Yomiuri on China Syndrome: Gov’t secretly figured out how far the melted fuel would burn through reactor pedestals — “Worst-possible scenario”

Published: October 16th, 2011 at 11:44 am ET
By

88 comments


Tokyo, Oct. 15 — “The Japanese nuclear safety agency secretly calculated the possibility of a worst-case meltdown at Tokyo Electric Power Co.’s Fukushima No. 1 power plant,” reports the Yomiuri Simbun.

The agency began working on this report in late March, as Tepco was saying the nuclear fuel was only “slightly damaged.” It wasn’t until April 18 that the Japanese government acknowledged the fuel had begun to melt. Tepco did not acknowledge this until April 20.

In one scenario, all reactor cores dropped out at the same time. In another, melted fuel jetted out of the vessels.

China Syndrome

The calculations were premised on nuclear fuel at Reactors No. 1, 2 and 3 would melt down entirely, developing into a so-called “China syndrome,” the worst-possible scenario.

“Coined in the United States, the term China syndrome refers to an imagined worst-case meltdown of nuclear fuel that burns through the bottom of a containment vessel and eventually through the Earth’s crust until finally reaching China,” reports Yomiuri.

The agency’s calculations indicated that if water could not be injected, erosion could badly damage the reactor containment vessels’ 10-foot thick concrete walls.

The agency said it had roughly gauged the extent to which the pedestals (floor) of the containment vessels would be eroded should all the melted fuel drop through the pressure vessel of the three reactors.

The erosion could “possibly” stop after vessel wall was eroded to a depth of around 6 feet in eight days.

Read More: Japan nuclear agency secretly calculated Fukushima meltdown risks

At 2:45 in

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wwYk62WpV_s

Published: October 16th, 2011 at 11:44 am ET
By

88 comments

Related Posts

  1. Fukushima Boss: “The worst-case scenario is a China syndrome” where fuels leaves containment — Top Gov’t Official: Strong possibility fuel outside containment December 29, 2011
  2. Time.com: China Syndrome “might just have happened at Fukushima” — Molten fuel may have “melted through everything into the earth” May 16, 2011
  3. China syndrome inevitable says architect of Fukushima Reactor No. 3 — Warns of massive hydrovolcanic explosion — Melted fuel inevitably sank underground November 19, 2011
  4. Japan Times: China Syndrome was near at Reactor No. 2, believed Fukushima boss Yoshida December 28, 2011
  5. China Syndrome discussed in multiple news reports: Closer than previously believed to burning through ground below reactor December 1, 2011

88 comments to Yomiuri on China Syndrome: Gov’t secretly figured out how far the melted fuel would burn through reactor pedestals — “Worst-possible scenario”

  • Erin

    Please sign the petition to end nuclear energy in the U.S. We cannot afford to continue putting our own nation at risk, now that we can plainly see that even in technologically advanced Japan — they have no means of resolving this kind of crisis, let alone preventing it in the first place. Do we really need our very own, homegrown Fukushima before we close our nuclear power plants? Are the Germans THAT much smarter than we are?!

    https://wwws.whitehouse.gov/petitions/%21/petition/end-use-nuclear-energy-united-states/H0Pd79B1?utm_source=wh.gov&utm_medium=shorturl&utm_campaign=shorturl

  • arclight arclight

    suppose if the emergency is under control they wouldnt mind releasing the spectrographic results from all them universities and private laboratories that are keeping the information secret until when??

    “It said the calculation results were conveyed to the agency, but it is unknown whether the information was shared with the Cabinet Office or other government organizations.

    Regarding the announcement of the calculations a half year after the outbreak of the crisis, the JNES said that although the calculations were exclusively for the sake of studies within the agency and Tepco, it decided to make them public as the initial phase of coping with the crisis has finished.”

    Read more: http://www.bellinghamherald.com/2011/10/15/2229629/japan-nuclear-agency-secretly.html#ixzz1axhp8JOq

  • Shouldn’t the title be changed from China Syndrome to Canary Syndrome?

    …Opposite side of the Planet of Japan are the Canary Islands.

    …Me thinks the next most popular name for new babies, both male and female, will be…drum role please…you sitting down…here it comes….

    Cyclops.

    Party like its 1999 friends

    red red wine

    • Heart of the Rose Heart of the Rose

      I believe in a dose of all of it… first.. we fight.. then we prep …because of the economy…we have young ones and are stocking up on food …the kids get the daily recommended dose of iodine plus 25%..and other recommendations as affordable.
      …LIVE…have sex with your husband..kiss your children…
      …get you affairs in order..get sauced on Saturday night.
      Find your comrades …prepare for worse case scenario.

      • StillJill StillJill

        O.K., I stand corrected–truer words still.

        Was thinking today that what the world needs is a daily dose of puppy breath,….that would remind us to LOVE! 🙂

        • Heart of the Rose Heart of the Rose

          @Whoopie
          OH..lolol..I was thinking about something a bit passionate than “puppy breath”…..
          TPTB…underestimates the power of love….morons…

      • Chewable calcium is a must now for kids to help block absorption of strontium.

        Dr. Busby said the calcium pills being developed for Japan include magnesium also.

        I cannot find chewable magnesium. Has anyone else found it?

        I do give my younger one (who cannot swallow pills) daily gummy vitamins.

        I am really torn about the food.

        Should we stop eating potatoes, carrots, and all root vegetables?

        We no longer drink milk or eat yogurt or icecream (so sad) but cheese keeps finding its way in our diet.

        I wish we had some definitive knowledge about how contaminated our food really is here in the US.

        It is very hard to transform a teenager and a pre-teen into vegans overnight!

        I am sick with worry about my kids’ health…

        • midwestern midwestern

          majia, for cheese you can find parmesan and other aged cheddar that are aged at least ten months, up to two years. You can get this on sale and freeze it.
          I found chewable calcium (kind of like toffee)–Nutrition Now, Calcium soft chews(I have gotten big boxes discounted different stores). There is also Viactiv–soft chews in flavors like chocolate and chocolate mint. Kids like these two.

        • midwestern midwestern

          Chlorella and spirulina contain a lot of calcium and magnesium also. The tablets are chewable, but kids aren’t crazy about the flavor (in my experience)…

  • Grampybone Grampybone

    Looks like the 3 cores are in full China syndrome to me. 10 feet of concrete will not matter after that quake because of the cracks it sustained. What they should calculate is what happens when the cores are melting into the soil under the containment. I don’t think there is a way to measure the insane amount of nuclear fission products that would be released from the core being exposed to the earth itself. Concrete could contain the melted fuel for a limited time period, but what happens when the seawater washes over the cores and carries fission products out the cracks in containment? No one knows and TEPCO wants to keep it that way.

