron, lead, and other materials on the fuel pellets to stop fission.
Hopefully, work will be able to proceed to remove other fuel assemblies.
But many spent fuel assemblies are likely to fail as fuel removal proceeds in SFP1,2,3,&4.
Eventually, borated sand will be dumped into the pool to replace the water.
Hopefully, fuel removal will not cause an explosion, like the one that many believe originated in SFP3.
Eventually, the empty spent fuel pools will be covered by a concrete Sarcophagus.
Report Comment
http://www.4shared.com/account/dir/E4sQOura/_online.html
Report Comment
It's not the MOX that's problematical… it's the PU-Breeder types that are what goes BANG! Pool of 4 has 40. Pool of 3 had over 50, but they were over 10 years old. The core had new ones!
Report Comment
Eeeeew.
Report Comment
OK, I see what you're getting at.
Report Comment
So, if I'm understanding this correctly, the concern is the greater amount of Pu produced as the fuel is used, correct?
Needing a pretty basic explanation, thanks. I'm a nuclear newbie. Is this what you're referring to? BWR type breeder reactor?
http://science.howstuffworks.com/nuclear-energy-info3.htm
"There are two major types of light-water reactors.
In boiling-water reactors, the water heated in the core boils, forming steam. The steam is fed through pipes from the pressure vessel to the turbine. It is then cooled, condensing into water, which is pumped back to the core. In pressurized-water reactors ….
Production reactors are used chiefly to produce plutonium 239 for use in nuclear weapons. In the most important type of production reactor, fuel rods containing both uranium 235 and uranium 238 are placed in horizontal channels in a large cube of graphite, which serves as the moderator. Water circulates through the channels, removing the heat produced by the fuel rods. Neutrons emitted by the fission of uranium 235 are absorbed by the uranium 238, forming uranium 239, which decays into plutonium 239. After a certain percentage of the uranium has been converted into plutonium, the bars are removed from the reactor and the plutonium is chemically separated from the rest of the material in the bars.
Report Comment
And ships passing back and forth from France, Areva involvement.
Areva rendering assistance at Fukushima.
http://www.areva.com/EN/news-9247/areva-and-the-events-of-fukushima.html
????? Go figure.
Report Comment
Spent fuel transport, Japan:
http://www.nft.co.jp/english/business/pdf/safe.pdf
White paper, above. Apologists at work.
Transport of MOX fuel from Europe to Japan, the stakes:
http://www.areva.com/EN/operations-1391/transport-of-mox-fuel-from-europe-to-japan-the-stakes.html
(That's the one I had to hunt for.)
Worldwide transport:
http://www.princeton.edu/sgs/publications/ipfm/Managing-Spent-Fuel-Sept-2011.pdf
IAEA document on worldwide transport, 1998:
http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/te_1103_web.pdf
Discussion of storage of waste, Greenpeace, and some epidemiologic statistics from Japan:
http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/news/Blogs/nuclear-reaction/fukushima-nuclear-crisis-update-for-september/blog/42113/?accept=faccb899dc564fe2ad029edc60fb9f00
So assuming they can get the stuff out of the pools to transport it, what happens then?
Report Comment
If you break down the actual physical process of removing anything from around/inside the reactor and SF rods it becames obvious that the video cameras employed will have their CCD ( CMOS/MOS ) burned in Seconds .
I have seen 'broken' pixels on a HD video professional camera caused by just X-rays at the airport …
How many hundred of thousands of cameras would they calculate to be needed ?
How else will they see what to handle in that mangled structure ?
But very soon more worries are coming , by mid February to mid March , the bi-anual passage and pressure by the Centrifugal Bulge created by the orbiting Earth around the sun , will pass over the Japan latitude and act as a butterfly-effect on the tectonic situation …
Take that a few notches higher and start considering the effect on tectonics by the approaching ( a few thousand years ) of Orion Arm as part of our galaxy , and that it is a much higher concentration of stars hence gravitational 'knots' or Vortexes that the Earth will go through , enough to stir the magma and tectonic plates to release heat so bananas can grow AGAIN at the Poles ( ya , passing through the dense Orion Arm is periodic ) .
But will the bananas , this time , be radioactive ?
Report Comment
thanks Jay, good point on the Centrifugal Bulge, I can understand how that may affect things.
What I'm not so sure of is the gravitational effects of another far away galaxy. I would expect that the Sun would have a far higher order of gravity on us then anything that far away. Sure, our solar system will be influenced, but in relative terms, the Sun is the controller.
I'd be glad to read any material you may have on galatic gravity.
Report Comment