    • I’ve read that radon, which is quite extensive in areas of Japan’s water and worse after earthquakes, is now interacting with the melted, fissioning coriums…

      • Dr. Anne Lee Tomlinson Maziar anne

        North American Radon Spikes As Indicators of Fukushima’s “China Syndrome”
        http://pissinontheroses.blogspot.com/2011/08/north-american-radon-spikes-as.html
        [Update] 178X Saint Louis Background Radiation Source Identified
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEsKxmJPUmM&t=13m31s
        explanation for video:
        “UPDATE 9/10/11: http://youtu.be/IgQzBTcIhLU
        The 178X fallout = 8/11/11 Fukushima China Syndrome melt through into the ground water.

        “Update 9/7/11: On August 20th, the POTRBLOG team reported that the 178X background radioactive rain fall “may be indicative of a RECENT SIGNIFICANT radiological event in Fukushima.” That assessment now appears to be now born out by a Japanese report of large Iodine-131 detections in radioactive sewage collected in Oshu City 180+ KM north of Fukushima on August 25th. The collection date of the sewage sample correlates to several earthquakes during the period and reports of radioactive steam rising up from cracks in the ground at the Fukushima nuclear site. It also correlates strongly with large increases in radioactive detection along the jetstream in North America.

        “Taken together, the data is indicative of Coruim entering the ground water, becoming re-critical, and inducing the release/production of large amounts of Radon 222. The associated detections of extremely large quantities of Radon Daughters in the radioactive fallout raining down on North America are likely indicators of harder to detect longer half life fallout in the same rainfall.”

      • Dr. Anne Lee Tomlinson Maziar anne

        Neptunium 239 Fallout Once Again Rains Down On The USA – [Maximum Alert]
        Thursday, October 13, 2011

        http://pissinontheroses.blogspot.com/2011/10/maximum-alert-fukushima-fallout.html

        http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=c76_1318573802

      • Dr. Anne Lee Tomlinson Maziar anne

        It doesn’t help that the US is putting uranium in the roads around St Louis. And what is happening at Fort Calhoun Nuclear Power Plant?

      • Dr. Anne Lee Tomlinson Maziar anne

        ST. LOUIS AIRPORT/ HAZELWOOD INTERIM STORAGE/FUTURA COATINGS CO.
        MISSOURI EPA ID# MOD980633176

        “ The St. Louis Airport/Hazelwood Interim Storage/Futura Coatings Co. site is comprised of numerous properties located in two distinct areas. The St. Louis Downtown Site (SLDS) is located at the Mallinckrodt Chemical Plant in downtown St. Louis, and the North County sites are located near the Lambert International Airport. The North County sites include the St. Louis Airport Site (SLAPS), the Hazelwood Interim Storage Site (HISS), and various vicinity properties. Uranium ores were processed at the downtown site from 1942 to 1957 under contracts to the Manhattan Engineering District (MED) and later the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC). The transfer of process residues from downtown to sites near the Airport resulted in the contamination of numerous private and municipally owned properties.
        “The St. Louis radioactively-contaminated sites are part of the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) established by Congress in 1974 for the AEC to address the cleanup of formerly used properties contaminated as a result of historic nuclear weapons production. The U.S. Department of Energy, successor to the AEC, managed the FUSRAP until October 1997 when responsibility….
        “Elevated levels of uranium, thorium, and radium are present in surface and subsurface soils. Shallow groundwater is impacted by uranium. Direct contact with or accidental ingestion of contaminated soils or groundwater on or near the sites may pose health risks to individuals….”

        http://www.epa.gov/region7/cleanup/npl_files/mod980633176.pdf

      • Dr. Anne Lee Tomlinson Maziar anne

        Weldon Spring Site
        St. Charles County, Missouri
        “The Army kept 200 acres and on this property the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission built a uranium ore processing plant in 1958. The Weldon Spring Uranium Feed Mill Plant processed raw uranium ore into “yellow cake,” or concentrated ore that was shipped to other sites. The toxic materials produced by the plant were stored in open-air lagoons along with TNT and wastes and uranium and radioactive materials were disposed of in a quarry. In 1967 the Army took over the plant to produce dangerous herbicides. The processing plant operated until 1968 after which the site was abandoned but still contained contaminated equipment and hazardous chemicals….”
        http://www.greatriverroad.com/stcharles/weldonsite.htm

      • Dr. Anne Lee Tomlinson Maziar anne

        DEPLETED URANIUM ALERT!
        http://www.apfn.org/apfn/DU.htm

        Army DU Specialist turned whistleblower
        Dr. Doug Rokke- Depleted Uranium
        Audio:
        http://www.apfn.org/audio/rokke-depleted_uranium.mp3

        Depleted Uranium: Uses and Hazards
        Doug Rokke, Ph.D.
        http://www.stopnato.org.uk/du-watch/rokke/rokke.htm

      • Dr. Anne Lee Tomlinson Maziar anne

        Depleted Uranium Is Used in Golf Clubs—and It’s Legal!
        As governments dither on about where to store radioactive depleted uranium, they quietly allow it to permeate products that people come into contact with daily.
        by Heidi Stevenson
        22 May 2011
        http://www.gaia-health.com/articles451/000461-depleted-uranium-golf-clubs-crockery.shtml

      • Dr. Anne Lee Tomlinson Maziar anne

        REPOST:
        Depleted Uranium – Rokke
        The person interviewed, Rokke,said they are putting DU in concrete for the roads near St. Louis, and there are places in Illinois and Indiana that are really contaminated. I finally listened to the whole tape and recommend it.
        ChasAha
        August 27, 2011 at 2:27 am • Reply
        DU – Depleted Uranium – DEPLETED does NOT mean depleted is this case. It’s a word that is used specifically to deceive.
        From Interview (5/19/2011) Regarding Fukushima:
        “We are at an exposure level that should not be there!”
        “No way to contain it, no way to clean it up… they do NOT realize the extent of the problem.”
        “Do we have a world wide problem? YES!”
        “Are we prepared? NO!” – Dr. Doug Rokke (pronounced rocky)
        DR Rokke is a Depleted Uranium Expert: (specializing in clean ups)
        bio: http://newsworldwide.wordpress.com/2011/05/19/exclusive-roger-cooper-interview-with-doug-rokke-there-is-no-safe-radiation-level/

        RADIO interview at the University of Illinois by Roger Cooper located at this link –
        47 minutes: http://www.podomatic.com/profile/rogercooper99

      • Dr. Anne Lee Tomlinson Maziar anne

        SO YOU THINK DEPLETED URANIUM ISN’T HARMFUL info
        “On impact, depleted uranium ignites. It generates fires and explosions, and death to those in near proximity. In addition, it also generates airborne oxides. This is where the great and long-term damage occurs to millions; 40% of the depleted uranium is left on the battlefield after the battle….
        “Once inhaled, which DUO universally is, it is the most destructive form of ionizing radiation by far. One gram of DU releases 13,000 alpha particles (a helium nucleus) per second. One alpha particle can cause cancer under the right conditions.
        “DU inhaled nano particles, less than 10 microns big, stay lodged in tissue for decades, emitting radiation that does great and cumulative damage.
        “Depleted uranium in your body is like miniature cannons going off for decades inside your body. They fire high-energy particles at 12,000 shots per second. They wreck and damage DNA chains. They induce chemical changes inside cells. And if the particles survive, they can replicate and do even more damage.
        “Worldwide and USA
        “DU is a worldwide toxin. Because it is aerosolized, it can travel great distances from where it is used to penetrate armor in a war. It began to be used in war in the 1973 Arab-Israeli war, then in the Gulf War in 1990-91, and continues to be used today.
        “Gulf War veterans were found to have DU in their clothing, bodies, and semen; 67 percent of them have offspring with birth defects. Fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue, and chronic neurological conditions are much more common among them than in the general public. Lauren Moret, eminent scientist, has stated that DU is the main cause of Gulf War Syndrome.
        Whereas only 400 soldiers were killed in the war, 11,000 of the 580,000 soldiers are now deceased, and over 325,000 are on permanent disability as of 2000.

        • Dr. Anne Lee Tomlinson Maziar anne

          [cont.]
          “In the areas of the world where it has been used most, mainly the Middle East and in the areas in and around Serbia, the soil and air is so contaminated with depleted uranium that millions of Iraqis and others in the area, as well as their offspring, will be developing cancers for decades to come, cancers they otherwise would not have developed. …
          “Dr. James Howensteine, M.D., has written in April 2006 that we have a lung cancer epidemic from depleted uranium in the US, and that it has just begun….
          “In perspective, you can develop lung cancer if you smoke for 30 years, or if you have exposure to depleted uranium in 30 days….
          ‘we face a progressive poisoning of all life on earth….”
          http://www.military-quotes.com/forum/so-think-depleted-uranium-isnt-t80576.html

      • Misitu

        Radon is an inert gas. It combines with nothing chemically [pace extreme conditions]. The interaction if any would be by exchanging particles emitted during nuclear decay.

        Anyone less lazy than me care to look this up somewhere?

        (note: corium contains more exotic stuff than a landfill)

  • Whoopie Whoopie

    New Tweet worth checking out
    Fukushima Nuclear Disaster As Bad As Chernobyl According To Swedish Expert + New Radiation Map From France
    http://humansarefree.com/2011/03/fukushima-nuclear-disaster-as-bad-as.html

    • Whoopie

      You are an amazing digger:)

      • Anthony Anthony

        Agreed!!
        ***Since the earthquake and tsunami last Friday, four nuclear power plants in northeastern Japan reported damage. Most serious damage appear to be in the Fukushima Daiichi complex where a meltdown or ”partial meltdown” has been found in Unit 1 and 3.
        ”The accident should be classified as the worst on the scale – Fukushima is as serious as Chernobyl”

        Frigyes Reisch, 78, is associate professor of nuclear safety at the Royal Institute of Technology (KTH). Over 27 years, until 1997, he worked for the Nuclear Power Inspectorate, SKI. In 1993 he worked a year for the IAEA as an international educator in the INES scale, including in Russia and the Czech Republic. Frigyes Reisch believes that the Japanese authorities blinds the dangers of Fukushima to keep people quiet – but there is also a national scope:
        – There is tremendous commercial interest in this. The entire world’s nuclear industry is Japanese.

        As an example, he mention the second global nuclear power giant, General Electric Hitachi Nuclear Energy, has Japanese majority ownership.
        – Given all the rescue workers who worked closely with the affected units and inhaled radioactive steam, it´s in reality impossible to not die of radiation. It’s not good. I do not know how many people who live north of Fukushima, but I guess it is so densely populated that there are a few million,” said Frigyes Reisch.

        So far, winds have been westerly and blowing out the radioactivity of the Pacific Ocean. But according to forecasts, they will during the day today to turn around and start blowing north – with the chance of precipitation. How far the radioactive particles can be spread is due to local conditions. After the Chernobyl accident Gavle, 1000 km from Chernobyl, had most radioactive precipitation in Sweden.
        (Original article: http://www.aftonbladet.se/nyheter/jordskalvetijapan/article8707871.ab)

        According to the “Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety” – France, the radioactive…

        • Anthony Anthony

          ***According to the “Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety” – France, the radioactive cloud will spread almost throughout the entire planet by March 26, 2011.****

      • ENENEWS Staff

        Thanks for all your efforts Whoopie

    • BreadAndButter BreadAndButter

      Hi Whoopie, the IRSN is the equivalent of the NRC…. just don’t expect too much from this map from March 25… it probably doesn’t show what happened then.

    • moonshellblue moonshellblue

      The map has been out for quite some time. Here’s an old time radiation duck and cover.http://youtu.be/to6GGq840uU

  • kintaman kintaman

    I will say it again because it needs repeating:

    “No IMMEDIATE threat to human health”. Thank you to TEPCO, Japanese government and NHK (including other media) for your lies. When the illnesses begin there will be nowhere for your to run and hide. The people will find you and hang you all.

  • kintaman kintaman

    Just curious, are there any other enenews.com readers who left Japan after 3-11 like me (I refuse to ever go back to my once home)?

    • Grampybone Grampybone

      I’m not from Japan however I used to live 11 miles from Vermont Yankee which just started leaking Cesium into the Connecticut river. I used to swim in that river, but never downstream from Vernon VT because of the radiation. I often traveled downstream with my environmental science class and found multi-finned fish and mutated frogs and toads with abnormal legs and deformed eyes. My environmental science teacher warned us that there could be a problem with fault-line power plants even on minor faults and that a serious melt down could happen in a high risk area like Japan. I am so sorry to hear about your refugee status. The Fukushima danger was given to me in 2004 before I graduated high school, but I never expected it to come true. I also like your avatar a lot. Glad to see other people who learn from gaming here too lol. Best of luck watch out for the deathclaws.

    • Sickputer

      I would also like to know if there are any readers from South America?

      • Misitu

        Kind of. How can I help.. been there 6 months during fuxu, back in UK for a few months then back for good. Have a small beta gamma detector available.

        Seafood plentiful, might run the counter over the fish occasionally.

        Luckily now all lefty govts in SA not TOO TOO sympathetic to the big guys from up there. Hope to continue as only hope for the underpeople thereabouts.

        drop me a line at misitu arroba yahoo punto co punto uk if you like

    • Human0815

      We left Japan exact the same Date when the Wind changed (03/15), we stayed for a Month in the north of Thailand but returned to Tokyo because it is better to Die in your own burning Castle than dieing somewhere in Misery!

      Now, after 220 Days of watching Fukushima i still doubt that one, two or three Corium are in a Mode of the China Syndrome!

      This News would leak asap.,
      J-Village is full of People who need Money
      and some “Fishermens” standing at the Gate
      with Bucks of Money for a interesting Story,
      not only Japanese-
      this Fishermens” are international!

      I am happy that the Government checked this out,
      we done the same,
      i am sure that our conclusions are similar!

  • Flapdoodle Flapdoodle

    If someone came to me and asked how far it would melt down, I would want to know what the rock, and soil was like under the reactor. Then I would ask if there were known water issues; underground stream or river, how high is the water table. I will bet zero or minimal research was conducted prior to construction.

    I have never seen a molten puddle of reactor core, but I doubt it would stay as a pancake for long. The center would likely be hottest, so it would try to assume a conical shape. If the ground can be melted/vaporized easily, it may try to assume the shape of a column.

    • Misitu

      The plant is built on a platform excavated from what was a 35m high hill. The turbine hall basement extends to below sea level. The buildings are a few metres from the sea. Groundwater is therefore level with the basement walls or just below; however, if the subsoil or immediate bedrock is impervious then the flowing groundwater will be below that. That said, in the contrary case e.g. clays they would be dampish due to being so near the sea.

      The records IIRC show that the immediate bedrock as such is a mixed series of mudstones with sandy lenses, or similar. If so there are likely fissures which would contain water.

      For this discussion we do not I think need to go any deeper.

      My best bet is that the corium has already created a dry zone around itself by heating up the neighbouring rock enough to release any water as steam.

      However, the unpredictability of the corium progress implies that all bets are off as to prognosis, though in extremis I would say that the steam generation could continue indefinitely, given adequate rainfall. Given an extended drought followed by copious rain COULD lead to the potential for explosions.

      I found reports from Tepco re two geological surveys that were slated to happen following a recent seismic incident prior to 2011 (2006 or 2007 I think). Having asked for results of these surveys and found none I came to the (not surprising) conclusion that the surveys never took place.

      I asked both here and on Physics Forums.

      As always, happy for any corrections to obviate Blind Alley (aka Shitcreek) Syndrome.

      Heat applied to mudstones will eventually metamorphose the clay minerals to shale then slate then micaschist; for sandstones will metamorphose the quartz to quartzite and/or gneiss and/or granite. These rocks are found at the root of mountain ranges and are real hard guys. It would be like the heat of the corium causing the rocks to form a hard insulating layer.

      Is my best guess but someone might like to check…

      • Misitu

        Is my best guess but someone might like to check the reported and estimated temperatures of the coriums and the rock types I mentioned…

        • Misitu

          Silica 1830 deg C
          Granite 3100 deg C
          Corium 2500 (maybe up to 2900) deg C
          Clay (kaolin) 3275 deg C
          Minerals found in igneous and metamorphic rocks:
          Plagioclase feldspar 1825°K.
          Pyroxene is 1650°K.
          ————————
          Potential for corium melting granite is zero, but it can certainly metamorphose sedimentary rocks like clays, mudstones and sandstones, but those would tend to form an insulating layer. Water would be driven off probably through expansion cracks in the strata above the corium.

          One might suppose that a really really bad possibility is that the corium heats up the surrounding rocks into a very resistant crust, maybe several inches thick (I am making this up as I go now, it could be feet thick …) and then when the phase changes occur in the corium due to transient volumes of gas being generated we end up with a very severe increase of pressure situation.

          ULP.

          no need to spell this out further.

      • Dr. Anne Lee Tomlinson Maziar anne

        The turbine buildings are on landfill.

        • Misitu

          Hi Anne, it was myself that postulated landfill originally as the geol map of Japan said “Holocene Reclaimed Land” implying landfill, e.g. marine reclamation by dredging.

          Subsequent to that, maybe a month later, an article appeared in one of the Shimbuns showing that Fuxu daiichi was constructed after excavating a seashore hill. The reason for doing this was the economics of the operating plant, it being cheap to pump the cooling water a few inches up from the sea rather than 100ft to the top of the hill. So once again the lie is given to the cheapness of nuclear electricity generation: the unsafe location was affordable, the safe location was not.

          The turbine hall floor is a few metres below sea level.

          Landfill may have been used for hardcore in the foundations but anything other than rubble would have been an imbecility one step too far even for what we know of the former institution known as Tepco.

          Apologies for the earlier misunderstanding: it’s a risk of this site that we have limited information, and sometimes because of that reach wrong conclusions. I did try to correct it at the time.

          M.

          • Dr. Anne Lee Tomlinson Maziar anne

            @ Misitu, I got this information from a report on the internet that showed a diagram of the plant from the side which showed the turbine buildings on landfill and which I posted some time ago. There are probably other sources as well.

          • Dr. Anne Lee Tomlinson Maziar anne

            anne
            September 21, 2011 at 8:23 pm • Reply
            Taco, I posted this diagram yesterday:
            Disaster at Fukushima Daiichi: How Did It Happen?
            http://www.ucsusa.org/nuclear_power/nuclear_power_and_global_warming/
            can download a pdf:
            http://www.ucsusa.org/assets/documents/nuclear_power/Fukushima-Tragedy.pdf
            In the pdf, on page 12, a diagram of Unit 1,2,3 Operating Reactors, shows the reactor on granite and the turbine building on artificial rock.
            http://enenews.com/japan-nuke-expert-fuel-rods-estimated-be-12-meters-underground-reactors-1-3-be-100-feet-deep-year

          • Misitu

            Anne: I remember that diagram and I believe that it is a fantasy principally because there is no granite at the surface at that site and it would not magically stop just there. But I will look for the other diagrams that seem more in tune with geological realities.

            “artificial rock” is not a good term.

            More later …

          • Misitu

            Anne: I have looked through my bookmarks and found the following…

            Two articles showing the site and describing the construction. There is no granite here!

            http://www.dianuke.org/ge-plan-followed-with-inflexibility/
            http://www.dianuke.org/fukushima-plant-site-originally-was-a-hill-safe-from-tsunami/

            Quotations from the article stating the questionable decision to cost cut and thereby also safety cut. Note that

            this would have been uneconomic had the subsoil been granite bedrock:

            Toyoda also cited two other reasons for Tepco clearing away the bluff — seawater pumps used to provide coolant water

            needed to be set up on the ground up to 10 meters from the sea, and extremely heavy equipment, including the 500-ton

            reator pressure vessels, were expected to be brought in by boat.

            In fact, Tepco decided to build the plant on low ground based on a cost-benefit calculation of the operating costs

            of the seawater pumps, according to two research papers separately written by senior Tepco engineers in the 1960s.

            If the seawater pumps were placed on high ground, their operating costs would be accordingly higher.

            “We decided to build the plant at ground level after comparing the ground construction costs and operating costs of

            the circulation water pumps,” wrote Hiroshi Kaburaki, then deputy head of the Tepco’s construction office at the

            Fukushima No. 1 plant, in the January 1969 edition of Hatsuden Suiryoku, a technical magazine on power plants.

            Post from a Japanese Geologist:
            http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=3356008#post3356008

            “As for Fukushima`s geology, *yes, it has been long known that around the Fukushima Daiichi Plant is sedimentary

            rock Taga Group; around the plant this rock is called the Tomioka Formation, whch is made of coarse sandstone (or

            Grit) and tuffaceous siltstone. It`s pity that*no*geologists*(as*far as I know)*have warned the vulnebility of the

            Fukushima Daiichi Plant in terms of…

          • Misitu

            … It`s pity that*no*geologists*(as*far as I know)*have warned the vulnebility of the

            Fukushima Daiichi Plant in terms of geology, as it won’t take a rocket science (but so simple and clear) to check

            this out. But instead, I think most of us trusted info provided by Tepco, such as videos in*nuclear safety which

            states that “this region*of Fukushima Daiichi Plant have never experienced major earthquake or tsunami over the past

            400 years”. *
            As for the groundwater-flow information, I don`t know. I checked several website, but I could not find one,

            including the one in Japanese. As the bedrock of the area is made of coarse sandstone, the rock is highly permeable

            and has plenty of waters flowing in the underground of the plain (but in a very very*slow speed) around the*nuke

            plant. The source (catchment of rain) is the nearby Abukuma mountains, and the groundwater of this nature will spend

            hundred or more years to flow from the mountains to the coastline. But I do not have data to prove this – I am just

            stating a general rule.”

            [snip]

            “I have talked with some of my colleagues (geology professors) today, and some of them knew for many years/decades

            that the bed rock of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuke Power Plant is soft sedimentary rock. They do not know why

            government (both national and local/prefectural) approved for the construction of the plant on such a bad spot, and

            can only think of*unethical acts of polititians and the industry.*Also,*my colleagues warn that the type of bed

            rock, which geologists identify,*and the strength/suitability of the*bed rock, which soil/geo-engineers determine,

            is different, even though I would*still support that*young sedimentary rocks below the Fukushima Daiichi Nuke Plant

            is NOT*suitable for constructing buildings that have to endure earthquakes. ”

            And the geology survey that may only have ever been hot air:
            http://www.tepco.co

          • Misitu

            I noticed that the diagram showing “granite” beneath the reactor building and “artificial rock” under the turbine hall is next to (before or after, not sure, pasted from other userid) a snap of Brown’s Ferry NPP, Alabama USA. My impression is that the slideshow is a bit of a hack put together in haste to meet a deadline, probably to keep up the “reassure the stupid people” pressure.

            I can supply a ref to the geological map of Japan if necessary but trust that the above will do for the moment as I have to get a bit of life in today.

            Cheers
            Misitu.

          • Dr. Anne Lee Tomlinson Maziar anne

            This slide presentation only has pictures of Fukushima Daiichi.
            Anatomy of a Tragedy: Fukushima Dai-ichi March 2011, by Dave Lochbaum, April 2011
            http://www.ucsusa.org/assets/documents/nuclear_power/Fukushima-Tragedy.pdf
            I don’t know what you are referring to when you say:
            “I noticed that the diagram showing “granite” beneath the reactor building and “artificial rock” under the turbine hall is next to (before or after, not sure, pasted from other userid) a snap of Brown’s Ferry NPP, Alabama USA.”
            I doubt you should be denigrating the work by David Lochbaum who is a nuclear engineer:
            U.S. Nuclear Plants Have Same Risks, and Backups, as Japan Counterparts

            David Lochbaum, a nuclear engineer and the director of the Nuclear Safety Project of the Union of Concerned Scientists,
            http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/14/world/asia/14industry.html

          • Dr. Anne Lee Tomlinson Maziar anne

            Japan’s Once-Powerful Nuclear Industry is Under Siege
            17 Mar 2011
            “The proposed Kaminoseki nuclear plant is to be built on landfill in a national park in the country’s well-known Inland Sea, hailed as Japan’s Galapagos. For three decades, local residents, fishermen, and environmental activists have opposed the plant, saying it should not be built in the picturesque sea, with its rich marine life and fishing culture dating back millennia. The Inland Sea has also been the site of intense seismic activity, including the epicenter of the 1995 Kobe earthquake that killed 6,400 people….
            “In 2009, the utility began clearing forests for the project — located just 50 miles from Hiroshima — and reclaiming land from the sea….”
            http://e360.yale.edu/feature/japans_once-powerful_nuclear_industry_is_under_siege/2383/

          • Dr. Anne Lee Tomlinson Maziar anne

            Why Underground Entombment At
            Fukushima Daiichi Won’t Succeed
            By Yoichi Shimatsu, 7-28-11
            “Fukushima No.1 rests on landfill comprising loose rock and sand over the natural seabed and is positioned only a couple of meters above the high tide mark. Water seepage and earthquake-caused liquefaction have seriously disturbed this rather weak soil structure….
            “Much of the danger comes from simpler processes. Extremely hot magma, consisting of nuclear residues mixed with soil minerals, will boil any sea water seeping underground, creating pressurized steam.Think of oatmeal cooking in a pot and how bubbles create blow holes. The same is happening inside the landfill.
            “The steam-created tubes harden when they cool, leaving lines of structural weakness. Eventually, these air pockets will collapse, and the massive weight of the water-filled reactors, piles of spent rods and their supporting structures will drop into deep sinkholes.

            “If the magma tubes become filled with sea water, the landfill will resemble a gigantic sponge, prone to liquefaction and collapse under earthquake motion. Even the resonance vibrations from large machines could trigger the sudden opening of new sinkholes.

            “Water holds other dangers as well, since it is a better medium for nuclear fission than the mix of stones, dirt and concrete now under the reactors. Once sea water seeps into the newly opened underground channels, the fissile particles will become free-floating and fire neutrons into bits of uranium, plutonium and other isotopes, triggering cascades of fission. The resulting steam pressure is volcanic, bursting out of the ground and spewing vast amounts of radioactive material into the atmosphere. The oatmeal spatters across the stove top. …”
            http://www.rense.com/general94/whyf.htm

          • Dr. Anne Lee Tomlinson Maziar anne

            Japan engineers knew tsunami could overrun plant
            March 30, 2011
            “But a review of company and regulatory records shows that Japan and its largest utility repeatedly downplayed dangers and ignored warnings – including a 2007 tsunami study from Tokyo Electric Power Company’s senior safety engineer.
            “’We still have the possibilities that the tsunami height exceeds the determined design height due to the uncertainties regarding the tsunami phenomenon,’ Tokyo Electric researchers said in a report reviewed by Reuters.
            “The research paper concluded that there was a roughly 10 per cent chance that a tsunami could test or overrun the defences of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant within a 50-year span based on the most conservative assumptions….
            “The 40-year-old nuclear complex was built near a quake zone in the Pacific that had produced earthquakes of magnitude 8 or higher four times in the past 400 years – in 1896, 1793, 1677 and then in 1611, Tokyo Electric researchers had come to understand….
            “Company Vice President Sakae Muto said the utility had built its Fukushima nuclear power plant ‘with a margin for error’ based on its assessment of the largest waves to hit the site in the past.
            “That would have included the magnitude 9.5 Chile earthquake in 1960 that killed 140 in Japan and generated a wave estimated at near six metres, roughly in line with the plans for Fukushima Daiichi a decade later…..
            “Japanese regulators also knew a major earthquake could damage exhaust ducts. A September 2007 review of damage at the same Tokyo Electric nuclear plant by NISA Deputy Director Akira Fukushima showed two spots where the exhaust ducts had broken….”
            http://www.theage.com.au/environment/japan-engineers-knew-tsunami-could-overrun-plant-20110330-1cfmy.html

        • Dr. Anne Lee Tomlinson Maziar anne

          Hydraulic tomography in fractured granite: Mizunami Underground Research site, Japan

          “1. Introduction
          [2] The accurate prediction of fluid flow and radionuclide transport in the subsurface is critical in the design of highlevel nuclear waste repositories. Geologic formations of low hydraulic conductivity (K) of igneous origins (e.g., crystalline rocks such as granite, basalt, tuffs, etc.) have been suggested as suitable sites for the construction of nuclear waste repositories in many countries. These geologic formations, however, often contain interconnected fractures or fault zones on a continuum of scales [Bonnet et al., 2001] caused by cooling and/or tectonic processes. These fractures strongly affect groundwater flow and contaminant transport, as flow is predominantly carried through a limited number of major fractures. Therefore, the accurate characterization of the limited number of large fractures and fault zones, as well as their connectivity is of paramount importance in predicting the hydraulic behavior around a nuclear waste repository….

          “ [4] A fractured geologic medium is a mixture of two or more distinct populations of voids (i.e., fractures of various sizes and the matrix pore space). In general, fractures are highly elongated voids (open conduits), which are generally sparsely distributed in geologic media. The matrix pore space of geologic media, on the other hand, is an aggregation of a large number of small granular voids…

          “[14] The Mizunami Underground Research Laboratory (MIU) is located in Mizunami, in the central part of the main island (Honshu) of Japan. The site has been operated by the Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA) since 2002. Currently, the underground research facility is under construction for deep subsurface scientific investigations. Two 1,000-m deep shafts and several drifts are currently being excavated for geoscientific research as well as development and assessment of deep subsurface engineering techniques.

          • Dr. Anne Lee Tomlinson Maziar anne

            [cont.]
            JAEA is carrying out a wide range of research in an effort to build a firm scientific and technological basis for geological
            disposal of high-level nuclear waste.

            “2.2. Site Geology and Investigations
            “[15] The MIU site lies at the border of Cretaceous plutonic rocks of the Ryoke Belt and Mesozoic sedimentary rock of the Mino Belt. The research galleries of the MIU are being constructed in the Cretaceous Toki Granite, which forms the basement complex in the area as shown in a conceptual cross-sectional view of the site (Figure 1; see Figure 2 for the location of the cross section). The site geology consists of the Miocene Mizunami sedimentary rock sequence and the underlying Toki granite. The Mizunami Group is divided into Akeyo Formation, Hongo
            Formation (AK/HG in Figure 1) and Toki Lignite–bearing Formation (TK in Figure 1). The Akeyo and Hongo Formations are at the top and composed of tuffaceous sandstone, mudstone, granular conglomerate and basal conglomerate. The Toki Lignite–bearing Formation is mainly composed of muddy sandstone, tuffaceous sandstone, granular conglomerate, lignite and basal conglomerate at the bottom [Itoigawa, 1980]. The contact between the Hongo formation and the Toki Lignite–bearing formation is conceptualized to be a flow barrier. Toki Granite, which underlies the Toki Lignite–bearing formation, is composed of coarse-to-medium-grained biotite granite. The granite is highly fractured at depths between 300–500 m with dips of fractures that are less than 30 degrees. Beneath the
            highly fractured domain (upper highly fractured domain: UHFD in Figure 1) is a granitic body which is less fractured (lower sparsely fractured domain: LSFD in Figure 1), which is known to extend to large depths. Previous research and geological investigations at the site have shown that there are low-angle fracture zones (LAFZ in Figure 1) within the UHFD.

          • Dr. Anne Lee Tomlinson Maziar anne

            [cont.]
            . In addition, there is evidence of
            the existence of various flow barriers (fault zones) including a prominent one that runs through the site oriented North-North-West (NNW) designated as fault IF_SB3_02.
            “[16] Within the MIU construction site boundary, numerous lineaments and potential fracture zones have been identified through lineament and seismic surveys. Figure 2 shows a plan view of the site map with the locations of the boreholes, the locations of the main (MS) and ventilation shafts (VS), and the approximate extent of fault IF_SB3_02. In particular, this fault was recognized during early site mapping at a roadside outcropping and at a preexisting underground tunnel network as being potentially significant to groundwater flow because of the occurrence of fault gouge. The fault appears to be a normal fault, dipping approximately 85 degrees with about one meter of vertical displacement observed at the road cut, while the lateral displacement is unknown at this time. It has been intersected by borehole MSB-3 and by the main shaft. The fault
            has not been located in the northwest edge of the site. This fault can be seen to effectively compartmentalize the site into northeast and southwest regions. The hydrogeologic characteristics of these lineaments and faults, including those for fault IF_SB3_02, are largely unknown….”

            http://tian.hwr.arizona.edu/data/pub/6ade2a3a84c60eb2ca5877ff9bae2121.pdf

        • Dr. Anne Lee Tomlinson Maziar anne

          Deep geological repository

          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_geological_repository

          Current Status of R&D Activities at the Mizunami Underground
          Research Laboratory in Japan

          ”The Mizunami Underground Research Laboratory (MIU) is now under construction by the Japan Nuclear Cycle Development Institute, in the Cretaceous Toki granite in the Tono area, central Japan. The MIU is a purpose-built generic underground research laboratory that provides a foundation for multidisciplinary studies to build a firm scientific and technical basis for geological disposal of nuclear wastes…..
          “More information on the MIU Project is available on http://www.jnc.go.jp/

          http://www.meetmatt-conf.net/aogs_archive/2005/iwg/58-IWG-A0922.pdf

          Master Plan of the Mizunami Underground Research Laboratory Project

          “The facility is known as the Mizunami Underground Research Laboratory (MIU) and
          located in Akeyo-cho, Mizunami City

          http://www.jaea.go.jp/04/tono/miu_e/publ/tn74102003-001.pdf

          Underground space use: analysis of the past and lessons for the…
          “The URL project for crystalline rock is located in Mizunami, Gifu, in the central part of Honshu, the main island of Japan (Figure 1). The MIU facility and related surface plant will be constructed on land in Akeyo-cho leased from Mizunami City. The site is about 7.8 hectares and located in the Intergarden of Tono Frontier Science Research City (p. 336)…”

          http://books.google.com/books?id=iXaytB3ByDIC&pg=PA336&lpg=PA336&dq=Akeyo-cho,+Mizunami+City&source=bl&ots=nF75Vwqo_N&sig=OfsJAL2Pd3Cao_ocjH4QG8K1UUI&hl=en&ei=8dmcTrTREs2FsALkpcDoCQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=6&ved=0CD0Q6AEwBQ#v=onepage&q=Akeyo-cho%2C%20Mizunami%20City&f=false

          http://www.prp.toki.gifu.jp/english/cont01.html

          http://www.maplandia.com/japan/chubu/gifu/places-nagisa-natsumaya.html

        • Dr. Anne Lee Tomlinson Maziar anne

          Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant

          The location of the plant was on a bluff which was originally 35-meters above sea level. During construction, however, TEPCO lowered the height of the bluff by 25-meters. One reason the bluff was lowered was so that the base of the reactors could be constructed on solid bedrock to mitigate the threat posed by earthquakes.
          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fukushima_Daiichi_Nuclear_Power_Plant

          Fukushima plant site originally was a hill safe from tsunami
          Tuesday, July 12, 2011
          “Katsumi Naganuma, 70, a former worker at Tokyo Electric Power Co., feels particular guilt because he knows that a 35-meter-high, tsunami-safe, bluff overlooking the sea was shaved down to build the Fukushima plant closer to sea level more than 40 years ago.
          “Tepco, assuming tsunami 3.1 meters or higher would never hit the coast, cut down the bluff by some 25 meters and erected the plant on artificially prepared ground only 10 meters above sea level.
          “’When I see the situation now, I feel it was wrong to clear that much of the hill away,’ said Naganuma, who worked at Tepco’s local office preparing for the construction in the late 1960s.
          “’If they did not dig the ground down that much, we would not have faced this situation. (The nuclear disaster) would not have happened,’ said Naganuma….”
          http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/nn20110712x2.html

          • Dr. Anne Lee Tomlinson Maziar anne

            Actually, if the earthquake damaged the pipes causing the coolant to leak out, the disaster would have happened even without the tsunami. However, the site itself may have been much more prone to damage from the earthquake than if it had been built on the original bluff. However, the bluff may have been originally too porous to allow the plant to have been built on it.

            The real tragedy is that the ill chosen site was doomed to tragedy because of three more mistakes. 1) Reactor #3 was never built to have used MOX fuel. 2) The plant was never built to last more than 20 years. So granting another license after 40 years use was a colossal mistake. 3) If there was additional MOX fuel stored there and a weapons making facility as well…..

            Bad judgment after bad judgment created the largest and most devastating environmental disaster to date. But has the world learned its lesson? The nuclear industry just keeps plowing ahead as if it has blinders on.

  • Whoopie Whoopie

    Here’s where I find Goodies in case you guys dont have it MARKED
    http://twitter.com/#!/search/realtime/fukushima

    • Erin

      Hey Whoopie – Off-topic – sorry to jump in here, but been trying to catch your attention for a couple days and keep missing you …

      Did you ever e-mail me? Because I’ve received several mails claiming to be from you, then a weird yahoo warning about “suspicious activity” in my acct., after which it wouldn’t let me reply to “you.” This made me wonder … how would I know if it wasn’t you …, so I’m bringing it here.

  • StillJill StillJill

    Finally,…the ground is fertile enough for these leaks and graphs to ‘spread like wildfire’. That is how it appears to me anyway.

    If anyone would have told me,…back in April when I came here,…that this ‘cover-up CRIME INC”, would cover the entire earth until November,…..I would have name called that person as out of their bloody mind. I have been wrong a lot.
    I only wish I were entirely wrong!

    But, that is not reality.

    It is time to put on the full suit of armor,….as our ‘mindset’ must be UNSHAKABLE!

  • Sickputer

    So from the scale rating nuclear accidents it advances by order of ten for each number. 7 is the maximum, but if it were expanded then ten times Chernobyl is an 8 and a 9 is 100X Chernobyl.

    I vote for an 8.5 for Fukushima and possibly a 9 in another 6 months.

  • dpl dpl

    The Japanese nuke industry has committed suicide on their on shores. The outside players in this business rushed in to try and save the reputation of nuclear power. It was quite a show using all the tricks of controlling media, experts opinion and govt. agencies to convince you to remain calm. Well the SHTF and the price to pay for our stupidity cannot be put on the creditcard for future generations to pay off.

    • lam335 lam335

      These people have not committed suicide–they have committed mass murder.

      And yet the Japanese nuke industry is still actively trying to export its “technology”” to other countries. (Of course, these were GE reactors, but I don’t see GE backing away from nuclear either).

      • lam335 lam335

        The nuke industry in the U.S. also continues playing the same old games, seeking to extend licenses, increase the power output at old reactors, and deny/diminish/refuse to disclose anytime something goes wrong.

        They are doing everything in their power NOT to let FUK undermine their so-called renaissance–the industry’s lobbying and propaganda wing, the Nuclear Energy Institute, recently commissioned a “survey” claiming that a majority of Americans “still” support nuclear power:

        “Six months after the Fukushima Daiichi accident in Japan, solid majorities of Americans still view nuclear energy favorably, still support the extension of operating licenses at existing facilities that meet federal safety standards, and still believe that construction of a new reactor is acceptable at the site of the nearest nuclear power plant that already is operating, a new national survey shows.”
        http://www.facebook.com/topic.php?uid=157387224301493&topic=1345

        http://www.nei.org/resourcesandstats/documentlibrary/reliableandaffordableenergy/reports/latest-trends-in-us-public-opinion-about-nuclear-energy-sept-2011

        This is a load of crap (forgive my language, but I call it as I see it). If these survey results are accurate, it is only because the media has barely covered the on-going crisis since March and the vast majority of Americans are blissfully ignoring it. Most think the crisis is “over” and most have no idea just how much it released–and continues to release. The fact that massive amounts of Plutonium were released in the first week and no media reported on it for months is incomprehensible.

        • bluerthanblu bluerthanblu

          Bisconti Research Inc. has numerous Japanese clients in the nuclear industry. Without a doubt, this large survey sampling of public opinion is not an objective information source. Media, energy companies, and state/govt/int’l nuclear regulation groups are involved in a big business ‘menage a trois’ (good political cartoon material. Would that get the message out best, lol?). A comment like: ‘A nationally representative sample of 1,000 U.S. adults was interviewed by telephone, with a margin of error of plus or minus three percentage points’ is made to sound like the data is ‘the truth’ to people unfamiliar with nuclear science or statistics data (i.e., make the data ‘fit’ your desired results by set up).

          Just got thru viewing Gordon Edwards presentation (Prt 3 of 5) about ‘Radiation and the Ultimate Waste’ problem that remains unsolved to date. The fact that rad waste can’t be destroyed is asking nature to ‘put it on hold’ for 10,000+ years (into infinity). Plutonium waste puts out heat underground and degrades metal containers. You can’t bury waste fast enough with the amount produced from one reactor. Uranium mining leaves the rock more radioactive than the uranium! Edwards says nature will recycle what is not destroyed completely. We cannot destroy the waste at this time. A comment left out of the vid, due to time, is that the answer to any waste issue by nuc proponents is that ‘it’s a PR problem, not a technical one.’ See Edwards’ vids at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FjlFOEtsDRQ&feature=related.

          Clearly, nuc media spin obfuscates public awareness to keep control of public opinion. Busby has some theories of the difference between pro-nuc and no-nuke people, one of ‘control’ vs. ‘fear of chaos’ types, at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjOPoeRT2CM&feature=autoplay&list=UL12EEeaMuEdU&lf=mfu_in_order&playnext=2. The industry grip on media needs to be pried out of their dirty hands and disseminated properly to the public. IMO,…

  • StillJill StillJill

    Yeah,…and where did they take the survey? In a Nuclear Industry business convention somewhere?

  • StillJill StillJill

    O.K. puppy breath for those of us facing this alone.

    Wouldn’t mind some nitrous oxide from time to time also God, K? K! 🙂

  • cant fool all the people all the time

    @Sickputer
    we are from kauai down here in brazil for nearly 2 years now. Fukushima not even a blip on the radar here. Fuku que?

    I’ve a good friend here who teaches oceanography ( for petrobras she makes charts for where the oil would go if one of their floating oil riggs springs a leak as we all witnessed in the gulf. Anyways, she said a good way to track what’s happening with the waters off the coast of japan is using this program called gnome. She gave me a link. You just need to know what is being dumped into the ocean so as to ascertain the weight and then this program will display how and where the poison is going within the currents.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=18xZoXu1USM

  • Bleifrei Bleifrei

    we all going to accumulated ( and became our part off radiation anywhere.
    it is done
    is more and more until everything in the reactor( and under) burned out and washed away the rest by the pacific

    so the cool temp are small and fLL any days in the reactor

    depending on the melt drops lower, Tepco version of cold shut down !!

  • StillJill StillJill

    Very true,….bleed it out,….boil and bubble, ’til it’s empty,…and Wholla,…..tepcos idea of cold shut down! I like it Bleifrei! 🙂

  • Bleifrei Bleifrei

    lol
    @ Jill
    i don´t like this way
    but Tepco !

    better to give any Jp-Gov-member and Tepco -Gov-Member a spoon and let them spoon up the waste

    • BreadAndButter BreadAndButter

      Spoon? They need BUCKETS at least 🙂

      No wait – give them forks – keeps them busy for longer.

  • StillJill StillJill

    Bailing out the Titanic with a thimble comes to mind.

    I watch these sweet, old retirees here in Cali,…out early each morning chasing a dozen pesky leaves with a leaf blower,….over and over. More leaves fall from their tree branches as they blow and blow. Exercise in futility,….but they will never stop. They are gerbils on a treadmill.

    The cleaning up and burning of the ash,…..like a band-aid on an amputation, unfortunately!

  • StillJill StillJill

    I still believe that IF even a dumb rat will try with everything in it, to crawl out of a bucket with rising water,…..that the Japanese will too, when the water rises,.IE) their children start to die.

    Nothing will change much until their ‘soddish eyes’ see the carnage!

  • Bleifrei Bleifrei

    @ BreadAndButter

    no buckets ( that go to fast and to easy for this criminals!)
    better than a spoon , a tweezers or so ..
    jap Gov and tepco Gov are sufficiently people,for this job